Can a Beast Master command their stirge companion to use Blood Drain and then Dodge on subsequent turns,...
up vote
19
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to optimize the damage done by a ranged Beast Master ranger, and was thinking of choosing the Stirge as a companion.
Blood Drain. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, 5 (1d4 + 3) piercing damage, and the stirge attaches to the target.
The Stirge will have 12HP (4x my level), 16 AC, +7 attack modifier, and do 7 points of damage per attack (all increasing with level and proficiency). It is not the creature that does most damage per attack, no, but consider the following part of the attack.
While attached, the stirge doesn't attack. Instead, at the start of each of the stirge's turns, the target loses 5 (1d4 + 3) hit points due to blood loss.
Can I command my companion to attack, and on the following turn leave it attached while I attack? This means another 7 auto-hit damage with it, my possible attack, and the stirge doing the Dodge action (per Errata '18 at "Ranger: Ranger's Companion"). The stirge will detach itself after draining 10HP, so I could pull this off every two-turns.
Up to 11th level, when companions can finally take multi-attacks, the Stirge seems a pretty solid companion. After that, probably better companions will exist.
dnd-5e ranger animal-companions
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to optimize the damage done by a ranged Beast Master ranger, and was thinking of choosing the Stirge as a companion.
Blood Drain. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, 5 (1d4 + 3) piercing damage, and the stirge attaches to the target.
The Stirge will have 12HP (4x my level), 16 AC, +7 attack modifier, and do 7 points of damage per attack (all increasing with level and proficiency). It is not the creature that does most damage per attack, no, but consider the following part of the attack.
While attached, the stirge doesn't attack. Instead, at the start of each of the stirge's turns, the target loses 5 (1d4 + 3) hit points due to blood loss.
Can I command my companion to attack, and on the following turn leave it attached while I attack? This means another 7 auto-hit damage with it, my possible attack, and the stirge doing the Dodge action (per Errata '18 at "Ranger: Ranger's Companion"). The stirge will detach itself after draining 10HP, so I could pull this off every two-turns.
Up to 11th level, when companions can finally take multi-attacks, the Stirge seems a pretty solid companion. After that, probably better companions will exist.
dnd-5e ranger animal-companions
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
3
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
1
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36
add a comment |
up vote
19
down vote
favorite
up vote
19
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to optimize the damage done by a ranged Beast Master ranger, and was thinking of choosing the Stirge as a companion.
Blood Drain. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, 5 (1d4 + 3) piercing damage, and the stirge attaches to the target.
The Stirge will have 12HP (4x my level), 16 AC, +7 attack modifier, and do 7 points of damage per attack (all increasing with level and proficiency). It is not the creature that does most damage per attack, no, but consider the following part of the attack.
While attached, the stirge doesn't attack. Instead, at the start of each of the stirge's turns, the target loses 5 (1d4 + 3) hit points due to blood loss.
Can I command my companion to attack, and on the following turn leave it attached while I attack? This means another 7 auto-hit damage with it, my possible attack, and the stirge doing the Dodge action (per Errata '18 at "Ranger: Ranger's Companion"). The stirge will detach itself after draining 10HP, so I could pull this off every two-turns.
Up to 11th level, when companions can finally take multi-attacks, the Stirge seems a pretty solid companion. After that, probably better companions will exist.
dnd-5e ranger animal-companions
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
I'm trying to optimize the damage done by a ranged Beast Master ranger, and was thinking of choosing the Stirge as a companion.
Blood Drain. Melee Weapon Attack: +5 to hit, 5 (1d4 + 3) piercing damage, and the stirge attaches to the target.
The Stirge will have 12HP (4x my level), 16 AC, +7 attack modifier, and do 7 points of damage per attack (all increasing with level and proficiency). It is not the creature that does most damage per attack, no, but consider the following part of the attack.
While attached, the stirge doesn't attack. Instead, at the start of each of the stirge's turns, the target loses 5 (1d4 + 3) hit points due to blood loss.
Can I command my companion to attack, and on the following turn leave it attached while I attack? This means another 7 auto-hit damage with it, my possible attack, and the stirge doing the Dodge action (per Errata '18 at "Ranger: Ranger's Companion"). The stirge will detach itself after draining 10HP, so I could pull this off every two-turns.
Up to 11th level, when companions can finally take multi-attacks, the Stirge seems a pretty solid companion. After that, probably better companions will exist.
dnd-5e ranger animal-companions
dnd-5e ranger animal-companions
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
18.2k248114
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
asked Nov 28 at 15:02
BlueMoon93
11.7k963126
11.7k963126
3
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
1
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36
add a comment |
3
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
1
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36
3
3
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
1
1
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
Disgusting, but Legal
Other than the very image of a person with a pet vampire-mosquito-bat-thing, I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea.
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
This works by RAW
Nothing in RAW will prevent you from taking a Stirge as a companion. You would then be able to use your action to command it to attack exactly as you describe. Once attached, it would not require an attack to deal the damage each round. It would then take the Dodge action each round as per the errata.
I would rule that it can't Dodge
This isn't strictly RAW as the Stirge's stat block doesn't indicate it this way but it makes sense and is how I would run it.
I would consider "attached" to be an equivalent condition to the Grappled condition which states:
A grappled creature's speed becomes 0, and it can't benefit from any bonus to its speed.
Now this does contradict the rules as the stirge states:
The stirge can detach itself by spending 5 feet of its movement.
implying that is has movement to spend. However, I would say that it has 0 speed unless it chooses to detach. If you, and more importantly your DM, agree with this premise then it cannot dodge.
In the text for the Dodge action:
You lose this benefit if you are incapacitated or if your speed drops to 0.
Therefore, the stirge will simply do nothing each turn. Without disadvantage on their attack, it's quite possible your target will simply kill the stirge on their turn.
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
|
show 3 more comments
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
Disgusting, but Legal
Other than the very image of a person with a pet vampire-mosquito-bat-thing, I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea.
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
Disgusting, but Legal
Other than the very image of a person with a pet vampire-mosquito-bat-thing, I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea.
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
up vote
25
down vote
accepted
Disgusting, but Legal
Other than the very image of a person with a pet vampire-mosquito-bat-thing, I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea.
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
Disgusting, but Legal
Other than the very image of a person with a pet vampire-mosquito-bat-thing, I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea.
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
answered Nov 28 at 15:23
T.J.L.
27.5k387146
27.5k387146
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
add a comment |
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
25
25
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
His name is Fluffly!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 15:24
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
You did not address the "Can it use the dodge action while attached?"
– Mindwin
2 days ago
1
1
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
@Mindwin I most certainly did. The statement "I am aware of nothing in the rules that would prohibit your idea" neither has nor requires caveats about particular elements of the original post.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
This works by RAW
Nothing in RAW will prevent you from taking a Stirge as a companion. You would then be able to use your action to command it to attack exactly as you describe. Once attached, it would not require an attack to deal the damage each round. It would then take the Dodge action each round as per the errata.
I would rule that it can't Dodge
This isn't strictly RAW as the Stirge's stat block doesn't indicate it this way but it makes sense and is how I would run it.
I would consider "attached" to be an equivalent condition to the Grappled condition which states:
A grappled creature's speed becomes 0, and it can't benefit from any bonus to its speed.
Now this does contradict the rules as the stirge states:
The stirge can detach itself by spending 5 feet of its movement.
implying that is has movement to spend. However, I would say that it has 0 speed unless it chooses to detach. If you, and more importantly your DM, agree with this premise then it cannot dodge.
In the text for the Dodge action:
You lose this benefit if you are incapacitated or if your speed drops to 0.
Therefore, the stirge will simply do nothing each turn. Without disadvantage on their attack, it's quite possible your target will simply kill the stirge on their turn.
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
15
down vote
This works by RAW
Nothing in RAW will prevent you from taking a Stirge as a companion. You would then be able to use your action to command it to attack exactly as you describe. Once attached, it would not require an attack to deal the damage each round. It would then take the Dodge action each round as per the errata.
I would rule that it can't Dodge
This isn't strictly RAW as the Stirge's stat block doesn't indicate it this way but it makes sense and is how I would run it.
I would consider "attached" to be an equivalent condition to the Grappled condition which states:
A grappled creature's speed becomes 0, and it can't benefit from any bonus to its speed.
Now this does contradict the rules as the stirge states:
The stirge can detach itself by spending 5 feet of its movement.
implying that is has movement to spend. However, I would say that it has 0 speed unless it chooses to detach. If you, and more importantly your DM, agree with this premise then it cannot dodge.
In the text for the Dodge action:
You lose this benefit if you are incapacitated or if your speed drops to 0.
Therefore, the stirge will simply do nothing each turn. Without disadvantage on their attack, it's quite possible your target will simply kill the stirge on their turn.
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
|
show 3 more comments
up vote
15
down vote
up vote
15
down vote
This works by RAW
Nothing in RAW will prevent you from taking a Stirge as a companion. You would then be able to use your action to command it to attack exactly as you describe. Once attached, it would not require an attack to deal the damage each round. It would then take the Dodge action each round as per the errata.
I would rule that it can't Dodge
This isn't strictly RAW as the Stirge's stat block doesn't indicate it this way but it makes sense and is how I would run it.
I would consider "attached" to be an equivalent condition to the Grappled condition which states:
A grappled creature's speed becomes 0, and it can't benefit from any bonus to its speed.
Now this does contradict the rules as the stirge states:
The stirge can detach itself by spending 5 feet of its movement.
implying that is has movement to spend. However, I would say that it has 0 speed unless it chooses to detach. If you, and more importantly your DM, agree with this premise then it cannot dodge.
In the text for the Dodge action:
You lose this benefit if you are incapacitated or if your speed drops to 0.
Therefore, the stirge will simply do nothing each turn. Without disadvantage on their attack, it's quite possible your target will simply kill the stirge on their turn.
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
This works by RAW
Nothing in RAW will prevent you from taking a Stirge as a companion. You would then be able to use your action to command it to attack exactly as you describe. Once attached, it would not require an attack to deal the damage each round. It would then take the Dodge action each round as per the errata.
I would rule that it can't Dodge
This isn't strictly RAW as the Stirge's stat block doesn't indicate it this way but it makes sense and is how I would run it.
I would consider "attached" to be an equivalent condition to the Grappled condition which states:
A grappled creature's speed becomes 0, and it can't benefit from any bonus to its speed.
Now this does contradict the rules as the stirge states:
The stirge can detach itself by spending 5 feet of its movement.
implying that is has movement to spend. However, I would say that it has 0 speed unless it chooses to detach. If you, and more importantly your DM, agree with this premise then it cannot dodge.
In the text for the Dodge action:
You lose this benefit if you are incapacitated or if your speed drops to 0.
Therefore, the stirge will simply do nothing each turn. Without disadvantage on their attack, it's quite possible your target will simply kill the stirge on their turn.
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
edited Nov 29 at 3:44
V2Blast
18.2k248114
18.2k248114
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
answered Nov 28 at 15:34
linksassin
3,8481940
3,8481940
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
|
show 3 more comments
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
3
3
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
While I don't think it's unreasonable to houserule that an attached stirge has their speed dropped to zero, that isn't actually in their stat block and may not be applicable to OP whose DM may not be using that houserule - especially if they're just using the raw stat block.
– NautArch
Nov 28 at 15:37
6
6
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
@NautArch it does state that is must spend 5 feet of movement to detach. So I guess that invalidates my argument since it has movement to spend.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 15:40
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
"doesn't attack" seems like it might include "doesn't get an action" which might also prevent dodging.
– Ben Barden
Nov 28 at 17:25
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
@BenBarden That's not how it is worded so I wouldn't make that assumption. attack =/= action and it's dangerous to start making that assumption.
– linksassin
Nov 28 at 17:32
1
1
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
@BenBarden: The inability to attack is more likely related to the fact that it's leeching behavior is already considered attacking. The rule seems to suggest "doesn't need to make an additional attack action to continue the leeching in progress" more than "forfaits their actions while attached".
– Flater
Nov 29 at 8:46
|
show 3 more comments
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136411%2fcan-a-beast-master-command-their-stirge-companion-to-use-blood-drain-and-then-do%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
It's worth noting that, as long as the Stirge has at least 5ft of movement remaining, it can still take advantage multiattack. Attack/attach. detach. attack/attach again.
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 15:38
@goodguy5 That's a great point, I hadn't considered it!
– BlueMoon93
Nov 28 at 16:16
1
oh! and at level 13 (proficiency +5), it automatically deals 10 damage and therefore detaches at the beginning of its turn. Allowing for two more attacks!
– goodguy5
Nov 28 at 16:36