Is g measurable?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, A)$ be a measurable space and let $f : X to mathbb R$ be a measurable function.
Let $g(x) = 0$ if $f(x)$ is rational
and $g(x) = 1$ if $f(x)$ is irrational.
Am I correct in saying $g$ is measurable ?
measure-theory
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, A)$ be a measurable space and let $f : X to mathbb R$ be a measurable function.
Let $g(x) = 0$ if $f(x)$ is rational
and $g(x) = 1$ if $f(x)$ is irrational.
Am I correct in saying $g$ is measurable ?
measure-theory
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $(X, A)$ be a measurable space and let $f : X to mathbb R$ be a measurable function.
Let $g(x) = 0$ if $f(x)$ is rational
and $g(x) = 1$ if $f(x)$ is irrational.
Am I correct in saying $g$ is measurable ?
measure-theory
Let $(X, A)$ be a measurable space and let $f : X to mathbb R$ be a measurable function.
Let $g(x) = 0$ if $f(x)$ is rational
and $g(x) = 1$ if $f(x)$ is irrational.
Am I correct in saying $g$ is measurable ?
measure-theory
measure-theory
edited Nov 18 at 13:06
amWhy
191k27223439
191k27223439
asked Nov 18 at 12:09
Johnmallu
266
266
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39
add a comment |
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The inverse image of any Borel set under $g$ is $emptyset$, $X$, $f^{-1}(mathbb Q)$ or $f^{-1}(mathbb Q^{c})$ and each of these sets is measurable.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The inverse image of any Borel set under $g$ is $emptyset$, $X$, $f^{-1}(mathbb Q)$ or $f^{-1}(mathbb Q^{c})$ and each of these sets is measurable.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The inverse image of any Borel set under $g$ is $emptyset$, $X$, $f^{-1}(mathbb Q)$ or $f^{-1}(mathbb Q^{c})$ and each of these sets is measurable.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
The inverse image of any Borel set under $g$ is $emptyset$, $X$, $f^{-1}(mathbb Q)$ or $f^{-1}(mathbb Q^{c})$ and each of these sets is measurable.
The inverse image of any Borel set under $g$ is $emptyset$, $X$, $f^{-1}(mathbb Q)$ or $f^{-1}(mathbb Q^{c})$ and each of these sets is measurable.
answered Nov 18 at 12:32
Kavi Rama Murthy
44.1k31852
44.1k31852
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003454%2fis-g-measurable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
You can write $h(a) = mathbb 1(atext{ is rational})$, then $g(x)=h(f(x))$, $f$ is measurable and clearly $h$ is measurable too, so $hcirc f$ is measurable. Of course you need to justify that $h$ is measurable.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:16
How would you prove h to be measurable I know that for h to be measurable it must be a function between two measurable spaces such that the preimage of any measurable set is measurable . @P.Quinton
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:20
Observe that any subset of $mathbb Q$ is measurable, hence so is $mathbb Rsetminus mathbb Q$. For any measurable set $Xsubseteq mathbb R$, the two sets $Xcap mathbb Q$ and $xsetminus mathbb Q$ are also measurable and the image of $X$ with respect to $h$ is directly a function of those two sets.
– P. Quinton
Nov 18 at 12:32
Ah I see. Thank you for clarifying and the explanation.
– Johnmallu
Nov 18 at 12:39