Three lines moving at same velocity form a triangle. What is the formula for their lengths at time t?











up vote
5
down vote

favorite












Three infinite lines on a plane forming a triangle where they cross. The lines are travelling perpendicular to their length at a constant speed $v=1$ such as the triangle is getting smaller.



The lengths of the sides of the triangle at time $t=0$ are $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$. Find the lengths of the sides of $t$.



This is a question I invented while thinking about physics. Extra marks for an intuitive solution without using vectors.



Considering the space-time diagram at some time $t$ all three lines will meet a point forming a triangular pyramid in space-time. Maybe this gives a clue to solving it.










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    5
    down vote

    favorite












    Three infinite lines on a plane forming a triangle where they cross. The lines are travelling perpendicular to their length at a constant speed $v=1$ such as the triangle is getting smaller.



    The lengths of the sides of the triangle at time $t=0$ are $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$. Find the lengths of the sides of $t$.



    This is a question I invented while thinking about physics. Extra marks for an intuitive solution without using vectors.



    Considering the space-time diagram at some time $t$ all three lines will meet a point forming a triangular pyramid in space-time. Maybe this gives a clue to solving it.










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      5
      down vote

      favorite











      Three infinite lines on a plane forming a triangle where they cross. The lines are travelling perpendicular to their length at a constant speed $v=1$ such as the triangle is getting smaller.



      The lengths of the sides of the triangle at time $t=0$ are $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$. Find the lengths of the sides of $t$.



      This is a question I invented while thinking about physics. Extra marks for an intuitive solution without using vectors.



      Considering the space-time diagram at some time $t$ all three lines will meet a point forming a triangular pyramid in space-time. Maybe this gives a clue to solving it.










      share|cite|improve this question













      Three infinite lines on a plane forming a triangle where they cross. The lines are travelling perpendicular to their length at a constant speed $v=1$ such as the triangle is getting smaller.



      The lengths of the sides of the triangle at time $t=0$ are $(x_0,y_0,z_0)$. Find the lengths of the sides of $t$.



      This is a question I invented while thinking about physics. Extra marks for an intuitive solution without using vectors.



      Considering the space-time diagram at some time $t$ all three lines will meet a point forming a triangular pyramid in space-time. Maybe this gives a clue to solving it.







      geometry dynamical-systems






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 18 at 2:41









      zooby

      956616




      956616






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Put the incentre at the origin, the result is just homothety $r(t)=r(0)-t$, for $t<r(0)=r$ (where $r(t)$ is the inradius at time $t$) and hence also on the side lengths $x(t)=x(0)(1-frac{t}{r(0)})$, etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Excellent! Answer very quick!
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 3:09


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          A little more definitive answer..........



          enter image description here



          $$x_t = x (1 - frac{2 Vcdot t}{(x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})})$$



          $$text{where} zge yge x text{and} (x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})ge Vcdot t$$



          Substitute $y$ and $y_t$, or $z$ and $z_t$ for $x$ and $x_t$ to get $y_t$ or $z_t$ in the above formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 15:10












          • Yes, that works.
            – Phil H
            Nov 18 at 18:06











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003085%2fthree-lines-moving-at-same-velocity-form-a-triangle-what-is-the-formula-for-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Put the incentre at the origin, the result is just homothety $r(t)=r(0)-t$, for $t<r(0)=r$ (where $r(t)$ is the inradius at time $t$) and hence also on the side lengths $x(t)=x(0)(1-frac{t}{r(0)})$, etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Excellent! Answer very quick!
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 3:09















          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted










          Put the incentre at the origin, the result is just homothety $r(t)=r(0)-t$, for $t<r(0)=r$ (where $r(t)$ is the inradius at time $t$) and hence also on the side lengths $x(t)=x(0)(1-frac{t}{r(0)})$, etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Excellent! Answer very quick!
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 3:09













          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          3
          down vote



          accepted






          Put the incentre at the origin, the result is just homothety $r(t)=r(0)-t$, for $t<r(0)=r$ (where $r(t)$ is the inradius at time $t$) and hence also on the side lengths $x(t)=x(0)(1-frac{t}{r(0)})$, etc.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          Put the incentre at the origin, the result is just homothety $r(t)=r(0)-t$, for $t<r(0)=r$ (where $r(t)$ is the inradius at time $t$) and hence also on the side lengths $x(t)=x(0)(1-frac{t}{r(0)})$, etc.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 18 at 13:15

























          answered Nov 18 at 3:02









          user10354138

          6,500623




          6,500623












          • Excellent! Answer very quick!
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 3:09


















          • Excellent! Answer very quick!
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 3:09
















          Excellent! Answer very quick!
          – zooby
          Nov 18 at 3:09




          Excellent! Answer very quick!
          – zooby
          Nov 18 at 3:09










          up vote
          1
          down vote













          A little more definitive answer..........



          enter image description here



          $$x_t = x (1 - frac{2 Vcdot t}{(x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})})$$



          $$text{where} zge yge x text{and} (x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})ge Vcdot t$$



          Substitute $y$ and $y_t$, or $z$ and $z_t$ for $x$ and $x_t$ to get $y_t$ or $z_t$ in the above formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 15:10












          • Yes, that works.
            – Phil H
            Nov 18 at 18:06















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          A little more definitive answer..........



          enter image description here



          $$x_t = x (1 - frac{2 Vcdot t}{(x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})})$$



          $$text{where} zge yge x text{and} (x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})ge Vcdot t$$



          Substitute $y$ and $y_t$, or $z$ and $z_t$ for $x$ and $x_t$ to get $y_t$ or $z_t$ in the above formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 15:10












          • Yes, that works.
            – Phil H
            Nov 18 at 18:06













          up vote
          1
          down vote










          up vote
          1
          down vote









          A little more definitive answer..........



          enter image description here



          $$x_t = x (1 - frac{2 Vcdot t}{(x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})})$$



          $$text{where} zge yge x text{and} (x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})ge Vcdot t$$



          Substitute $y$ and $y_t$, or $z$ and $z_t$ for $x$ and $x_t$ to get $y_t$ or $z_t$ in the above formula.






          share|cite|improve this answer














          A little more definitive answer..........



          enter image description here



          $$x_t = x (1 - frac{2 Vcdot t}{(x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})})$$



          $$text{where} zge yge x text{and} (x+z-y)tan(frac{A}{2})ge Vcdot t$$



          Substitute $y$ and $y_t$, or $z$ and $z_t$ for $x$ and $x_t$ to get $y_t$ or $z_t$ in the above formula.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited Nov 18 at 14:03

























          answered Nov 18 at 5:29









          Phil H

          3,9152312




          3,9152312












          • Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 15:10












          • Yes, that works.
            – Phil H
            Nov 18 at 18:06


















          • Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
            – zooby
            Nov 18 at 15:10












          • Yes, that works.
            – Phil H
            Nov 18 at 18:06
















          Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
          – zooby
          Nov 18 at 15:10






          Yes, but you don't need $tan(A/2)$ because you can calculate that from the sides of the triangle. $L^2 = (x+y-z)(x-y+z)(z-x+y)/(x+y+z)$ give or take a factor of 2.
          – zooby
          Nov 18 at 15:10














          Yes, that works.
          – Phil H
          Nov 18 at 18:06




          Yes, that works.
          – Phil H
          Nov 18 at 18:06


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003085%2fthree-lines-moving-at-same-velocity-form-a-triangle-what-is-the-formula-for-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater