TikZ: Understanding the usage of calc library











up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












For the following MWE, I need to place block (yaw) {C} midway between (1) the middle point between (output) and (integrator) (2) and (sum2).



So, how can I correct this syntax node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C}; to make it work?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}




Additionally, is it possible to create a new node using node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {}; without creating auxiliary nodes/coordinates?










share|improve this question
























  • Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 10:26










  • @Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 10:33










  • Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 13:27












  • Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:27















up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1












For the following MWE, I need to place block (yaw) {C} midway between (1) the middle point between (output) and (integrator) (2) and (sum2).



So, how can I correct this syntax node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C}; to make it work?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}




Additionally, is it possible to create a new node using node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {}; without creating auxiliary nodes/coordinates?










share|improve this question
























  • Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 10:26










  • @Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 10:33










  • Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 13:27












  • Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:27













up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
7
down vote

favorite
1






1





For the following MWE, I need to place block (yaw) {C} midway between (1) the middle point between (output) and (integrator) (2) and (sum2).



So, how can I correct this syntax node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C}; to make it work?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}




Additionally, is it possible to create a new node using node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {}; without creating auxiliary nodes/coordinates?










share|improve this question















For the following MWE, I need to place block (yaw) {C} midway between (1) the middle point between (output) and (integrator) (2) and (sum2).



So, how can I correct this syntax node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C}; to make it work?



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)+0.5*{(output)-(integrator)}!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}




Additionally, is it possible to create a new node using node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {}; without creating auxiliary nodes/coordinates?







tikz-pgf tikz-calc






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 15 at 11:11

























asked Nov 15 at 10:21









Diaa

2,51011644




2,51011644












  • Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 10:26










  • @Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 10:33










  • Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 13:27












  • Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:27


















  • Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 10:26










  • @Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 10:33










  • Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
    – Vinzza
    Nov 15 at 13:27












  • Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:27
















Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
– Vinzza
Nov 15 at 10:26




Hey! Did ($.25*(output)+.25*(integrator)+.5*(sum2)$) work for you?
– Vinzza
Nov 15 at 10:26












@Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
– Diaa
Nov 15 at 10:33




@Vinzza It does. But, why does my approach not work?
– Diaa
Nov 15 at 10:33












Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
– Vinzza
Nov 15 at 13:27






Comments do not allow enough characters, so I have replied with an answer! I hope it will help you! :)
– Vinzza
Nov 15 at 13:27














Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
– marmot
Nov 15 at 14:27




Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). Try ($(0,-2cm)+(integrator)+0.5*($(output)-(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) to have something that does not throw an error. However, from your description in words I think you want node [block] (yaw) at ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};, yet this can be done without calc: node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};.
– marmot
Nov 15 at 14:27










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
5
down vote



accepted










I don't know how complex expression can be understood by calc but instead of trying to understand how to write such expression, I think it's easier to use an auxiliar coordinate and solve the problem:



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
coordinate (aux) at ($(integrator.east)!.5!(output)$);
node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(aux)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
draw (aux) |- (yaw);
draw (yaw)-|(sum2);
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:13






  • 1




    @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:24












  • @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:25










  • Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:31


















up vote
6
down vote













Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). You can definitely do that without auxiliary coordinates and actually even without calc.



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at
($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
coordinate[midway] (aux);
draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
end{tikzpicture}

bigskip

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
node [block] (yaw) at
([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};
%
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
coordinate[midway] (aux);
draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


enter image description here






share|improve this answer





















  • I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:45






  • 1




    @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:47










  • XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:58










  • @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 15:03










  • I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:28


















up vote
5
down vote













Here, to simplify the code, I'll replace (integrator) with (A), (output) with (B) and (sum2) with (C).
There is two things not right with
($ (A) + 0.5*{ (B)-(A) }!0.5!(C) $).




  • First, I don't think you can use {}, with the calc package, for the coordinate part. For me, it only works for with scalar. So ($ {2+2}*(A) $) will compute, but not ($ 2*{(A)+(B)} $) (or am I wrong?)


  • The second thing is that this formula doesn't seem to correspond to the point you want.
    I kind of get that you want to start from (A), "move" to the middle of [AB] and continue like that, but you mix relative (B-A) and absolute positioning (C).
    One right formula would have been ($ { (A) + 0.5*{(B)-(A)} }!0.5!(C) $).
    But because tikz can't do the computation, you'll have to give the expanded formula: ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C)$).



One other way to do it is ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $). Here, we take the middle of (A) and (B), and then the middle of the result and (C).



I hope this will answer your interrogations!



You can test the three solutions here (the last one with temporary coordinate):



documentclass[tikz,margin=10pt]{standalone}
usetikzlibrary{calc}

begin{document}

begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1]

draw[black!10] (0,0) grid (4,4);
node (A) at (1,1) {A};
node (B) at (3,1) {B};
node (C) at (2,3) {C};

%% 1
draw[red] ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $) circle (.05);
%% 2
draw[orange] ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C) $) circle (.1);
%% 3
coordinate (foo) at ($ (A) !.5! (B) $);
draw[yellow] ($ (foo) !.5! (C) $) circle (.15);

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


which gives



results






share|improve this answer





















  • Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:29


















up vote
5
down vote













The calc library allows you to apply Parway Modifiers repeatedly. Thus, the following syntax



($(integrator)!.5!!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$) 


does the following:




  • pgf calculates the middle of (integrator) and (output)

  • then calculates the middle of this last calculated point and the next one (sum2)


We can continue like this as many times as we want.



Here is for example page 144 of the manual 3.0.1a modified by adding two more points.



exemple



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
usetikzlibrary{calc}

begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw,circle,inner sep=1pt}]
draw [help lines] (0,0) grid (3,2);
%first node
draw[densely dotted] (0,0) -- (3,2);
node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) {1};
%second node
draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) -- (3,0);
node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$){2};

%third node
draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$)--(3,2);
nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$) {3};

%fourth node
draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$)--(0,2);
nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)!.5!(0,2)$) {4};
end{tikzpicture}

end{document}


Unfortunately, this does not simplify the writing of the code. The use of an auxiliary point as @Ignasi did is therefore more elegant.



Updated just for fun: A complete solution with the calc library



And without using yshift=-2cm and without intermediate point (It's really complicated and unreadable!)



draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);


But which places the point in the same place with the syntax indicated in the manual 3.0.1a p143, i quote:




The general meaning of <a>!<factor>!<angle>:<b> is “First, consider
the line from <a> to <b>. Then rotate this line by <angle> around the
point <a>.




documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);
draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Old answer:



Nevertheless, here is a solution that includes a series of Parway Modifiers.



soluce



documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

begin{document}

tikzset{
block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
tmp/.style = {coordinate},
sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
input/.style = {coordinate},
output/.style= {coordinate},
pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
}
}

begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
node [sum] (sum2) {};
node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
draw (sum2)|-([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);

draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

end{tikzpicture}
end{document}


Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    one way how to reduce your code:




    • use tikz librarychains placement nodes in chain and draw lines between them by macro join

    • node "c" in feedback simple pace below of node vdynamics

    • put coordinates in image directly and not via nodes

    • coordinates can contain labels, exploit this for label $Psi$


    • define nodes distance only ones and than use it all all nodes positioning



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz,nccmath,amssymb}
      usetikzlibrary{arrows,
      calc, chains,
      positioning,
      shapes}

      begin{document}

      tikzset{
      block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum size=3em,
      on chain, join=by ->},
      sum/.style = {draw, fill=white, circle},
      }
      makeatletter
      tikzset{suspend join/.code={deftikz@after@path{}}} % <--- for dicountinue of jon macro
      makeatother

      begin{tikzpicture}[
      node distance = 0.5cm and 1cm,
      start chain = going right,
      > = latex']
      coordinate (in);
      node [sum,right=of in, on chain] (sum2) {};
      node [block] (ractuator) {$mfrac{2}{s+2}$};
      node [block] (vdynamics) {$mfrac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
      node [block] (integrator) {$mfrac{1}{s}$};
      coordinate[right=of integrator] (out) {};
      node [block, suspend join,
      below = of vdynamics] (yaw) {C};
      %
      draw[->] (in) -- (sum2);
      draw[->] (integrator) -- coordinate[label=$Psi(s)$] (psi) (out);
      draw[->] (psi) |- (yaw);
      draw[->] (yaw) -| (sum2);
      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}



    enter image description here



    off-topic: for fraction is used mfrac (medium sized fraction) defined in the nccmath package






    share|improve this answer























    • Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 16:48











    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460089%2ftikz-understanding-the-usage-of-calc-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes








    5 Answers
    5






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    I don't know how complex expression can be understood by calc but instead of trying to understand how to write such expression, I think it's easier to use an auxiliar coordinate and solve the problem:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    coordinate (aux) at ($(integrator.east)!.5!(output)$);
    node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(aux)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    draw (aux) |- (yaw);
    draw (yaw)-|(sum2);
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:13






    • 1




      @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:24












    • @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:25










    • Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:31















    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted










    I don't know how complex expression can be understood by calc but instead of trying to understand how to write such expression, I think it's easier to use an auxiliar coordinate and solve the problem:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    coordinate (aux) at ($(integrator.east)!.5!(output)$);
    node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(aux)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    draw (aux) |- (yaw);
    draw (yaw)-|(sum2);
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:13






    • 1




      @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:24












    • @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:25










    • Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:31













    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    5
    down vote



    accepted






    I don't know how complex expression can be understood by calc but instead of trying to understand how to write such expression, I think it's easier to use an auxiliar coordinate and solve the problem:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    coordinate (aux) at ($(integrator.east)!.5!(output)$);
    node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(aux)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    draw (aux) |- (yaw);
    draw (yaw)-|(sum2);
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer












    I don't know how complex expression can be understood by calc but instead of trying to understand how to write such expression, I think it's easier to use an auxiliar coordinate and solve the problem:



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    coordinate (aux) at ($(integrator.east)!.5!(output)$);
    node [block] (yaw) at ([yshift=-2cm]$(aux)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    draw (aux) |- (yaw);
    draw (yaw)-|(sum2);
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 11:01









    Ignasi

    89.9k4162302




    89.9k4162302












    • Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:13






    • 1




      @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:24












    • @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:25










    • Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:31


















    • Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:13






    • 1




      @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:24












    • @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
      – Ignasi
      Nov 15 at 11:25










    • Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 11:31
















    Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:13




    Many thanks. For my question edit, can I make a new node using this syntax node [tmp, below = 2cm of ($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$) ] (tmp1) {};?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:13




    1




    1




    @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:24






    @Diaa Something like node [block, yshift=-2cm] (yaw) at ($(aux)!.5!(sum2)$) {C}; works for me. Instead of yshift you could also use below=2cm but with a different result. The calc expression in positioning option didn't work for me.
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:24














    @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:25




    @Diaa In any case I don't see the problem in using auxiliary coordinates/nodes. What's wrong with them?
    – Ignasi
    Nov 15 at 11:25












    Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:31




    Nothing wrong; I just want to teach myself how to reduce my code :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 11:31










    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). You can definitely do that without auxiliary coordinates and actually even without calc.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    bigskip

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:45






    • 1




      @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 14:47










    • XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:58










    • @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 15:03










    • I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:28















    up vote
    6
    down vote













    Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). You can definitely do that without auxiliary coordinates and actually even without calc.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    bigskip

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer





















    • I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:45






    • 1




      @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 14:47










    • XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:58










    • @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 15:03










    • I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:28













    up vote
    6
    down vote










    up vote
    6
    down vote









    Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). You can definitely do that without auxiliary coordinates and actually even without calc.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    bigskip

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here






    share|improve this answer












    Your approach does not work because you try to use { and } where you should use ($ and $). You can definitely do that without auxiliary coordinates and actually even without calc.



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ($(0,-2cm)+($(output)!0.5!(integrator)$)!0.5!(sum2)$) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    bigskip

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    node [block] (yaw) at
    ([yshift=-2cm]barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2) {C};
    %
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output)
    coordinate[midway] (aux);
    draw (aux) |- (yaw) -| (sum2);
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    enter image description here







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 14:34









    marmot

    76.2k486160




    76.2k486160












    • I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:45






    • 1




      @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 14:47










    • XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:58










    • @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 15:03










    • I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:28


















    • I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:45






    • 1




      @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 14:47










    • XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 14:58










    • @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
      – marmot
      Nov 15 at 15:03










    • I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:28
















    I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:45




    I am sorry, but could you tell me where I can find more explanation on this line ([yshift=-2cm] barycentric cs:output=1,integrator=1,sum2=2)?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:45




    1




    1




    @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:47




    @Diaa Section 13.2.2 Barycentric Systems of the pgfmanual. Come on, it only has 1161 pages. (Just kidding! ;-)
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 14:47












    XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:58




    XD. If you don't mind, I have off-topic question: when saying node distance = 2 cm, it measures this distance between the nodes centers. Is it possible to make this distance imply the spacing between (left node.east) and (right node.west) instead?
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 14:58












    @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 15:03




    @Diaa I am not sure I agree with your statement. You are already loading positioning, in which case the distances are measured between the node boundaries (modulo a very tiny bit of fine print). Try e.g. node [block, right=of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$}; in your settings. Then you will see that the distance between the node boundaries, and not centers, is 2cm, which is the value of node distance in your code.
    – marmot
    Nov 15 at 15:03












    I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:28




    I tried drawing a new node node [block, above of = yaw, draw=none, node distance=1mm] {Yaw Rate\Sensor}; and the result is two overlapping nodes as seen here.
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:28










    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Here, to simplify the code, I'll replace (integrator) with (A), (output) with (B) and (sum2) with (C).
    There is two things not right with
    ($ (A) + 0.5*{ (B)-(A) }!0.5!(C) $).




    • First, I don't think you can use {}, with the calc package, for the coordinate part. For me, it only works for with scalar. So ($ {2+2}*(A) $) will compute, but not ($ 2*{(A)+(B)} $) (or am I wrong?)


    • The second thing is that this formula doesn't seem to correspond to the point you want.
      I kind of get that you want to start from (A), "move" to the middle of [AB] and continue like that, but you mix relative (B-A) and absolute positioning (C).
      One right formula would have been ($ { (A) + 0.5*{(B)-(A)} }!0.5!(C) $).
      But because tikz can't do the computation, you'll have to give the expanded formula: ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C)$).



    One other way to do it is ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $). Here, we take the middle of (A) and (B), and then the middle of the result and (C).



    I hope this will answer your interrogations!



    You can test the three solutions here (the last one with temporary coordinate):



    documentclass[tikz,margin=10pt]{standalone}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}

    begin{document}

    begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1]

    draw[black!10] (0,0) grid (4,4);
    node (A) at (1,1) {A};
    node (B) at (3,1) {B};
    node (C) at (2,3) {C};

    %% 1
    draw[red] ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $) circle (.05);
    %% 2
    draw[orange] ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C) $) circle (.1);
    %% 3
    coordinate (foo) at ($ (A) !.5! (B) $);
    draw[yellow] ($ (foo) !.5! (C) $) circle (.15);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    which gives



    results






    share|improve this answer





















    • Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:29















    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Here, to simplify the code, I'll replace (integrator) with (A), (output) with (B) and (sum2) with (C).
    There is two things not right with
    ($ (A) + 0.5*{ (B)-(A) }!0.5!(C) $).




    • First, I don't think you can use {}, with the calc package, for the coordinate part. For me, it only works for with scalar. So ($ {2+2}*(A) $) will compute, but not ($ 2*{(A)+(B)} $) (or am I wrong?)


    • The second thing is that this formula doesn't seem to correspond to the point you want.
      I kind of get that you want to start from (A), "move" to the middle of [AB] and continue like that, but you mix relative (B-A) and absolute positioning (C).
      One right formula would have been ($ { (A) + 0.5*{(B)-(A)} }!0.5!(C) $).
      But because tikz can't do the computation, you'll have to give the expanded formula: ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C)$).



    One other way to do it is ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $). Here, we take the middle of (A) and (B), and then the middle of the result and (C).



    I hope this will answer your interrogations!



    You can test the three solutions here (the last one with temporary coordinate):



    documentclass[tikz,margin=10pt]{standalone}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}

    begin{document}

    begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1]

    draw[black!10] (0,0) grid (4,4);
    node (A) at (1,1) {A};
    node (B) at (3,1) {B};
    node (C) at (2,3) {C};

    %% 1
    draw[red] ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $) circle (.05);
    %% 2
    draw[orange] ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C) $) circle (.1);
    %% 3
    coordinate (foo) at ($ (A) !.5! (B) $);
    draw[yellow] ($ (foo) !.5! (C) $) circle (.15);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    which gives



    results






    share|improve this answer





















    • Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:29













    up vote
    5
    down vote










    up vote
    5
    down vote









    Here, to simplify the code, I'll replace (integrator) with (A), (output) with (B) and (sum2) with (C).
    There is two things not right with
    ($ (A) + 0.5*{ (B)-(A) }!0.5!(C) $).




    • First, I don't think you can use {}, with the calc package, for the coordinate part. For me, it only works for with scalar. So ($ {2+2}*(A) $) will compute, but not ($ 2*{(A)+(B)} $) (or am I wrong?)


    • The second thing is that this formula doesn't seem to correspond to the point you want.
      I kind of get that you want to start from (A), "move" to the middle of [AB] and continue like that, but you mix relative (B-A) and absolute positioning (C).
      One right formula would have been ($ { (A) + 0.5*{(B)-(A)} }!0.5!(C) $).
      But because tikz can't do the computation, you'll have to give the expanded formula: ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C)$).



    One other way to do it is ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $). Here, we take the middle of (A) and (B), and then the middle of the result and (C).



    I hope this will answer your interrogations!



    You can test the three solutions here (the last one with temporary coordinate):



    documentclass[tikz,margin=10pt]{standalone}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}

    begin{document}

    begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1]

    draw[black!10] (0,0) grid (4,4);
    node (A) at (1,1) {A};
    node (B) at (3,1) {B};
    node (C) at (2,3) {C};

    %% 1
    draw[red] ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $) circle (.05);
    %% 2
    draw[orange] ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C) $) circle (.1);
    %% 3
    coordinate (foo) at ($ (A) !.5! (B) $);
    draw[yellow] ($ (foo) !.5! (C) $) circle (.15);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    which gives



    results






    share|improve this answer












    Here, to simplify the code, I'll replace (integrator) with (A), (output) with (B) and (sum2) with (C).
    There is two things not right with
    ($ (A) + 0.5*{ (B)-(A) }!0.5!(C) $).




    • First, I don't think you can use {}, with the calc package, for the coordinate part. For me, it only works for with scalar. So ($ {2+2}*(A) $) will compute, but not ($ 2*{(A)+(B)} $) (or am I wrong?)


    • The second thing is that this formula doesn't seem to correspond to the point you want.
      I kind of get that you want to start from (A), "move" to the middle of [AB] and continue like that, but you mix relative (B-A) and absolute positioning (C).
      One right formula would have been ($ { (A) + 0.5*{(B)-(A)} }!0.5!(C) $).
      But because tikz can't do the computation, you'll have to give the expanded formula: ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C)$).



    One other way to do it is ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $). Here, we take the middle of (A) and (B), and then the middle of the result and (C).



    I hope this will answer your interrogations!



    You can test the three solutions here (the last one with temporary coordinate):



    documentclass[tikz,margin=10pt]{standalone}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}

    begin{document}

    begin{tikzpicture}[line width=1]

    draw[black!10] (0,0) grid (4,4);
    node (A) at (1,1) {A};
    node (B) at (3,1) {B};
    node (C) at (2,3) {C};

    %% 1
    draw[red] ($ (A) !.5! (B) !.5! (C) $) circle (.05);
    %% 2
    draw[orange] ($ .25*(A) + .25*(B) + .5*(C) $) circle (.1);
    %% 3
    coordinate (foo) at ($ (A) !.5! (B) $);
    draw[yellow] ($ (foo) !.5! (C) $) circle (.15);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    which gives



    results







    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Nov 15 at 13:12









    Vinzza

    1808




    1808












    • Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:29


















    • Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
      – Diaa
      Nov 15 at 15:29
















    Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:29




    Thanks for the answer, but I didn't interrogate :)
    – Diaa
    Nov 15 at 15:29










    up vote
    5
    down vote













    The calc library allows you to apply Parway Modifiers repeatedly. Thus, the following syntax



    ($(integrator)!.5!!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$) 


    does the following:




    • pgf calculates the middle of (integrator) and (output)

    • then calculates the middle of this last calculated point and the next one (sum2)


    We can continue like this as many times as we want.



    Here is for example page 144 of the manual 3.0.1a modified by adding two more points.



    exemple



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz}
    usetikzlibrary{calc}

    begin{document}
    begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw,circle,inner sep=1pt}]
    draw [help lines] (0,0) grid (3,2);
    %first node
    draw[densely dotted] (0,0) -- (3,2);
    node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) {1};
    %second node
    draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) -- (3,0);
    node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$){2};

    %third node
    draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$)--(3,2);
    nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$) {3};

    %fourth node
    draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$)--(0,2);
    nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)!.5!(0,2)$) {4};
    end{tikzpicture}

    end{document}


    Unfortunately, this does not simplify the writing of the code. The use of an auxiliary point as @Ignasi did is therefore more elegant.



    Updated just for fun: A complete solution with the calc library



    And without using yshift=-2cm and without intermediate point (It's really complicated and unreadable!)



    draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);


    But which places the point in the same place with the syntax indicated in the manual 3.0.1a p143, i quote:




    The general meaning of <a>!<factor>!<angle>:<b> is “First, consider
    the line from <a> to <b>. Then rotate this line by <angle> around the
    point <a>.




    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);
    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    Old answer:



    Nevertheless, here is a solution that includes a series of Parway Modifiers.



    soluce



    documentclass{article}
    usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
    usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

    begin{document}

    tikzset{
    block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
    tmp/.style = {coordinate},
    sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
    input/.style = {coordinate},
    output/.style= {coordinate},
    pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
    }
    }

    begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
    node [sum] (sum2) {};
    node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
    node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
    node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
    draw (sum2)|-([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);

    draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
    draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
    draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

    end{tikzpicture}
    end{document}


    Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      5
      down vote













      The calc library allows you to apply Parway Modifiers repeatedly. Thus, the following syntax



      ($(integrator)!.5!!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$) 


      does the following:




      • pgf calculates the middle of (integrator) and (output)

      • then calculates the middle of this last calculated point and the next one (sum2)


      We can continue like this as many times as we want.



      Here is for example page 144 of the manual 3.0.1a modified by adding two more points.



      exemple



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz}
      usetikzlibrary{calc}

      begin{document}
      begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw,circle,inner sep=1pt}]
      draw [help lines] (0,0) grid (3,2);
      %first node
      draw[densely dotted] (0,0) -- (3,2);
      node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) {1};
      %second node
      draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) -- (3,0);
      node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$){2};

      %third node
      draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$)--(3,2);
      nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$) {3};

      %fourth node
      draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$)--(0,2);
      nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)!.5!(0,2)$) {4};
      end{tikzpicture}

      end{document}


      Unfortunately, this does not simplify the writing of the code. The use of an auxiliary point as @Ignasi did is therefore more elegant.



