In cases like the one mentioned, can good/nice be interchangeable
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.
He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.
In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?
word-usage word-choice usage
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.
He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.
In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?
word-usage word-choice usage
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
up vote
2
down vote
favorite
He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.
He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.
In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?
word-usage word-choice usage
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
He can't have good things because, he doesn't look after them.
He can't have nice things because, he doesn't look after them.
In cases like this are nice and good interchangeable?
word-usage word-choice usage
word-usage word-choice usage
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
asked Nov 26 at 9:35
Soumya Ghosh
231716
231716
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.
She has a lot of really nice things in her house.
The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:
Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").
Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.
Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be
He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.
She has a lot of really nice things in her house.
The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:
Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.
She has a lot of really nice things in her house.
The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:
Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
up vote
4
down vote
accepted
In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.
She has a lot of really nice things in her house.
The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:
Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
In AmE, nice things is a collocation that refers to items of higher quality which tend to cost more than things which are not very nice.
She has a lot of really nice things in her house.
The phrase good things does not typically have that materialistic sense, but tends to be used of other kinds of benefits:
Patience, kindness, an optimistic disposition—these are all good things.
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
answered Nov 26 at 10:35
Tᴚoɯɐuo
104k677168
104k677168
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
add a comment |
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
I thought that was "good" the one having that materialistic sense instead of "nice", at least according to the Cambridge Dictionary. I'm wrong and I should remove my answer, am I? [No irony]
– RubioRic
Nov 26 at 13:45
1
1
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
@Rubio Ric: The dictionary is giving you the meaning of the word good in general contexts: "It's a good car". That is, the car functions well, is reliable, whatever. But the meaning of a word in a collocation can trump the general meaning. Hence, nice things = things that are well made, high quality, stylish, often expensive, not "friendly, behaving pleasantly". good things is not necessarily materialistic and very often it is not, referring to things that have spiritual or emotional or cultural value rather than materialistic, mercantile or functional value.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 14:06
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
I'd be more inclined to say that "nice" means "things [I/he/she/we] like" (which contains higher quality items, but not exclusively)
– Flater
Nov 26 at 14:48
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
"Things we like" is rather too broad, IMO, for this collocation.
– Tᴚoɯɐuo
Nov 26 at 15:20
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").
Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.
Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be
He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").
Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.
Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be
He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").
Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.
Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be
He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
In this sentence it would be "nice things", because 'things' here refers to material belongings and the sentence/expression is about their appearance, and not their function. So, for objects you would say "wow that's a nice mug/wallet/purse/etc" and not "wow that's a good mug/wallet/purse/etc", unless maybe you were talking about the function of the object specifically ("this is a really good purse because I can fit all my stuff in it").
Also, "He/she/we can't have nice things" is a common expression, especially on social media these days.
Finally, there's no comma after "because". So the sentence should be
He can't have nice things because he doesn't look after them.
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
answered Nov 26 at 9:57
neotryte
63646
63646
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f186654%2fin-cases-like-the-one-mentioned-can-good-nice-be-interchangeable%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
