Baire sets have arbitrarily fine refinements. Barry Simon. Problem 1 page 239.
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Definition (Baire set) Let X be a compact Hausdorff space. The Baire sets are the smallest $sigma$-algebra containing all compacts $G_{delta}$'s.
Definition (Partition) Given an algebra , $mathcal{U}$, a partition associated to $mathcal{U}$, is a finite subset $mathcal{P}subset mathcal{U}$ so that
(i) All sets in $mathcal{P}$ are nonempty
(ii) $P_1, P_2inmathcal{P}Rightarrow P_1cap P_2=emptyset$
(iii) $bigcup_{Pinmathcal{P}}P=X$
Problem:
Given any open cover $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$, of a compact Hausdorff space $X$, prove that one can find a partition $left{P_jright}_{j=1}^{n}$ into Baire sets so that each $P_j$ lies in some single $U_a$.
(Hint: First find an open cover by Baire sets, $left{V_lright}_{l=1}^{m}$, so each $V_l$ is in some $U_a$.
I have this...
Let $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$ open cover of $X$. $X$ is compact, then exists $1,ldots, m$ such that $left{U_{l}right}_{l=1}^{m}$ is finite open cover of $X$.
Now, $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l$, and $bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_lsetminus(U_1cup ldots, cup U_{l-1})$ with $U_{0}=emptyset.$ now this union is disjoint.
Define $P_l=U_lsetminus (U_1cup ldots cup U_{0})$. This works?...
general-topology compactness
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Definition (Baire set) Let X be a compact Hausdorff space. The Baire sets are the smallest $sigma$-algebra containing all compacts $G_{delta}$'s.
Definition (Partition) Given an algebra , $mathcal{U}$, a partition associated to $mathcal{U}$, is a finite subset $mathcal{P}subset mathcal{U}$ so that
(i) All sets in $mathcal{P}$ are nonempty
(ii) $P_1, P_2inmathcal{P}Rightarrow P_1cap P_2=emptyset$
(iii) $bigcup_{Pinmathcal{P}}P=X$
Problem:
Given any open cover $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$, of a compact Hausdorff space $X$, prove that one can find a partition $left{P_jright}_{j=1}^{n}$ into Baire sets so that each $P_j$ lies in some single $U_a$.
(Hint: First find an open cover by Baire sets, $left{V_lright}_{l=1}^{m}$, so each $V_l$ is in some $U_a$.
I have this...
Let $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$ open cover of $X$. $X$ is compact, then exists $1,ldots, m$ such that $left{U_{l}right}_{l=1}^{m}$ is finite open cover of $X$.
Now, $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l$, and $bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_lsetminus(U_1cup ldots, cup U_{l-1})$ with $U_{0}=emptyset.$ now this union is disjoint.
Define $P_l=U_lsetminus (U_1cup ldots cup U_{0})$. This works?...
general-topology compactness
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
Definition (Baire set) Let X be a compact Hausdorff space. The Baire sets are the smallest $sigma$-algebra containing all compacts $G_{delta}$'s.
Definition (Partition) Given an algebra , $mathcal{U}$, a partition associated to $mathcal{U}$, is a finite subset $mathcal{P}subset mathcal{U}$ so that
(i) All sets in $mathcal{P}$ are nonempty
(ii) $P_1, P_2inmathcal{P}Rightarrow P_1cap P_2=emptyset$
(iii) $bigcup_{Pinmathcal{P}}P=X$
Problem:
Given any open cover $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$, of a compact Hausdorff space $X$, prove that one can find a partition $left{P_jright}_{j=1}^{n}$ into Baire sets so that each $P_j$ lies in some single $U_a$.
(Hint: First find an open cover by Baire sets, $left{V_lright}_{l=1}^{m}$, so each $V_l$ is in some $U_a$.
I have this...
Let $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$ open cover of $X$. $X$ is compact, then exists $1,ldots, m$ such that $left{U_{l}right}_{l=1}^{m}$ is finite open cover of $X$.
Now, $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l$, and $bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_lsetminus(U_1cup ldots, cup U_{l-1})$ with $U_{0}=emptyset.$ now this union is disjoint.
Define $P_l=U_lsetminus (U_1cup ldots cup U_{0})$. This works?...
general-topology compactness
Definition (Baire set) Let X be a compact Hausdorff space. The Baire sets are the smallest $sigma$-algebra containing all compacts $G_{delta}$'s.
Definition (Partition) Given an algebra , $mathcal{U}$, a partition associated to $mathcal{U}$, is a finite subset $mathcal{P}subset mathcal{U}$ so that
(i) All sets in $mathcal{P}$ are nonempty
(ii) $P_1, P_2inmathcal{P}Rightarrow P_1cap P_2=emptyset$
(iii) $bigcup_{Pinmathcal{P}}P=X$
Problem:
Given any open cover $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$, of a compact Hausdorff space $X$, prove that one can find a partition $left{P_jright}_{j=1}^{n}$ into Baire sets so that each $P_j$ lies in some single $U_a$.
(Hint: First find an open cover by Baire sets, $left{V_lright}_{l=1}^{m}$, so each $V_l$ is in some $U_a$.
I have this...
Let $left{U_{a}right}_{ain I}$ open cover of $X$. $X$ is compact, then exists $1,ldots, m$ such that $left{U_{l}right}_{l=1}^{m}$ is finite open cover of $X$.
Now, $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l$, and $bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_l=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} U_lsetminus(U_1cup ldots, cup U_{l-1})$ with $U_{0}=emptyset.$ now this union is disjoint.
Define $P_l=U_lsetminus (U_1cup ldots cup U_{0})$. This works?...
general-topology compactness
general-topology compactness
edited Nov 18 at 5:52
asked Nov 17 at 23:44
eraldcoil
26119
26119
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20
add a comment |
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002967%2fbaire-sets-have-arbitrarily-fine-refinements-barry-simon-problem-1-page-239%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
No, there is no reason why the $P_l$ you define are Baire sets. What have you learnt about Baire sets? They're Borel obviously. But do you have more info than that on such sets? Start looking there first.
– Henno Brandsma
Nov 18 at 6:15
I only know that the baire sets are in the smallest sigma algebra that contains the compacts formed by intersection of open sets.
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 15:27
$(U_a)$ open cover of X. for each $x$, exists $a_x$ such that $xin U_{a_(x)}$. ${x}$ is closed and $U_{a_x}$ open By Urysohn's lemma exists $f_x:Xto [0,1]$ ${f_x}(y)=1$ over ${x}$ and ${f_x}(y)=0$ over $Xsetminus U_{a_x}$ Then $left{y:f_x(y)>0right}subset U_{a_x}$ Now, ${y:{f_x}(y)>1/2}$ is open Baire set Then $V_x=left{y:{f_x}(y)>1/2right}$ is open cover Baire sets of $X$. And $X$ compact, then exists $x_1,ldots,x_m$ such that $X=bigcup_{l=1}^{m} V_l$ with $V_l=V_{x_l}$ Defines $P_l=V_{l}setminus (V_1 cupldots cup V_{l-1})$ $V_{0}=emptyset$ It is work?..
– eraldcoil
Nov 18 at 23:20