Is Gibbs sampling an MCMC method?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
As far as I understand it, it is (at least, that is how Wikipedia defines it). But I've found this statement by Efron* (emphasis added):
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the great success story of modern-day Bayesian statistics. MCMC, and its sister method “Gibbs sampling,” permit the numerical calculation of posterior distributions in situations far too complicated for analytic expression.
and now I'm confused. Is this just a minor difference in terminology, or is Gibbs sampling something other than MCMC?
[*]: Efron 2011, "The Bootstrap and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo"
mcmc gibbs
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
As far as I understand it, it is (at least, that is how Wikipedia defines it). But I've found this statement by Efron* (emphasis added):
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the great success story of modern-day Bayesian statistics. MCMC, and its sister method “Gibbs sampling,” permit the numerical calculation of posterior distributions in situations far too complicated for analytic expression.
and now I'm confused. Is this just a minor difference in terminology, or is Gibbs sampling something other than MCMC?
[*]: Efron 2011, "The Bootstrap and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo"
mcmc gibbs
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
up vote
8
down vote
favorite
As far as I understand it, it is (at least, that is how Wikipedia defines it). But I've found this statement by Efron* (emphasis added):
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the great success story of modern-day Bayesian statistics. MCMC, and its sister method “Gibbs sampling,” permit the numerical calculation of posterior distributions in situations far too complicated for analytic expression.
and now I'm confused. Is this just a minor difference in terminology, or is Gibbs sampling something other than MCMC?
[*]: Efron 2011, "The Bootstrap and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo"
mcmc gibbs
As far as I understand it, it is (at least, that is how Wikipedia defines it). But I've found this statement by Efron* (emphasis added):
Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is the great success story of modern-day Bayesian statistics. MCMC, and its sister method “Gibbs sampling,” permit the numerical calculation of posterior distributions in situations far too complicated for analytic expression.
and now I'm confused. Is this just a minor difference in terminology, or is Gibbs sampling something other than MCMC?
[*]: Efron 2011, "The Bootstrap and Markov-Chain Monte Carlo"
mcmc gibbs
mcmc gibbs
asked Nov 29 at 21:52
Gabriel
1,0501234
1,0501234
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
The algorithm that is now called Gibbs sampling forms a Markov-chain and uses Monte-Carlo simulation for its inputs, so it does indeed fall within the proper scope of MCMC (Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo) methods. Historically, the method can be traced back at least to the mid-twentieth century, but it was not well-known and was only later popularised by the seminal paper of Geman and Geman (1984) which examined statistical physics in relation to the use of the Gibbs distribution (for some historical references, see Casella and George 1992, p. 167).
For some reason, thoughout his paper, Efron refers to the Gibbs sampler as if it were outside the scope of MCMC. He does this in the quote you have given, and also in some other parts of the paper. Since his opening reference to the technique refers to the "Gibbs sampler" (given in quotes) it is possible that he is alluding to the historical fact that the original method was developed through the Gibbs distribution in statistical physics, and was not incorporated into the general statistical theory of MCMC until much later. This is my best guess as to why he refers to it this way.
Update: Since Prof Efron is still alive I took the liberty of writing to him to ask why he describes the Gibbs sampler in this way. Here is his response (reproduced with his permission):
It was for mainly historical reasons... On the other hand, the Gibbs algorithm looks quite different from the MCMC recipe, and it takes some work to show that it is in some sense the same.
(Efron 2018, personal correspondence, ellipsis in original)
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Go with Wikipedia. Better yet, go with these MCMC researchers:
Tierney (1994), "Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions";
Geyer (2011), "Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo";
Robert and Casella (2011), "A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo".
The Gibbs sampler is an example of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Indeed, it is a special case of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Any algorithm that generates random draws from a distribution $pi(theta)$ by simulating a Markov chain that has $pi(theta)$ as its stationary distribution is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and that's exactly what the Gibbs sampler does.
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
The algorithm that is now called Gibbs sampling forms a Markov-chain and uses Monte-Carlo simulation for its inputs, so it does indeed fall within the proper scope of MCMC (Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo) methods. Historically, the method can be traced back at least to the mid-twentieth century, but it was not well-known and was only later popularised by the seminal paper of Geman and Geman (1984) which examined statistical physics in relation to the use of the Gibbs distribution (for some historical references, see Casella and George 1992, p. 167).
For some reason, thoughout his paper, Efron refers to the Gibbs sampler as if it were outside the scope of MCMC. He does this in the quote you have given, and also in some other parts of the paper. Since his opening reference to the technique refers to the "Gibbs sampler" (given in quotes) it is possible that he is alluding to the historical fact that the original method was developed through the Gibbs distribution in statistical physics, and was not incorporated into the general statistical theory of MCMC until much later. This is my best guess as to why he refers to it this way.
Update: Since Prof Efron is still alive I took the liberty of writing to him to ask why he describes the Gibbs sampler in this way. Here is his response (reproduced with his permission):
It was for mainly historical reasons... On the other hand, the Gibbs algorithm looks quite different from the MCMC recipe, and it takes some work to show that it is in some sense the same.
(Efron 2018, personal correspondence, ellipsis in original)
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
The algorithm that is now called Gibbs sampling forms a Markov-chain and uses Monte-Carlo simulation for its inputs, so it does indeed fall within the proper scope of MCMC (Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo) methods. Historically, the method can be traced back at least to the mid-twentieth century, but it was not well-known and was only later popularised by the seminal paper of Geman and Geman (1984) which examined statistical physics in relation to the use of the Gibbs distribution (for some historical references, see Casella and George 1992, p. 167).
For some reason, thoughout his paper, Efron refers to the Gibbs sampler as if it were outside the scope of MCMC. He does this in the quote you have given, and also in some other parts of the paper. Since his opening reference to the technique refers to the "Gibbs sampler" (given in quotes) it is possible that he is alluding to the historical fact that the original method was developed through the Gibbs distribution in statistical physics, and was not incorporated into the general statistical theory of MCMC until much later. This is my best guess as to why he refers to it this way.
Update: Since Prof Efron is still alive I took the liberty of writing to him to ask why he describes the Gibbs sampler in this way. Here is his response (reproduced with his permission):
It was for mainly historical reasons... On the other hand, the Gibbs algorithm looks quite different from the MCMC recipe, and it takes some work to show that it is in some sense the same.
(Efron 2018, personal correspondence, ellipsis in original)
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
add a comment |
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
up vote
10
down vote
accepted
The algorithm that is now called Gibbs sampling forms a Markov-chain and uses Monte-Carlo simulation for its inputs, so it does indeed fall within the proper scope of MCMC (Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo) methods. Historically, the method can be traced back at least to the mid-twentieth century, but it was not well-known and was only later popularised by the seminal paper of Geman and Geman (1984) which examined statistical physics in relation to the use of the Gibbs distribution (for some historical references, see Casella and George 1992, p. 167).
For some reason, thoughout his paper, Efron refers to the Gibbs sampler as if it were outside the scope of MCMC. He does this in the quote you have given, and also in some other parts of the paper. Since his opening reference to the technique refers to the "Gibbs sampler" (given in quotes) it is possible that he is alluding to the historical fact that the original method was developed through the Gibbs distribution in statistical physics, and was not incorporated into the general statistical theory of MCMC until much later. This is my best guess as to why he refers to it this way.
Update: Since Prof Efron is still alive I took the liberty of writing to him to ask why he describes the Gibbs sampler in this way. Here is his response (reproduced with his permission):
It was for mainly historical reasons... On the other hand, the Gibbs algorithm looks quite different from the MCMC recipe, and it takes some work to show that it is in some sense the same.
(Efron 2018, personal correspondence, ellipsis in original)
The algorithm that is now called Gibbs sampling forms a Markov-chain and uses Monte-Carlo simulation for its inputs, so it does indeed fall within the proper scope of MCMC (Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo) methods. Historically, the method can be traced back at least to the mid-twentieth century, but it was not well-known and was only later popularised by the seminal paper of Geman and Geman (1984) which examined statistical physics in relation to the use of the Gibbs distribution (for some historical references, see Casella and George 1992, p. 167).
For some reason, thoughout his paper, Efron refers to the Gibbs sampler as if it were outside the scope of MCMC. He does this in the quote you have given, and also in some other parts of the paper. Since his opening reference to the technique refers to the "Gibbs sampler" (given in quotes) it is possible that he is alluding to the historical fact that the original method was developed through the Gibbs distribution in statistical physics, and was not incorporated into the general statistical theory of MCMC until much later. This is my best guess as to why he refers to it this way.
Update: Since Prof Efron is still alive I took the liberty of writing to him to ask why he describes the Gibbs sampler in this way. Here is his response (reproduced with his permission):
It was for mainly historical reasons... On the other hand, the Gibbs algorithm looks quite different from the MCMC recipe, and it takes some work to show that it is in some sense the same.
(Efron 2018, personal correspondence, ellipsis in original)
edited 19 hours ago
answered Nov 30 at 2:14
Ben
19.8k22296
19.8k22296
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
add a comment |
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
1
1
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
Thank you! I'll wait to see if you get an answer from Dr Efron, if not I'll still select this as the answer.
– Gabriel
Nov 30 at 3:09
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Go with Wikipedia. Better yet, go with these MCMC researchers:
Tierney (1994), "Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions";
Geyer (2011), "Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo";
Robert and Casella (2011), "A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo".
The Gibbs sampler is an example of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Indeed, it is a special case of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Any algorithm that generates random draws from a distribution $pi(theta)$ by simulating a Markov chain that has $pi(theta)$ as its stationary distribution is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and that's exactly what the Gibbs sampler does.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Go with Wikipedia. Better yet, go with these MCMC researchers:
Tierney (1994), "Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions";
Geyer (2011), "Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo";
Robert and Casella (2011), "A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo".
The Gibbs sampler is an example of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Indeed, it is a special case of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Any algorithm that generates random draws from a distribution $pi(theta)$ by simulating a Markov chain that has $pi(theta)$ as its stationary distribution is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and that's exactly what the Gibbs sampler does.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Go with Wikipedia. Better yet, go with these MCMC researchers:
Tierney (1994), "Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions";
Geyer (2011), "Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo";
Robert and Casella (2011), "A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo".
The Gibbs sampler is an example of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Indeed, it is a special case of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Any algorithm that generates random draws from a distribution $pi(theta)$ by simulating a Markov chain that has $pi(theta)$ as its stationary distribution is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and that's exactly what the Gibbs sampler does.
Go with Wikipedia. Better yet, go with these MCMC researchers:
Tierney (1994), "Markov Chains for Exploring Posterior Distributions";
Geyer (2011), "Introduction to Markov Chain Monte Carlo";
Robert and Casella (2011), "A Short History of Markov Chain Monte Carlo".
The Gibbs sampler is an example of a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm. Indeed, it is a special case of the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Any algorithm that generates random draws from a distribution $pi(theta)$ by simulating a Markov chain that has $pi(theta)$ as its stationary distribution is a Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm, and that's exactly what the Gibbs sampler does.
edited Nov 30 at 13:13
answered Nov 30 at 2:01
bamts
633310
633310
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Cross Validated!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstats.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f379508%2fis-gibbs-sampling-an-mcmc-method%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown