If $C(16,r) = C(16,r+2)$, then find $r$. Explain how you know.
If $C(16,r) = C(16,r+2)$, then find $r$. Explain how you know.
Just started dealing with combinations and permutations rights now and came across this study problem. I've converted each side into their combination formula forms, but I'm not sure where to go from there(or even if that's what I should be doing). Any help with this or at least where I should start?
combinations
add a comment |
If $C(16,r) = C(16,r+2)$, then find $r$. Explain how you know.
Just started dealing with combinations and permutations rights now and came across this study problem. I've converted each side into their combination formula forms, but I'm not sure where to go from there(or even if that's what I should be doing). Any help with this or at least where I should start?
combinations
add a comment |
If $C(16,r) = C(16,r+2)$, then find $r$. Explain how you know.
Just started dealing with combinations and permutations rights now and came across this study problem. I've converted each side into their combination formula forms, but I'm not sure where to go from there(or even if that's what I should be doing). Any help with this or at least where I should start?
combinations
If $C(16,r) = C(16,r+2)$, then find $r$. Explain how you know.
Just started dealing with combinations and permutations rights now and came across this study problem. I've converted each side into their combination formula forms, but I'm not sure where to go from there(or even if that's what I should be doing). Any help with this or at least where I should start?
combinations
combinations
edited Dec 3 '18 at 9:23
Tianlalu
3,09621038
3,09621038
asked Dec 3 '18 at 4:23
Gold Pony Boy
152
152
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Note that $binom{n}{k} = binom{n}{n-k}.$
What equation does this give for $r$ in your scenario? What is the solution to that equation?
Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$ Since $r ne r+2,$ the value of $r$ that you find is unique.
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
add a comment |
Hint: Think about row $16$ of Pascal's triangle. When does it increase (going to the right) and when does it decrease? What values are duplicated and where?
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
add a comment |
$C_r^{16}=C_{r+2}^{16}$
Then using the definition of combination you'll get
$$frac{16!}{r!(16-r)!}=frac{16!}{(r+2)!(16-r-2)!}$$
$$implies frac{1}{r!(16-r)(15-r).(14-r)!}=frac{1}{(r+2)(r+1).r!.(14-r)!}$$
$$implies (16-r)(15-r)=(r+2)(r+1)$$
$$implies 240-31r+r^2=r^2+3r+2$$
$$implies 34r=238$$
$$implies r=7$$
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023625%2fif-c16-r-c16-r2-then-find-r-explain-how-you-know%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Note that $binom{n}{k} = binom{n}{n-k}.$
What equation does this give for $r$ in your scenario? What is the solution to that equation?
Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$ Since $r ne r+2,$ the value of $r$ that you find is unique.
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
add a comment |
Note that $binom{n}{k} = binom{n}{n-k}.$
What equation does this give for $r$ in your scenario? What is the solution to that equation?
Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$ Since $r ne r+2,$ the value of $r$ that you find is unique.
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
add a comment |
Note that $binom{n}{k} = binom{n}{n-k}.$
What equation does this give for $r$ in your scenario? What is the solution to that equation?
Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$ Since $r ne r+2,$ the value of $r$ that you find is unique.
Note that $binom{n}{k} = binom{n}{n-k}.$
What equation does this give for $r$ in your scenario? What is the solution to that equation?
Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$ Since $r ne r+2,$ the value of $r$ that you find is unique.
edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:35
answered Dec 3 '18 at 4:28
Display name
791313
791313
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
add a comment |
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
Your equation does not imply $$binom na=binom nbimplies a=n-b$$
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 4:52
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
@KemonoChen Note that $binom{n}{a+1} > binom{n}{a}$ when $a < lfloor n/2 rfloor,$ hence an integer can be taken on at most twice as you range among $binom{n}{0}, dots, binom{n}{n}.$
– Display name
Dec 3 '18 at 5:00
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
Exactly. I think it would be better to put this into your answer to clarify. :P The original answer is logically incorrect.
– Kemono Chen
Dec 3 '18 at 5:01
add a comment |
Hint: Think about row $16$ of Pascal's triangle. When does it increase (going to the right) and when does it decrease? What values are duplicated and where?
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
add a comment |
Hint: Think about row $16$ of Pascal's triangle. When does it increase (going to the right) and when does it decrease? What values are duplicated and where?
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
add a comment |
Hint: Think about row $16$ of Pascal's triangle. When does it increase (going to the right) and when does it decrease? What values are duplicated and where?
Hint: Think about row $16$ of Pascal's triangle. When does it increase (going to the right) and when does it decrease? What values are duplicated and where?
answered Dec 3 '18 at 4:29
Carl Schildkraut
11.2k11441
11.2k11441
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
add a comment |
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
Okay, I see the connection now, so r must be 7...?
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 4:45
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
@GoldPonyBoy Yes.
– Carl Schildkraut
Dec 3 '18 at 6:06
add a comment |
$C_r^{16}=C_{r+2}^{16}$
Then using the definition of combination you'll get
$$frac{16!}{r!(16-r)!}=frac{16!}{(r+2)!(16-r-2)!}$$
$$implies frac{1}{r!(16-r)(15-r).(14-r)!}=frac{1}{(r+2)(r+1).r!.(14-r)!}$$
$$implies (16-r)(15-r)=(r+2)(r+1)$$
$$implies 240-31r+r^2=r^2+3r+2$$
$$implies 34r=238$$
$$implies r=7$$
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
|
show 1 more comment
$C_r^{16}=C_{r+2}^{16}$
Then using the definition of combination you'll get
$$frac{16!}{r!(16-r)!}=frac{16!}{(r+2)!(16-r-2)!}$$
$$implies frac{1}{r!(16-r)(15-r).(14-r)!}=frac{1}{(r+2)(r+1).r!.(14-r)!}$$
$$implies (16-r)(15-r)=(r+2)(r+1)$$
$$implies 240-31r+r^2=r^2+3r+2$$
$$implies 34r=238$$
$$implies r=7$$
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
|
show 1 more comment
$C_r^{16}=C_{r+2}^{16}$
Then using the definition of combination you'll get
$$frac{16!}{r!(16-r)!}=frac{16!}{(r+2)!(16-r-2)!}$$
$$implies frac{1}{r!(16-r)(15-r).(14-r)!}=frac{1}{(r+2)(r+1).r!.(14-r)!}$$
$$implies (16-r)(15-r)=(r+2)(r+1)$$
$$implies 240-31r+r^2=r^2+3r+2$$
$$implies 34r=238$$
$$implies r=7$$
$C_r^{16}=C_{r+2}^{16}$
Then using the definition of combination you'll get
$$frac{16!}{r!(16-r)!}=frac{16!}{(r+2)!(16-r-2)!}$$
$$implies frac{1}{r!(16-r)(15-r).(14-r)!}=frac{1}{(r+2)(r+1).r!.(14-r)!}$$
$$implies (16-r)(15-r)=(r+2)(r+1)$$
$$implies 240-31r+r^2=r^2+3r+2$$
$$implies 34r=238$$
$$implies r=7$$
edited Dec 3 '18 at 6:50
answered Dec 3 '18 at 4:41
Fareed AF
44211
44211
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
|
show 1 more comment
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
Sorry, I must be stupid or something and my algebra is off, but i can't get from the last line to r = 7
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:06
2
2
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@GoldPonyBoy Just expand both sides, move everything to one side, and solve the quadratic equation.
– mathematics2x2life
Dec 3 '18 at 5:07
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
@mathematics2x2life Oh I AM just dumb, I wrote -r*-r = -r^2. This is what I started to do originally, but couldn't follow the logic at first. Thanks for the help, I really appreciate it.
– Gold Pony Boy
Dec 3 '18 at 5:12
1
1
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
@Gold Pony Boy we have that $(r+2)!=(r+2)(r+1).r!$ So you remove $r!$ both sides and you are left with $(r+1)(r+2)$ on the right side
– Fareed AF
Dec 3 '18 at 5:30
1
1
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
This approach is true but massive overkill. Better to note that the denominator $D(r) = r!(16−r)!$ is monotonic increasing for r < floor(n/2), achieves a maximum at n/2 = 8, and is symmetric about floor(n/2). From that we can directly conclude that if D(x) = D(y), then we must have y = n-x
– smci
Dec 3 '18 at 17:46
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3023625%2fif-c16-r-c16-r2-then-find-r-explain-how-you-know%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown