A special polynomial











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For $n geq 2$, let $phi =|t(t-1)...(t-n)|; forall; t in [0,n]$.



1/ Show that $phi$ peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$



2/ Evaluate $dfrac{phi'}{phi}$ in accordance with $displaystyle g(t)=sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{(t-k)}$



Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 17 at 15:06










  • For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
    – Clayton
    Nov 17 at 15:16










  • Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
    – Morpheus
    Nov 17 at 16:37










  • What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
    – egreg
    Nov 17 at 17:37










  • What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
    – Morpheus
    Nov 18 at 11:59















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












For $n geq 2$, let $phi =|t(t-1)...(t-n)|; forall; t in [0,n]$.



1/ Show that $phi$ peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$



2/ Evaluate $dfrac{phi'}{phi}$ in accordance with $displaystyle g(t)=sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{(t-k)}$



Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question
























  • Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 17 at 15:06










  • For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
    – Clayton
    Nov 17 at 15:16










  • Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
    – Morpheus
    Nov 17 at 16:37










  • What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
    – egreg
    Nov 17 at 17:37










  • What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
    – Morpheus
    Nov 18 at 11:59













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











For $n geq 2$, let $phi =|t(t-1)...(t-n)|; forall; t in [0,n]$.



1/ Show that $phi$ peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$



2/ Evaluate $dfrac{phi'}{phi}$ in accordance with $displaystyle g(t)=sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{(t-k)}$



Any help would be appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question















For $n geq 2$, let $phi =|t(t-1)...(t-n)|; forall; t in [0,n]$.



1/ Show that $phi$ peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$



2/ Evaluate $dfrac{phi'}{phi}$ in accordance with $displaystyle g(t)=sum_{k=0}^n frac{1}{(t-k)}$



Any help would be appreciated.







real-analysis proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 14:57









amWhy

191k27223438




191k27223438










asked Nov 17 at 14:45









Morpheus

336




336












  • Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 17 at 15:06










  • For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
    – Clayton
    Nov 17 at 15:16










  • Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
    – Morpheus
    Nov 17 at 16:37










  • What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
    – egreg
    Nov 17 at 17:37










  • What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
    – Morpheus
    Nov 18 at 11:59


















  • Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
    – Andy Walls
    Nov 17 at 15:06










  • For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
    – Clayton
    Nov 17 at 15:16










  • Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
    – Morpheus
    Nov 17 at 16:37










  • What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
    – egreg
    Nov 17 at 17:37










  • What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
    – Morpheus
    Nov 18 at 11:59
















Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
– Andy Walls
Nov 17 at 15:06




Rolle's theorem should help with part 1.
– Andy Walls
Nov 17 at 15:06












For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
– Clayton
Nov 17 at 15:16




For the second, note that $phi’/phi=frac{d}{dx}logphi(x)$.
– Clayton
Nov 17 at 15:16












Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
– Morpheus
Nov 17 at 16:37




Thanks for your hints, but i can't come up with a proof for these questions. Can you be more explicit please?
– Morpheus
Nov 17 at 16:37












What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
– egreg
Nov 17 at 17:37




What do you mean by “peaks”? That it has a local maximum?
– egreg
Nov 17 at 17:37












What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
– Morpheus
Nov 18 at 11:59




What i mean by peaks is that $phi$ has a maximum on [0,n], and that it is reached on a point of [0,1]
– Morpheus
Nov 18 at 11:59










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Well, assuming that I understand you correctly, the first part is the product:
$$phi_n(t)=left|prod_{k=0}^nt-kright|implies{left(phi(t)=0iff t-k=0;\thereforephi(t)=0iff t=kright)}$$
You can evaluate this product using the falling factorial, provided that you appropriately restrict the domain of $n$ to $ngeq2$:
$$phi_n(t)=left|(t)_{n+1}right| : ngeq2$$
By definition, this is the same as
$$phi_n(t)=left|frac{Gamma(t+1)}{Gamma(t-n)}right|; text{if }tinmathbb{Z}, text{then }phi_n(t)=left|frac{t!}{Gamma(t-n)}right|$$
Now, I'm not sure what you mean by "peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$," but if you mean that $phi_n(t)$ has a local maximum at $0leq tleq 1$ then you only need to show that $phi_n(0)=0$, $phi_n(1)=0$, and $exists tin(0,1):phi_n(t)neq0$.



From the original product, you know that $phi_n(k)=0$, where $kinleft{xinmathbb{Z}mid0leq xleq nright}$, so the first two statements are true (you can also show this using the limit of the gamma function in the denominator). For the final statement, consider that $Gamma(x)$ has no zeros (so the numerator is never zero), and is finite if $x$ is not a negative integer (so the denominator is finite if $x$ is not an integer). Thus if $tnotinmathbb{Z}$, then $phi_n(t)neq0$.



Hope this helps.



As for the second part to your question, I'm not sure how to interpret it. Is $frac{phiprime}{phi}$ meant to denote $frac{partialphi_n(t)}{partial t}frac{1}{phi_n(t)}$? And if so, what does $g(t)$ have to do with it?






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002439%2fa-special-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Well, assuming that I understand you correctly, the first part is the product:
    $$phi_n(t)=left|prod_{k=0}^nt-kright|implies{left(phi(t)=0iff t-k=0;\thereforephi(t)=0iff t=kright)}$$
    You can evaluate this product using the falling factorial, provided that you appropriately restrict the domain of $n$ to $ngeq2$:
    $$phi_n(t)=left|(t)_{n+1}right| : ngeq2$$
    By definition, this is the same as
    $$phi_n(t)=left|frac{Gamma(t+1)}{Gamma(t-n)}right|; text{if }tinmathbb{Z}, text{then }phi_n(t)=left|frac{t!}{Gamma(t-n)}right|$$
    Now, I'm not sure what you mean by "peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$," but if you mean that $phi_n(t)$ has a local maximum at $0leq tleq 1$ then you only need to show that $phi_n(0)=0$, $phi_n(1)=0$, and $exists tin(0,1):phi_n(t)neq0$.



    From the original product, you know that $phi_n(k)=0$, where $kinleft{xinmathbb{Z}mid0leq xleq nright}$, so the first two statements are true (you can also show this using the limit of the gamma function in the denominator). For the final statement, consider that $Gamma(x)$ has no zeros (so the numerator is never zero), and is finite if $x$ is not a negative integer (so the denominator is finite if $x$ is not an integer). Thus if $tnotinmathbb{Z}$, then $phi_n(t)neq0$.



    Hope this helps.



    As for the second part to your question, I'm not sure how to interpret it. Is $frac{phiprime}{phi}$ meant to denote $frac{partialphi_n(t)}{partial t}frac{1}{phi_n(t)}$? And if so, what does $g(t)$ have to do with it?






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Well, assuming that I understand you correctly, the first part is the product:
      $$phi_n(t)=left|prod_{k=0}^nt-kright|implies{left(phi(t)=0iff t-k=0;\thereforephi(t)=0iff t=kright)}$$
      You can evaluate this product using the falling factorial, provided that you appropriately restrict the domain of $n$ to $ngeq2$:
      $$phi_n(t)=left|(t)_{n+1}right| : ngeq2$$
      By definition, this is the same as
      $$phi_n(t)=left|frac{Gamma(t+1)}{Gamma(t-n)}right|; text{if }tinmathbb{Z}, text{then }phi_n(t)=left|frac{t!}{Gamma(t-n)}right|$$
      Now, I'm not sure what you mean by "peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$," but if you mean that $phi_n(t)$ has a local maximum at $0leq tleq 1$ then you only need to show that $phi_n(0)=0$, $phi_n(1)=0$, and $exists tin(0,1):phi_n(t)neq0$.



      From the original product, you know that $phi_n(k)=0$, where $kinleft{xinmathbb{Z}mid0leq xleq nright}$, so the first two statements are true (you can also show this using the limit of the gamma function in the denominator). For the final statement, consider that $Gamma(x)$ has no zeros (so the numerator is never zero), and is finite if $x$ is not a negative integer (so the denominator is finite if $x$ is not an integer). Thus if $tnotinmathbb{Z}$, then $phi_n(t)neq0$.



      Hope this helps.



      As for the second part to your question, I'm not sure how to interpret it. Is $frac{phiprime}{phi}$ meant to denote $frac{partialphi_n(t)}{partial t}frac{1}{phi_n(t)}$? And if so, what does $g(t)$ have to do with it?






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Well, assuming that I understand you correctly, the first part is the product:
        $$phi_n(t)=left|prod_{k=0}^nt-kright|implies{left(phi(t)=0iff t-k=0;\thereforephi(t)=0iff t=kright)}$$
        You can evaluate this product using the falling factorial, provided that you appropriately restrict the domain of $n$ to $ngeq2$:
        $$phi_n(t)=left|(t)_{n+1}right| : ngeq2$$
        By definition, this is the same as
        $$phi_n(t)=left|frac{Gamma(t+1)}{Gamma(t-n)}right|; text{if }tinmathbb{Z}, text{then }phi_n(t)=left|frac{t!}{Gamma(t-n)}right|$$
        Now, I'm not sure what you mean by "peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$," but if you mean that $phi_n(t)$ has a local maximum at $0leq tleq 1$ then you only need to show that $phi_n(0)=0$, $phi_n(1)=0$, and $exists tin(0,1):phi_n(t)neq0$.



        From the original product, you know that $phi_n(k)=0$, where $kinleft{xinmathbb{Z}mid0leq xleq nright}$, so the first two statements are true (you can also show this using the limit of the gamma function in the denominator). For the final statement, consider that $Gamma(x)$ has no zeros (so the numerator is never zero), and is finite if $x$ is not a negative integer (so the denominator is finite if $x$ is not an integer). Thus if $tnotinmathbb{Z}$, then $phi_n(t)neq0$.



        Hope this helps.



        As for the second part to your question, I'm not sure how to interpret it. Is $frac{phiprime}{phi}$ meant to denote $frac{partialphi_n(t)}{partial t}frac{1}{phi_n(t)}$? And if so, what does $g(t)$ have to do with it?






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Well, assuming that I understand you correctly, the first part is the product:
        $$phi_n(t)=left|prod_{k=0}^nt-kright|implies{left(phi(t)=0iff t-k=0;\thereforephi(t)=0iff t=kright)}$$
        You can evaluate this product using the falling factorial, provided that you appropriately restrict the domain of $n$ to $ngeq2$:
        $$phi_n(t)=left|(t)_{n+1}right| : ngeq2$$
        By definition, this is the same as
        $$phi_n(t)=left|frac{Gamma(t+1)}{Gamma(t-n)}right|; text{if }tinmathbb{Z}, text{then }phi_n(t)=left|frac{t!}{Gamma(t-n)}right|$$
        Now, I'm not sure what you mean by "peaks at a point belonging to $[0,1]$," but if you mean that $phi_n(t)$ has a local maximum at $0leq tleq 1$ then you only need to show that $phi_n(0)=0$, $phi_n(1)=0$, and $exists tin(0,1):phi_n(t)neq0$.



        From the original product, you know that $phi_n(k)=0$, where $kinleft{xinmathbb{Z}mid0leq xleq nright}$, so the first two statements are true (you can also show this using the limit of the gamma function in the denominator). For the final statement, consider that $Gamma(x)$ has no zeros (so the numerator is never zero), and is finite if $x$ is not a negative integer (so the denominator is finite if $x$ is not an integer). Thus if $tnotinmathbb{Z}$, then $phi_n(t)neq0$.



        Hope this helps.



        As for the second part to your question, I'm not sure how to interpret it. Is $frac{phiprime}{phi}$ meant to denote $frac{partialphi_n(t)}{partial t}frac{1}{phi_n(t)}$? And if so, what does $g(t)$ have to do with it?







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 17 at 17:56

























        answered Nov 17 at 17:25









        R. Burton

        1267




        1267






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002439%2fa-special-polynomial%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater