“invisible to” VS “invisible for”
- Nomination courses will be visible only for the enrolled participants.
- Nomination courses will be visible only to the enrolled participants.
When I want to suggest that nomination courses will only be made avalible to enrolled students, which preposition should I choose?
prepositions
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
add a comment |
- Nomination courses will be visible only for the enrolled participants.
- Nomination courses will be visible only to the enrolled participants.
When I want to suggest that nomination courses will only be made avalible to enrolled students, which preposition should I choose?
prepositions
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
add a comment |
- Nomination courses will be visible only for the enrolled participants.
- Nomination courses will be visible only to the enrolled participants.
When I want to suggest that nomination courses will only be made avalible to enrolled students, which preposition should I choose?
prepositions
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
- Nomination courses will be visible only for the enrolled participants.
- Nomination courses will be visible only to the enrolled participants.
When I want to suggest that nomination courses will only be made avalible to enrolled students, which preposition should I choose?
prepositions
prepositions
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
asked Dec 2 '18 at 6:45
Mike Philip
30513
30513
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
One group of native speakers might use to there, and another might use for, and a third group might use these prepositions interchangeably.
Who is it visible to? and Who is it visible for? could both be paraphrased as "Who can see it?"
Some speakers would recognize this distinction: visible to is a statement of the bald fact that something can be seen and visible for is a statement that the visibility is intentional. They were meant to be able to see it.
Some speakers would not recognize that distinction.
Since not all speakers use these prepositions in exactly the same manner, there can be some doubt about whether the visibility is intentional and you will have to rely upon context to make that determination.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
add a comment |
"Visible to" seems to me the more idiomatic preposition when specifying who may see it.
The total eclipse will only be visible to people in northern Europe, although other nearby countries will be able to see the partial eclipse.
You can use "visible for" with things like time frame.
The eclipse will only be visible for a short while, from around 8:20 to 8:50 in the morning.
[Edit] I agree with Tᴚoɯɐuo's answer that "visible to" indicates who are able to see it while "visible for" indicates who are intended to see it. However the distinction is so slight that in order to make the point you should say something like "intended to be visible" or "meant to be visible"
The study guide should only be visible to enrolled students.
The study guide was meant to be visible only to enrolled students, but as we found out yesterday, it's actually visible to everyone.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
The more commonly used preposition to introduce an object after visible is “to”:
Visible:
PREP. to - Its contents were visible to all of them.
(Online OXFORD Collocation Dictionary)
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187204%2finvisible-to-vs-invisible-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
One group of native speakers might use to there, and another might use for, and a third group might use these prepositions interchangeably.
Who is it visible to? and Who is it visible for? could both be paraphrased as "Who can see it?"
Some speakers would recognize this distinction: visible to is a statement of the bald fact that something can be seen and visible for is a statement that the visibility is intentional. They were meant to be able to see it.
Some speakers would not recognize that distinction.
Since not all speakers use these prepositions in exactly the same manner, there can be some doubt about whether the visibility is intentional and you will have to rely upon context to make that determination.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
add a comment |
One group of native speakers might use to there, and another might use for, and a third group might use these prepositions interchangeably.
Who is it visible to? and Who is it visible for? could both be paraphrased as "Who can see it?"
Some speakers would recognize this distinction: visible to is a statement of the bald fact that something can be seen and visible for is a statement that the visibility is intentional. They were meant to be able to see it.
Some speakers would not recognize that distinction.
Since not all speakers use these prepositions in exactly the same manner, there can be some doubt about whether the visibility is intentional and you will have to rely upon context to make that determination.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
add a comment |
One group of native speakers might use to there, and another might use for, and a third group might use these prepositions interchangeably.
Who is it visible to? and Who is it visible for? could both be paraphrased as "Who can see it?"
Some speakers would recognize this distinction: visible to is a statement of the bald fact that something can be seen and visible for is a statement that the visibility is intentional. They were meant to be able to see it.
Some speakers would not recognize that distinction.
Since not all speakers use these prepositions in exactly the same manner, there can be some doubt about whether the visibility is intentional and you will have to rely upon context to make that determination.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
One group of native speakers might use to there, and another might use for, and a third group might use these prepositions interchangeably.
Who is it visible to? and Who is it visible for? could both be paraphrased as "Who can see it?"
Some speakers would recognize this distinction: visible to is a statement of the bald fact that something can be seen and visible for is a statement that the visibility is intentional. They were meant to be able to see it.
Some speakers would not recognize that distinction.
Since not all speakers use these prepositions in exactly the same manner, there can be some doubt about whether the visibility is intentional and you will have to rely upon context to make that determination.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
edited Dec 2 '18 at 10:15
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
answered Dec 2 '18 at 10:07
Tᴚoɯɐuo
108k682174
108k682174
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
add a comment |
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
1
1
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
This answer sounds confused and most of all confusing to beginners.
– Gio
Dec 2 '18 at 13:57
1
1
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
@Gio: Feel free to write your own unconfused and unconfusing answer.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Dec 2 '18 at 13:59
add a comment |
"Visible to" seems to me the more idiomatic preposition when specifying who may see it.
The total eclipse will only be visible to people in northern Europe, although other nearby countries will be able to see the partial eclipse.
You can use "visible for" with things like time frame.
The eclipse will only be visible for a short while, from around 8:20 to 8:50 in the morning.
[Edit] I agree with Tᴚoɯɐuo's answer that "visible to" indicates who are able to see it while "visible for" indicates who are intended to see it. However the distinction is so slight that in order to make the point you should say something like "intended to be visible" or "meant to be visible"
The study guide should only be visible to enrolled students.
The study guide was meant to be visible only to enrolled students, but as we found out yesterday, it's actually visible to everyone.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
"Visible to" seems to me the more idiomatic preposition when specifying who may see it.
The total eclipse will only be visible to people in northern Europe, although other nearby countries will be able to see the partial eclipse.
You can use "visible for" with things like time frame.
The eclipse will only be visible for a short while, from around 8:20 to 8:50 in the morning.
[Edit] I agree with Tᴚoɯɐuo's answer that "visible to" indicates who are able to see it while "visible for" indicates who are intended to see it. However the distinction is so slight that in order to make the point you should say something like "intended to be visible" or "meant to be visible"
The study guide should only be visible to enrolled students.
The study guide was meant to be visible only to enrolled students, but as we found out yesterday, it's actually visible to everyone.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
"Visible to" seems to me the more idiomatic preposition when specifying who may see it.
The total eclipse will only be visible to people in northern Europe, although other nearby countries will be able to see the partial eclipse.
You can use "visible for" with things like time frame.
The eclipse will only be visible for a short while, from around 8:20 to 8:50 in the morning.
[Edit] I agree with Tᴚoɯɐuo's answer that "visible to" indicates who are able to see it while "visible for" indicates who are intended to see it. However the distinction is so slight that in order to make the point you should say something like "intended to be visible" or "meant to be visible"
The study guide should only be visible to enrolled students.
The study guide was meant to be visible only to enrolled students, but as we found out yesterday, it's actually visible to everyone.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
"Visible to" seems to me the more idiomatic preposition when specifying who may see it.
The total eclipse will only be visible to people in northern Europe, although other nearby countries will be able to see the partial eclipse.
You can use "visible for" with things like time frame.
The eclipse will only be visible for a short while, from around 8:20 to 8:50 in the morning.
[Edit] I agree with Tᴚoɯɐuo's answer that "visible to" indicates who are able to see it while "visible for" indicates who are intended to see it. However the distinction is so slight that in order to make the point you should say something like "intended to be visible" or "meant to be visible"
The study guide should only be visible to enrolled students.
The study guide was meant to be visible only to enrolled students, but as we found out yesterday, it's actually visible to everyone.
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
edited Dec 2 '18 at 15:56
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:07
Andrew
65.9k675145
65.9k675145
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
So visible for in my case sounds strange to native speakers, but it is still understandable?
– Mike Philip
Dec 2 '18 at 7:21
1
1
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
@MikePhilip: It doesn’t even sound strange.
– Ry-
Dec 2 '18 at 10:02
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
One could even use both, e.g. "The courses will be visible to all enrolled students for the entire registration period." In fact, the modifier "for <time period>" can be applied to almost any expression, even those that idiomatically use "for" for other purposes, too (e.g. "I've been looking for a present for my friend for her graduation for several months already, but I haven't found anything suitable").
– Ilmari Karonen
Dec 2 '18 at 13:29
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I doesn't sound particularly strange it spoken English but the word order is convoluted in written English. Why not "Only enrolled participants can view nomination courses"?
– alephzero
Dec 2 '18 at 14:00
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
@MikePhilip I have to disagree with the others, as it sounds strange to me. But perhaps that's only my personal opinion. I've edited my answer to signify.
– Andrew
Dec 2 '18 at 15:42
add a comment |
The more commonly used preposition to introduce an object after visible is “to”:
Visible:
PREP. to - Its contents were visible to all of them.
(Online OXFORD Collocation Dictionary)
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
add a comment |
The more commonly used preposition to introduce an object after visible is “to”:
Visible:
PREP. to - Its contents were visible to all of them.
(Online OXFORD Collocation Dictionary)
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
add a comment |
The more commonly used preposition to introduce an object after visible is “to”:
Visible:
PREP. to - Its contents were visible to all of them.
(Online OXFORD Collocation Dictionary)
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
The more commonly used preposition to introduce an object after visible is “to”:
Visible:
PREP. to - Its contents were visible to all of them.
(Online OXFORD Collocation Dictionary)
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
answered Dec 2 '18 at 7:08
user070221
4,5161830
4,5161830
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187204%2finvisible-to-vs-invisible-for%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
