Prove the shift rule for series











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $N$ be a natural number. Then the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ converges if and only if the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n}$ converges.



I've tried splitting $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ into $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$ but am not getting anywhere. I've also tried using the $epsilon$ definition for convergence but am getting confused.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Think about partial sums.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 17 at 18:23










  • How would I go about this?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 18:42















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












Let $N$ be a natural number. Then the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ converges if and only if the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n}$ converges.



I've tried splitting $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ into $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$ but am not getting anywhere. I've also tried using the $epsilon$ definition for convergence but am getting confused.










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 2




    Think about partial sums.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 17 at 18:23










  • How would I go about this?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 18:42













up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











Let $N$ be a natural number. Then the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ converges if and only if the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n}$ converges.



I've tried splitting $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ into $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$ but am not getting anywhere. I've also tried using the $epsilon$ definition for convergence but am getting confused.










share|cite|improve this question













Let $N$ be a natural number. Then the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ converges if and only if the series $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n}$ converges.



I've tried splitting $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ into $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$ but am not getting anywhere. I've also tried using the $epsilon$ definition for convergence but am getting confused.







sequences-and-series proof-writing






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 17 at 18:23









m.bazza

827




827








  • 2




    Think about partial sums.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 17 at 18:23










  • How would I go about this?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 18:42














  • 2




    Think about partial sums.
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Nov 17 at 18:23










  • How would I go about this?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 18:42








2




2




Think about partial sums.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 17 at 18:23




Think about partial sums.
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Nov 17 at 18:23












How would I go about this?
– m.bazza
Nov 17 at 18:42




How would I go about this?
– m.bazza
Nov 17 at 18:42










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote













$sum_{n=1}^Na_n$ is just a number, let's call it $C$. So if the sum of $a_n$ converges to $A$, then the $$A=sum_{n=1}^infty a_n=sum_{n=1}^N a_n+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=C+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}$$ wich yields $$sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=A-C$$
Since both $A$ and $C$ are finite then $A-C$ is finite, so the series converges.



Similarly, you can go the other way around






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 19:17






  • 1




    It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
    – Andrei
    Nov 17 at 19:31


















up vote
0
down vote













As you have written we have $$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$where $$sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$ is bounded therefore $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ is bounded if and only if $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n+N}$ is bounded.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002652%2fprove-the-shift-rule-for-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote













    $sum_{n=1}^Na_n$ is just a number, let's call it $C$. So if the sum of $a_n$ converges to $A$, then the $$A=sum_{n=1}^infty a_n=sum_{n=1}^N a_n+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=C+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}$$ wich yields $$sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=A-C$$
    Since both $A$ and $C$ are finite then $A-C$ is finite, so the series converges.



    Similarly, you can go the other way around






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
      – m.bazza
      Nov 17 at 19:17






    • 1




      It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
      – Andrei
      Nov 17 at 19:31















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    $sum_{n=1}^Na_n$ is just a number, let's call it $C$. So if the sum of $a_n$ converges to $A$, then the $$A=sum_{n=1}^infty a_n=sum_{n=1}^N a_n+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=C+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}$$ wich yields $$sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=A-C$$
    Since both $A$ and $C$ are finite then $A-C$ is finite, so the series converges.



    Similarly, you can go the other way around






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
      – m.bazza
      Nov 17 at 19:17






    • 1




      It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
      – Andrei
      Nov 17 at 19:31













    up vote
    1
    down vote










    up vote
    1
    down vote









    $sum_{n=1}^Na_n$ is just a number, let's call it $C$. So if the sum of $a_n$ converges to $A$, then the $$A=sum_{n=1}^infty a_n=sum_{n=1}^N a_n+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=C+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}$$ wich yields $$sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=A-C$$
    Since both $A$ and $C$ are finite then $A-C$ is finite, so the series converges.



    Similarly, you can go the other way around






    share|cite|improve this answer












    $sum_{n=1}^Na_n$ is just a number, let's call it $C$. So if the sum of $a_n$ converges to $A$, then the $$A=sum_{n=1}^infty a_n=sum_{n=1}^N a_n+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=C+sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}$$ wich yields $$sum_{n=1}^infty a_{n+N}=A-C$$
    Since both $A$ and $C$ are finite then $A-C$ is finite, so the series converges.



    Similarly, you can go the other way around







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 17 at 19:14









    Andrei

    10.3k21025




    10.3k21025












    • ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
      – m.bazza
      Nov 17 at 19:17






    • 1




      It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
      – Andrei
      Nov 17 at 19:31


















    • ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
      – m.bazza
      Nov 17 at 19:17






    • 1




      It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
      – Andrei
      Nov 17 at 19:31
















    ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 19:17




    ok, but how do you know that $C$ is finite?
    – m.bazza
    Nov 17 at 19:17




    1




    1




    It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
    – Andrei
    Nov 17 at 19:31




    It is a finite sum of given finite numbers.
    – Andrei
    Nov 17 at 19:31










    up vote
    0
    down vote













    As you have written we have $$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$where $$sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$ is bounded therefore $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ is bounded if and only if $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n+N}$ is bounded.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      As you have written we have $$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$where $$sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$ is bounded therefore $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ is bounded if and only if $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n+N}$ is bounded.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        As you have written we have $$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$where $$sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$ is bounded therefore $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ is bounded if and only if $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n+N}$ is bounded.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        As you have written we have $$sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n=sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{N+n} +sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$where $$sum_{n=1}^{N}a_n$$ is bounded therefore $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_n$ is bounded if and only if $sum_{n=1}^{infty}a_{n+N}$ is bounded.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Mostafa Ayaz

        13.1k3735




        13.1k3735






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002652%2fprove-the-shift-rule-for-series%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

            Ивакино (Тотемский район)

            Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)