Is $O(2^{n/2})$ the same as $O(2^n)$?
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Why or why not? It seems like the answer should be no, but on the other hand, it's weird that you'd reach the same value in a constant multiple of n.
computational-complexity
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Why or why not? It seems like the answer should be no, but on the other hand, it's weird that you'd reach the same value in a constant multiple of n.
computational-complexity
3
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
3
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48
add a comment |
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
up vote
3
down vote
favorite
Why or why not? It seems like the answer should be no, but on the other hand, it's weird that you'd reach the same value in a constant multiple of n.
computational-complexity
Why or why not? It seems like the answer should be no, but on the other hand, it's weird that you'd reach the same value in a constant multiple of n.
computational-complexity
computational-complexity
edited Nov 20 at 9:53
J.-E. Pin
18.3k21754
18.3k21754
asked Nov 18 at 0:40
Henry Bigelow
486
486
3
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
3
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48
add a comment |
3
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
3
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48
3
3
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
3
3
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$2^{n}$ is $O(2^{n})$ but it is not $O(2^{n/2})$.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I made the same mistake once but if you write $x=2^n$, then you would have $O(x) = O(x^2)$ which of course doesn't make sense.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By exponent rules, $O(2^{n/2}) = O((2^{1/2})^n) approx O(1.414^n)$ which clearly differs from $O(2^n)$ by more than a constant factor (consider the ratio).
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
$2^{n}$ is $O(2^{n})$ but it is not $O(2^{n/2})$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
$2^{n}$ is $O(2^{n})$ but it is not $O(2^{n/2})$.
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
$2^{n}$ is $O(2^{n})$ but it is not $O(2^{n/2})$.
$2^{n}$ is $O(2^{n})$ but it is not $O(2^{n/2})$.
answered Nov 18 at 0:42
Kavi Rama Murthy
43.5k31751
43.5k31751
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I made the same mistake once but if you write $x=2^n$, then you would have $O(x) = O(x^2)$ which of course doesn't make sense.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
I made the same mistake once but if you write $x=2^n$, then you would have $O(x) = O(x^2)$ which of course doesn't make sense.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
I made the same mistake once but if you write $x=2^n$, then you would have $O(x) = O(x^2)$ which of course doesn't make sense.
I made the same mistake once but if you write $x=2^n$, then you would have $O(x) = O(x^2)$ which of course doesn't make sense.
answered Nov 18 at 0:52
Stan Tendijck
1,401210
1,401210
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By exponent rules, $O(2^{n/2}) = O((2^{1/2})^n) approx O(1.414^n)$ which clearly differs from $O(2^n)$ by more than a constant factor (consider the ratio).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By exponent rules, $O(2^{n/2}) = O((2^{1/2})^n) approx O(1.414^n)$ which clearly differs from $O(2^n)$ by more than a constant factor (consider the ratio).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
By exponent rules, $O(2^{n/2}) = O((2^{1/2})^n) approx O(1.414^n)$ which clearly differs from $O(2^n)$ by more than a constant factor (consider the ratio).
By exponent rules, $O(2^{n/2}) = O((2^{1/2})^n) approx O(1.414^n)$ which clearly differs from $O(2^n)$ by more than a constant factor (consider the ratio).
answered Nov 18 at 3:00
qwr
6,54242654
6,54242654
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003016%2fis-o2n-2-the-same-as-o2n%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
One may observe that, as $n to infty$, $displaystyle frac{2^n}{2^{n/2}} to infty.$
– Olivier Oloa
Nov 18 at 0:45
3
a constant multiple of $n$ has big consequences when $n$ is in the exponent
– mathworker21
Nov 18 at 0:48