Is there a symbol for “less than, equal to, or greater than”? [duplicate]












3















This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to find a symbol for "less than, equal to, or greater than" similar to this:



enter image description here



I have not been able to find one. If anyone knows of such a command, please let me know.



Thank you










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
13 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 5




    In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
    – uzsolt
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:44








  • 5




    What's the use-case? :D
    – stendarr
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:22










  • Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
    – Peter Wilson
    Dec 3 '18 at 19:03










  • @PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
    – thymaro
    12 hours ago
















3















This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to find a symbol for "less than, equal to, or greater than" similar to this:



enter image description here



I have not been able to find one. If anyone knows of such a command, please let me know.



Thank you










share|improve this question













marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
13 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.











  • 5




    In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
    – uzsolt
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:44








  • 5




    What's the use-case? :D
    – stendarr
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:22










  • Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
    – Peter Wilson
    Dec 3 '18 at 19:03










  • @PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
    – thymaro
    12 hours ago














3












3








3








This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to find a symbol for "less than, equal to, or greater than" similar to this:



enter image description here



I have not been able to find one. If anyone knows of such a command, please let me know.



Thank you










share|improve this question














This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers




I am trying to find a symbol for "less than, equal to, or greater than" similar to this:



enter image description here



I have not been able to find one. If anyone knows of such a command, please let me know.



Thank you





This question already has an answer here:




  • How to look up a symbol or identify a math symbol or character?

    16 answers








math-mode






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Dec 2 '18 at 22:38









Adam Aberra

16114




16114




marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
13 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.






marked as duplicate by Werner math-mode
Users with the  math-mode badge can single-handedly close math-mode questions as duplicates and reopen them as needed.

StackExchange.ready(function() {
if (StackExchange.options.isMobile) return;

$('.dupe-hammer-message-hover:not(.hover-bound)').each(function() {
var $hover = $(this).addClass('hover-bound'),
$msg = $hover.siblings('.dupe-hammer-message');

$hover.hover(
function() {
$hover.showInfoMessage('', {
messageElement: $msg.clone().show(),
transient: false,
position: { my: 'bottom left', at: 'top center', offsetTop: -7 },
dismissable: false,
relativeToBody: true
});
},
function() {
StackExchange.helpers.removeMessages();
}
);
});
});
13 hours ago


This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.










  • 5




    In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
    – uzsolt
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:44








  • 5




    What's the use-case? :D
    – stendarr
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:22










  • Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
    – Peter Wilson
    Dec 3 '18 at 19:03










  • @PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
    – thymaro
    12 hours ago














  • 5




    In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
    – uzsolt
    Dec 3 '18 at 4:44








  • 5




    What's the use-case? :D
    – stendarr
    Dec 3 '18 at 7:22










  • Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
    – Peter Wilson
    Dec 3 '18 at 19:03










  • @PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
    – thymaro
    12 hours ago








5




5




In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
– uzsolt
Dec 3 '18 at 4:44






In similar cases you can use detexify.kirelabs.org/classify.html - draw your desired symbol and it tries to recognize it. Your case: usepackage{ amssymb } lesseqqgtr :)
– uzsolt
Dec 3 '18 at 4:44






5




5




What's the use-case? :D
– stendarr
Dec 3 '18 at 7:22




What's the use-case? :D
– stendarr
Dec 3 '18 at 7:22












Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
– Peter Wilson
Dec 3 '18 at 19:03




Makes no sense to me as it indicates that there is no relationship between the numerical values.
– Peter Wilson
Dec 3 '18 at 19:03












@PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
– thymaro
12 hours ago




@PeterWilson mathematical theoreticists will have their use-case for such a hell-born symbol. As a non-mathematician, I don't question their methods. As long as a math's doctor came up with the symbol, I imagine there is indeed a use for it.
– thymaro
12 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















10














Here are the possibilities with amssymb:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{amssymb}

begin{document}

[ Agtreqqless B, quad Alesseqqgtr B]%
[ Agtreqless Bquad Alesseqgtr B]%
[ Agtrless Bquad Alessgtr B]%

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer































    4














    Here are two possibilities using usepackage[T1]{fontenc} or usepackage{amssymb}:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
    usepackage{amssymb}

    begin{document}
    centering

    $theta_{nc}^D < theta^D$\
    $theta_{nc}^D > theta^D$\
    $theta_{nc}^D = theta^D$\
    $theta_{nc}^D leq theta^D$\
    $theta_{nc}^D geq theta^D$\

    $theta_{nc}^Dlesseqqgtr theta^D$

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer



















    • 1




      There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
      – Werner
      13 hours ago


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    10














    Here are the possibilities with amssymb:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{amssymb}

    begin{document}

    [ Agtreqqless B, quad Alesseqqgtr B]%
    [ Agtreqless Bquad Alesseqgtr B]%
    [ Agtrless Bquad Alessgtr B]%

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer




























      10














      Here are the possibilities with amssymb:



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{amssymb}

      begin{document}

      [ Agtreqqless B, quad Alesseqqgtr B]%
      [ Agtreqless Bquad Alesseqgtr B]%
      [ Agtrless Bquad Alessgtr B]%

      end{document}


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer


























        10












        10








        10






        Here are the possibilities with amssymb:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amssymb}

        begin{document}

        [ Agtreqqless B, quad Alesseqqgtr B]%
        [ Agtreqless Bquad Alesseqgtr B]%
        [ Agtrless Bquad Alessgtr B]%

        end{document}


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer














        Here are the possibilities with amssymb:



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{amssymb}

        begin{document}

        [ Agtreqqless B, quad Alesseqqgtr B]%
        [ Agtreqless Bquad Alesseqgtr B]%
        [ Agtrless Bquad Alessgtr B]%

        end{document}


        enter image description here







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Dec 3 '18 at 9:23

























        answered Dec 2 '18 at 22:49









        Bernard

        166k769194




        166k769194























            4














            Here are two possibilities using usepackage[T1]{fontenc} or usepackage{amssymb}:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
            usepackage{amssymb}

            begin{document}
            centering

            $theta_{nc}^D < theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D > theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D = theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D leq theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D geq theta^D$\

            $theta_{nc}^Dlesseqqgtr theta^D$

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
              – Werner
              13 hours ago
















            4














            Here are two possibilities using usepackage[T1]{fontenc} or usepackage{amssymb}:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
            usepackage{amssymb}

            begin{document}
            centering

            $theta_{nc}^D < theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D > theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D = theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D leq theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D geq theta^D$\

            $theta_{nc}^Dlesseqqgtr theta^D$

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer



















            • 1




              There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
              – Werner
              13 hours ago














            4












            4








            4






            Here are two possibilities using usepackage[T1]{fontenc} or usepackage{amssymb}:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
            usepackage{amssymb}

            begin{document}
            centering

            $theta_{nc}^D < theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D > theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D = theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D leq theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D geq theta^D$\

            $theta_{nc}^Dlesseqqgtr theta^D$

            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer














            Here are two possibilities using usepackage[T1]{fontenc} or usepackage{amssymb}:



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
            usepackage{amssymb}

            begin{document}
            centering

            $theta_{nc}^D < theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D > theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D = theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D leq theta^D$\
            $theta_{nc}^D geq theta^D$\

            $theta_{nc}^Dlesseqqgtr theta^D$

            end{document}


            enter image description here







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 13 hours ago









            samcarter

            85.7k794275




            85.7k794275










            answered Dec 2 '18 at 23:20









            Lily G

            612




            612








            • 1




              There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
              – Werner
              13 hours ago














            • 1




              There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
              – Werner
              13 hours ago








            1




            1




            There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
            – Werner
            13 hours ago




            There seems to be no real need for usepackage[T1]{fontenc}.
            – Werner
            13 hours ago



            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater