Can an abjuration wizard willingly dismiss their Arcane Ward or allow an attack to bypass it?











up vote
4
down vote

favorite












I play an abjuration wizard, and I recently encountered a situation where I wanted to take damage (in order to get a saving throw to permanently end an aboleth's charm effect that was only temporarily suppressed). So, I asked my party to hit me with an attack.



However, I realized that I had my Arcane Ward activated, and the wording of the feature seems to say that it always blocks any incoming damage unconditionally (PHB, p. 115):




Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.




I also don't see any language in the ability that would allow me to choose to dismiss the ward.



Luckily, in this case, the attacker was a rogue, and because I was letting him hit me, he got advantage and therefore Sneak Attack, which was enough to punch through the ward and deal a bit of damage to my actual HP with a single attack.



However, this raised the question:



If I actually want to take damage for some reason, is there anything in the Arcane Ward feature that lets me do so without needing to first reduce my ward to 0 HP?










share|improve this question




























    up vote
    4
    down vote

    favorite












    I play an abjuration wizard, and I recently encountered a situation where I wanted to take damage (in order to get a saving throw to permanently end an aboleth's charm effect that was only temporarily suppressed). So, I asked my party to hit me with an attack.



    However, I realized that I had my Arcane Ward activated, and the wording of the feature seems to say that it always blocks any incoming damage unconditionally (PHB, p. 115):




    Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.




    I also don't see any language in the ability that would allow me to choose to dismiss the ward.



    Luckily, in this case, the attacker was a rogue, and because I was letting him hit me, he got advantage and therefore Sneak Attack, which was enough to punch through the ward and deal a bit of damage to my actual HP with a single attack.



    However, this raised the question:



    If I actually want to take damage for some reason, is there anything in the Arcane Ward feature that lets me do so without needing to first reduce my ward to 0 HP?










    share|improve this question


























      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      4
      down vote

      favorite











      I play an abjuration wizard, and I recently encountered a situation where I wanted to take damage (in order to get a saving throw to permanently end an aboleth's charm effect that was only temporarily suppressed). So, I asked my party to hit me with an attack.



      However, I realized that I had my Arcane Ward activated, and the wording of the feature seems to say that it always blocks any incoming damage unconditionally (PHB, p. 115):




      Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.




      I also don't see any language in the ability that would allow me to choose to dismiss the ward.



      Luckily, in this case, the attacker was a rogue, and because I was letting him hit me, he got advantage and therefore Sneak Attack, which was enough to punch through the ward and deal a bit of damage to my actual HP with a single attack.



      However, this raised the question:



      If I actually want to take damage for some reason, is there anything in the Arcane Ward feature that lets me do so without needing to first reduce my ward to 0 HP?










      share|improve this question















      I play an abjuration wizard, and I recently encountered a situation where I wanted to take damage (in order to get a saving throw to permanently end an aboleth's charm effect that was only temporarily suppressed). So, I asked my party to hit me with an attack.



      However, I realized that I had my Arcane Ward activated, and the wording of the feature seems to say that it always blocks any incoming damage unconditionally (PHB, p. 115):




      Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.




      I also don't see any language in the ability that would allow me to choose to dismiss the ward.



      Luckily, in this case, the attacker was a rogue, and because I was letting him hit me, he got advantage and therefore Sneak Attack, which was enough to punch through the ward and deal a bit of damage to my actual HP with a single attack.



      However, this raised the question:



      If I actually want to take damage for some reason, is there anything in the Arcane Ward feature that lets me do so without needing to first reduce my ward to 0 HP?







      dnd-5e class-feature wizard






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Nov 27 at 6:51

























      asked Nov 27 at 6:35









      Ryan Thompson

      4,32911444




      4,32911444






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          7
          down vote



          accepted










          No, they can't, by the rules as written.



          As you note, the feature says:




          When you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, you can simultaneously use a strand of the spell’s magic to create a magical ward on yourself that lasts until you finish a long rest. The ward has a hit point maximum equal to twice your wizard level + your Intelligence modifier. Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.



          While the ward has 0 hit points, it can’t absorb damage, but its magic remains. Whenever you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, the ward regains a number of hit points equal to twice the level of the spell.




          There is no option for you not to benefit from the ward while it has hit points. It simply says that if the ward has hit points and you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead - not that it "can", but rather that it does.



          Of course, your DM could reasonably houserule that the ward is under your control, and that you could choose to weaken it, dismiss it entirely, or essentially cause it to "flicker" and temporarily deactivate.






          share|improve this answer





















            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136308%2fcan-an-abjuration-wizard-willingly-dismiss-their-arcane-ward-or-allow-an-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            7
            down vote



            accepted










            No, they can't, by the rules as written.



            As you note, the feature says:




            When you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, you can simultaneously use a strand of the spell’s magic to create a magical ward on yourself that lasts until you finish a long rest. The ward has a hit point maximum equal to twice your wizard level + your Intelligence modifier. Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.



            While the ward has 0 hit points, it can’t absorb damage, but its magic remains. Whenever you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, the ward regains a number of hit points equal to twice the level of the spell.




            There is no option for you not to benefit from the ward while it has hit points. It simply says that if the ward has hit points and you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead - not that it "can", but rather that it does.



            Of course, your DM could reasonably houserule that the ward is under your control, and that you could choose to weaken it, dismiss it entirely, or essentially cause it to "flicker" and temporarily deactivate.






            share|improve this answer

























              up vote
              7
              down vote



              accepted










              No, they can't, by the rules as written.



              As you note, the feature says:




              When you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, you can simultaneously use a strand of the spell’s magic to create a magical ward on yourself that lasts until you finish a long rest. The ward has a hit point maximum equal to twice your wizard level + your Intelligence modifier. Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.



              While the ward has 0 hit points, it can’t absorb damage, but its magic remains. Whenever you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, the ward regains a number of hit points equal to twice the level of the spell.




              There is no option for you not to benefit from the ward while it has hit points. It simply says that if the ward has hit points and you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead - not that it "can", but rather that it does.



              Of course, your DM could reasonably houserule that the ward is under your control, and that you could choose to weaken it, dismiss it entirely, or essentially cause it to "flicker" and temporarily deactivate.






              share|improve this answer























                up vote
                7
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                7
                down vote



                accepted






                No, they can't, by the rules as written.



                As you note, the feature says:




                When you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, you can simultaneously use a strand of the spell’s magic to create a magical ward on yourself that lasts until you finish a long rest. The ward has a hit point maximum equal to twice your wizard level + your Intelligence modifier. Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.



                While the ward has 0 hit points, it can’t absorb damage, but its magic remains. Whenever you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, the ward regains a number of hit points equal to twice the level of the spell.




                There is no option for you not to benefit from the ward while it has hit points. It simply says that if the ward has hit points and you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead - not that it "can", but rather that it does.



                Of course, your DM could reasonably houserule that the ward is under your control, and that you could choose to weaken it, dismiss it entirely, or essentially cause it to "flicker" and temporarily deactivate.






                share|improve this answer












                No, they can't, by the rules as written.



                As you note, the feature says:




                When you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, you can simultaneously use a strand of the spell’s magic to create a magical ward on yourself that lasts until you finish a long rest. The ward has a hit point maximum equal to twice your wizard level + your Intelligence modifier. Whenever you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead. If this damage reduces the ward to 0 hit points, you take any remaining damage.



                While the ward has 0 hit points, it can’t absorb damage, but its magic remains. Whenever you cast an abjuration spell of 1st level or higher, the ward regains a number of hit points equal to twice the level of the spell.




                There is no option for you not to benefit from the ward while it has hit points. It simply says that if the ward has hit points and you take damage, the ward takes the damage instead - not that it "can", but rather that it does.



                Of course, your DM could reasonably houserule that the ward is under your control, and that you could choose to weaken it, dismiss it entirely, or essentially cause it to "flicker" and temporarily deactivate.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered Nov 27 at 6:51









                V2Blast

                18.2k248114




                18.2k248114






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f136308%2fcan-an-abjuration-wizard-willingly-dismiss-their-arcane-ward-or-allow-an-attack%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                    How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                    QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater