Why do I get unnecessary column space when using `multicolumn` in type `X` columns?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
Two of my columns have extra space before them which is not supposed to be there. I think the issue has to do with using multicolumn inside a table with type X columns.
My source code:
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{tabularx}
newcolumntype{C}{ >{ arraybackslash Centering } X }
renewcommand tabularxcolumn [1] { >{ centering } m{#1} }
renewcommand{tabularxcolumn}[1]{ >{centering}m{#1} }
usepackage{booktabs}
usepackage{ragged2e}
usepackage{makecell}
usepackage{multirow}
setlengthextrarowheight{10pt}
usepackage{float}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic, LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{multcolhsize}[1]{dimexpr #1hsize + #1tabcolsep + tabcolsep relax}
usepackage{adjustbox}
begin{document}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{sum_{j in mathnormalbold{R}, thinspace j neq i} P_{R, thinspace j}^{adjustbox{raise=0.1baselineskip}{*}} thinspace w_{ij}}
begin{table*}[htb]
% Table options
% Caption
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
% Center the table
centering
begin{tabularx}{textwidth}{>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=1.35hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C |>{hsize=0.9hsize}C}
toprule
$left| V_{R, thinspace i} right|^{2}$ & $left| Z_{RR, thinspace ii} right|$& $P_{R, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}}$
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$ displaystyle RERInteractionSumm$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C|}{
$left| S_{eq, thinspace i}^{adjustbox{raise=0.05baselineskip}{*}} right|$
}
& multicolumn{2}{>{hsize=multcolhsize{2}}C}{$SDSCR_{i}$}
\
Xhline{0.2mm}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabularx}
end{table*}
end{document}
tables tabularx multicolumn
tables tabularx multicolumn
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
asked Nov 17 at 20:42
Al-Motasem Aldaoudeyeh
1,400311
1,400311
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42
add a comment |
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basicccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}
– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, usemathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
c column type: multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
1
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq} and mathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
Using a
tabularxenvironment for the table at hand seems like vast overkill. Moreover, one of the hallmark capabilities of atabularxenvironment, viz., automatic line breaking, is never used. I suggest you use anarrayenvironment or, if the tabular must absolutely, positively, span the width of both columns, atabular*environment. With either environment, there's no need to calculate cell widths, etc.
I would also like to suggest that you omit all vertical lines —-they’re not needed —- and be less generous with the value of
extrarowheight.
documentclass{IEEEtran}
usepackage{fontspec}
usepackage{array,ragged2e,booktabs,float}
newcolumntype{C}{>{Centeringarraybackslash} X }
setlengthextrarowheight{4pt}
usepackage[defaultmathsizes, subdued, italic,
LGRgreek, symbolre, symbolmisc]{mathastext}
newcommand{RERInteractionSumm}{%
sum_{jinmathbf{R},jneq i} P_{R,j}^* w_{ij}}
begin{document}
begin{table*}[htb]
caption{Comparison of SDSCR obtained by...}
label{table:SDSCR_full_v_app_27}
centering
%% First version: use an 'array' env.
$begin{array}{@{} *{9}{c} @{}}
toprule
| V_{R,i}|^{2} & | Z_{RR,ii}| & P_{R,i}^* &
multicolumn{2}{c}{displaystyleRERInteractionSumm}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{| S_{eq, i}^*|}&
multicolumn{2}{c@{}}{mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}}
\
cmidrule(r){1-1}
cmidrule(lr){2-2}
cmidrule(lr){3-3}
cmidrule(lr){4-5}
cmidrule(lr){6-7}
cmidrule(l){8-9}
0.992 & 0.0941 & 3 & -1.05-0.095j & -0.95-0.513j & 1.95 & 2.11 & 5.41 & 4.99
\
0.995 & 0.0921 & 3 & -1.08-0.108j & -0.97-0.529j & 1.92 & 2.10 & 5.62 & 5.16
\
0.997 & 0.0910 & 3 & -1.09-0.115j & -0.98-0.537j & 1.91 & 2.09 & 5.73 & 5.25
\
0.999 & 0.0900 & 3 & -1.11-0.124j & -1.00-0.547j & 1.90 & 2.08 & 5.86 & 5.35
\
1.001 & 0.0886 & 3 & -1.12-0.132j & -1.01-0.557j & 1.88 & 2.07 & 6.01 & 5.46
\
1.003 & 0.0872 & 3 & -1.14-0.143j & -1.02-0.569j & 1.86 & 2.06 & 6.16 & 5.58
\
1.005 & 0.0858 & 3 & -1.16-0.154j & -1.04-0.582j & 1.85 & 2.05 & 6.34 & 5.72
\
1.007 & 0.0843 & 3 & -1.18-0.166j & -1.06-0.596j & 1.83 & 2.04 & 6.54 & 5.87
\
1.009 & 0.0827 & 3 & -1.21-0.180j & -1.07-0.612j & 1.80 & 2.02 & 6.77 & 6.04
\
1.011 & 0.0809 & 3 & -1.23-0.196j & -1.09-0.630j & 1.78 & 2.01 & 7.02 & 6.23
\
bottomrule
end{array}$
vspace{1cm}
%%% Second version: use a 'tabular*' env.
setlengthtabcolsep{0pt}
begin{tabular*}{textwidth}{@{extracolsep{fill}} *{9}{c} }
toprule
$| V_{R,i}|^{2}$ & $| Z_{RR,ii}|$ & $P_{R,i}^*$ &
multicolumn{2}{c}{$displaystyleRERInteractionSumm$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$| S_{eq, i}^*|$}&
multicolumn{2}{c}{$mathrm{SDSCR}_{i}$}
\
cmidrule{1-1}
cmidrule{2-2}
cmidrule{3-3}
cmidrule{4-5}
cmidrule{6-7}
cmidrule{8-9}
$0.992$ & $0.0941$ & $3$ & $-1.05-0.095j$ & $-0.95-0.513j$ & $1.95$ & $2.11$ & $5.41$ & $4.99$
\
$0.995$ & $0.0921$ & $3$ & $-1.08-0.108j$ & $-0.97-0.529j$ & $1.92$ & $2.10$ & $5.62$ & $5.16$
\
$0.997$ & $0.0910$ & $3$ & $-1.09-0.115j$ & $-0.98-0.537j$ & $1.91$ & $2.09$ & $5.73$ & $5.25$
\
$0.999$ & $0.0900$ & $3$ & $-1.11-0.124j$ & $-1.00-0.547j$ & $1.90$ & $2.08$ & $5.86$ & $5.35$
\
$1.001$ & $0.0886$ & $3$ & $-1.12-0.132j$ & $-1.01-0.557j$ & $1.88$ & $2.07$ & $6.01$ & $5.46$
\
$1.003$ & $0.0872$ & $3$ & $-1.14-0.143j$ & $-1.02-0.569j$ & $1.86$ & $2.06$ & $6.16$ & $5.58$
\
$1.005$ & $0.0858$ & $3$ & $-1.16-0.154j$ & $-1.04-0.582j$ & $1.85$ & $2.05$ & $6.34$ & $5.72$
\
$1.007$ & $0.0843$ & $3$ & $-1.18-0.166j$ & $-1.06-0.596j$ & $1.83$ & $2.04$ & $6.54$ & $5.87$
\
$1.009$ & $0.0827$ & $3$ & $-1.21-0.180j$ & $-1.07-0.612j$ & $1.80$ & $2.02$ & $6.77$ & $6.04$
\
$1.011$ & $0.0809$ & $3$ & $-1.23-0.196j$ & $-1.09-0.630j$ & $1.78$ & $2.01$ & $7.02$ & $6.23$
\
bottomrule
end{tabular*}
end{table*}
end{document}
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
edited Nov 18 at 4:11
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
answered Nov 17 at 21:42
Mico
270k30367755
270k30367755
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
add a comment |
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
1
1
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
+1 for not using my package:-)
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:43
add a comment |
draft saved
draft discarded
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460504%2fwhy-do-i-get-unnecessary-column-space-when-using-multicolumn-in-type-x-colu%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The width calculations for the three header cells that span two columns each are incorrect. Anyway, it's not even necessary to calculate their widths. It suffices to the the basic
ccolumn type:multicolumn{2}{c}{...}– Mico
Nov 17 at 21:11
1
In addition to what @Mico said, I would never use tabularx for a data table of numbers, X columns are all about line breaking of text to a calculated width.
– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:41
don't use math italic for multi-letter words, as you image shows they are spaced incorrectly for a word, use
mathrm{eq}andmathrm{SDSCR}– David Carlisle
Nov 17 at 21:42