Is it sufficient to just “plug in numbers” to prove that a limit exists for multivariable functions?











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












I have just learned that if $lim limits_{(x,y) to (a,b)}f(x,y)=f(a,b)$ then the function is continuous at that point.



My question is, let's say we have a very simple function and limit, such as:



$lim limits_{(x,y) to (2,3)}x^2+y^2=L$



Can I, without any further justification, just "plug in" (2,3) to get L=13? Or would I need some further proof (like the squeeze theorem). Similarly, if I can just "plug in" x and y values into a function and get a real number back, is that sufficient to conclude that the function is continuous at that point?



Also please avoid using epsilon delta stuff, I haven't learned that at all.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    0
    down vote

    favorite












    I have just learned that if $lim limits_{(x,y) to (a,b)}f(x,y)=f(a,b)$ then the function is continuous at that point.



    My question is, let's say we have a very simple function and limit, such as:



    $lim limits_{(x,y) to (2,3)}x^2+y^2=L$



    Can I, without any further justification, just "plug in" (2,3) to get L=13? Or would I need some further proof (like the squeeze theorem). Similarly, if I can just "plug in" x and y values into a function and get a real number back, is that sufficient to conclude that the function is continuous at that point?



    Also please avoid using epsilon delta stuff, I haven't learned that at all.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      0
      down vote

      favorite











      I have just learned that if $lim limits_{(x,y) to (a,b)}f(x,y)=f(a,b)$ then the function is continuous at that point.



      My question is, let's say we have a very simple function and limit, such as:



      $lim limits_{(x,y) to (2,3)}x^2+y^2=L$



      Can I, without any further justification, just "plug in" (2,3) to get L=13? Or would I need some further proof (like the squeeze theorem). Similarly, if I can just "plug in" x and y values into a function and get a real number back, is that sufficient to conclude that the function is continuous at that point?



      Also please avoid using epsilon delta stuff, I haven't learned that at all.










      share|cite|improve this question













      I have just learned that if $lim limits_{(x,y) to (a,b)}f(x,y)=f(a,b)$ then the function is continuous at that point.



      My question is, let's say we have a very simple function and limit, such as:



      $lim limits_{(x,y) to (2,3)}x^2+y^2=L$



      Can I, without any further justification, just "plug in" (2,3) to get L=13? Or would I need some further proof (like the squeeze theorem). Similarly, if I can just "plug in" x and y values into a function and get a real number back, is that sufficient to conclude that the function is continuous at that point?



      Also please avoid using epsilon delta stuff, I haven't learned that at all.







      limits multivariable-calculus continuity






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 17 at 23:59









      vevvvio

      1112




      1112






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          No. By "plugging in numbers," what you are assuming is continuity at the point you're plugging in. If you have already shown your function is continuous (or you are allowed to assume this), then you're fine, otherwise, you need to actually show that the limit equals the value you get by plugging in those numbers. The way one traditionally does this is by "epsilon-delta stuff."






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
            – vevvvio
            Nov 18 at 2:06











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002981%2fis-it-sufficient-to-just-plug-in-numbers-to-prove-that-a-limit-exists-for-mult%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          0
          down vote













          No. By "plugging in numbers," what you are assuming is continuity at the point you're plugging in. If you have already shown your function is continuous (or you are allowed to assume this), then you're fine, otherwise, you need to actually show that the limit equals the value you get by plugging in those numbers. The way one traditionally does this is by "epsilon-delta stuff."






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
            – vevvvio
            Nov 18 at 2:06















          up vote
          0
          down vote













          No. By "plugging in numbers," what you are assuming is continuity at the point you're plugging in. If you have already shown your function is continuous (or you are allowed to assume this), then you're fine, otherwise, you need to actually show that the limit equals the value you get by plugging in those numbers. The way one traditionally does this is by "epsilon-delta stuff."






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
            – vevvvio
            Nov 18 at 2:06













          up vote
          0
          down vote










          up vote
          0
          down vote









          No. By "plugging in numbers," what you are assuming is continuity at the point you're plugging in. If you have already shown your function is continuous (or you are allowed to assume this), then you're fine, otherwise, you need to actually show that the limit equals the value you get by plugging in those numbers. The way one traditionally does this is by "epsilon-delta stuff."






          share|cite|improve this answer












          No. By "plugging in numbers," what you are assuming is continuity at the point you're plugging in. If you have already shown your function is continuous (or you are allowed to assume this), then you're fine, otherwise, you need to actually show that the limit equals the value you get by plugging in those numbers. The way one traditionally does this is by "epsilon-delta stuff."







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 18 at 0:14









          Carl Schildkraut

          10.6k11438




          10.6k11438












          • Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
            – vevvvio
            Nov 18 at 2:06


















          • Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
            – vevvvio
            Nov 18 at 2:06
















          Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
          – vevvvio
          Nov 18 at 2:06




          Right, but I had a quiz question that asked if a particular point was continuous, and this particular point gave a real number for its output in the function. I guess my struggle here is that to show a point is continuous, I must evaluate the limit of that point. How am I supposed to evaluate the limit of a function that gives a real number at that point? We aren't using the epsilon Delta definition, so there must be some other way. I guess I'm wondering how to evaluate a limit like this then.
          – vevvvio
          Nov 18 at 2:06


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002981%2fis-it-sufficient-to-just-plug-in-numbers-to-prove-that-a-limit-exists-for-mult%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater