A tricky contour integral.











up vote
1
down vote

favorite
3












Let $f$ be holomorphic on a domain $D$ containing $overline{D}(0,1)$, and $gamma$ be the positively oriented circular contour centred at 0 of radius 1. Prove that
$$
frac{1}{2 pi i} int_{gamma} frac{overline{f(z)}}{(z-z_0)} dz=
begin{cases} overline{f(0)} &mbox{if} ,, |z_0|<1, \
overline{f(0)}-overline{f(1/ overline{z_0})} &mbox{if},, |z_0|>1.
end{cases}
$$



In the previous part of the question I was asked to prove that for a continuous function $phi:A={zinmathbb{C}:|z|=1}rightarrowmathbb{C}$ and $gamma$ as above,



$$overline{int_{gamma}phi(z),, dz} = -int_{gamma} overline{phi(z)},,frac{dz}{z^2}$$



which I've already done. So it's reasonable to think that the above would help solve the integral (perhaps along with Cauchy's Integral Formula) for the different cases of $z_0$ but I don't know how to get to a point where I can use it.



I've seen some suggestions of a variable change from $z$ to $1/z$ as $overline{f(bar{z})}$ is in fact holomorphic and so continuous on A since for $|z|=1 ,,bar{z}=1/z$ by the identity $bar{z}z=|z|^2$ but I don't know how to implement the change of variables on a contour integral because we haven't been taught how to do so yet which leads me to think that maybe it isn't what they want us to do.



Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite
    3












    Let $f$ be holomorphic on a domain $D$ containing $overline{D}(0,1)$, and $gamma$ be the positively oriented circular contour centred at 0 of radius 1. Prove that
    $$
    frac{1}{2 pi i} int_{gamma} frac{overline{f(z)}}{(z-z_0)} dz=
    begin{cases} overline{f(0)} &mbox{if} ,, |z_0|<1, \
    overline{f(0)}-overline{f(1/ overline{z_0})} &mbox{if},, |z_0|>1.
    end{cases}
    $$



    In the previous part of the question I was asked to prove that for a continuous function $phi:A={zinmathbb{C}:|z|=1}rightarrowmathbb{C}$ and $gamma$ as above,



    $$overline{int_{gamma}phi(z),, dz} = -int_{gamma} overline{phi(z)},,frac{dz}{z^2}$$



    which I've already done. So it's reasonable to think that the above would help solve the integral (perhaps along with Cauchy's Integral Formula) for the different cases of $z_0$ but I don't know how to get to a point where I can use it.



    I've seen some suggestions of a variable change from $z$ to $1/z$ as $overline{f(bar{z})}$ is in fact holomorphic and so continuous on A since for $|z|=1 ,,bar{z}=1/z$ by the identity $bar{z}z=|z|^2$ but I don't know how to implement the change of variables on a contour integral because we haven't been taught how to do so yet which leads me to think that maybe it isn't what they want us to do.



    Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      3









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite
      3






      3





      Let $f$ be holomorphic on a domain $D$ containing $overline{D}(0,1)$, and $gamma$ be the positively oriented circular contour centred at 0 of radius 1. Prove that
      $$
      frac{1}{2 pi i} int_{gamma} frac{overline{f(z)}}{(z-z_0)} dz=
      begin{cases} overline{f(0)} &mbox{if} ,, |z_0|<1, \
      overline{f(0)}-overline{f(1/ overline{z_0})} &mbox{if},, |z_0|>1.
      end{cases}
      $$



      In the previous part of the question I was asked to prove that for a continuous function $phi:A={zinmathbb{C}:|z|=1}rightarrowmathbb{C}$ and $gamma$ as above,



      $$overline{int_{gamma}phi(z),, dz} = -int_{gamma} overline{phi(z)},,frac{dz}{z^2}$$



      which I've already done. So it's reasonable to think that the above would help solve the integral (perhaps along with Cauchy's Integral Formula) for the different cases of $z_0$ but I don't know how to get to a point where I can use it.



      I've seen some suggestions of a variable change from $z$ to $1/z$ as $overline{f(bar{z})}$ is in fact holomorphic and so continuous on A since for $|z|=1 ,,bar{z}=1/z$ by the identity $bar{z}z=|z|^2$ but I don't know how to implement the change of variables on a contour integral because we haven't been taught how to do so yet which leads me to think that maybe it isn't what they want us to do.



      Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.










      share|cite|improve this question















      Let $f$ be holomorphic on a domain $D$ containing $overline{D}(0,1)$, and $gamma$ be the positively oriented circular contour centred at 0 of radius 1. Prove that
      $$
      frac{1}{2 pi i} int_{gamma} frac{overline{f(z)}}{(z-z_0)} dz=
      begin{cases} overline{f(0)} &mbox{if} ,, |z_0|<1, \
      overline{f(0)}-overline{f(1/ overline{z_0})} &mbox{if},, |z_0|>1.
      end{cases}
      $$



      In the previous part of the question I was asked to prove that for a continuous function $phi:A={zinmathbb{C}:|z|=1}rightarrowmathbb{C}$ and $gamma$ as above,



      $$overline{int_{gamma}phi(z),, dz} = -int_{gamma} overline{phi(z)},,frac{dz}{z^2}$$



      which I've already done. So it's reasonable to think that the above would help solve the integral (perhaps along with Cauchy's Integral Formula) for the different cases of $z_0$ but I don't know how to get to a point where I can use it.



      I've seen some suggestions of a variable change from $z$ to $1/z$ as $overline{f(bar{z})}$ is in fact holomorphic and so continuous on A since for $|z|=1 ,,bar{z}=1/z$ by the identity $bar{z}z=|z|^2$ but I don't know how to implement the change of variables on a contour integral because we haven't been taught how to do so yet which leads me to think that maybe it isn't what they want us to do.



      Any guidance would be appreciated. Thank you in advance.







      complex-analysis contour-integration






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 18 at 12:04

























      asked Nov 18 at 10:07









      MathWolf

      569




      569






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          One of the quickest way to show this is to use power series. If $|zeta|<1$, we may write
          $frac{1}{z-zeta} = sum_{j=0}^infty frac{zeta^j}{z^{j+1}}$, and if $|zeta|>1$, then we have $frac{1}{z-zeta} = -sum_{j=0}^infty frac{z^j}{zeta^{j+1}}.$ Note that $overline{z} = z^{-1}$ on the unit circle and
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}int_gamma z^k dz = 1_{{k=-1}}.$$
          Let $f(z) = sum_{i=0}^infty a_i z^i$. In case $|zeta|<1$,
          $$
          frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i-j-1}zeta^jright) dz = overline{a_0} = overline{f(0)}.
          $$

          Otherwise,
          $$
          -frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i+j}zeta^{-j-1}right) dz = -sum_{j=0}^infty overline{a_{j+1}}zeta^{-j-1} = -overline{f(frac{1}{overline{zeta}})} + f(0),
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
            – MathWolf
            Nov 18 at 14:05











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          });
          });
          }, "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "69"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          convertImagesToLinks: true,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: 10,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003340%2fa-tricky-contour-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          up vote
          2
          down vote













          One of the quickest way to show this is to use power series. If $|zeta|<1$, we may write
          $frac{1}{z-zeta} = sum_{j=0}^infty frac{zeta^j}{z^{j+1}}$, and if $|zeta|>1$, then we have $frac{1}{z-zeta} = -sum_{j=0}^infty frac{z^j}{zeta^{j+1}}.$ Note that $overline{z} = z^{-1}$ on the unit circle and
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}int_gamma z^k dz = 1_{{k=-1}}.$$
          Let $f(z) = sum_{i=0}^infty a_i z^i$. In case $|zeta|<1$,
          $$
          frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i-j-1}zeta^jright) dz = overline{a_0} = overline{f(0)}.
          $$

          Otherwise,
          $$
          -frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i+j}zeta^{-j-1}right) dz = -sum_{j=0}^infty overline{a_{j+1}}zeta^{-j-1} = -overline{f(frac{1}{overline{zeta}})} + f(0),
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
            – MathWolf
            Nov 18 at 14:05















          up vote
          2
          down vote













          One of the quickest way to show this is to use power series. If $|zeta|<1$, we may write
          $frac{1}{z-zeta} = sum_{j=0}^infty frac{zeta^j}{z^{j+1}}$, and if $|zeta|>1$, then we have $frac{1}{z-zeta} = -sum_{j=0}^infty frac{z^j}{zeta^{j+1}}.$ Note that $overline{z} = z^{-1}$ on the unit circle and
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}int_gamma z^k dz = 1_{{k=-1}}.$$
          Let $f(z) = sum_{i=0}^infty a_i z^i$. In case $|zeta|<1$,
          $$
          frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i-j-1}zeta^jright) dz = overline{a_0} = overline{f(0)}.
          $$

          Otherwise,
          $$
          -frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i+j}zeta^{-j-1}right) dz = -sum_{j=0}^infty overline{a_{j+1}}zeta^{-j-1} = -overline{f(frac{1}{overline{zeta}})} + f(0),
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer





















          • We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
            – MathWolf
            Nov 18 at 14:05













          up vote
          2
          down vote










          up vote
          2
          down vote









          One of the quickest way to show this is to use power series. If $|zeta|<1$, we may write
          $frac{1}{z-zeta} = sum_{j=0}^infty frac{zeta^j}{z^{j+1}}$, and if $|zeta|>1$, then we have $frac{1}{z-zeta} = -sum_{j=0}^infty frac{z^j}{zeta^{j+1}}.$ Note that $overline{z} = z^{-1}$ on the unit circle and
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}int_gamma z^k dz = 1_{{k=-1}}.$$
          Let $f(z) = sum_{i=0}^infty a_i z^i$. In case $|zeta|<1$,
          $$
          frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i-j-1}zeta^jright) dz = overline{a_0} = overline{f(0)}.
          $$

          Otherwise,
          $$
          -frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i+j}zeta^{-j-1}right) dz = -sum_{j=0}^infty overline{a_{j+1}}zeta^{-j-1} = -overline{f(frac{1}{overline{zeta}})} + f(0),
          $$
          as desired.






          share|cite|improve this answer












          One of the quickest way to show this is to use power series. If $|zeta|<1$, we may write
          $frac{1}{z-zeta} = sum_{j=0}^infty frac{zeta^j}{z^{j+1}}$, and if $|zeta|>1$, then we have $frac{1}{z-zeta} = -sum_{j=0}^infty frac{z^j}{zeta^{j+1}}.$ Note that $overline{z} = z^{-1}$ on the unit circle and
          $$frac{1}{2pi i}int_gamma z^k dz = 1_{{k=-1}}.$$
          Let $f(z) = sum_{i=0}^infty a_i z^i$. In case $|zeta|<1$,
          $$
          frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i-j-1}zeta^jright) dz = overline{a_0} = overline{f(0)}.
          $$

          Otherwise,
          $$
          -frac{1}{2pi i} int_gamma left(sum_{i,jgeq 0} overline{a_i}z^{-i+j}zeta^{-j-1}right) dz = -sum_{j=0}^infty overline{a_{j+1}}zeta^{-j-1} = -overline{f(frac{1}{overline{zeta}})} + f(0),
          $$
          as desired.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Nov 18 at 12:10









          Song

          84011




          84011












          • We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
            – MathWolf
            Nov 18 at 14:05


















          • We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
            – MathWolf
            Nov 18 at 14:05
















          We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
          – MathWolf
          Nov 18 at 14:05




          We've only just started doing power series in complex analysis so this is a little too advanced for me at this point. But thank you for taking the time.
          – MathWolf
          Nov 18 at 14:05


















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





          Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


          Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003340%2fa-tricky-contour-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

          How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

          QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater