Test the following identities of the vector analysis, for fields $F, G: mathbb{R}^3→ mathbb{R}^3$ and...











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












Test the following identities of the vector analysis, for fields $F, G: mathbb{R}^3→ mathbb{R}^3$ and functions $f, g: mathbb{R}^3 → mathbb{R}$.



$text{a)}spacenabla cdot (nabla f times nabla g)=0.$



$text{b)}space nabla cdot (Ftimes G)=G cdot (nabla times F)-Fcdot (nabla times G).$



$text{c)}space text{div}(fF)=fmathrm{div}F+Fcdot nabla f.$



$text{d)}spacetext{rot}(fF)=ftext{rot}F+nabla f times F.$



I think I can try these properties by hand following the definitions but I notice that the work gets too long, my question is, can this be done easier with some properties instead of using the definitions? Thank you










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
    – Apocalypse
    Nov 17 at 23:27















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2












Test the following identities of the vector analysis, for fields $F, G: mathbb{R}^3→ mathbb{R}^3$ and functions $f, g: mathbb{R}^3 → mathbb{R}$.



$text{a)}spacenabla cdot (nabla f times nabla g)=0.$



$text{b)}space nabla cdot (Ftimes G)=G cdot (nabla times F)-Fcdot (nabla times G).$



$text{c)}space text{div}(fF)=fmathrm{div}F+Fcdot nabla f.$



$text{d)}spacetext{rot}(fF)=ftext{rot}F+nabla f times F.$



I think I can try these properties by hand following the definitions but I notice that the work gets too long, my question is, can this be done easier with some properties instead of using the definitions? Thank you










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 2




    Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
    – Apocalypse
    Nov 17 at 23:27













up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
2






2





Test the following identities of the vector analysis, for fields $F, G: mathbb{R}^3→ mathbb{R}^3$ and functions $f, g: mathbb{R}^3 → mathbb{R}$.



$text{a)}spacenabla cdot (nabla f times nabla g)=0.$



$text{b)}space nabla cdot (Ftimes G)=G cdot (nabla times F)-Fcdot (nabla times G).$



$text{c)}space text{div}(fF)=fmathrm{div}F+Fcdot nabla f.$



$text{d)}spacetext{rot}(fF)=ftext{rot}F+nabla f times F.$



I think I can try these properties by hand following the definitions but I notice that the work gets too long, my question is, can this be done easier with some properties instead of using the definitions? Thank you










share|cite|improve this question















Test the following identities of the vector analysis, for fields $F, G: mathbb{R}^3→ mathbb{R}^3$ and functions $f, g: mathbb{R}^3 → mathbb{R}$.



$text{a)}spacenabla cdot (nabla f times nabla g)=0.$



$text{b)}space nabla cdot (Ftimes G)=G cdot (nabla times F)-Fcdot (nabla times G).$



$text{c)}space text{div}(fF)=fmathrm{div}F+Fcdot nabla f.$



$text{d)}spacetext{rot}(fF)=ftext{rot}F+nabla f times F.$



I think I can try these properties by hand following the definitions but I notice that the work gets too long, my question is, can this be done easier with some properties instead of using the definitions? Thank you







calculus real-analysis multivariable-calculus vector-analysis






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 18 at 9:22









Fakemistake

1,635815




1,635815










asked Nov 17 at 23:21









user424241

20819




20819








  • 2




    Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
    – Apocalypse
    Nov 17 at 23:27














  • 2




    Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
    – Apocalypse
    Nov 17 at 23:27








2




2




Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
– Apocalypse
Nov 17 at 23:27




Actually they themselves are very useful properties. I think for the most part you need to verify by direct calculation.
– Apocalypse
Nov 17 at 23:27















active

oldest

votes











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002935%2ftest-the-following-identities-of-the-vector-analysis-for-fields-f-g-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown






























active

oldest

votes













active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes
















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002935%2ftest-the-following-identities-of-the-vector-analysis-for-fields-f-g-mathbb%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater