Show that $f$ defined on the interval $(a,b)$ is not differentiable for every point in $E$ with $m(E)=0$
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ have measure zero contained in the open interval $(a,b)$. In a previous problem I showed that there is a countable collection of open intervals, ${(c_k,d_k)}_k$, contained in $(a,b)$ for which each point in $E$ is contained in infinitely many intervals of the collection and $sum_k |(c_k,d_k)|=sum_kd_k-c_k<infty.$ Define $f(x)=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap(-infty,x)|$ for $x in (a,b)$. Show $f$ is increasing and fails to be differentiable for every point in $E$.
The absolute value bars mean measure of the interval. I have already shown $f$ was increasing by showing that if $a le u <v le b$ then $$begin{align} f(v)-f(u) &=sum_k |(c_k,d_k)cap [(-infty,u)cup[u,v)] |-sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap (-infty,u)|\&=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap [u,v)] |ge 0 end{align}$$
Let $D^+f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$ and $D^-f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[inf_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$
To show f is not differentiable at any point in $E$ then I need to show that $D^+f(x) not= D^-f(x)$ for every $x in E$. This is where I am having trouble. First from using what I did above to show that $f$ is increasing I found that for $t>0$
$$ A_t(f(x))= dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t}=dfrac{1}{t}sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)| $$
So at this point what we know is that if $xin E$ then $x$ belongs to $(c_k,d_k)$ for infinitely many $k$ and $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)|$ converges since $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)|<infty$. But Im not sure how to find the $sup_{0<|t|le h}$ and $inf_{0<|t|le h}$ of $A_t(f(x))$ I think that $inf_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))=0$ and $sup_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))>0$ but I dont know how to show it.
Any help is appreciated, thanks
real-analysis measure-theory derivatives limsup-and-liminf
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ have measure zero contained in the open interval $(a,b)$. In a previous problem I showed that there is a countable collection of open intervals, ${(c_k,d_k)}_k$, contained in $(a,b)$ for which each point in $E$ is contained in infinitely many intervals of the collection and $sum_k |(c_k,d_k)|=sum_kd_k-c_k<infty.$ Define $f(x)=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap(-infty,x)|$ for $x in (a,b)$. Show $f$ is increasing and fails to be differentiable for every point in $E$.
The absolute value bars mean measure of the interval. I have already shown $f$ was increasing by showing that if $a le u <v le b$ then $$begin{align} f(v)-f(u) &=sum_k |(c_k,d_k)cap [(-infty,u)cup[u,v)] |-sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap (-infty,u)|\&=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap [u,v)] |ge 0 end{align}$$
Let $D^+f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$ and $D^-f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[inf_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$
To show f is not differentiable at any point in $E$ then I need to show that $D^+f(x) not= D^-f(x)$ for every $x in E$. This is where I am having trouble. First from using what I did above to show that $f$ is increasing I found that for $t>0$
$$ A_t(f(x))= dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t}=dfrac{1}{t}sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)| $$
So at this point what we know is that if $xin E$ then $x$ belongs to $(c_k,d_k)$ for infinitely many $k$ and $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)|$ converges since $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)|<infty$. But Im not sure how to find the $sup_{0<|t|le h}$ and $inf_{0<|t|le h}$ of $A_t(f(x))$ I think that $inf_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))=0$ and $sup_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))>0$ but I dont know how to show it.
Any help is appreciated, thanks
real-analysis measure-theory derivatives limsup-and-liminf
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
Let $E$ have measure zero contained in the open interval $(a,b)$. In a previous problem I showed that there is a countable collection of open intervals, ${(c_k,d_k)}_k$, contained in $(a,b)$ for which each point in $E$ is contained in infinitely many intervals of the collection and $sum_k |(c_k,d_k)|=sum_kd_k-c_k<infty.$ Define $f(x)=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap(-infty,x)|$ for $x in (a,b)$. Show $f$ is increasing and fails to be differentiable for every point in $E$.
The absolute value bars mean measure of the interval. I have already shown $f$ was increasing by showing that if $a le u <v le b$ then $$begin{align} f(v)-f(u) &=sum_k |(c_k,d_k)cap [(-infty,u)cup[u,v)] |-sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap (-infty,u)|\&=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap [u,v)] |ge 0 end{align}$$
Let $D^+f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$ and $D^-f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[inf_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$
To show f is not differentiable at any point in $E$ then I need to show that $D^+f(x) not= D^-f(x)$ for every $x in E$. This is where I am having trouble. First from using what I did above to show that $f$ is increasing I found that for $t>0$
$$ A_t(f(x))= dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t}=dfrac{1}{t}sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)| $$
So at this point what we know is that if $xin E$ then $x$ belongs to $(c_k,d_k)$ for infinitely many $k$ and $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)|$ converges since $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)|<infty$. But Im not sure how to find the $sup_{0<|t|le h}$ and $inf_{0<|t|le h}$ of $A_t(f(x))$ I think that $inf_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))=0$ and $sup_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))>0$ but I dont know how to show it.
Any help is appreciated, thanks
real-analysis measure-theory derivatives limsup-and-liminf
Let $E$ have measure zero contained in the open interval $(a,b)$. In a previous problem I showed that there is a countable collection of open intervals, ${(c_k,d_k)}_k$, contained in $(a,b)$ for which each point in $E$ is contained in infinitely many intervals of the collection and $sum_k |(c_k,d_k)|=sum_kd_k-c_k<infty.$ Define $f(x)=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap(-infty,x)|$ for $x in (a,b)$. Show $f$ is increasing and fails to be differentiable for every point in $E$.
The absolute value bars mean measure of the interval. I have already shown $f$ was increasing by showing that if $a le u <v le b$ then $$begin{align} f(v)-f(u) &=sum_k |(c_k,d_k)cap [(-infty,u)cup[u,v)] |-sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap (-infty,u)|\&=sum_k|(c_k,d_k)cap [u,v)] |ge 0 end{align}$$
Let $D^+f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$ and $D^-f(x)=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[inf_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]$
To show f is not differentiable at any point in $E$ then I need to show that $D^+f(x) not= D^-f(x)$ for every $x in E$. This is where I am having trouble. First from using what I did above to show that $f$ is increasing I found that for $t>0$
$$ A_t(f(x))= dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t}=dfrac{1}{t}sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)| $$
So at this point what we know is that if $xin E$ then $x$ belongs to $(c_k,d_k)$ for infinitely many $k$ and $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)cap[x,x+t)|$ converges since $sum_{k=1}^{infty}|(c_k,d_k)|<infty$. But Im not sure how to find the $sup_{0<|t|le h}$ and $inf_{0<|t|le h}$ of $A_t(f(x))$ I think that $inf_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))=0$ and $sup_{0<|t|le h}A_t(f(x))>0$ but I dont know how to show it.
Any help is appreciated, thanks
real-analysis measure-theory derivatives limsup-and-liminf
real-analysis measure-theory derivatives limsup-and-liminf
asked Jun 16 '16 at 17:46
alpast
461314
461314
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38
add a comment |
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I don't know if you are still seeking for the answer (probably not...), but here's my try.
Indeed, I cannot figure out the supremum and the infimum from what you got. Let's think about it differently.
Let ${k_1,k_2,...,k_n,...}$ be the collection of natural numbers for which $xin I_k:=(c_k,d_k)$. Let $Nin mathbb{N}$ be such that $k_{N}$ is in the latter enumeration. Then, $xin I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. We know that finite intersections of open sets is open. Therefore, the latter finite intersection is open. This means we can pick an $epsilon_N>0$ small enough for $x+epsilon_N$ to remain in the intersection. Consequently, $[x,x+epsilon_N)subset I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. In particular, this means that the $N^{th}$-partial sum of $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)$ is
begin{equation}
[f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)]_N=sum_{k=1}^{N}ell((c_k,d_k)cap [x,x+epsilon_N))=sum_{k=1}^{N}epsilon_N=Nepsilon_N.
end{equation}
Hence, we observe that $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)ge Nepsilon_N$. Finally, we see that
begin{equation}
begin{split}
D^+f(x)&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]gelim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)}{t}right]\&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{Nepsilon_N}{t}right]ge N.
end{split}
end{equation}
But recall that $N$ can be arbitrarily large based on the fact that $xin I_k$ for infinitely many $k$. This tells us that $D^+f(x)$ is unbounded. Zhuanghua Liu gave you the correct hint :)
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
I don't know if you are still seeking for the answer (probably not...), but here's my try.
Indeed, I cannot figure out the supremum and the infimum from what you got. Let's think about it differently.
Let ${k_1,k_2,...,k_n,...}$ be the collection of natural numbers for which $xin I_k:=(c_k,d_k)$. Let $Nin mathbb{N}$ be such that $k_{N}$ is in the latter enumeration. Then, $xin I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. We know that finite intersections of open sets is open. Therefore, the latter finite intersection is open. This means we can pick an $epsilon_N>0$ small enough for $x+epsilon_N$ to remain in the intersection. Consequently, $[x,x+epsilon_N)subset I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. In particular, this means that the $N^{th}$-partial sum of $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)$ is
begin{equation}
[f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)]_N=sum_{k=1}^{N}ell((c_k,d_k)cap [x,x+epsilon_N))=sum_{k=1}^{N}epsilon_N=Nepsilon_N.
end{equation}
Hence, we observe that $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)ge Nepsilon_N$. Finally, we see that
begin{equation}
begin{split}
D^+f(x)&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]gelim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)}{t}right]\&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{Nepsilon_N}{t}right]ge N.
end{split}
end{equation}
But recall that $N$ can be arbitrarily large based on the fact that $xin I_k$ for infinitely many $k$. This tells us that $D^+f(x)$ is unbounded. Zhuanghua Liu gave you the correct hint :)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
I don't know if you are still seeking for the answer (probably not...), but here's my try.
Indeed, I cannot figure out the supremum and the infimum from what you got. Let's think about it differently.
Let ${k_1,k_2,...,k_n,...}$ be the collection of natural numbers for which $xin I_k:=(c_k,d_k)$. Let $Nin mathbb{N}$ be such that $k_{N}$ is in the latter enumeration. Then, $xin I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. We know that finite intersections of open sets is open. Therefore, the latter finite intersection is open. This means we can pick an $epsilon_N>0$ small enough for $x+epsilon_N$ to remain in the intersection. Consequently, $[x,x+epsilon_N)subset I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. In particular, this means that the $N^{th}$-partial sum of $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)$ is
begin{equation}
[f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)]_N=sum_{k=1}^{N}ell((c_k,d_k)cap [x,x+epsilon_N))=sum_{k=1}^{N}epsilon_N=Nepsilon_N.
end{equation}
Hence, we observe that $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)ge Nepsilon_N$. Finally, we see that
begin{equation}
begin{split}
D^+f(x)&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]gelim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)}{t}right]\&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{Nepsilon_N}{t}right]ge N.
end{split}
end{equation}
But recall that $N$ can be arbitrarily large based on the fact that $xin I_k$ for infinitely many $k$. This tells us that $D^+f(x)$ is unbounded. Zhuanghua Liu gave you the correct hint :)
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
I don't know if you are still seeking for the answer (probably not...), but here's my try.
Indeed, I cannot figure out the supremum and the infimum from what you got. Let's think about it differently.
Let ${k_1,k_2,...,k_n,...}$ be the collection of natural numbers for which $xin I_k:=(c_k,d_k)$. Let $Nin mathbb{N}$ be such that $k_{N}$ is in the latter enumeration. Then, $xin I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. We know that finite intersections of open sets is open. Therefore, the latter finite intersection is open. This means we can pick an $epsilon_N>0$ small enough for $x+epsilon_N$ to remain in the intersection. Consequently, $[x,x+epsilon_N)subset I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. In particular, this means that the $N^{th}$-partial sum of $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)$ is
begin{equation}
[f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)]_N=sum_{k=1}^{N}ell((c_k,d_k)cap [x,x+epsilon_N))=sum_{k=1}^{N}epsilon_N=Nepsilon_N.
end{equation}
Hence, we observe that $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)ge Nepsilon_N$. Finally, we see that
begin{equation}
begin{split}
D^+f(x)&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]gelim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)}{t}right]\&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{Nepsilon_N}{t}right]ge N.
end{split}
end{equation}
But recall that $N$ can be arbitrarily large based on the fact that $xin I_k$ for infinitely many $k$. This tells us that $D^+f(x)$ is unbounded. Zhuanghua Liu gave you the correct hint :)
I don't know if you are still seeking for the answer (probably not...), but here's my try.
Indeed, I cannot figure out the supremum and the infimum from what you got. Let's think about it differently.
Let ${k_1,k_2,...,k_n,...}$ be the collection of natural numbers for which $xin I_k:=(c_k,d_k)$. Let $Nin mathbb{N}$ be such that $k_{N}$ is in the latter enumeration. Then, $xin I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. We know that finite intersections of open sets is open. Therefore, the latter finite intersection is open. This means we can pick an $epsilon_N>0$ small enough for $x+epsilon_N$ to remain in the intersection. Consequently, $[x,x+epsilon_N)subset I_{k_1}cap I_{k_2}cap...cap I_{k_N}$. In particular, this means that the $N^{th}$-partial sum of $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)$ is
begin{equation}
[f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)]_N=sum_{k=1}^{N}ell((c_k,d_k)cap [x,x+epsilon_N))=sum_{k=1}^{N}epsilon_N=Nepsilon_N.
end{equation}
Hence, we observe that $f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)ge Nepsilon_N$. Finally, we see that
begin{equation}
begin{split}
D^+f(x)&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h}dfrac{f(x+t)-f(x)}{t} right]gelim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{f(x+epsilon_N)-f(x)}{t}right]\&=lim_{hrightarrow 0}left[sup_{0<|t|le h} dfrac{Nepsilon_N}{t}right]ge N.
end{split}
end{equation}
But recall that $N$ can be arbitrarily large based on the fact that $xin I_k$ for infinitely many $k$. This tells us that $D^+f(x)$ is unbounded. Zhuanghua Liu gave you the correct hint :)
answered Nov 18 at 3:21
Dirac's Butt
548
548
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f1828805%2fshow-that-f-defined-on-the-interval-a-b-is-not-differentiable-for-every-po%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$D^+f(x)$ does not converge, as $x in E$ belongs to infinite $(c_k, d_k)$,
– Zhuanghua Liu
Jul 5 '17 at 6:38