Is there any mechanical difference between the phrases, “as a reaction…” and “can use your...
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I was reading Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes when I stumbled on an interesting turn of phrase (it's repeated often in the book and in others, but this was where I first realized it).
The Demonic Boons section lists the following trait for followers of Graz'zt (p. 30):
Joy from Pain. Whenever this creature suffers a critical hit, it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
[Emphasis mine]
Meanwhile, in Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 46), the Mastermind rogue's Misdirection subclass feature says:
When you are targeted by an attack while a creature within 5 feet of you is granting you cover against that attack, you can use your reaction to have the attack target that creature instead of you.
[Emphasis mine]
Is there any mechanical difference between these two phrases? If something is done "as a reaction", does it not "use your reaction"? Or are they just interchangable phrases?
dnd-5e reactions
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I was reading Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes when I stumbled on an interesting turn of phrase (it's repeated often in the book and in others, but this was where I first realized it).
The Demonic Boons section lists the following trait for followers of Graz'zt (p. 30):
Joy from Pain. Whenever this creature suffers a critical hit, it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
[Emphasis mine]
Meanwhile, in Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 46), the Mastermind rogue's Misdirection subclass feature says:
When you are targeted by an attack while a creature within 5 feet of you is granting you cover against that attack, you can use your reaction to have the attack target that creature instead of you.
[Emphasis mine]
Is there any mechanical difference between these two phrases? If something is done "as a reaction", does it not "use your reaction"? Or are they just interchangable phrases?
dnd-5e reactions
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
I was reading Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes when I stumbled on an interesting turn of phrase (it's repeated often in the book and in others, but this was where I first realized it).
The Demonic Boons section lists the following trait for followers of Graz'zt (p. 30):
Joy from Pain. Whenever this creature suffers a critical hit, it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
[Emphasis mine]
Meanwhile, in Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 46), the Mastermind rogue's Misdirection subclass feature says:
When you are targeted by an attack while a creature within 5 feet of you is granting you cover against that attack, you can use your reaction to have the attack target that creature instead of you.
[Emphasis mine]
Is there any mechanical difference between these two phrases? If something is done "as a reaction", does it not "use your reaction"? Or are they just interchangable phrases?
dnd-5e reactions
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
I was reading Mordenkainen's Tome of Foes when I stumbled on an interesting turn of phrase (it's repeated often in the book and in others, but this was where I first realized it).
The Demonic Boons section lists the following trait for followers of Graz'zt (p. 30):
Joy from Pain. Whenever this creature suffers a critical hit, it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
[Emphasis mine]
Meanwhile, in Xanathar's Guide to Everything (p. 46), the Mastermind rogue's Misdirection subclass feature says:
When you are targeted by an attack while a creature within 5 feet of you is granting you cover against that attack, you can use your reaction to have the attack target that creature instead of you.
[Emphasis mine]
Is there any mechanical difference between these two phrases? If something is done "as a reaction", does it not "use your reaction"? Or are they just interchangable phrases?
dnd-5e reactions
dnd-5e reactions
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 28 at 6:11
V2Blast
18.2k248114
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
asked Nov 28 at 4:44
SeraphsWrath
4,3271152
4,3271152
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Grammar is the only difference
Mechanically these two phrases are identical. Doing something "as a reaction" "use[s] your reaction". They only exist in two forms to make the sentence structure and grammar correct for the various abilities that use them.
Third Person vs. Second Person
[...] it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
is a third person description of the action. Whereas,
[...] you can use your reaction [...]
is a second person perspective. Potentially, this the reason for the variations in phrasing. There are contradicting examples however, so this probably isn't the case.
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Grammar is the only difference
Mechanically these two phrases are identical. Doing something "as a reaction" "use[s] your reaction". They only exist in two forms to make the sentence structure and grammar correct for the various abilities that use them.
Third Person vs. Second Person
[...] it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
is a third person description of the action. Whereas,
[...] you can use your reaction [...]
is a second person perspective. Potentially, this the reason for the variations in phrasing. There are contradicting examples however, so this probably isn't the case.
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Grammar is the only difference
Mechanically these two phrases are identical. Doing something "as a reaction" "use[s] your reaction". They only exist in two forms to make the sentence structure and grammar correct for the various abilities that use them.
Third Person vs. Second Person
[...] it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
is a third person description of the action. Whereas,
[...] you can use your reaction [...]
is a second person perspective. Potentially, this the reason for the variations in phrasing. There are contradicting examples however, so this probably isn't the case.
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
up vote
8
down vote
accepted
Grammar is the only difference
Mechanically these two phrases are identical. Doing something "as a reaction" "use[s] your reaction". They only exist in two forms to make the sentence structure and grammar correct for the various abilities that use them.
Third Person vs. Second Person
[...] it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
is a third person description of the action. Whereas,
[...] you can use your reaction [...]
is a second person perspective. Potentially, this the reason for the variations in phrasing. There are contradicting examples however, so this probably isn't the case.
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
Grammar is the only difference
Mechanically these two phrases are identical. Doing something "as a reaction" "use[s] your reaction". They only exist in two forms to make the sentence structure and grammar correct for the various abilities that use them.
Third Person vs. Second Person
[...] it can make one melee weapon attack as a reaction.
is a third person description of the action. Whereas,
[...] you can use your reaction [...]
is a second person perspective. Potentially, this the reason for the variations in phrasing. There are contradicting examples however, so this probably isn't the case.
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
edited Nov 28 at 6:09
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
answered Nov 28 at 4:47
linksassin
3,8481940
3,8481940
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
add a comment |
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
1
1
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
I like this answer and I think it's correct, since I just now noticed a similar pattern with "use your action" and "as an action," and allowing "as an action" to not burn the creature's action would be absurdly broken. However, I will note that other abilities in Xanathar's use second person and still use "as a reaction", such as the Scout Rogue's Skirmisher Ability on page 47 ("you may move up to half your speed when an enemy ends its turn within 5 feet of you..."), so I'm not sure that's the reason. It was a good theory, though.
– SeraphsWrath
Nov 28 at 4:59
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
@SeraphsWrath ah well. The first part was my main answer. I was just having a guess based on the examples given. I would need to go a analyse a bunch more examples to come up with a better reasoning.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 5:05
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136388%2fis-there-any-mechanical-difference-between-the-phrases-as-a-reaction-and%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
