the spectrum of normal operator
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a Hilbert space if $T$ is a self-adjoint operator and $lambdain mathbb{R}$ is an eigenvalue of $T$ which is in a spectral gap $(r,s)$, then $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ and if $T$ is invertible we can say that $||T^{-1}||leq frac{1}{dist(lambda,spectrum(T))}$ ..
Now if we still work on $T$ but with $lambdain mathbb{{C|R}}$ then $T-lambda$ is a normal operator and hence we still have the relation with the distance above..
my question is how the spectrum of T with complex $lambda$ looks like in this case and do we still have the fact that $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ ??
functional-analysis eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a Hilbert space if $T$ is a self-adjoint operator and $lambdain mathbb{R}$ is an eigenvalue of $T$ which is in a spectral gap $(r,s)$, then $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ and if $T$ is invertible we can say that $||T^{-1}||leq frac{1}{dist(lambda,spectrum(T))}$ ..
Now if we still work on $T$ but with $lambdain mathbb{{C|R}}$ then $T-lambda$ is a normal operator and hence we still have the relation with the distance above..
my question is how the spectrum of T with complex $lambda$ looks like in this case and do we still have the fact that $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ ??
functional-analysis eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
In a Hilbert space if $T$ is a self-adjoint operator and $lambdain mathbb{R}$ is an eigenvalue of $T$ which is in a spectral gap $(r,s)$, then $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ and if $T$ is invertible we can say that $||T^{-1}||leq frac{1}{dist(lambda,spectrum(T))}$ ..
Now if we still work on $T$ but with $lambdain mathbb{{C|R}}$ then $T-lambda$ is a normal operator and hence we still have the relation with the distance above..
my question is how the spectrum of T with complex $lambda$ looks like in this case and do we still have the fact that $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ ??
functional-analysis eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory
In a Hilbert space if $T$ is a self-adjoint operator and $lambdain mathbb{R}$ is an eigenvalue of $T$ which is in a spectral gap $(r,s)$, then $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ and if $T$ is invertible we can say that $||T^{-1}||leq frac{1}{dist(lambda,spectrum(T))}$ ..
Now if we still work on $T$ but with $lambdain mathbb{{C|R}}$ then $T-lambda$ is a normal operator and hence we still have the relation with the distance above..
my question is how the spectrum of T with complex $lambda$ looks like in this case and do we still have the fact that $spectrum(T)subseteq(-infty,r]cup[s,infty)$ ??
functional-analysis eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory
functional-analysis eigenvalues-eigenvectors operator-theory
asked Nov 17 at 21:19
S.N.A
887
887
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38
add a comment |
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002814%2fthe-spectrum-of-normal-operator%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Adding a constant to an operator just moves the spectrum by that amount in the complex plane.
– Keith McClary
Nov 17 at 22:38