      Updated just for fun: A complete solution with the calc library



      And without using yshift=-2cm and without intermediate point (It's really complicated and unreadable!)



      draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);


      But which places the point in the same place with the syntax indicated in the manual 3.0.1a p143, i quote:




      The general meaning of <a>!<factor>!<angle>:<b> is “First, consider
      the line from <a> to <b>. Then rotate this line by <angle> around the
      point <a>.




      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
      usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

      begin{document}

      tikzset{
      block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
      tmp/.style = {coordinate},
      sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
      input/.style = {coordinate},
      output/.style= {coordinate},
      pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
      }
      }

      begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
      node [sum] (sum2) {};
      node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
      node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
      node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
      node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
      draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);
      draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
      draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
      draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      Old answer:



      Nevertheless, here is a solution that includes a series of Parway Modifiers.



      soluce



      documentclass{article}
      usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
      usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

      begin{document}

      tikzset{
      block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
      tmp/.style = {coordinate},
      sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
      input/.style = {coordinate},
      output/.style= {coordinate},
      pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
      }
      }

      begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
      node [sum] (sum2) {};
      node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
      node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
      node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
      node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
      draw (sum2)|-([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);

      draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
      draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
      draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

      end{tikzpicture}
      end{document}


      Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        5
        down vote










        up vote
        5
        down vote









        The calc library allows you to apply Parway Modifiers repeatedly. Thus, the following syntax



        ($(integrator)!.5!!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$) 


        does the following:




        • pgf calculates the middle of (integrator) and (output)

        • then calculates the middle of this last calculated point and the next one (sum2)


        We can continue like this as many times as we want.



        Here is for example page 144 of the manual 3.0.1a modified by adding two more points.



        exemple



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{calc}

        begin{document}
        begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw,circle,inner sep=1pt}]
        draw [help lines] (0,0) grid (3,2);
        %first node
        draw[densely dotted] (0,0) -- (3,2);
        node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) {1};
        %second node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) -- (3,0);
        node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$){2};

        %third node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$)--(3,2);
        nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$) {3};

        %fourth node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$)--(0,2);
        nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)!.5!(0,2)$) {4};
        end{tikzpicture}

        end{document}


        Unfortunately, this does not simplify the writing of the code. The use of an auxiliary point as @Ignasi did is therefore more elegant.



        Updated just for fun: A complete solution with the calc library



        And without using yshift=-2cm and without intermediate point (It's really complicated and unreadable!)



        draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);


        But which places the point in the same place with the syntax indicated in the manual 3.0.1a p143, i quote:




        The general meaning of <a>!<factor>!<angle>:<b> is “First, consider
        the line from <a> to <b>. Then rotate this line by <angle> around the
        point <a>.




        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
        usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

        begin{document}

        tikzset{
        block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
        tmp/.style = {coordinate},
        sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
        input/.style = {coordinate},
        output/.style= {coordinate},
        pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
        }
        }

        begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
        node [sum] (sum2) {};
        node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
        node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
        draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);
        draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
        draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
        draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        Old answer:



        Nevertheless, here is a solution that includes a series of Parway Modifiers.



        soluce



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
        usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

        begin{document}

        tikzset{
        block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
        tmp/.style = {coordinate},
        sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
        input/.style = {coordinate},
        output/.style= {coordinate},
        pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
        }
        }

        begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
        node [sum] (sum2) {};
        node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
        node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
        draw (sum2)|-([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);

        draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
        draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
        draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator






        share|improve this answer














        The calc library allows you to apply Parway Modifiers repeatedly. Thus, the following syntax



        ($(integrator)!.5!!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$) 


        does the following:




        • pgf calculates the middle of (integrator) and (output)

        • then calculates the middle of this last calculated point and the next one (sum2)


        We can continue like this as many times as we want.



        Here is for example page 144 of the manual 3.0.1a modified by adding two more points.



        exemple



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz}
        usetikzlibrary{calc}

        begin{document}
        begin{tikzpicture}[every node/.style={draw,circle,inner sep=1pt}]
        draw [help lines] (0,0) grid (3,2);
        %first node
        draw[densely dotted] (0,0) -- (3,2);
        node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) {1};
        %second node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)$) -- (3,0);
        node at ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$){2};

        %third node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)$)--(3,2);
        nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$) {3};

        %fourth node
        draw[densely dotted] ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)$)--(0,2);
        nodeat ($(0,0)!.3!(3,2)!.7!(3,0)!.6!(3,2)!.5!(0,2)$) {4};
        end{tikzpicture}

        end{document}


        Unfortunately, this does not simplify the writing of the code. The use of an auxiliary point as @Ignasi did is therefore more elegant.



        Updated just for fun: A complete solution with the calc library



        And without using yshift=-2cm and without intermediate point (It's really complicated and unreadable!)



        draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);


        But which places the point in the same place with the syntax indicated in the manual 3.0.1a p143, i quote:




        The general meaning of <a>!<factor>!<angle>:<b> is “First, consider
        the line from <a> to <b>. Then rotate this line by <angle> around the
        point <a>.




        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
        usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

        begin{document}

        tikzset{
        block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
        tmp/.style = {coordinate},
        sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
        input/.style = {coordinate},
        output/.style= {coordinate},
        pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
        }
        }

        begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
        node [sum] (sum2) {};
        node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
        node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
        draw (sum2)|-($(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)!2cm!90:(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);
        draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
        draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
        draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        Old answer:



        Nevertheless, here is a solution that includes a series of Parway Modifiers.



        soluce



        documentclass{article}
        usepackage{tikz,mathtools,amssymb}
        usetikzlibrary{shapes,arrows,positioning,calc}

        begin{document}

        tikzset{
        block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum height=3em, minimum width=3em},
        tmp/.style = {coordinate},
        sum/.style= {draw, fill=white, circle, node distance=1cm},
        input/.style = {coordinate},
        output/.style= {coordinate},
        pinstyle/.style = {pin edge={to-,thin,black}
        }
        }

        begin{tikzpicture}[auto, node distance=2cm,>=latex',align=center]
        node [sum] (sum2) {};
        node [block, right = 1cm of sum2](ractuator){$frac{2}{s+2}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of ractuator,] (vdynamics) {$frac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
        node [block, right = 1cm of vdynamics,] (integrator) {$frac{1}{s}$};
        node [output, right = 1.5cm of integrator] (output) {};
        draw (sum2)|-([yshift=-2cm]$(integrator)!.5!(output)!0.5!(sum2)$)node[block]{C}-|($(integrator)!.5!(output)$);

        draw [->] (ractuator) -- (vdynamics);
        draw [->] (vdynamics) -- (integrator);
        draw [->] (integrator) -- node[name=heading]{$Psi(s)$} (output);

        end{tikzpicture}
        end{document}


        Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 15 at 22:19

























        answered Nov 15 at 15:08









        AndréC

        5,7921937




        5,7921937






















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            one way how to reduce your code:




            • use tikz librarychains placement nodes in chain and draw lines between them by macro join

            • node "c" in feedback simple pace below of node vdynamics

            • put coordinates in image directly and not via nodes

            • coordinates can contain labels, exploit this for label $Psi$


            • define nodes distance only ones and than use it all all nodes positioning



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{tikz,nccmath,amssymb}
              usetikzlibrary{arrows,
              calc, chains,
              positioning,
              shapes}

              begin{document}

              tikzset{
              block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum size=3em,
              on chain, join=by ->},
              sum/.style = {draw, fill=white, circle},
              }
              makeatletter
              tikzset{suspend join/.code={deftikz@after@path{}}} % <--- for dicountinue of jon macro
              makeatother

              begin{tikzpicture}[
              node distance = 0.5cm and 1cm,
              start chain = going right,
              > = latex']
              coordinate (in);
              node [sum,right=of in, on chain] (sum2) {};
              node [block] (ractuator) {$mfrac{2}{s+2}$};
              node [block] (vdynamics) {$mfrac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
              node [block] (integrator) {$mfrac{1}{s}$};
              coordinate[right=of integrator] (out) {};
              node [block, suspend join,
              below = of vdynamics] (yaw) {C};
              %
              draw[->] (in) -- (sum2);
              draw[->] (integrator) -- coordinate[label=$Psi(s)$] (psi) (out);
              draw[->] (psi) |- (yaw);
              draw[->] (yaw) -| (sum2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}



            enter image description here



            off-topic: for fraction is used mfrac (medium sized fraction) defined in the nccmath package






            share|improve this answer























            • Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
              – Diaa
              Nov 15 at 16:48















            up vote
            3
            down vote













            one way how to reduce your code:




            • use tikz librarychains placement nodes in chain and draw lines between them by macro join

            • node "c" in feedback simple pace below of node vdynamics

            • put coordinates in image directly and not via nodes

            • coordinates can contain labels, exploit this for label $Psi$


            • define nodes distance only ones and than use it all all nodes positioning



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{tikz,nccmath,amssymb}
              usetikzlibrary{arrows,
              calc, chains,
              positioning,
              shapes}

              begin{document}

              tikzset{
              block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum size=3em,
              on chain, join=by ->},
              sum/.style = {draw, fill=white, circle},
              }
              makeatletter
              tikzset{suspend join/.code={deftikz@after@path{}}} % <--- for dicountinue of jon macro
              makeatother

              begin{tikzpicture}[
              node distance = 0.5cm and 1cm,
              start chain = going right,
              > = latex']
              coordinate (in);
              node [sum,right=of in, on chain] (sum2) {};
              node [block] (ractuator) {$mfrac{2}{s+2}$};
              node [block] (vdynamics) {$mfrac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
              node [block] (integrator) {$mfrac{1}{s}$};
              coordinate[right=of integrator] (out) {};
              node [block, suspend join,
              below = of vdynamics] (yaw) {C};
              %
              draw[->] (in) -- (sum2);
              draw[->] (integrator) -- coordinate[label=$Psi(s)$] (psi) (out);
              draw[->] (psi) |- (yaw);
              draw[->] (yaw) -| (sum2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}



            enter image description here



            off-topic: for fraction is used mfrac (medium sized fraction) defined in the nccmath package






            share|improve this answer























            • Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
              – Diaa
              Nov 15 at 16:48













            up vote
            3
            down vote










            up vote
            3
            down vote









            one way how to reduce your code:




            • use tikz librarychains placement nodes in chain and draw lines between them by macro join

            • node "c" in feedback simple pace below of node vdynamics

            • put coordinates in image directly and not via nodes

            • coordinates can contain labels, exploit this for label $Psi$


            • define nodes distance only ones and than use it all all nodes positioning



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{tikz,nccmath,amssymb}
              usetikzlibrary{arrows,
              calc, chains,
              positioning,
              shapes}

              begin{document}

              tikzset{
              block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum size=3em,
              on chain, join=by ->},
              sum/.style = {draw, fill=white, circle},
              }
              makeatletter
              tikzset{suspend join/.code={deftikz@after@path{}}} % <--- for dicountinue of jon macro
              makeatother

              begin{tikzpicture}[
              node distance = 0.5cm and 1cm,
              start chain = going right,
              > = latex']
              coordinate (in);
              node [sum,right=of in, on chain] (sum2) {};
              node [block] (ractuator) {$mfrac{2}{s+2}$};
              node [block] (vdynamics) {$mfrac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
              node [block] (integrator) {$mfrac{1}{s}$};
              coordinate[right=of integrator] (out) {};
              node [block, suspend join,
              below = of vdynamics] (yaw) {C};
              %
              draw[->] (in) -- (sum2);
              draw[->] (integrator) -- coordinate[label=$Psi(s)$] (psi) (out);
              draw[->] (psi) |- (yaw);
              draw[->] (yaw) -| (sum2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}



            enter image description here



            off-topic: for fraction is used mfrac (medium sized fraction) defined in the nccmath package






            share|improve this answer














            one way how to reduce your code:




            • use tikz librarychains placement nodes in chain and draw lines between them by macro join

            • node "c" in feedback simple pace below of node vdynamics

            • put coordinates in image directly and not via nodes

            • coordinates can contain labels, exploit this for label $Psi$


            • define nodes distance only ones and than use it all all nodes positioning



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{tikz,nccmath,amssymb}
              usetikzlibrary{arrows,
              calc, chains,
              positioning,
              shapes}

              begin{document}

              tikzset{
              block/.style = {draw, fill=white, rectangle, minimum size=3em,
              on chain, join=by ->},
              sum/.style = {draw, fill=white, circle},
              }
              makeatletter
              tikzset{suspend join/.code={deftikz@after@path{}}} % <--- for dicountinue of jon macro
              makeatother

              begin{tikzpicture}[
              node distance = 0.5cm and 1cm,
              start chain = going right,
              > = latex']
              coordinate (in);
              node [sum,right=of in, on chain] (sum2) {};
              node [block] (ractuator) {$mfrac{2}{s+2}$};
              node [block] (vdynamics) {$mfrac{-0.125(s+0.437)}{(s+1.29)(s+0.193)}$};
              node [block] (integrator) {$mfrac{1}{s}$};
              coordinate[right=of integrator] (out) {};
              node [block, suspend join,
              below = of vdynamics] (yaw) {C};
              %
              draw[->] (in) -- (sum2);
              draw[->] (integrator) -- coordinate[label=$Psi(s)$] (psi) (out);
              draw[->] (psi) |- (yaw);
              draw[->] (yaw) -| (sum2);
              end{tikzpicture}
              end{document}



            enter image description here



            off-topic: for fraction is used mfrac (medium sized fraction) defined in the nccmath package







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Nov 15 at 20:14

























            answered Nov 15 at 16:42









            Zarko

            116k865154




            116k865154












            • Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
              – Diaa
              Nov 15 at 16:48


















            • Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
              – Diaa
              Nov 15 at 16:48
















            Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
            – Diaa
            Nov 15 at 16:48




            Perfect! Thanks for this beautiful answer.
            – Diaa
            Nov 15 at 16:48


















             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f460089%2ftikz-understanding-the-usage-of-calc-library%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater