What will become of the two cubesats deployed as part of the Insight mission?
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
So as part of the Insight mission, two Cubesats were also launched to relay data during landing (so data can be obtained if something goes wrong)
What becomes of these satellites once their primary mission is done?
mars artificial-satellite insight
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
So as part of the Insight mission, two Cubesats were also launched to relay data during landing (so data can be obtained if something goes wrong)
What becomes of these satellites once their primary mission is done?
mars artificial-satellite insight
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
up vote
11
down vote
favorite
So as part of the Insight mission, two Cubesats were also launched to relay data during landing (so data can be obtained if something goes wrong)
What becomes of these satellites once their primary mission is done?
mars artificial-satellite insight
So as part of the Insight mission, two Cubesats were also launched to relay data during landing (so data can be obtained if something goes wrong)
What becomes of these satellites once their primary mission is done?
mars artificial-satellite insight
mars artificial-satellite insight
asked Nov 26 at 20:01
Machavity
2,2741736
2,2741736
add a comment |
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
MarCO's primary mission isn't actually to transmit data from InSight during its entry period. That's a non-essentially function that can be done by other spacecraft, if needed. Instead, the main part of the MarCO mission is determining the functionality of cubesats during deep space missions. We've never before sent such small spacecraft this far from Earth, and the satellites are really mostly a testbed for future cubesat missions.
In terms of their orbital trajectory - well, Emily Lakdawalla wrote about this back in March:
With no ability to enter orbit at Mars, the MarCO spacecraft will shoot on past, remaining in solar orbit. I assume their Earth controllers will remain in contact for as long as possible.
As I understand it, "as long as possible" is hopefully in the area of a few weeks.
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
Not an answer, but comments can't have pictures.
After the primary mission of supporting the InSight landing, one of the MarCO sats did snap a nice picture of Mars while departing:
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Both MarCO cubesats are flying by Mars -- not in orbit. Furthermore, during their radio coverage of InSight's entry/descent/landing, their solar arrays are pointed away from the sun, towards Mars. They are on battery power, and will eventually stop transmitting when the batteries die. Then they will continue passively around the sun.
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
|
show 1 more comment
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
MarCO's primary mission isn't actually to transmit data from InSight during its entry period. That's a non-essentially function that can be done by other spacecraft, if needed. Instead, the main part of the MarCO mission is determining the functionality of cubesats during deep space missions. We've never before sent such small spacecraft this far from Earth, and the satellites are really mostly a testbed for future cubesat missions.
In terms of their orbital trajectory - well, Emily Lakdawalla wrote about this back in March:
With no ability to enter orbit at Mars, the MarCO spacecraft will shoot on past, remaining in solar orbit. I assume their Earth controllers will remain in contact for as long as possible.
As I understand it, "as long as possible" is hopefully in the area of a few weeks.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
MarCO's primary mission isn't actually to transmit data from InSight during its entry period. That's a non-essentially function that can be done by other spacecraft, if needed. Instead, the main part of the MarCO mission is determining the functionality of cubesats during deep space missions. We've never before sent such small spacecraft this far from Earth, and the satellites are really mostly a testbed for future cubesat missions.
In terms of their orbital trajectory - well, Emily Lakdawalla wrote about this back in March:
With no ability to enter orbit at Mars, the MarCO spacecraft will shoot on past, remaining in solar orbit. I assume their Earth controllers will remain in contact for as long as possible.
As I understand it, "as long as possible" is hopefully in the area of a few weeks.
add a comment |
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
up vote
15
down vote
accepted
MarCO's primary mission isn't actually to transmit data from InSight during its entry period. That's a non-essentially function that can be done by other spacecraft, if needed. Instead, the main part of the MarCO mission is determining the functionality of cubesats during deep space missions. We've never before sent such small spacecraft this far from Earth, and the satellites are really mostly a testbed for future cubesat missions.
In terms of their orbital trajectory - well, Emily Lakdawalla wrote about this back in March:
With no ability to enter orbit at Mars, the MarCO spacecraft will shoot on past, remaining in solar orbit. I assume their Earth controllers will remain in contact for as long as possible.
As I understand it, "as long as possible" is hopefully in the area of a few weeks.
MarCO's primary mission isn't actually to transmit data from InSight during its entry period. That's a non-essentially function that can be done by other spacecraft, if needed. Instead, the main part of the MarCO mission is determining the functionality of cubesats during deep space missions. We've never before sent such small spacecraft this far from Earth, and the satellites are really mostly a testbed for future cubesat missions.
In terms of their orbital trajectory - well, Emily Lakdawalla wrote about this back in March:
With no ability to enter orbit at Mars, the MarCO spacecraft will shoot on past, remaining in solar orbit. I assume their Earth controllers will remain in contact for as long as possible.
As I understand it, "as long as possible" is hopefully in the area of a few weeks.
answered Nov 26 at 20:13
HDE 226868
2,46911137
2,46911137
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
Not an answer, but comments can't have pictures.
After the primary mission of supporting the InSight landing, one of the MarCO sats did snap a nice picture of Mars while departing:
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
Not an answer, but comments can't have pictures.
After the primary mission of supporting the InSight landing, one of the MarCO sats did snap a nice picture of Mars while departing:
add a comment |
up vote
11
down vote
up vote
11
down vote
Not an answer, but comments can't have pictures.
After the primary mission of supporting the InSight landing, one of the MarCO sats did snap a nice picture of Mars while departing:
Not an answer, but comments can't have pictures.
After the primary mission of supporting the InSight landing, one of the MarCO sats did snap a nice picture of Mars while departing:
answered Nov 26 at 22:43
Russell Borogove
78.3k2255340
78.3k2255340
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Both MarCO cubesats are flying by Mars -- not in orbit. Furthermore, during their radio coverage of InSight's entry/descent/landing, their solar arrays are pointed away from the sun, towards Mars. They are on battery power, and will eventually stop transmitting when the batteries die. Then they will continue passively around the sun.
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
8
down vote
Both MarCO cubesats are flying by Mars -- not in orbit. Furthermore, during their radio coverage of InSight's entry/descent/landing, their solar arrays are pointed away from the sun, towards Mars. They are on battery power, and will eventually stop transmitting when the batteries die. Then they will continue passively around the sun.
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
|
show 1 more comment
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Both MarCO cubesats are flying by Mars -- not in orbit. Furthermore, during their radio coverage of InSight's entry/descent/landing, their solar arrays are pointed away from the sun, towards Mars. They are on battery power, and will eventually stop transmitting when the batteries die. Then they will continue passively around the sun.
Both MarCO cubesats are flying by Mars -- not in orbit. Furthermore, during their radio coverage of InSight's entry/descent/landing, their solar arrays are pointed away from the sun, towards Mars. They are on battery power, and will eventually stop transmitting when the batteries die. Then they will continue passively around the sun.
answered Nov 26 at 20:30
Dr Sheldon
3,7811342
3,7811342
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
|
show 1 more comment
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
1
1
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
Why don't the MarCO sats re-orient the arrays towards the sun after EDL? Do they lack the attitude gas to do that?
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 26 at 21:25
1
1
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
@WayneConrad "Each MarCO's attitude-control system combines a star tracker, Sun sensors, gyroscopes and three-axis reaction wheels for monitoring and adjusting orientation. Accelerating a reaction wheel rotates the spacecraft in the opposite direction from the direction the wheel is spinning." No mention of any attitude gas at all. But I don't know why they couldn't reorient with just reaction wheels.
– Ross Presser
Nov 26 at 22:16
3
3
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
There are thrusters, fed by a single tank. They were used for course corrections, and to de-saturate the reaction wheels. MarCO A (nicknamed WALL-E) had a leak and is believed to be out of gas. MarCO B might be able to re-orient to the sun, but being aligned to send data to Earth is a higher priority.
– Dr Sheldon
Nov 26 at 23:03
5
5
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
Clearly, orienting for data transmission is important right now. That doesn't explain why they wouldn't reorient later. Many interplanetary craft aim solar and antenna by reorienting the craft repeatedly, after all.
– Saiboogu
Nov 26 at 23:09
1
1
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
According to space.com/42541-mars-insight-lander-success.html, "It's possible that MarCO-A and MarCO-B could observe an asteroid or other celestial body if their paths bring them close enough, and if funding for an extended mission is granted, John Baker, NASA's program office manager for the MarCO mission, told Space.com." This contradicts the assertion that they are going to run out of power in a few weeks and die.
– Wayne Conrad
Nov 27 at 0:58
|
show 1 more comment
Thanks for contributing an answer to Space Exploration Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fspace.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f32311%2fwhat-will-become-of-the-two-cubesats-deployed-as-part-of-the-insight-mission%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown