Proving that a matrix is symmetric if it can be expressed as a spectral decomposition











up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













If ${u_1, cdots, u_n}$ is an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, and if $A$ can be expressed as
$$A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$$
then $A$ is symmetric and has eigenvalues $c_1, cdots, c_n$.




I'm trying to prove this. Here's what I have so far.





I figure I need to show:





  1. $A$ is symmetric. I can achieve this by showing that $A$ has an orthonormal set of $n$ eigenvectors (or equivalently, that $A$ is orthogonally diagonalizable). If $P$ orthogonally diagonalizes $A$ then $D = P^TAP equiv A = PDP^T$. $(PDP^T) = (PDP^T)^T$ by trivial manipulations, knowing that $D$ is diagonal and thus $D^T = D$.


  2. $c_1, cdots, c_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$.


I think both of these would be satisfied if I could show that $c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$ was equivalent to $PDP^T$ for the orthogonal matrix $P$ and a $D$ such that $D_{ij} = begin{cases}0 & i neq j\c_i & i = jend{cases}$.



If $P$ was an orthogonal matrix such that $P = begin{bmatrix} u_1 & cdots & u_nend{bmatrix}$ where $u_j$ was an eigenvector of $A$ then it would also be a basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, since we'd have $n$ linearly independent vectors. If I had this then I believe you can do the tedious matrix multiplication and get $PDP^T$ given the $D$ defined above and receive $A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$. Then I'd be done.



But to me the question implies that any orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$ would satisfy this. Perhaps I need to show that if $A$ can be expressed with those basis vectors then those basis vectors must be the eigenvectors of $A$. I'm kind of stuck on this part though!



Edit: To be clear: I have outlined here my approach to the proof and what I know to be true. I'm ultimately stuck on how to prove the quoted question. I am asking how one can prove this.





This is exercise 7.2.26 of Anton and Rorres' Elementary Linear Algebra, 11th ed.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:21










  • @jgon Correct, fixed.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:40















up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1













If ${u_1, cdots, u_n}$ is an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, and if $A$ can be expressed as
$$A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$$
then $A$ is symmetric and has eigenvalues $c_1, cdots, c_n$.




I'm trying to prove this. Here's what I have so far.





I figure I need to show:





  1. $A$ is symmetric. I can achieve this by showing that $A$ has an orthonormal set of $n$ eigenvectors (or equivalently, that $A$ is orthogonally diagonalizable). If $P$ orthogonally diagonalizes $A$ then $D = P^TAP equiv A = PDP^T$. $(PDP^T) = (PDP^T)^T$ by trivial manipulations, knowing that $D$ is diagonal and thus $D^T = D$.


  2. $c_1, cdots, c_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$.


I think both of these would be satisfied if I could show that $c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$ was equivalent to $PDP^T$ for the orthogonal matrix $P$ and a $D$ such that $D_{ij} = begin{cases}0 & i neq j\c_i & i = jend{cases}$.



If $P$ was an orthogonal matrix such that $P = begin{bmatrix} u_1 & cdots & u_nend{bmatrix}$ where $u_j$ was an eigenvector of $A$ then it would also be a basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, since we'd have $n$ linearly independent vectors. If I had this then I believe you can do the tedious matrix multiplication and get $PDP^T$ given the $D$ defined above and receive $A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$. Then I'd be done.



But to me the question implies that any orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$ would satisfy this. Perhaps I need to show that if $A$ can be expressed with those basis vectors then those basis vectors must be the eigenvectors of $A$. I'm kind of stuck on this part though!



Edit: To be clear: I have outlined here my approach to the proof and what I know to be true. I'm ultimately stuck on how to prove the quoted question. I am asking how one can prove this.





This is exercise 7.2.26 of Anton and Rorres' Elementary Linear Algebra, 11th ed.










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:21










  • @jgon Correct, fixed.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:40













up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
3
down vote

favorite
1






1






If ${u_1, cdots, u_n}$ is an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, and if $A$ can be expressed as
$$A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$$
then $A$ is symmetric and has eigenvalues $c_1, cdots, c_n$.




I'm trying to prove this. Here's what I have so far.





I figure I need to show:





  1. $A$ is symmetric. I can achieve this by showing that $A$ has an orthonormal set of $n$ eigenvectors (or equivalently, that $A$ is orthogonally diagonalizable). If $P$ orthogonally diagonalizes $A$ then $D = P^TAP equiv A = PDP^T$. $(PDP^T) = (PDP^T)^T$ by trivial manipulations, knowing that $D$ is diagonal and thus $D^T = D$.


  2. $c_1, cdots, c_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$.


I think both of these would be satisfied if I could show that $c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$ was equivalent to $PDP^T$ for the orthogonal matrix $P$ and a $D$ such that $D_{ij} = begin{cases}0 & i neq j\c_i & i = jend{cases}$.



If $P$ was an orthogonal matrix such that $P = begin{bmatrix} u_1 & cdots & u_nend{bmatrix}$ where $u_j$ was an eigenvector of $A$ then it would also be a basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, since we'd have $n$ linearly independent vectors. If I had this then I believe you can do the tedious matrix multiplication and get $PDP^T$ given the $D$ defined above and receive $A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$. Then I'd be done.



But to me the question implies that any orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$ would satisfy this. Perhaps I need to show that if $A$ can be expressed with those basis vectors then those basis vectors must be the eigenvectors of $A$. I'm kind of stuck on this part though!



Edit: To be clear: I have outlined here my approach to the proof and what I know to be true. I'm ultimately stuck on how to prove the quoted question. I am asking how one can prove this.





This is exercise 7.2.26 of Anton and Rorres' Elementary Linear Algebra, 11th ed.










share|cite|improve this question
















If ${u_1, cdots, u_n}$ is an orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, and if $A$ can be expressed as
$$A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$$
then $A$ is symmetric and has eigenvalues $c_1, cdots, c_n$.




I'm trying to prove this. Here's what I have so far.





I figure I need to show:





  1. $A$ is symmetric. I can achieve this by showing that $A$ has an orthonormal set of $n$ eigenvectors (or equivalently, that $A$ is orthogonally diagonalizable). If $P$ orthogonally diagonalizes $A$ then $D = P^TAP equiv A = PDP^T$. $(PDP^T) = (PDP^T)^T$ by trivial manipulations, knowing that $D$ is diagonal and thus $D^T = D$.


  2. $c_1, cdots, c_n$ are the eigenvalues of $A$.


I think both of these would be satisfied if I could show that $c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$ was equivalent to $PDP^T$ for the orthogonal matrix $P$ and a $D$ such that $D_{ij} = begin{cases}0 & i neq j\c_i & i = jend{cases}$.



If $P$ was an orthogonal matrix such that $P = begin{bmatrix} u_1 & cdots & u_nend{bmatrix}$ where $u_j$ was an eigenvector of $A$ then it would also be a basis for $mathbb{R}^n$, since we'd have $n$ linearly independent vectors. If I had this then I believe you can do the tedious matrix multiplication and get $PDP^T$ given the $D$ defined above and receive $A = c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T$. Then I'd be done.



But to me the question implies that any orthonormal basis for $mathbb{R}^n$ would satisfy this. Perhaps I need to show that if $A$ can be expressed with those basis vectors then those basis vectors must be the eigenvectors of $A$. I'm kind of stuck on this part though!



Edit: To be clear: I have outlined here my approach to the proof and what I know to be true. I'm ultimately stuck on how to prove the quoted question. I am asking how one can prove this.





This is exercise 7.2.26 of Anton and Rorres' Elementary Linear Algebra, 11th ed.







linear-algebra eigenvalues-eigenvectors diagonalization orthogonal-matrices






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 21 at 2:30









JimmyK4542

39.9k245105




39.9k245105










asked Nov 20 at 23:57









Emily Horsman

111110




111110








  • 1




    I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:21










  • @jgon Correct, fixed.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:40














  • 1




    I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:21










  • @jgon Correct, fixed.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:40








1




1




I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
– jgon
Nov 21 at 0:21




I assume that the last term should be $c_nu_nu_n^T$ not $c_nu_n+u_n^T$?
– jgon
Nov 21 at 0:21












@jgon Correct, fixed.
– Emily Horsman
Nov 21 at 0:40




@jgon Correct, fixed.
– Emily Horsman
Nov 21 at 0:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your question, but if its helpful, here's how I would write this proof.



1) If $$A=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T,$$then observe that
$$A^T=left(sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tright)^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_i(u_i^T)^Tu_i^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T=A,$$
where the second equality follows since taking transposes reverses the order of multiplication for matrices, and we can always pull constants out front.



2) If $A$ has the form above, then to show $c_j$ is an eigenvalue, consider the following product:
$$Au_j= sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tu_j=sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_idelta_{ij}=c_ju_j.$$
The second equality follows from the fact that the $u_i$ form an orthonormal basis so $u_i^Tu_j=delta_{ij}$ (by definition of orthonormal).






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 1:02












  • @EmilyHorsman exactly.
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 1:13


















up vote
3
down vote













By inspection from the hypotesis we have that



$$A^T= (c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T)^T=A$$



and



$$Acdot u_i=c_iu_i$$



therefore the thesis follows.






share|cite|improve this answer























  • @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:23










  • @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:28










  • I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:30










  • It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:47


















up vote
1
down vote













Note that



$(u_i u_i^T)^T = (u_i^T)^Tu_i^T = u_i u_i^T; tag 1$



thus each matrix $u_i u_i^T$ is symmetric; hence every $c_i u_i u_i^T$ and hence their sum. This shows that



$A^T = A. tag 2$



We further note that, since the $u_i$ are orthnormal,



$u_i^T u_j = delta_{ij}, tag 3$



whence



$A u_j = displaystyle left ( sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^T right ) u_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^Tu_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_iu_i delta_{ij} = c_j u_j, tag 4$



which shows that $c_j$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with associated eigenvector $u_j$, $1 le j le n$.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007072%2fproving-that-a-matrix-is-symmetric-if-it-can-be-expressed-as-a-spectral-decompos%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your question, but if its helpful, here's how I would write this proof.



    1) If $$A=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T,$$then observe that
    $$A^T=left(sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tright)^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_i(u_i^T)^Tu_i^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T=A,$$
    where the second equality follows since taking transposes reverses the order of multiplication for matrices, and we can always pull constants out front.



    2) If $A$ has the form above, then to show $c_j$ is an eigenvalue, consider the following product:
    $$Au_j= sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tu_j=sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_idelta_{ij}=c_ju_j.$$
    The second equality follows from the fact that the $u_i$ form an orthonormal basis so $u_i^Tu_j=delta_{ij}$ (by definition of orthonormal).






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 1:02












    • @EmilyHorsman exactly.
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 1:13















    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted










    I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your question, but if its helpful, here's how I would write this proof.



    1) If $$A=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T,$$then observe that
    $$A^T=left(sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tright)^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_i(u_i^T)^Tu_i^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T=A,$$
    where the second equality follows since taking transposes reverses the order of multiplication for matrices, and we can always pull constants out front.



    2) If $A$ has the form above, then to show $c_j$ is an eigenvalue, consider the following product:
    $$Au_j= sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tu_j=sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_idelta_{ij}=c_ju_j.$$
    The second equality follows from the fact that the $u_i$ form an orthonormal basis so $u_i^Tu_j=delta_{ij}$ (by definition of orthonormal).






    share|cite|improve this answer





















    • $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 1:02












    • @EmilyHorsman exactly.
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 1:13













    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted







    up vote
    4
    down vote



    accepted






    I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your question, but if its helpful, here's how I would write this proof.



    1) If $$A=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T,$$then observe that
    $$A^T=left(sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tright)^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_i(u_i^T)^Tu_i^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T=A,$$
    where the second equality follows since taking transposes reverses the order of multiplication for matrices, and we can always pull constants out front.



    2) If $A$ has the form above, then to show $c_j$ is an eigenvalue, consider the following product:
    $$Au_j= sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tu_j=sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_idelta_{ij}=c_ju_j.$$
    The second equality follows from the fact that the $u_i$ form an orthonormal basis so $u_i^Tu_j=delta_{ij}$ (by definition of orthonormal).






    share|cite|improve this answer












    I'm not quite sure what you're asking in your question, but if its helpful, here's how I would write this proof.



    1) If $$A=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T,$$then observe that
    $$A^T=left(sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tright)^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_i(u_i^T)^Tu_i^T=sum_{i=1}^n c_iu_iu_i^T=A,$$
    where the second equality follows since taking transposes reverses the order of multiplication for matrices, and we can always pull constants out front.



    2) If $A$ has the form above, then to show $c_j$ is an eigenvalue, consider the following product:
    $$Au_j= sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_iu_i^Tu_j=sum_{i=1}^nc_iu_idelta_{ij}=c_ju_j.$$
    The second equality follows from the fact that the $u_i$ form an orthonormal basis so $u_i^Tu_j=delta_{ij}$ (by definition of orthonormal).







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Nov 21 at 0:29









    jgon

    10.1k11638




    10.1k11638












    • $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 1:02












    • @EmilyHorsman exactly.
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 1:13


















    • $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 1:02












    • @EmilyHorsman exactly.
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 1:13
















    $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 1:02






    $u_i^Tu_j = 0$ if $i neq j$. So $Au_j = c_ju_ju_j^Tu_j$ right? Ah and $u_j^Tu_j = 1$ since its orthonormal.
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 1:02














    @EmilyHorsman exactly.
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 1:13




    @EmilyHorsman exactly.
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 1:13










    up vote
    3
    down vote













    By inspection from the hypotesis we have that



    $$A^T= (c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T)^T=A$$



    and



    $$Acdot u_i=c_iu_i$$



    therefore the thesis follows.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:23










    • @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:28










    • I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 0:30










    • It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 0:47















    up vote
    3
    down vote













    By inspection from the hypotesis we have that



    $$A^T= (c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T)^T=A$$



    and



    $$Acdot u_i=c_iu_i$$



    therefore the thesis follows.






    share|cite|improve this answer























    • @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:23










    • @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:28










    • I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 0:30










    • It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 0:47













    up vote
    3
    down vote










    up vote
    3
    down vote









    By inspection from the hypotesis we have that



    $$A^T= (c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T)^T=A$$



    and



    $$Acdot u_i=c_iu_i$$



    therefore the thesis follows.






    share|cite|improve this answer














    By inspection from the hypotesis we have that



    $$A^T= (c_1u_1u_1^T + cdots + c_nu_nu_n^T)^T=A$$



    and



    $$Acdot u_i=c_iu_i$$



    therefore the thesis follows.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited Nov 21 at 0:26

























    answered Nov 21 at 0:04









    gimusi

    88.7k74394




    88.7k74394












    • @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:23










    • @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:28










    • I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 0:30










    • It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 0:47


















    • @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:23










    • @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
      – gimusi
      Nov 21 at 0:28










    • I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
      – jgon
      Nov 21 at 0:30










    • It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
      – Emily Horsman
      Nov 21 at 0:47
















    @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:23




    @jgon Opsssss yes I think you are right!
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:23












    @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:28




    @jgon in that way I think it reduces to a simple check by the definition.
    – gimusi
    Nov 21 at 0:28












    I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:30




    I agree, this whole question confuses me to be honest
    – jgon
    Nov 21 at 0:30












    It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:47




    It seems I was vastly overcomplicating it
    – Emily Horsman
    Nov 21 at 0:47










    up vote
    1
    down vote













    Note that



    $(u_i u_i^T)^T = (u_i^T)^Tu_i^T = u_i u_i^T; tag 1$



    thus each matrix $u_i u_i^T$ is symmetric; hence every $c_i u_i u_i^T$ and hence their sum. This shows that



    $A^T = A. tag 2$



    We further note that, since the $u_i$ are orthnormal,



    $u_i^T u_j = delta_{ij}, tag 3$



    whence



    $A u_j = displaystyle left ( sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^T right ) u_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^Tu_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_iu_i delta_{ij} = c_j u_j, tag 4$



    which shows that $c_j$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with associated eigenvector $u_j$, $1 le j le n$.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      Note that



      $(u_i u_i^T)^T = (u_i^T)^Tu_i^T = u_i u_i^T; tag 1$



      thus each matrix $u_i u_i^T$ is symmetric; hence every $c_i u_i u_i^T$ and hence their sum. This shows that



      $A^T = A. tag 2$



      We further note that, since the $u_i$ are orthnormal,



      $u_i^T u_j = delta_{ij}, tag 3$



      whence



      $A u_j = displaystyle left ( sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^T right ) u_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^Tu_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_iu_i delta_{ij} = c_j u_j, tag 4$



      which shows that $c_j$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with associated eigenvector $u_j$, $1 le j le n$.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote










        up vote
        1
        down vote









        Note that



        $(u_i u_i^T)^T = (u_i^T)^Tu_i^T = u_i u_i^T; tag 1$



        thus each matrix $u_i u_i^T$ is symmetric; hence every $c_i u_i u_i^T$ and hence their sum. This shows that



        $A^T = A. tag 2$



        We further note that, since the $u_i$ are orthnormal,



        $u_i^T u_j = delta_{ij}, tag 3$



        whence



        $A u_j = displaystyle left ( sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^T right ) u_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^Tu_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_iu_i delta_{ij} = c_j u_j, tag 4$



        which shows that $c_j$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with associated eigenvector $u_j$, $1 le j le n$.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        Note that



        $(u_i u_i^T)^T = (u_i^T)^Tu_i^T = u_i u_i^T; tag 1$



        thus each matrix $u_i u_i^T$ is symmetric; hence every $c_i u_i u_i^T$ and hence their sum. This shows that



        $A^T = A. tag 2$



        We further note that, since the $u_i$ are orthnormal,



        $u_i^T u_j = delta_{ij}, tag 3$



        whence



        $A u_j = displaystyle left ( sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^T right ) u_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_i u_i u_i^Tu_j = sum_{i = 1}^n c_iu_i delta_{ij} = c_j u_j, tag 4$



        which shows that $c_j$ is an eigenvalue of $A$ with associated eigenvector $u_j$, $1 le j le n$.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 21 at 0:49









        Robert Lewis

        42k22760




        42k22760






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3007072%2fproving-that-a-matrix-is-symmetric-if-it-can-be-expressed-as-a-spectral-decompos%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater