Hamiltonian and Lagrangian correspondence
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to clarify how we get a Hamiltonian directly from a Lagrangian using the Legendre transform. Let me give some preliminaries for my question to make sense.
A Hamiltonian system is a triple $(M,omega, H)$, where $(M,omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $Hin C^infty(M)$ is some prescribed smooth function (the symplectic structure isn't important to this question, but since this is a symplectic topic, I'm going to include it).
Now, let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $omega$ be the standard symplectic form on $T^*M$, and let $Fin C^infty(TM)$ be our Lagrangian, that is, $F_p:=F|_{T_pM}$ is strictly convex for each $pin M$. For the moment, let's fix $pin M$ and focus on $F_p:T_pMtomathbb{R}$. For $alphain T_p^*M$, define
$$F_{p,alpha}(v)=F_p(v)-alpha(v)$$
for $vin T_pM$. The mapping $F_{p,alpha}$ is said to be stable if there exists a unique critical point in $T_pM$ for $F_{p,alpha}$. Then define the stability set
$$S_{F_p}={alphain T_p^*M:F_{p,alpha}text{ is stable}}.$$
Then $S_{F_p}$ is open and convex in $T_p^*M$, and leads to my first question of when do we have that $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$?
Furthermore, since $F_p$ is strictly convex, we have that the Legendre transform associated to $F_p$, denoted $L_{F_p}:T_pMto S_{F_p}$ is a diffeomorphism. Moreover, with our dual $F_p^*:S_{F_p}tomathbb{R}$, we see that
$$L_{F_p}^{-1}=L_{F_p^*}.$$
Again, with my understanding, don't we need $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$ for this to make sense?
Combining the fibewise defined maps, we obtain
$$mathcal{L}:TMto T^*M,qquad mathcal{L}|_{T_pM}=L_{F_p},$$
and
$$H:S_Ftomathbb{R},qquad H|_{S_{F_p}}=F_p^*,$$
and $mathcal{L}:TMto S_F$ is a diffeomorphism.
Note that I'm using the notation of
$$S_F=bigcup_{pin M}S_{F_p}.$$
Now, this defined $H$ should yield the Hamiltonian system $(T^*M,omega,H)$, but we don't necessarily have $H$ defined on the whole cotangent bundle, which seems odds since our Lagrangian was defined on the whole tangent bundle. Am I missing something in this construction? I was under the impression that Lagrangians on the tangent bundle were equivalent to Hamiltonians on the cotangent bundle.
I guess all of this reduced to the question: How do we remedy the fact that $S_{F_p}$ and $T_p^*M$ aren't necessarily equal?
As always, any help or references would be greatly appreciated.
differential-geometry differential-topology symplectic-geometry euler-lagrange-equation hamilton-equations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to clarify how we get a Hamiltonian directly from a Lagrangian using the Legendre transform. Let me give some preliminaries for my question to make sense.
A Hamiltonian system is a triple $(M,omega, H)$, where $(M,omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $Hin C^infty(M)$ is some prescribed smooth function (the symplectic structure isn't important to this question, but since this is a symplectic topic, I'm going to include it).
Now, let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $omega$ be the standard symplectic form on $T^*M$, and let $Fin C^infty(TM)$ be our Lagrangian, that is, $F_p:=F|_{T_pM}$ is strictly convex for each $pin M$. For the moment, let's fix $pin M$ and focus on $F_p:T_pMtomathbb{R}$. For $alphain T_p^*M$, define
$$F_{p,alpha}(v)=F_p(v)-alpha(v)$$
for $vin T_pM$. The mapping $F_{p,alpha}$ is said to be stable if there exists a unique critical point in $T_pM$ for $F_{p,alpha}$. Then define the stability set
$$S_{F_p}={alphain T_p^*M:F_{p,alpha}text{ is stable}}.$$
Then $S_{F_p}$ is open and convex in $T_p^*M$, and leads to my first question of when do we have that $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$?
Furthermore, since $F_p$ is strictly convex, we have that the Legendre transform associated to $F_p$, denoted $L_{F_p}:T_pMto S_{F_p}$ is a diffeomorphism. Moreover, with our dual $F_p^*:S_{F_p}tomathbb{R}$, we see that
$$L_{F_p}^{-1}=L_{F_p^*}.$$
Again, with my understanding, don't we need $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$ for this to make sense?
Combining the fibewise defined maps, we obtain
$$mathcal{L}:TMto T^*M,qquad mathcal{L}|_{T_pM}=L_{F_p},$$
and
$$H:S_Ftomathbb{R},qquad H|_{S_{F_p}}=F_p^*,$$
and $mathcal{L}:TMto S_F$ is a diffeomorphism.
Note that I'm using the notation of
$$S_F=bigcup_{pin M}S_{F_p}.$$
Now, this defined $H$ should yield the Hamiltonian system $(T^*M,omega,H)$, but we don't necessarily have $H$ defined on the whole cotangent bundle, which seems odds since our Lagrangian was defined on the whole tangent bundle. Am I missing something in this construction? I was under the impression that Lagrangians on the tangent bundle were equivalent to Hamiltonians on the cotangent bundle.
I guess all of this reduced to the question: How do we remedy the fact that $S_{F_p}$ and $T_p^*M$ aren't necessarily equal?
As always, any help or references would be greatly appreciated.
differential-geometry differential-topology symplectic-geometry euler-lagrange-equation hamilton-equations
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I'm trying to clarify how we get a Hamiltonian directly from a Lagrangian using the Legendre transform. Let me give some preliminaries for my question to make sense.
A Hamiltonian system is a triple $(M,omega, H)$, where $(M,omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $Hin C^infty(M)$ is some prescribed smooth function (the symplectic structure isn't important to this question, but since this is a symplectic topic, I'm going to include it).
Now, let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $omega$ be the standard symplectic form on $T^*M$, and let $Fin C^infty(TM)$ be our Lagrangian, that is, $F_p:=F|_{T_pM}$ is strictly convex for each $pin M$. For the moment, let's fix $pin M$ and focus on $F_p:T_pMtomathbb{R}$. For $alphain T_p^*M$, define
$$F_{p,alpha}(v)=F_p(v)-alpha(v)$$
for $vin T_pM$. The mapping $F_{p,alpha}$ is said to be stable if there exists a unique critical point in $T_pM$ for $F_{p,alpha}$. Then define the stability set
$$S_{F_p}={alphain T_p^*M:F_{p,alpha}text{ is stable}}.$$
Then $S_{F_p}$ is open and convex in $T_p^*M$, and leads to my first question of when do we have that $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$?
Furthermore, since $F_p$ is strictly convex, we have that the Legendre transform associated to $F_p$, denoted $L_{F_p}:T_pMto S_{F_p}$ is a diffeomorphism. Moreover, with our dual $F_p^*:S_{F_p}tomathbb{R}$, we see that
$$L_{F_p}^{-1}=L_{F_p^*}.$$
Again, with my understanding, don't we need $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$ for this to make sense?
Combining the fibewise defined maps, we obtain
$$mathcal{L}:TMto T^*M,qquad mathcal{L}|_{T_pM}=L_{F_p},$$
and
$$H:S_Ftomathbb{R},qquad H|_{S_{F_p}}=F_p^*,$$
and $mathcal{L}:TMto S_F$ is a diffeomorphism.
Note that I'm using the notation of
$$S_F=bigcup_{pin M}S_{F_p}.$$
Now, this defined $H$ should yield the Hamiltonian system $(T^*M,omega,H)$, but we don't necessarily have $H$ defined on the whole cotangent bundle, which seems odds since our Lagrangian was defined on the whole tangent bundle. Am I missing something in this construction? I was under the impression that Lagrangians on the tangent bundle were equivalent to Hamiltonians on the cotangent bundle.
I guess all of this reduced to the question: How do we remedy the fact that $S_{F_p}$ and $T_p^*M$ aren't necessarily equal?
As always, any help or references would be greatly appreciated.
differential-geometry differential-topology symplectic-geometry euler-lagrange-equation hamilton-equations
I'm trying to clarify how we get a Hamiltonian directly from a Lagrangian using the Legendre transform. Let me give some preliminaries for my question to make sense.
A Hamiltonian system is a triple $(M,omega, H)$, where $(M,omega)$ is a symplectic manifold and $Hin C^infty(M)$ is some prescribed smooth function (the symplectic structure isn't important to this question, but since this is a symplectic topic, I'm going to include it).
Now, let $M$ be a smooth manifold and let $omega$ be the standard symplectic form on $T^*M$, and let $Fin C^infty(TM)$ be our Lagrangian, that is, $F_p:=F|_{T_pM}$ is strictly convex for each $pin M$. For the moment, let's fix $pin M$ and focus on $F_p:T_pMtomathbb{R}$. For $alphain T_p^*M$, define
$$F_{p,alpha}(v)=F_p(v)-alpha(v)$$
for $vin T_pM$. The mapping $F_{p,alpha}$ is said to be stable if there exists a unique critical point in $T_pM$ for $F_{p,alpha}$. Then define the stability set
$$S_{F_p}={alphain T_p^*M:F_{p,alpha}text{ is stable}}.$$
Then $S_{F_p}$ is open and convex in $T_p^*M$, and leads to my first question of when do we have that $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$?
Furthermore, since $F_p$ is strictly convex, we have that the Legendre transform associated to $F_p$, denoted $L_{F_p}:T_pMto S_{F_p}$ is a diffeomorphism. Moreover, with our dual $F_p^*:S_{F_p}tomathbb{R}$, we see that
$$L_{F_p}^{-1}=L_{F_p^*}.$$
Again, with my understanding, don't we need $S_{F_p}=T_p^*M$ for this to make sense?
Combining the fibewise defined maps, we obtain
$$mathcal{L}:TMto T^*M,qquad mathcal{L}|_{T_pM}=L_{F_p},$$
and
$$H:S_Ftomathbb{R},qquad H|_{S_{F_p}}=F_p^*,$$
and $mathcal{L}:TMto S_F$ is a diffeomorphism.
Note that I'm using the notation of
$$S_F=bigcup_{pin M}S_{F_p}.$$
Now, this defined $H$ should yield the Hamiltonian system $(T^*M,omega,H)$, but we don't necessarily have $H$ defined on the whole cotangent bundle, which seems odds since our Lagrangian was defined on the whole tangent bundle. Am I missing something in this construction? I was under the impression that Lagrangians on the tangent bundle were equivalent to Hamiltonians on the cotangent bundle.
I guess all of this reduced to the question: How do we remedy the fact that $S_{F_p}$ and $T_p^*M$ aren't necessarily equal?
As always, any help or references would be greatly appreciated.
differential-geometry differential-topology symplectic-geometry euler-lagrange-equation hamilton-equations
differential-geometry differential-topology symplectic-geometry euler-lagrange-equation hamilton-equations
asked Nov 17 at 22:05
Matt
42228
42228
add a comment |
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002876%2fhamiltonian-and-lagrangian-correspondence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown