The Mxied Atdiiodn











up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1












It has been swohn that to raed a txet the oedrr in which the lrtetes of each idniaduvl word aepapr is not ipmotanrt, so lnog as the fsrit and lsat ltetres are the correct oens. This is not the case with nmuebrs baecsue if one slcarbmes the ditgis of a nmbeur it is not psisolbe to wrok out what the ogirianl nemubr was.



Tehre are, hevoewr, cirtaen cesas in wchih tehre is sifuficnet inmoartfion to fnid out the onriiagl neumbrs if olny the interior diigts of each of them wree mixed wilhe the fsirt and lsat digtis wree lfet untaelred. Scuh is the case in the fonlwloig aditiodn:



Can you rseotre the oigrianl atdiiodn and its sum?



  34,614  
52,876
+ 72,548
--------
187,308


Source: Beatriz Viterbo










share|improve this question
























  • What is the source?
    – gabbo1092
    Nov 28 at 17:40










  • @gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
    – Bernardo Recamán Santos
    Nov 28 at 17:43















up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1












It has been swohn that to raed a txet the oedrr in which the lrtetes of each idniaduvl word aepapr is not ipmotanrt, so lnog as the fsrit and lsat ltetres are the correct oens. This is not the case with nmuebrs baecsue if one slcarbmes the ditgis of a nmbeur it is not psisolbe to wrok out what the ogirianl nemubr was.



Tehre are, hevoewr, cirtaen cesas in wchih tehre is sifuficnet inmoartfion to fnid out the onriiagl neumbrs if olny the interior diigts of each of them wree mixed wilhe the fsirt and lsat digtis wree lfet untaelred. Scuh is the case in the fonlwloig aditiodn:



Can you rseotre the oigrianl atdiiodn and its sum?



  34,614  
52,876
+ 72,548
--------
187,308


Source: Beatriz Viterbo










share|improve this question
























  • What is the source?
    – gabbo1092
    Nov 28 at 17:40










  • @gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
    – Bernardo Recamán Santos
    Nov 28 at 17:43













up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
10
down vote

favorite
1






1





It has been swohn that to raed a txet the oedrr in which the lrtetes of each idniaduvl word aepapr is not ipmotanrt, so lnog as the fsrit and lsat ltetres are the correct oens. This is not the case with nmuebrs baecsue if one slcarbmes the ditgis of a nmbeur it is not psisolbe to wrok out what the ogirianl nemubr was.



Tehre are, hevoewr, cirtaen cesas in wchih tehre is sifuficnet inmoartfion to fnid out the onriiagl neumbrs if olny the interior diigts of each of them wree mixed wilhe the fsirt and lsat digtis wree lfet untaelred. Scuh is the case in the fonlwloig aditiodn:



Can you rseotre the oigrianl atdiiodn and its sum?



  34,614  
52,876
+ 72,548
--------
187,308


Source: Beatriz Viterbo










share|improve this question















It has been swohn that to raed a txet the oedrr in which the lrtetes of each idniaduvl word aepapr is not ipmotanrt, so lnog as the fsrit and lsat ltetres are the correct oens. This is not the case with nmuebrs baecsue if one slcarbmes the ditgis of a nmbeur it is not psisolbe to wrok out what the ogirianl nemubr was.



Tehre are, hevoewr, cirtaen cesas in wchih tehre is sifuficnet inmoartfion to fnid out the onriiagl neumbrs if olny the interior diigts of each of them wree mixed wilhe the fsirt and lsat digtis wree lfet untaelred. Scuh is the case in the fonlwloig aditiodn:



Can you rseotre the oigrianl atdiiodn and its sum?



  34,614  
52,876
+ 72,548
--------
187,308


Source: Beatriz Viterbo







mathematics arithmetic






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 29 at 11:10

























asked Nov 28 at 17:31









Bernardo Recamán Santos

2,2611141




2,2611141












  • What is the source?
    – gabbo1092
    Nov 28 at 17:40










  • @gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
    – Bernardo Recamán Santos
    Nov 28 at 17:43


















  • What is the source?
    – gabbo1092
    Nov 28 at 17:40










  • @gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
    – Bernardo Recamán Santos
    Nov 28 at 17:43
















What is the source?
– gabbo1092
Nov 28 at 17:40




What is the source?
– gabbo1092
Nov 28 at 17:40












@gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
– Bernardo Recamán Santos
Nov 28 at 17:43




@gabbo1092: Beatriz Viterbo
– Bernardo Recamán Santos
Nov 28 at 17:43










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
14
down vote



accepted










The solution is




$36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$


There is a phenomenon in English called Typoglycemia, where, given some sentence, as long as the first and last letters of each word stay put, the middle letters can be scrambled beyond recognition and somehow the human brain is able to comprehend what the sentence means.


For example, although the paragraph in the question is scrambled, it is not hard to read it.


This puzzle applies the same idea, but to as a math problem. I assumed that the first and last digits of each number were correct, and that I had to scramble the other digits to get an equation that represented a "correct" addition problem.




Here's how I solved the puzzle.




First, I noticed that the tens digits in each of the summands add to $15$. Because we know that these digits are correct, the tens digit of the sum must be either $7$ or $8$, with a carry of $2$ or $3$ from the ones column. But, notice that it is not possible to make a carry of $3$ in the ones' column, and therefore the tens digit of the sum must be $7$.


Then, I set the digits in the ones' column to be the largest digit they could be. This yielded $6$ in the first summand, $8$ in the second summand, and $5$ in the final summand; for a total of $19$. To make the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens column, I assumed a carry of $1$ from the tenths' column. This made the sum of the ones' column $20$, placing a $0$ as the ones' digit of the sum and the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens' column.


At this point, I had
$36.textrm{[14|41]}4 + 58.textrm{[27|72]}6 + 75.textrm{[24|42]}8 = 170.textrm{[38|83]}8$

At which point, it is relatively easy to figure out the correct combination. I noticed that it is not possible to make a sum of $18$ in the tenths' column (remember, we need a carry of $1$ into the ones' column, for the previous paragraph to work). Therefore, we have a sum of $13$ in the tenths' column; the only way to do this is $4 + 7 + 2 = 13$.


This gives a final answer of
$36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$







share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    5
    down vote













    Solution:




    $36.414 +58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$




    Method:




    First note that with the starting numbers staying in place the absolute min numbers (before the decimal) are 31, 52, 72, which add up to 155. The max (not including the decimals) adds to 169. With that in mind I set the value to be a 170 in the final answer and made the rest of the numbers be 36, 58, 75. Then since I knew the decimals of the added numbers has to add to over 1 (to turn the 169 to 170). With that observation in mind I found the final numbers placement.







    share|improve this answer




























      up vote
      1
      down vote













      If




      the decimal point can be moved as well,




      there are other solutions




      which are trivial modifications of the one already found by others:

      3.6414 + 5.8726 + 7.5248 = 17.0388

      364.14 + 587.26 + 752.48 = 1703.88

      3641.4 + 5872.6 + 7524.8 = 17038.8







      share|improve this answer





















      • My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
        – Bernardo Recamán Santos
        Nov 29 at 11:26










      • Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
        – Hugh
        2 days ago











      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "559"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f75837%2fthe-mxied-atdiiodn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      14
      down vote



      accepted










      The solution is




      $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$


      There is a phenomenon in English called Typoglycemia, where, given some sentence, as long as the first and last letters of each word stay put, the middle letters can be scrambled beyond recognition and somehow the human brain is able to comprehend what the sentence means.


      For example, although the paragraph in the question is scrambled, it is not hard to read it.


      This puzzle applies the same idea, but to as a math problem. I assumed that the first and last digits of each number were correct, and that I had to scramble the other digits to get an equation that represented a "correct" addition problem.




      Here's how I solved the puzzle.




      First, I noticed that the tens digits in each of the summands add to $15$. Because we know that these digits are correct, the tens digit of the sum must be either $7$ or $8$, with a carry of $2$ or $3$ from the ones column. But, notice that it is not possible to make a carry of $3$ in the ones' column, and therefore the tens digit of the sum must be $7$.


      Then, I set the digits in the ones' column to be the largest digit they could be. This yielded $6$ in the first summand, $8$ in the second summand, and $5$ in the final summand; for a total of $19$. To make the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens column, I assumed a carry of $1$ from the tenths' column. This made the sum of the ones' column $20$, placing a $0$ as the ones' digit of the sum and the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens' column.


      At this point, I had
      $36.textrm{[14|41]}4 + 58.textrm{[27|72]}6 + 75.textrm{[24|42]}8 = 170.textrm{[38|83]}8$

      At which point, it is relatively easy to figure out the correct combination. I noticed that it is not possible to make a sum of $18$ in the tenths' column (remember, we need a carry of $1$ into the ones' column, for the previous paragraph to work). Therefore, we have a sum of $13$ in the tenths' column; the only way to do this is $4 + 7 + 2 = 13$.


      This gives a final answer of
      $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$







      share|improve this answer



























        up vote
        14
        down vote



        accepted










        The solution is




        $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$


        There is a phenomenon in English called Typoglycemia, where, given some sentence, as long as the first and last letters of each word stay put, the middle letters can be scrambled beyond recognition and somehow the human brain is able to comprehend what the sentence means.


        For example, although the paragraph in the question is scrambled, it is not hard to read it.


        This puzzle applies the same idea, but to as a math problem. I assumed that the first and last digits of each number were correct, and that I had to scramble the other digits to get an equation that represented a "correct" addition problem.




        Here's how I solved the puzzle.




        First, I noticed that the tens digits in each of the summands add to $15$. Because we know that these digits are correct, the tens digit of the sum must be either $7$ or $8$, with a carry of $2$ or $3$ from the ones column. But, notice that it is not possible to make a carry of $3$ in the ones' column, and therefore the tens digit of the sum must be $7$.


        Then, I set the digits in the ones' column to be the largest digit they could be. This yielded $6$ in the first summand, $8$ in the second summand, and $5$ in the final summand; for a total of $19$. To make the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens column, I assumed a carry of $1$ from the tenths' column. This made the sum of the ones' column $20$, placing a $0$ as the ones' digit of the sum and the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens' column.


        At this point, I had
        $36.textrm{[14|41]}4 + 58.textrm{[27|72]}6 + 75.textrm{[24|42]}8 = 170.textrm{[38|83]}8$

        At which point, it is relatively easy to figure out the correct combination. I noticed that it is not possible to make a sum of $18$ in the tenths' column (remember, we need a carry of $1$ into the ones' column, for the previous paragraph to work). Therefore, we have a sum of $13$ in the tenths' column; the only way to do this is $4 + 7 + 2 = 13$.


        This gives a final answer of
        $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$







        share|improve this answer

























          up vote
          14
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          14
          down vote



          accepted






          The solution is




          $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$


          There is a phenomenon in English called Typoglycemia, where, given some sentence, as long as the first and last letters of each word stay put, the middle letters can be scrambled beyond recognition and somehow the human brain is able to comprehend what the sentence means.


          For example, although the paragraph in the question is scrambled, it is not hard to read it.


          This puzzle applies the same idea, but to as a math problem. I assumed that the first and last digits of each number were correct, and that I had to scramble the other digits to get an equation that represented a "correct" addition problem.




          Here's how I solved the puzzle.




          First, I noticed that the tens digits in each of the summands add to $15$. Because we know that these digits are correct, the tens digit of the sum must be either $7$ or $8$, with a carry of $2$ or $3$ from the ones column. But, notice that it is not possible to make a carry of $3$ in the ones' column, and therefore the tens digit of the sum must be $7$.


          Then, I set the digits in the ones' column to be the largest digit they could be. This yielded $6$ in the first summand, $8$ in the second summand, and $5$ in the final summand; for a total of $19$. To make the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens column, I assumed a carry of $1$ from the tenths' column. This made the sum of the ones' column $20$, placing a $0$ as the ones' digit of the sum and the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens' column.


          At this point, I had
          $36.textrm{[14|41]}4 + 58.textrm{[27|72]}6 + 75.textrm{[24|42]}8 = 170.textrm{[38|83]}8$

          At which point, it is relatively easy to figure out the correct combination. I noticed that it is not possible to make a sum of $18$ in the tenths' column (remember, we need a carry of $1$ into the ones' column, for the previous paragraph to work). Therefore, we have a sum of $13$ in the tenths' column; the only way to do this is $4 + 7 + 2 = 13$.


          This gives a final answer of
          $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$







          share|improve this answer














          The solution is




          $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$


          There is a phenomenon in English called Typoglycemia, where, given some sentence, as long as the first and last letters of each word stay put, the middle letters can be scrambled beyond recognition and somehow the human brain is able to comprehend what the sentence means.


          For example, although the paragraph in the question is scrambled, it is not hard to read it.


          This puzzle applies the same idea, but to as a math problem. I assumed that the first and last digits of each number were correct, and that I had to scramble the other digits to get an equation that represented a "correct" addition problem.




          Here's how I solved the puzzle.




          First, I noticed that the tens digits in each of the summands add to $15$. Because we know that these digits are correct, the tens digit of the sum must be either $7$ or $8$, with a carry of $2$ or $3$ from the ones column. But, notice that it is not possible to make a carry of $3$ in the ones' column, and therefore the tens digit of the sum must be $7$.


          Then, I set the digits in the ones' column to be the largest digit they could be. This yielded $6$ in the first summand, $8$ in the second summand, and $5$ in the final summand; for a total of $19$. To make the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens column, I assumed a carry of $1$ from the tenths' column. This made the sum of the ones' column $20$, placing a $0$ as the ones' digit of the sum and the necessary carry of $2$ into the tens' column.


          At this point, I had
          $36.textrm{[14|41]}4 + 58.textrm{[27|72]}6 + 75.textrm{[24|42]}8 = 170.textrm{[38|83]}8$

          At which point, it is relatively easy to figure out the correct combination. I noticed that it is not possible to make a sum of $18$ in the tenths' column (remember, we need a carry of $1$ into the ones' column, for the previous paragraph to work). Therefore, we have a sum of $13$ in the tenths' column; the only way to do this is $4 + 7 + 2 = 13$.


          This gives a final answer of
          $36.414 + 58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$








          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited Nov 29 at 0:03

























          answered Nov 28 at 17:47









          Hugh

          1,114514




          1,114514






















              up vote
              5
              down vote













              Solution:




              $36.414 +58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$




              Method:




              First note that with the starting numbers staying in place the absolute min numbers (before the decimal) are 31, 52, 72, which add up to 155. The max (not including the decimals) adds to 169. With that in mind I set the value to be a 170 in the final answer and made the rest of the numbers be 36, 58, 75. Then since I knew the decimals of the added numbers has to add to over 1 (to turn the 169 to 170). With that observation in mind I found the final numbers placement.







              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                5
                down vote













                Solution:




                $36.414 +58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$




                Method:




                First note that with the starting numbers staying in place the absolute min numbers (before the decimal) are 31, 52, 72, which add up to 155. The max (not including the decimals) adds to 169. With that in mind I set the value to be a 170 in the final answer and made the rest of the numbers be 36, 58, 75. Then since I knew the decimals of the added numbers has to add to over 1 (to turn the 169 to 170). With that observation in mind I found the final numbers placement.







                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  5
                  down vote









                  Solution:




                  $36.414 +58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$




                  Method:




                  First note that with the starting numbers staying in place the absolute min numbers (before the decimal) are 31, 52, 72, which add up to 155. The max (not including the decimals) adds to 169. With that in mind I set the value to be a 170 in the final answer and made the rest of the numbers be 36, 58, 75. Then since I knew the decimals of the added numbers has to add to over 1 (to turn the 169 to 170). With that observation in mind I found the final numbers placement.







                  share|improve this answer












                  Solution:




                  $36.414 +58.726 + 75.248 = 170.388$




                  Method:




                  First note that with the starting numbers staying in place the absolute min numbers (before the decimal) are 31, 52, 72, which add up to 155. The max (not including the decimals) adds to 169. With that in mind I set the value to be a 170 in the final answer and made the rest of the numbers be 36, 58, 75. Then since I knew the decimals of the added numbers has to add to over 1 (to turn the 169 to 170). With that observation in mind I found the final numbers placement.








                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 28 at 17:50









                  gabbo1092

                  4,684738




                  4,684738






















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      If




                      the decimal point can be moved as well,




                      there are other solutions




                      which are trivial modifications of the one already found by others:

                      3.6414 + 5.8726 + 7.5248 = 17.0388

                      364.14 + 587.26 + 752.48 = 1703.88

                      3641.4 + 5872.6 + 7524.8 = 17038.8







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                        – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                        Nov 29 at 11:26










                      • Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                        – Hugh
                        2 days ago















                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote













                      If




                      the decimal point can be moved as well,




                      there are other solutions




                      which are trivial modifications of the one already found by others:

                      3.6414 + 5.8726 + 7.5248 = 17.0388

                      364.14 + 587.26 + 752.48 = 1703.88

                      3641.4 + 5872.6 + 7524.8 = 17038.8







                      share|improve this answer





















                      • My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                        – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                        Nov 29 at 11:26










                      • Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                        – Hugh
                        2 days ago













                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote










                      up vote
                      1
                      down vote









                      If




                      the decimal point can be moved as well,




                      there are other solutions




                      which are trivial modifications of the one already found by others:

                      3.6414 + 5.8726 + 7.5248 = 17.0388

                      364.14 + 587.26 + 752.48 = 1703.88

                      3641.4 + 5872.6 + 7524.8 = 17038.8







                      share|improve this answer












                      If




                      the decimal point can be moved as well,




                      there are other solutions




                      which are trivial modifications of the one already found by others:

                      3.6414 + 5.8726 + 7.5248 = 17.0388

                      364.14 + 587.26 + 752.48 = 1703.88

                      3641.4 + 5872.6 + 7524.8 = 17038.8








                      share|improve this answer












                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer










                      answered Nov 29 at 6:40









                      elias

                      8,50332152




                      8,50332152












                      • My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                        – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                        Nov 29 at 11:26










                      • Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                        – Hugh
                        2 days ago


















                      • My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                        – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                        Nov 29 at 11:26










                      • Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                        – Hugh
                        2 days ago
















                      My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                      – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                      Nov 29 at 11:26




                      My original intention involved whole numbers, with dot separating thousands, as we use it in Spanish. I have corrected question.
                      – Bernardo Recamán Santos
                      Nov 29 at 11:26












                      Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                      – Hugh
                      2 days ago




                      Oh, the dot separated thousands. I assumed that they were decimals in my answer, I'll correct for that.
                      – Hugh
                      2 days ago


















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f75837%2fthe-mxied-atdiiodn%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                      How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                      QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater