How can I tell someone a character is taken? [closed]
I’m really bad at turning people down. In a role play I’m hosting, someone asked to be a character that’s already taken. How do I nicely let them know the character is taken?
social online-roleplaying
closed as unclear what you're asking by Zachiel, V2Blast, Wibbs, Purple Monkey, Szega Dec 2 '18 at 22:24
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
I’m really bad at turning people down. In a role play I’m hosting, someone asked to be a character that’s already taken. How do I nicely let them know the character is taken?
social online-roleplaying
closed as unclear what you're asking by Zachiel, V2Blast, Wibbs, Purple Monkey, Szega Dec 2 '18 at 22:24
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
2
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
6
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
3
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
2
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
I’m really bad at turning people down. In a role play I’m hosting, someone asked to be a character that’s already taken. How do I nicely let them know the character is taken?
social online-roleplaying
I’m really bad at turning people down. In a role play I’m hosting, someone asked to be a character that’s already taken. How do I nicely let them know the character is taken?
social online-roleplaying
social online-roleplaying
edited Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
doppelgreener♦
32k11136230
32k11136230
asked Dec 2 '18 at 15:53
kara.beth
211
211
closed as unclear what you're asking by Zachiel, V2Blast, Wibbs, Purple Monkey, Szega Dec 2 '18 at 22:24
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
closed as unclear what you're asking by Zachiel, V2Blast, Wibbs, Purple Monkey, Szega Dec 2 '18 at 22:24
Please clarify your specific problem or add additional details to highlight exactly what you need. As it's currently written, it’s hard to tell exactly what you're asking. See the How to Ask page for help clarifying this question. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
2
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
6
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
3
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
2
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
1
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
2
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
6
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
3
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
2
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25
1
1
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
2
2
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
6
6
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
3
3
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
2
2
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Just say: “Sorry, that character is taken. Here's the ones that are still available.”
Having played various games online or in person this is all that really needs to be said. It's fine and polite and should be non-confrontational. If the person kicks up a huge stink about it, it indicates they'll probably be a bad fit for your environment anyway, and you can disinvite them from the game or otherwise not proceed with them. The player is now informed about their remaining options and can make a new choice.
If there is a public list of available characters, it helps to mark which ones are taken and/or which ones are still available so as to help avoid clashes like this. It's been the norm for my online games to have a document listing the players and the characters they have chosen. The same document provides the remaining available roster.
If you've got a potential enormous world, e.g. you're all playing on a large spaceship but it's the Chief Engineer role that's already taken, it is helpful to give a brief overview of what kinds of roles are available and list which ones are filled/taken.
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
add a comment |
Understand the transaction here
I gather they know the character is taken.
Regardless... The transaction is "Even though this character may be taken, I would rather play that anyway. Will you be able to effectively DM this game if two of this type of character are in the party?"
So it's not "asking for permission on a matter where you have fiat". It's "asking if your planned adventure will be able to support this and if you will be able (and willing) to facilitate that".
That is more of a self-assessment question, with an answer "yes" or "no".
No different than a private pilot "can we bring my weightlifting set on our trip". The pilot doesn't need to agonize over saying no, merely assess whether it exceeds flight minimums or his personal minimums. So it is for you: either this adventure works that way or it doesn't.
add a comment |
Characters can't be taken...
In most RPGs, there is no rule specifying that two players cannot have similar characters. It is entirely permissible to have multiple players (or even an entire party!) of the same class, race, or race/class combination.
Because those players will give their characters different backstories and personalities, roleplaying them differently, the characters will diverge significantly, despite some similar mechanical elements. Not every dwarven barbarian is the same!
Unless you decide they can
Of course, the exception to any rule is 'if the GM decides otherwise'. If you, for some reason, don't want this to happen, then the correct way to express your preference is as a preference: "Hey, I'm sorry, but I'd prefer if you chose a race/class/race-class combination that was unique—someone is already a _____ and I'd rather not have two.'
If no-two-characters-alike is a rule of your particular RPG, then point them to the rulebook.
Finally, if some feature of your game makes it possible for characters to be 'taken' (e.g. there's a list of pregenerated characters they must choose from) then it should be obvious to them that they may have chosen an unavailable character. Telling them someone already picked that one is unlikely to cause significant surprise (though disappointment is a possibility).
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Just say: “Sorry, that character is taken. Here's the ones that are still available.”
Having played various games online or in person this is all that really needs to be said. It's fine and polite and should be non-confrontational. If the person kicks up a huge stink about it, it indicates they'll probably be a bad fit for your environment anyway, and you can disinvite them from the game or otherwise not proceed with them. The player is now informed about their remaining options and can make a new choice.
If there is a public list of available characters, it helps to mark which ones are taken and/or which ones are still available so as to help avoid clashes like this. It's been the norm for my online games to have a document listing the players and the characters they have chosen. The same document provides the remaining available roster.
If you've got a potential enormous world, e.g. you're all playing on a large spaceship but it's the Chief Engineer role that's already taken, it is helpful to give a brief overview of what kinds of roles are available and list which ones are filled/taken.
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
add a comment |
Just say: “Sorry, that character is taken. Here's the ones that are still available.”
Having played various games online or in person this is all that really needs to be said. It's fine and polite and should be non-confrontational. If the person kicks up a huge stink about it, it indicates they'll probably be a bad fit for your environment anyway, and you can disinvite them from the game or otherwise not proceed with them. The player is now informed about their remaining options and can make a new choice.
If there is a public list of available characters, it helps to mark which ones are taken and/or which ones are still available so as to help avoid clashes like this. It's been the norm for my online games to have a document listing the players and the characters they have chosen. The same document provides the remaining available roster.
If you've got a potential enormous world, e.g. you're all playing on a large spaceship but it's the Chief Engineer role that's already taken, it is helpful to give a brief overview of what kinds of roles are available and list which ones are filled/taken.
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
add a comment |
Just say: “Sorry, that character is taken. Here's the ones that are still available.”
Having played various games online or in person this is all that really needs to be said. It's fine and polite and should be non-confrontational. If the person kicks up a huge stink about it, it indicates they'll probably be a bad fit for your environment anyway, and you can disinvite them from the game or otherwise not proceed with them. The player is now informed about their remaining options and can make a new choice.
If there is a public list of available characters, it helps to mark which ones are taken and/or which ones are still available so as to help avoid clashes like this. It's been the norm for my online games to have a document listing the players and the characters they have chosen. The same document provides the remaining available roster.
If you've got a potential enormous world, e.g. you're all playing on a large spaceship but it's the Chief Engineer role that's already taken, it is helpful to give a brief overview of what kinds of roles are available and list which ones are filled/taken.
Just say: “Sorry, that character is taken. Here's the ones that are still available.”
Having played various games online or in person this is all that really needs to be said. It's fine and polite and should be non-confrontational. If the person kicks up a huge stink about it, it indicates they'll probably be a bad fit for your environment anyway, and you can disinvite them from the game or otherwise not proceed with them. The player is now informed about their remaining options and can make a new choice.
If there is a public list of available characters, it helps to mark which ones are taken and/or which ones are still available so as to help avoid clashes like this. It's been the norm for my online games to have a document listing the players and the characters they have chosen. The same document provides the remaining available roster.
If you've got a potential enormous world, e.g. you're all playing on a large spaceship but it's the Chief Engineer role that's already taken, it is helpful to give a brief overview of what kinds of roles are available and list which ones are filled/taken.
edited Dec 2 '18 at 17:14
answered Dec 2 '18 at 16:14
doppelgreener♦
32k11136230
32k11136230
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
add a comment |
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
1
1
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
First sentence was a completely adequate answer. :)
– Lexible
Dec 2 '18 at 20:38
add a comment |
Understand the transaction here
I gather they know the character is taken.
Regardless... The transaction is "Even though this character may be taken, I would rather play that anyway. Will you be able to effectively DM this game if two of this type of character are in the party?"
So it's not "asking for permission on a matter where you have fiat". It's "asking if your planned adventure will be able to support this and if you will be able (and willing) to facilitate that".
That is more of a self-assessment question, with an answer "yes" or "no".
No different than a private pilot "can we bring my weightlifting set on our trip". The pilot doesn't need to agonize over saying no, merely assess whether it exceeds flight minimums or his personal minimums. So it is for you: either this adventure works that way or it doesn't.
add a comment |
Understand the transaction here
I gather they know the character is taken.
Regardless... The transaction is "Even though this character may be taken, I would rather play that anyway. Will you be able to effectively DM this game if two of this type of character are in the party?"
So it's not "asking for permission on a matter where you have fiat". It's "asking if your planned adventure will be able to support this and if you will be able (and willing) to facilitate that".
That is more of a self-assessment question, with an answer "yes" or "no".
No different than a private pilot "can we bring my weightlifting set on our trip". The pilot doesn't need to agonize over saying no, merely assess whether it exceeds flight minimums or his personal minimums. So it is for you: either this adventure works that way or it doesn't.
add a comment |
Understand the transaction here
I gather they know the character is taken.
Regardless... The transaction is "Even though this character may be taken, I would rather play that anyway. Will you be able to effectively DM this game if two of this type of character are in the party?"
So it's not "asking for permission on a matter where you have fiat". It's "asking if your planned adventure will be able to support this and if you will be able (and willing) to facilitate that".
That is more of a self-assessment question, with an answer "yes" or "no".
No different than a private pilot "can we bring my weightlifting set on our trip". The pilot doesn't need to agonize over saying no, merely assess whether it exceeds flight minimums or his personal minimums. So it is for you: either this adventure works that way or it doesn't.
Understand the transaction here
I gather they know the character is taken.
Regardless... The transaction is "Even though this character may be taken, I would rather play that anyway. Will you be able to effectively DM this game if two of this type of character are in the party?"
So it's not "asking for permission on a matter where you have fiat". It's "asking if your planned adventure will be able to support this and if you will be able (and willing) to facilitate that".
That is more of a self-assessment question, with an answer "yes" or "no".
No different than a private pilot "can we bring my weightlifting set on our trip". The pilot doesn't need to agonize over saying no, merely assess whether it exceeds flight minimums or his personal minimums. So it is for you: either this adventure works that way or it doesn't.
edited Dec 2 '18 at 20:34
answered Dec 2 '18 at 20:12
Harper
81737
81737
add a comment |
add a comment |
Characters can't be taken...
In most RPGs, there is no rule specifying that two players cannot have similar characters. It is entirely permissible to have multiple players (or even an entire party!) of the same class, race, or race/class combination.
Because those players will give their characters different backstories and personalities, roleplaying them differently, the characters will diverge significantly, despite some similar mechanical elements. Not every dwarven barbarian is the same!
Unless you decide they can
Of course, the exception to any rule is 'if the GM decides otherwise'. If you, for some reason, don't want this to happen, then the correct way to express your preference is as a preference: "Hey, I'm sorry, but I'd prefer if you chose a race/class/race-class combination that was unique—someone is already a _____ and I'd rather not have two.'
If no-two-characters-alike is a rule of your particular RPG, then point them to the rulebook.
Finally, if some feature of your game makes it possible for characters to be 'taken' (e.g. there's a list of pregenerated characters they must choose from) then it should be obvious to them that they may have chosen an unavailable character. Telling them someone already picked that one is unlikely to cause significant surprise (though disappointment is a possibility).
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
add a comment |
Characters can't be taken...
In most RPGs, there is no rule specifying that two players cannot have similar characters. It is entirely permissible to have multiple players (or even an entire party!) of the same class, race, or race/class combination.
Because those players will give their characters different backstories and personalities, roleplaying them differently, the characters will diverge significantly, despite some similar mechanical elements. Not every dwarven barbarian is the same!
Unless you decide they can
Of course, the exception to any rule is 'if the GM decides otherwise'. If you, for some reason, don't want this to happen, then the correct way to express your preference is as a preference: "Hey, I'm sorry, but I'd prefer if you chose a race/class/race-class combination that was unique—someone is already a _____ and I'd rather not have two.'
If no-two-characters-alike is a rule of your particular RPG, then point them to the rulebook.
Finally, if some feature of your game makes it possible for characters to be 'taken' (e.g. there's a list of pregenerated characters they must choose from) then it should be obvious to them that they may have chosen an unavailable character. Telling them someone already picked that one is unlikely to cause significant surprise (though disappointment is a possibility).
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
add a comment |
Characters can't be taken...
In most RPGs, there is no rule specifying that two players cannot have similar characters. It is entirely permissible to have multiple players (or even an entire party!) of the same class, race, or race/class combination.
Because those players will give their characters different backstories and personalities, roleplaying them differently, the characters will diverge significantly, despite some similar mechanical elements. Not every dwarven barbarian is the same!
Unless you decide they can
Of course, the exception to any rule is 'if the GM decides otherwise'. If you, for some reason, don't want this to happen, then the correct way to express your preference is as a preference: "Hey, I'm sorry, but I'd prefer if you chose a race/class/race-class combination that was unique—someone is already a _____ and I'd rather not have two.'
If no-two-characters-alike is a rule of your particular RPG, then point them to the rulebook.
Finally, if some feature of your game makes it possible for characters to be 'taken' (e.g. there's a list of pregenerated characters they must choose from) then it should be obvious to them that they may have chosen an unavailable character. Telling them someone already picked that one is unlikely to cause significant surprise (though disappointment is a possibility).
Characters can't be taken...
In most RPGs, there is no rule specifying that two players cannot have similar characters. It is entirely permissible to have multiple players (or even an entire party!) of the same class, race, or race/class combination.
Because those players will give their characters different backstories and personalities, roleplaying them differently, the characters will diverge significantly, despite some similar mechanical elements. Not every dwarven barbarian is the same!
Unless you decide they can
Of course, the exception to any rule is 'if the GM decides otherwise'. If you, for some reason, don't want this to happen, then the correct way to express your preference is as a preference: "Hey, I'm sorry, but I'd prefer if you chose a race/class/race-class combination that was unique—someone is already a _____ and I'd rather not have two.'
If no-two-characters-alike is a rule of your particular RPG, then point them to the rulebook.
Finally, if some feature of your game makes it possible for characters to be 'taken' (e.g. there's a list of pregenerated characters they must choose from) then it should be obvious to them that they may have chosen an unavailable character. Telling them someone already picked that one is unlikely to cause significant surprise (though disappointment is a possibility).
answered Dec 2 '18 at 16:17
Syric
17715
17715
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
add a comment |
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
11
11
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
FWIW, number of RPG's have characters/roles by name (Lady Blackbird comes to mind) so this may be one of those kinds of games.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:30
add a comment |
1
Could you clarify what is meant by 'taken', please? Is it a feature of your system, a personal preference, or something else?
– Syric
Dec 2 '18 at 16:18
2
What is it about telling someone that a character is available that is causing you a problem? I get the feeling that there is more going on here than choosing which character to play. Also, what game are you playing? That can make a difference in how this gets answered.
– KorvinStarmast
Dec 2 '18 at 16:29
6
My understanding is this is a roleplay with either a defined roster of available player characters and/or a defined roster of roles (a ship won't have two captains) and a user has picked a player character someone else picked or a role that is already occupied to the limit. Is that correct?
– doppelgreener♦
Dec 2 '18 at 16:41
3
It might also be helpful to know the system you're using. As a comment to one of the answers suggests, the way this is handled can vary enormously between different systems
– Wibbs
Dec 2 '18 at 17:57
2
Hello and welcome. The answers that already came seem to make a lot of assumptions about things that Doppelgreener and Wibbs asked you, but you haven't probably had the time to answer to (yet). I'm voting to put the question on hold as "unclear" - basically we need some more information to be able to answer properly. - This does not mean that the question is bad, just that we can get better, more focused answers with a little more info ;)
– Zachiel
Dec 2 '18 at 21:25