Constructing a local non-Noetherian domain with spectrum ${(0), mathfrak{m} }$.
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A DVR necessarily has spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }$, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }?$
Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.
I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.
My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A DVR necessarily has spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }$, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }?$
Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.
I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.
My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
A DVR necessarily has spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }$, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }?$
Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.
I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.
My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra
A DVR necessarily has spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }$, but a DVR is also necessarily noetherian. Can we find an example of a non-noetherian (thus non DVR) ring, say $R$, with the spectrum ${ 0, mathfrak{m} }?$
Clearly we need $R$ a domain since the zero ideal is in the spec. We also have $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ since then $R$ would be a field, thus noetherian but even if it didn’t follow that $mathfrak{m} neq 0$ I would require this so it’s interesting. Also, krull dimension is obviously 1 since we have one chain of prime ideals of height 1.
I have tried the standard non-noetherian things like starting with a polynomial ring in countably many variables and quotienting and localizing, but so far no luck. I always accidentally land on a field instead of a 2 point spectrum. I also haven’t been able to come up with a way to see this from an algebro-geometric side of things.
My commutative algebra skills are moderate, I went about halfway through Atiyah Macdonald. I’m sure someone with stronger comm alg intuition will see an easy construction?
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra
algebraic-geometry ring-theory commutative-algebra
edited Nov 18 at 22:27
user26857
39.2k123882
39.2k123882
asked Nov 15 at 0:21
Prince M
1,7231520
1,7231520
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^{mathbb{R}_{ge 0}}]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_{r in S} c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ and $S subseteq mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.
For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^{nu(g)}$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. This means $I$ is determined by the valuations of its nonzero elements, and the set of all such valuations is an upward-closed subset of $mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ (upward-closed means if $x in S$ and $y ge x$ then $y in S$). There are two infinite families $[r, infty)$ and $(r, infty)$ of such subsets, so the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely
$$I_r = { f in R : nu(f) ge r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
and
$$J_r = { f in R : nu(f) > r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
(together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_{infty}$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian. Note that $I_r = (x^r)$ is principal but $J_r$ is not even countably generated.
The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^{mathbb{R}_{ge 0}}]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_{r in S} c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ and $S subseteq mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.
For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^{nu(g)}$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. This means $I$ is determined by the valuations of its nonzero elements, and the set of all such valuations is an upward-closed subset of $mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ (upward-closed means if $x in S$ and $y ge x$ then $y in S$). There are two infinite families $[r, infty)$ and $(r, infty)$ of such subsets, so the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely
$$I_r = { f in R : nu(f) ge r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
and
$$J_r = { f in R : nu(f) > r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
(together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_{infty}$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian. Note that $I_r = (x^r)$ is principal but $J_r$ is not even countably generated.
The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^{mathbb{R}_{ge 0}}]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_{r in S} c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ and $S subseteq mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.
For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^{nu(g)}$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. This means $I$ is determined by the valuations of its nonzero elements, and the set of all such valuations is an upward-closed subset of $mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ (upward-closed means if $x in S$ and $y ge x$ then $y in S$). There are two infinite families $[r, infty)$ and $(r, infty)$ of such subsets, so the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely
$$I_r = { f in R : nu(f) ge r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
and
$$J_r = { f in R : nu(f) > r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
(together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_{infty}$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian. Note that $I_r = (x^r)$ is principal but $J_r$ is not even countably generated.
The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^{mathbb{R}_{ge 0}}]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_{r in S} c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ and $S subseteq mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.
For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^{nu(g)}$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. This means $I$ is determined by the valuations of its nonzero elements, and the set of all such valuations is an upward-closed subset of $mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ (upward-closed means if $x in S$ and $y ge x$ then $y in S$). There are two infinite families $[r, infty)$ and $(r, infty)$ of such subsets, so the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely
$$I_r = { f in R : nu(f) ge r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
and
$$J_r = { f in R : nu(f) > r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
(together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_{infty}$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian. Note that $I_r = (x^r)$ is principal but $J_r$ is not even countably generated.
The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.
To expand on Bernard's answer, let $k$ be a field and consider the ring $R = k[[x^{mathbb{R}_{ge 0}}]]$ of formal power series of the form $sum_{r in S} c_r x^r$ where $r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ and $S subseteq mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ is well-ordered (this guarantees that multiplication is well-defined). This is a valuation ring.
For $f in R$ a nonzero power series, write $nu(f) in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ for the smallest exponent of a nonzero term in $f$. If $I$ is any nonzero ideal of $R$, then if some nonzero $f in I$ has valuation $nu(f)$, then multiplying by every element of $R$, and observing that nonzero every $g in R$ can be written as $x^{nu(g)}$ times a unit, we see that $I$ contains every element of $R$ with valuation $ge nu(f)$. This means $I$ is determined by the valuations of its nonzero elements, and the set of all such valuations is an upward-closed subset of $mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$ (upward-closed means if $x in S$ and $y ge x$ then $y in S$). There are two infinite families $[r, infty)$ and $(r, infty)$ of such subsets, so the ideals of $R$ come in two infinite families, namely
$$I_r = { f in R : nu(f) ge r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
and
$$J_r = { f in R : nu(f) > r }, r in mathbb{R}_{ge 0}$$
(together with the zero ideal, which you can think of as $I_{infty}$). These ideals are totally ordered and in particular show that $R$ is very far from Noetherian. Note that $I_r = (x^r)$ is principal but $J_r$ is not even countably generated.
The corresponding quotients $R/I_r$ and $R/J_r$ contain nontrivial nilpotents, and hence $I_r$ and $J_r$ are not prime, except for $J_0$, which is the unique maximal ideal, and $I_0$, which is the unit ideal. So $R$ has exactly two prime ideals, $(0)$ and $J_0$, as desired.
edited Nov 18 at 3:36
answered Nov 15 at 1:11
Qiaochu Yuan
275k32578914
275k32578914
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
add a comment |
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
Great answer, explicit and detailed!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 19:43
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
up vote
3
down vote
A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.
A non-discrete valuation ring of height $1$ is such an example.
answered Nov 15 at 0:48
Bernard
116k637108
116k637108
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
add a comment |
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
1
1
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
Ok give me an example verifying the existence of a non discrete valuation ring of height 1
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 1:34
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
@Prince: I construct exactly such a thing in my answer.
– Qiaochu Yuan
Nov 15 at 1:57
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
I see that! I upvoted yours and will probably accept it. I tried to comment on it and say thank you, but it said my comment was too short.
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:16
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
Too be honest I always avoid rings of formal power series because I never learned them so they feel uncomfortable.. I should probably get over that!
– Prince M
Nov 15 at 2:17
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999012%2fconstructing-a-local-non-noetherian-domain-with-spectrum-0-mathfrakm%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown