Artin-Schreier Extensions











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This question is out-dated, a follow-up question can be found here.



Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$, and denote by $L_c$ the splitting field of $f_c := X^p-x+c in K[X]$ for some $c in K$. It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is reducible over $K$ if and only if $c = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$. (The main idea is that $f_c(alpha) = 0$ implies $f(alpha+u)=0$ for every $u in mathbb{F_p} subseteq K$. Hence all irreducible factors of $f_c$ need to have the same degree.)



However, how can I prove that $L_c$ and $L_{c'}$ are $K$-isomorphic (for some $c,c' in K$) if and only if $c-c' = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$?



The if-part is clear. And if we let $alpha in L_c$ be a root of $f_c$ and $beta in L_{c'}$ be a root of $f_{c'}$, then the only-if-part boils down to proving that $alpha-beta in K$. However, I do not see how this could be done. I am grateful for any help!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 7:50










  • @user8268: You are right, I changed it!
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 7:52






  • 1




    if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 8:05












  • @user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:37










  • The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:53















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












This question is out-dated, a follow-up question can be found here.



Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$, and denote by $L_c$ the splitting field of $f_c := X^p-x+c in K[X]$ for some $c in K$. It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is reducible over $K$ if and only if $c = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$. (The main idea is that $f_c(alpha) = 0$ implies $f(alpha+u)=0$ for every $u in mathbb{F_p} subseteq K$. Hence all irreducible factors of $f_c$ need to have the same degree.)



However, how can I prove that $L_c$ and $L_{c'}$ are $K$-isomorphic (for some $c,c' in K$) if and only if $c-c' = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$?



The if-part is clear. And if we let $alpha in L_c$ be a root of $f_c$ and $beta in L_{c'}$ be a root of $f_{c'}$, then the only-if-part boils down to proving that $alpha-beta in K$. However, I do not see how this could be done. I am grateful for any help!










share|cite|improve this question
























  • at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 7:50










  • @user8268: You are right, I changed it!
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 7:52






  • 1




    if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 8:05












  • @user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:37










  • The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:53













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











This question is out-dated, a follow-up question can be found here.



Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$, and denote by $L_c$ the splitting field of $f_c := X^p-x+c in K[X]$ for some $c in K$. It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is reducible over $K$ if and only if $c = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$. (The main idea is that $f_c(alpha) = 0$ implies $f(alpha+u)=0$ for every $u in mathbb{F_p} subseteq K$. Hence all irreducible factors of $f_c$ need to have the same degree.)



However, how can I prove that $L_c$ and $L_{c'}$ are $K$-isomorphic (for some $c,c' in K$) if and only if $c-c' = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$?



The if-part is clear. And if we let $alpha in L_c$ be a root of $f_c$ and $beta in L_{c'}$ be a root of $f_{c'}$, then the only-if-part boils down to proving that $alpha-beta in K$. However, I do not see how this could be done. I am grateful for any help!










share|cite|improve this question















This question is out-dated, a follow-up question can be found here.



Let $K$ be a field of characteristic $p > 0$, and denote by $L_c$ the splitting field of $f_c := X^p-x+c in K[X]$ for some $c in K$. It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is reducible over $K$ if and only if $c = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$. (The main idea is that $f_c(alpha) = 0$ implies $f(alpha+u)=0$ for every $u in mathbb{F_p} subseteq K$. Hence all irreducible factors of $f_c$ need to have the same degree.)



However, how can I prove that $L_c$ and $L_{c'}$ are $K$-isomorphic (for some $c,c' in K$) if and only if $c-c' = b^p-b$ for some $b in K$?



The if-part is clear. And if we let $alpha in L_c$ be a root of $f_c$ and $beta in L_{c'}$ be a root of $f_{c'}$, then the only-if-part boils down to proving that $alpha-beta in K$. However, I do not see how this could be done. I am grateful for any help!







field-theory extension-field






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 9:54

























asked Nov 17 at 7:23









Algebrus

434211




434211












  • at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 7:50










  • @user8268: You are right, I changed it!
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 7:52






  • 1




    if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 8:05












  • @user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:37










  • The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:53


















  • at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 7:50










  • @user8268: You are right, I changed it!
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 7:52






  • 1




    if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
    – user8268
    Nov 17 at 8:05












  • @user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:37










  • The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
    – Algebrus
    Nov 17 at 9:53
















at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
– user8268
Nov 17 at 7:50




at the beginning: "It is not difficult to check that $f_c$ is irreducible ..." should be "reducible"
– user8268
Nov 17 at 7:50












@user8268: You are right, I changed it!
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 7:52




@user8268: You are right, I changed it!
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 7:52




1




1




if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
– user8268
Nov 17 at 8:05






if $pneq 2$ then $beta=2alpha$ is a root of $x^p-x-2c=f_{2c}$, and yet $alpha-betanotin K$ (and $2c-c=cneq b^p-b$ for any $b$ unless $f_c$ is reducible)
– user8268
Nov 17 at 8:05














@user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 9:37




@user8268: This is interesting. I will ask a new question about that.
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 9:37












The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 9:53




The new question can now be found here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/3002150/…
– Algebrus
Nov 17 at 9:53










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













For $K$ a finite field.



Let $phi(x) = x^p$ the Frobenius. Then $a^p-a = c$ means $phi^{n+1}(a) = phi^n(a) + phi^n(c)= a + sum_{l=0}^{n} phi^l(c)$.



Let $m = [mathbf{F}_p(c):mathbf{F}_p]$. Then $sum_{l=0}^{m-1} phi^l(c) = Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c)$.



Since $c in mathbf{F}_p(a)$, there are two choices :




  • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) = 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=m$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= m$ and $mathbf{F}_p(a)=mathbf{F}_p(c)$.


  • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) ne 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=mp$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= mp$. Only in that case $X^p-X + c$ is irreducible over $mathbf{F}_p(c)$.



From this comparing the degree of the extension we see when $mathbf{F}_p(a) simeqmathbf{F}_p(b)$ with $ a^p-a = c,b^p-b = d$.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002060%2fartin-schreier-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    For $K$ a finite field.



    Let $phi(x) = x^p$ the Frobenius. Then $a^p-a = c$ means $phi^{n+1}(a) = phi^n(a) + phi^n(c)= a + sum_{l=0}^{n} phi^l(c)$.



    Let $m = [mathbf{F}_p(c):mathbf{F}_p]$. Then $sum_{l=0}^{m-1} phi^l(c) = Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c)$.



    Since $c in mathbf{F}_p(a)$, there are two choices :




    • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) = 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=m$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= m$ and $mathbf{F}_p(a)=mathbf{F}_p(c)$.


    • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) ne 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=mp$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= mp$. Only in that case $X^p-X + c$ is irreducible over $mathbf{F}_p(c)$.



    From this comparing the degree of the extension we see when $mathbf{F}_p(a) simeqmathbf{F}_p(b)$ with $ a^p-a = c,b^p-b = d$.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      For $K$ a finite field.



      Let $phi(x) = x^p$ the Frobenius. Then $a^p-a = c$ means $phi^{n+1}(a) = phi^n(a) + phi^n(c)= a + sum_{l=0}^{n} phi^l(c)$.



      Let $m = [mathbf{F}_p(c):mathbf{F}_p]$. Then $sum_{l=0}^{m-1} phi^l(c) = Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c)$.



      Since $c in mathbf{F}_p(a)$, there are two choices :




      • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) = 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=m$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= m$ and $mathbf{F}_p(a)=mathbf{F}_p(c)$.


      • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) ne 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=mp$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= mp$. Only in that case $X^p-X + c$ is irreducible over $mathbf{F}_p(c)$.



      From this comparing the degree of the extension we see when $mathbf{F}_p(a) simeqmathbf{F}_p(b)$ with $ a^p-a = c,b^p-b = d$.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        For $K$ a finite field.



        Let $phi(x) = x^p$ the Frobenius. Then $a^p-a = c$ means $phi^{n+1}(a) = phi^n(a) + phi^n(c)= a + sum_{l=0}^{n} phi^l(c)$.



        Let $m = [mathbf{F}_p(c):mathbf{F}_p]$. Then $sum_{l=0}^{m-1} phi^l(c) = Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c)$.



        Since $c in mathbf{F}_p(a)$, there are two choices :




        • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) = 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=m$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= m$ and $mathbf{F}_p(a)=mathbf{F}_p(c)$.


        • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) ne 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=mp$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= mp$. Only in that case $X^p-X + c$ is irreducible over $mathbf{F}_p(c)$.



        From this comparing the degree of the extension we see when $mathbf{F}_p(a) simeqmathbf{F}_p(b)$ with $ a^p-a = c,b^p-b = d$.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        For $K$ a finite field.



        Let $phi(x) = x^p$ the Frobenius. Then $a^p-a = c$ means $phi^{n+1}(a) = phi^n(a) + phi^n(c)= a + sum_{l=0}^{n} phi^l(c)$.



        Let $m = [mathbf{F}_p(c):mathbf{F}_p]$. Then $sum_{l=0}^{m-1} phi^l(c) = Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c)$.



        Since $c in mathbf{F}_p(a)$, there are two choices :




        • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) = 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=m$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= m$ and $mathbf{F}_p(a)=mathbf{F}_p(c)$.


        • Or $Tr_{mathbf{F}_p(c)/mathbf{F}_p}(c) ne 0$ and the least integer with $phi^l(a) = a$ is $l=mp$ and $[mathbf{F}_p(a):mathbf{F}_p]= mp$. Only in that case $X^p-X + c$ is irreducible over $mathbf{F}_p(c)$.



        From this comparing the degree of the extension we see when $mathbf{F}_p(a) simeqmathbf{F}_p(b)$ with $ a^p-a = c,b^p-b = d$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 17 at 8:17

























        answered Nov 17 at 8:04









        reuns

        19.2k21046




        19.2k21046






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002060%2fartin-schreier-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

            Ивакино (Тотемский район)

            Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)