$f_n to f$ then $tilde{f_n}to tilde{f}$ where $tilde{f_n}$ and $tilde{f}$ are the lifting of $f_n$ and $f$.











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
1












Let $p:(mathbb{R}^2,tilde{u})to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0) $ be a covering map and let $f_n:(I^2,u)to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0)$ be a sequence of function which converges uniformly to $f$ on every compact subset of $I^2=[0,1]times [0,1]$. Let $tilde{f_n}$ and $tilde{f}$ be unique lifting of $f_n$ and $f$. Then is it true that $tilde{f_n}to tilde{f}$ uniformly on each compact subset of $I^2$?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    1












    Let $p:(mathbb{R}^2,tilde{u})to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0) $ be a covering map and let $f_n:(I^2,u)to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0)$ be a sequence of function which converges uniformly to $f$ on every compact subset of $I^2=[0,1]times [0,1]$. Let $tilde{f_n}$ and $tilde{f}$ be unique lifting of $f_n$ and $f$. Then is it true that $tilde{f_n}to tilde{f}$ uniformly on each compact subset of $I^2$?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      1






      1





      Let $p:(mathbb{R}^2,tilde{u})to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0) $ be a covering map and let $f_n:(I^2,u)to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0)$ be a sequence of function which converges uniformly to $f$ on every compact subset of $I^2=[0,1]times [0,1]$. Let $tilde{f_n}$ and $tilde{f}$ be unique lifting of $f_n$ and $f$. Then is it true that $tilde{f_n}to tilde{f}$ uniformly on each compact subset of $I^2$?










      share|cite|improve this question













      Let $p:(mathbb{R}^2,tilde{u})to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0) $ be a covering map and let $f_n:(I^2,u)to (mathbb{R}^2setminus{0},u_0)$ be a sequence of function which converges uniformly to $f$ on every compact subset of $I^2=[0,1]times [0,1]$. Let $tilde{f_n}$ and $tilde{f}$ be unique lifting of $f_n$ and $f$. Then is it true that $tilde{f_n}to tilde{f}$ uniformly on each compact subset of $I^2$?







      analysis algebraic-topology






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 8 at 14:14









      XYZABC

      297110




      297110






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          +25










          First of all, $I^2$ is itself compact, so uniform convergence on compact subsets is just uniform convergence in this case. Otherwise this is true by standard lifting and compactness arguments. By compactness, the image $f(I^2)$ has some positive distance $r>0$ to $0$, so local inverses of $p$ exist in $r$-neighborhoods of every $y in f(I^2)$. Label these local inverses by points $x in I$ such that $p_x^{-1}$ is the local inverse of $p$ in the $r$-neighborhood of $f(x)$ which is encountered by path lifting $f$ along the straight line from $u$ to $x$. (By simple connectedness this is really independent of the path.) This means that $tilde{f}(x) = p_x^{-1} (f(x))$ for all $x in I^2$. We also have that $p_x^{-1} = p_y^{-1}$ if $|x-y|$ is small enough, in the intersection of the $r$-neighborhoods abour $f(x)$ and $f(y)$. And by compactness we can use finitely many of these inverse branches to construct the lifting, which shows that these are uniformly continuous in some neighborhood of $f(I^2)$. Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough and get uniform convergence.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
            – XYZABC
            Nov 24 at 6:31













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2990027%2ff-n-to-f-then-tildef-n-to-tildef-where-tildef-n-and-tildef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote



          +25










          First of all, $I^2$ is itself compact, so uniform convergence on compact subsets is just uniform convergence in this case. Otherwise this is true by standard lifting and compactness arguments. By compactness, the image $f(I^2)$ has some positive distance $r>0$ to $0$, so local inverses of $p$ exist in $r$-neighborhoods of every $y in f(I^2)$. Label these local inverses by points $x in I$ such that $p_x^{-1}$ is the local inverse of $p$ in the $r$-neighborhood of $f(x)$ which is encountered by path lifting $f$ along the straight line from $u$ to $x$. (By simple connectedness this is really independent of the path.) This means that $tilde{f}(x) = p_x^{-1} (f(x))$ for all $x in I^2$. We also have that $p_x^{-1} = p_y^{-1}$ if $|x-y|$ is small enough, in the intersection of the $r$-neighborhoods abour $f(x)$ and $f(y)$. And by compactness we can use finitely many of these inverse branches to construct the lifting, which shows that these are uniformly continuous in some neighborhood of $f(I^2)$. Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough and get uniform convergence.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
            – XYZABC
            Nov 24 at 6:31

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          +25










          First of all, $I^2$ is itself compact, so uniform convergence on compact subsets is just uniform convergence in this case. Otherwise this is true by standard lifting and compactness arguments. By compactness, the image $f(I^2)$ has some positive distance $r>0$ to $0$, so local inverses of $p$ exist in $r$-neighborhoods of every $y in f(I^2)$. Label these local inverses by points $x in I$ such that $p_x^{-1}$ is the local inverse of $p$ in the $r$-neighborhood of $f(x)$ which is encountered by path lifting $f$ along the straight line from $u$ to $x$. (By simple connectedness this is really independent of the path.) This means that $tilde{f}(x) = p_x^{-1} (f(x))$ for all $x in I^2$. We also have that $p_x^{-1} = p_y^{-1}$ if $|x-y|$ is small enough, in the intersection of the $r$-neighborhoods abour $f(x)$ and $f(y)$. And by compactness we can use finitely many of these inverse branches to construct the lifting, which shows that these are uniformly continuous in some neighborhood of $f(I^2)$. Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough and get uniform convergence.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
            – XYZABC
            Nov 24 at 6:31















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          +25







          up vote
          2
          down vote



          +25




          +25




          First of all, $I^2$ is itself compact, so uniform convergence on compact subsets is just uniform convergence in this case. Otherwise this is true by standard lifting and compactness arguments. By compactness, the image $f(I^2)$ has some positive distance $r>0$ to $0$, so local inverses of $p$ exist in $r$-neighborhoods of every $y in f(I^2)$. Label these local inverses by points $x in I$ such that $p_x^{-1}$ is the local inverse of $p$ in the $r$-neighborhood of $f(x)$ which is encountered by path lifting $f$ along the straight line from $u$ to $x$. (By simple connectedness this is really independent of the path.) This means that $tilde{f}(x) = p_x^{-1} (f(x))$ for all $x in I^2$. We also have that $p_x^{-1} = p_y^{-1}$ if $|x-y|$ is small enough, in the intersection of the $r$-neighborhoods abour $f(x)$ and $f(y)$. And by compactness we can use finitely many of these inverse branches to construct the lifting, which shows that these are uniformly continuous in some neighborhood of $f(I^2)$. Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough and get uniform convergence.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          First of all, $I^2$ is itself compact, so uniform convergence on compact subsets is just uniform convergence in this case. Otherwise this is true by standard lifting and compactness arguments. By compactness, the image $f(I^2)$ has some positive distance $r>0$ to $0$, so local inverses of $p$ exist in $r$-neighborhoods of every $y in f(I^2)$. Label these local inverses by points $x in I$ such that $p_x^{-1}$ is the local inverse of $p$ in the $r$-neighborhood of $f(x)$ which is encountered by path lifting $f$ along the straight line from $u$ to $x$. (By simple connectedness this is really independent of the path.) This means that $tilde{f}(x) = p_x^{-1} (f(x))$ for all $x in I^2$. We also have that $p_x^{-1} = p_y^{-1}$ if $|x-y|$ is small enough, in the intersection of the $r$-neighborhoods abour $f(x)$ and $f(y)$. And by compactness we can use finitely many of these inverse branches to construct the lifting, which shows that these are uniformly continuous in some neighborhood of $f(I^2)$. Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough and get uniform convergence.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 20 at 21:33









          Lukas Geyer

          12.9k1454




          12.9k1454












          • There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
            – XYZABC
            Nov 24 at 6:31




















          • There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
            – XYZABC
            Nov 24 at 6:31


















          There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
          – XYZABC
          Nov 24 at 6:31






          There are certain things that I have not understood here: (1). Why does the local inverse of $p$ exist in $r$ neighbourhood of $y$. (2). "Then you can use these same inverse branches of $p$ to lift $tilde{f_n}$ for $n$ large enough." This is also unclear to me why do all will go in the same branch after a certain $n$.
          – XYZABC
          Nov 24 at 6:31




















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2990027%2ff-n-to-f-then-tildef-n-to-tildef-where-tildef-n-and-tildef%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

          Ивакино (Тотемский район)

          Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)