Order of triggered abilities - will the abilities on the stack resolve after the player who owns the ability...











up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Let's say in a three-player game, Alice and Bob are playing Poison-Tip Archer. It's a 2/3 creature with:




Whenever another creature dies, each opponent loses 1 life.




Carol has 10 1/1 Saproling tokens in play.



All of them are 10 life, and someone plays Tremor:




Tremor deals 1 damage to each creature without flying.




So all 10 Saprolings would die, triggering both Poison-Tip Archer's abilities 10 times - enough for everyone on the table to die (20 lives lost for Carol, 10 for each Alice and Bob).



Will this be a tie? Is there an order in which the triggers are resolved that may make someone win? Does the result depend somehow on who is the active player?



Edit: Will it make a difference if the Poison-Tip Archer's would also die by the same effect (ie, play Wildfire - doing 4 damage to each creature instead of Tremor's 1)?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
    – Malco
    Nov 30 at 18:20















up vote
6
down vote

favorite












Let's say in a three-player game, Alice and Bob are playing Poison-Tip Archer. It's a 2/3 creature with:




Whenever another creature dies, each opponent loses 1 life.




Carol has 10 1/1 Saproling tokens in play.



All of them are 10 life, and someone plays Tremor:




Tremor deals 1 damage to each creature without flying.




So all 10 Saprolings would die, triggering both Poison-Tip Archer's abilities 10 times - enough for everyone on the table to die (20 lives lost for Carol, 10 for each Alice and Bob).



Will this be a tie? Is there an order in which the triggers are resolved that may make someone win? Does the result depend somehow on who is the active player?



Edit: Will it make a difference if the Poison-Tip Archer's would also die by the same effect (ie, play Wildfire - doing 4 damage to each creature instead of Tremor's 1)?










share|improve this question




















  • 2




    Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
    – Malco
    Nov 30 at 18:20













up vote
6
down vote

favorite









up vote
6
down vote

favorite











Let's say in a three-player game, Alice and Bob are playing Poison-Tip Archer. It's a 2/3 creature with:




Whenever another creature dies, each opponent loses 1 life.




Carol has 10 1/1 Saproling tokens in play.



All of them are 10 life, and someone plays Tremor:




Tremor deals 1 damage to each creature without flying.




So all 10 Saprolings would die, triggering both Poison-Tip Archer's abilities 10 times - enough for everyone on the table to die (20 lives lost for Carol, 10 for each Alice and Bob).



Will this be a tie? Is there an order in which the triggers are resolved that may make someone win? Does the result depend somehow on who is the active player?



Edit: Will it make a difference if the Poison-Tip Archer's would also die by the same effect (ie, play Wildfire - doing 4 damage to each creature instead of Tremor's 1)?










share|improve this question















Let's say in a three-player game, Alice and Bob are playing Poison-Tip Archer. It's a 2/3 creature with:




Whenever another creature dies, each opponent loses 1 life.




Carol has 10 1/1 Saproling tokens in play.



All of them are 10 life, and someone plays Tremor:




Tremor deals 1 damage to each creature without flying.




So all 10 Saprolings would die, triggering both Poison-Tip Archer's abilities 10 times - enough for everyone on the table to die (20 lives lost for Carol, 10 for each Alice and Bob).



Will this be a tie? Is there an order in which the triggers are resolved that may make someone win? Does the result depend somehow on who is the active player?



Edit: Will it make a difference if the Poison-Tip Archer's would also die by the same effect (ie, play Wildfire - doing 4 damage to each creature instead of Tremor's 1)?







magic-the-gathering






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 30 at 18:57









corsiKa

8,13122752




8,13122752










asked Nov 30 at 16:05









mgarciaisaia

2446




2446








  • 2




    Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
    – Malco
    Nov 30 at 18:20














  • 2




    Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
    – Malco
    Nov 30 at 18:20








2




2




Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
– Malco
Nov 30 at 18:20




Related for those looking for more info about losing in multiplayer games: In MTG, what happens when a player loses in multiplayer?
– Malco
Nov 30 at 18:20










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The Comprehensive Rules say:




405.3. If an effect puts two or more objects on the stack at the same time, those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). If a player controls more than one of these objects, that player chooses their relative order on the stack.



101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.



800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.




Without loss of generality, suppose the turn order is Alice->Bob->Carol->...




  1. If it's Alice's turn, her triggers are put on the stack first, then Bob's. Bob's triggers will resolve first, making Alice and Carol lose the game simultaneously. By rule 800.4a, Alice's triggers will leave the stack, leaving Bob alive and kicking at 10 life (this is important if there's someone else still in the game).


  2. If it's Bob's turn, the reverse happens: Alice's triggers will resolve first, killing Bob and Carol and leaving Alice alive.


  3. If it's Carol's (or somebody else's turn), Alice is before Bob in turn order and situation 1. applies.







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:28






  • 3




    @mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 16:37












  • Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:41










  • @Arthur beat me to it
    – DenisS
    Nov 30 at 16:41






  • 1




    @Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 20:53













Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "147"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44251%2forder-of-triggered-abilities-will-the-abilities-on-the-stack-resolve-after-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes








up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The Comprehensive Rules say:




405.3. If an effect puts two or more objects on the stack at the same time, those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). If a player controls more than one of these objects, that player chooses their relative order on the stack.



101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.



800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.




Without loss of generality, suppose the turn order is Alice->Bob->Carol->...




  1. If it's Alice's turn, her triggers are put on the stack first, then Bob's. Bob's triggers will resolve first, making Alice and Carol lose the game simultaneously. By rule 800.4a, Alice's triggers will leave the stack, leaving Bob alive and kicking at 10 life (this is important if there's someone else still in the game).


  2. If it's Bob's turn, the reverse happens: Alice's triggers will resolve first, killing Bob and Carol and leaving Alice alive.


  3. If it's Carol's (or somebody else's turn), Alice is before Bob in turn order and situation 1. applies.







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:28






  • 3




    @mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 16:37












  • Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:41










  • @Arthur beat me to it
    – DenisS
    Nov 30 at 16:41






  • 1




    @Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 20:53

















up vote
10
down vote



accepted










The Comprehensive Rules say:




405.3. If an effect puts two or more objects on the stack at the same time, those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). If a player controls more than one of these objects, that player chooses their relative order on the stack.



101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.



800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.




Without loss of generality, suppose the turn order is Alice->Bob->Carol->...




  1. If it's Alice's turn, her triggers are put on the stack first, then Bob's. Bob's triggers will resolve first, making Alice and Carol lose the game simultaneously. By rule 800.4a, Alice's triggers will leave the stack, leaving Bob alive and kicking at 10 life (this is important if there's someone else still in the game).


  2. If it's Bob's turn, the reverse happens: Alice's triggers will resolve first, killing Bob and Carol and leaving Alice alive.


  3. If it's Carol's (or somebody else's turn), Alice is before Bob in turn order and situation 1. applies.







share|improve this answer























  • Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:28






  • 3




    @mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 16:37












  • Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:41










  • @Arthur beat me to it
    – DenisS
    Nov 30 at 16:41






  • 1




    @Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 20:53















up vote
10
down vote



accepted







up vote
10
down vote



accepted






The Comprehensive Rules say:




405.3. If an effect puts two or more objects on the stack at the same time, those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). If a player controls more than one of these objects, that player chooses their relative order on the stack.



101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.



800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.




Without loss of generality, suppose the turn order is Alice->Bob->Carol->...




  1. If it's Alice's turn, her triggers are put on the stack first, then Bob's. Bob's triggers will resolve first, making Alice and Carol lose the game simultaneously. By rule 800.4a, Alice's triggers will leave the stack, leaving Bob alive and kicking at 10 life (this is important if there's someone else still in the game).


  2. If it's Bob's turn, the reverse happens: Alice's triggers will resolve first, killing Bob and Carol and leaving Alice alive.


  3. If it's Carol's (or somebody else's turn), Alice is before Bob in turn order and situation 1. applies.







share|improve this answer














The Comprehensive Rules say:




405.3. If an effect puts two or more objects on the stack at the same time, those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order (see rule 101.4). If a player controls more than one of these objects, that player chooses their relative order on the stack.



101.4. If multiple players would make choices and/or take actions at the same time, the active player (the player whose turn it is) makes any choices required, then the next player in turn order (usually the player seated to the active player’s left) makes any choices required, followed by the remaining nonactive players in turn order. Then the actions happen simultaneously. This rule is often referred to as the “Active Player, Nonactive Player (APNAP) order” rule.



800.4a When a player leaves the game, all objects (see rule 109) owned by that player leave the game and any effects which give that player control of any objects or players end. Then, if that player controlled any objects on the stack not represented by cards, those objects cease to exist. Then, if there are any objects still controlled by that player, those objects are exiled. This is not a state-based action. It happens as soon as the player leaves the game. If the player who left the game had priority at the time they left, priority passes to the next player in turn order who’s still in the game.




Without loss of generality, suppose the turn order is Alice->Bob->Carol->...




  1. If it's Alice's turn, her triggers are put on the stack first, then Bob's. Bob's triggers will resolve first, making Alice and Carol lose the game simultaneously. By rule 800.4a, Alice's triggers will leave the stack, leaving Bob alive and kicking at 10 life (this is important if there's someone else still in the game).


  2. If it's Bob's turn, the reverse happens: Alice's triggers will resolve first, killing Bob and Carol and leaving Alice alive.


  3. If it's Carol's (or somebody else's turn), Alice is before Bob in turn order and situation 1. applies.








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Nov 30 at 17:57









Zags

4,72821453




4,72821453










answered Nov 30 at 16:16









Glorfindel

1,5071623




1,5071623












  • Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:28






  • 3




    @mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 16:37












  • Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:41










  • @Arthur beat me to it
    – DenisS
    Nov 30 at 16:41






  • 1




    @Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 20:53




















  • Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:28






  • 3




    @mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 16:37












  • Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
    – mgarciaisaia
    Nov 30 at 16:41










  • @Arthur beat me to it
    – DenisS
    Nov 30 at 16:41






  • 1




    @Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
    – Arthur
    Nov 30 at 20:53


















Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
– mgarciaisaia
Nov 30 at 16:28




Thanks for the clarification. Just to be sure - it doesn't make any change if both Poison-Tip Archers would die because of the same effect, right? (just edited the question to add this one, sorry).
– mgarciaisaia
Nov 30 at 16:28




3




3




@mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
– Arthur
Nov 30 at 16:37






@mgarciaisaia No, that wouldn't matter. The triggers still happen: the archers see all other creatures who die at the same time as them, and triggers and triggered abilities, once they have happened, live independently of their source.
– Arthur
Nov 30 at 16:37














Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
– mgarciaisaia
Nov 30 at 16:41




Yeah. I was thinking about that, but wanted to be sure 👍
– mgarciaisaia
Nov 30 at 16:41












@Arthur beat me to it
– DenisS
Nov 30 at 16:41




@Arthur beat me to it
– DenisS
Nov 30 at 16:41




1




1




@Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
– Arthur
Nov 30 at 20:53






@Winterbone It isn't relevant. 101.4 is just quoted to help explain "APNAP order". The rule 405.3 itself says "those controlled by the active player are put on lowest, followed by each other player’s objects in APNAP order".
– Arthur
Nov 30 at 20:53




















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Board & Card Games Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fboardgames.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f44251%2forder-of-triggered-abilities-will-the-abilities-on-the-stack-resolve-after-the%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

Ивакино (Тотемский район)

Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)