2 player zero-sum-game rock paper scissors expected loss
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the Rock-Paper-Scissors game, I am trying to determine the expected loss for P1.
The following matrix displays how much P1 has lost:
A:
| 0 1 -1 |
| -1 0 1 |
| 1 -1 0 |
I am trying to find the expected loss for P1 when P1 uses mixed strategy x = (x1, x2, x3) and P2 uses mixed strategy y (y1, y2, y3)
I am not sure how to do this?
EDIT:
My attempt is thinking that if I should always have a 1/3 chance of winning, right?
linear-programming game-theory nash-equilibrium
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the Rock-Paper-Scissors game, I am trying to determine the expected loss for P1.
The following matrix displays how much P1 has lost:
A:
| 0 1 -1 |
| -1 0 1 |
| 1 -1 0 |
I am trying to find the expected loss for P1 when P1 uses mixed strategy x = (x1, x2, x3) and P2 uses mixed strategy y (y1, y2, y3)
I am not sure how to do this?
EDIT:
My attempt is thinking that if I should always have a 1/3 chance of winning, right?
linear-programming game-theory nash-equilibrium
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For the Rock-Paper-Scissors game, I am trying to determine the expected loss for P1.
The following matrix displays how much P1 has lost:
A:
| 0 1 -1 |
| -1 0 1 |
| 1 -1 0 |
I am trying to find the expected loss for P1 when P1 uses mixed strategy x = (x1, x2, x3) and P2 uses mixed strategy y (y1, y2, y3)
I am not sure how to do this?
EDIT:
My attempt is thinking that if I should always have a 1/3 chance of winning, right?
linear-programming game-theory nash-equilibrium
For the Rock-Paper-Scissors game, I am trying to determine the expected loss for P1.
The following matrix displays how much P1 has lost:
A:
| 0 1 -1 |
| -1 0 1 |
| 1 -1 0 |
I am trying to find the expected loss for P1 when P1 uses mixed strategy x = (x1, x2, x3) and P2 uses mixed strategy y (y1, y2, y3)
I am not sure how to do this?
EDIT:
My attempt is thinking that if I should always have a 1/3 chance of winning, right?
linear-programming game-theory nash-equilibrium
linear-programming game-theory nash-equilibrium
edited Nov 17 at 21:08
asked Nov 15 at 2:58
Jerry M.
1011
1011
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14
|
show 1 more comment
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14
|
show 1 more comment
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The expected payoff for $P1$ when he plays the mixed strategy $x$ and his opponent plays the mixed strategy $y$ is $x A y^top$.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The expected payoff for $P1$ when he plays the mixed strategy $x$ and his opponent plays the mixed strategy $y$ is $x A y^top$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The expected payoff for $P1$ when he plays the mixed strategy $x$ and his opponent plays the mixed strategy $y$ is $x A y^top$.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The expected payoff for $P1$ when he plays the mixed strategy $x$ and his opponent plays the mixed strategy $y$ is $x A y^top$.
The expected payoff for $P1$ when he plays the mixed strategy $x$ and his opponent plays the mixed strategy $y$ is $x A y^top$.
answered Nov 17 at 18:10
mlc
4,83431332
4,83431332
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999142%2f2-player-zero-sum-game-rock-paper-scissors-expected-loss%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
There are only $9$ things that can happen. Figure out their probabilities and add up the expected gains and losses.
– saulspatz
Nov 15 at 3:10
the solution proposed by saulspatz can be written elegantly in terms of $A$, $x$ and $y$
– LinAlg
Nov 15 at 16:29
I will attempt this, and post an answer. Thank you for the feed back.
– Jerry M.
Nov 15 at 17:03
It's true that you can always break even by playing $x = (1/3,1/3,1/3)$. But you can possibly do better, depending on P2's strategy. If P2 always plays rock, then you can always play paper and win every time.
– Théophile
Nov 17 at 21:12
@Théophile thank you for the feedback. I know this is dumb question but I am trying so hard to understand it
– Jerry M.
Nov 17 at 21:14