Definition of an exact sequence
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am a beginner at homology, and I am trying to learn it from this text: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~jean/sheaves-cohomology.pdf
I see the following definitions for exact sequences and short exact sequences :
But then later on I see this:
This is where I get confused :
How can that sequence be exact ? from the earlier definition I thought that this would require 2 mappings ?
why is g surjective ? I see surjectivity appear in the context of short exact sequences, not in the context of (merely) exact sequences (and that sequence is not a short exact sequence either since it does not start with 0 as per the earlier definition ?)
definition homology-cohomology homological-algebra exact-sequence
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am a beginner at homology, and I am trying to learn it from this text: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~jean/sheaves-cohomology.pdf
I see the following definitions for exact sequences and short exact sequences :
But then later on I see this:
This is where I get confused :
How can that sequence be exact ? from the earlier definition I thought that this would require 2 mappings ?
why is g surjective ? I see surjectivity appear in the context of short exact sequences, not in the context of (merely) exact sequences (and that sequence is not a short exact sequence either since it does not start with 0 as per the earlier definition ?)
definition homology-cohomology homological-algebra exact-sequence
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
I am a beginner at homology, and I am trying to learn it from this text: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~jean/sheaves-cohomology.pdf
I see the following definitions for exact sequences and short exact sequences :
But then later on I see this:
This is where I get confused :
How can that sequence be exact ? from the earlier definition I thought that this would require 2 mappings ?
why is g surjective ? I see surjectivity appear in the context of short exact sequences, not in the context of (merely) exact sequences (and that sequence is not a short exact sequence either since it does not start with 0 as per the earlier definition ?)
definition homology-cohomology homological-algebra exact-sequence
I am a beginner at homology, and I am trying to learn it from this text: http://www.seas.upenn.edu/~jean/sheaves-cohomology.pdf
I see the following definitions for exact sequences and short exact sequences :
But then later on I see this:
This is where I get confused :
How can that sequence be exact ? from the earlier definition I thought that this would require 2 mappings ?
why is g surjective ? I see surjectivity appear in the context of short exact sequences, not in the context of (merely) exact sequences (and that sequence is not a short exact sequence either since it does not start with 0 as per the earlier definition ?)
definition homology-cohomology homological-algebra exact-sequence
definition homology-cohomology homological-algebra exact-sequence
edited Nov 17 at 10:49
José Carlos Santos
142k20112208
142k20112208
asked Nov 17 at 10:08
user3203476
672612
672612
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
That sequence has two mappings. The one from $C$ to the null module $0$ is the null map (there are no other choices). And the kernel of the null map is, of course, the whole $C$. Therefore, claiming that that sequence is exact is equivalent to the assertion that $g$ is surjective.
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
That sequence has two mappings. The one from $C$ to the null module $0$ is the null map (there are no other choices). And the kernel of the null map is, of course, the whole $C$. Therefore, claiming that that sequence is exact is equivalent to the assertion that $g$ is surjective.
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
That sequence has two mappings. The one from $C$ to the null module $0$ is the null map (there are no other choices). And the kernel of the null map is, of course, the whole $C$. Therefore, claiming that that sequence is exact is equivalent to the assertion that $g$ is surjective.
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
That sequence has two mappings. The one from $C$ to the null module $0$ is the null map (there are no other choices). And the kernel of the null map is, of course, the whole $C$. Therefore, claiming that that sequence is exact is equivalent to the assertion that $g$ is surjective.
That sequence has two mappings. The one from $C$ to the null module $0$ is the null map (there are no other choices). And the kernel of the null map is, of course, the whole $C$. Therefore, claiming that that sequence is exact is equivalent to the assertion that $g$ is surjective.
answered Nov 17 at 10:13
José Carlos Santos
142k20112208
142k20112208
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
add a comment |
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
many thanks for your time !
– user3203476
Nov 17 at 10:26
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
I'm glad I could help.
– José Carlos Santos
Nov 17 at 10:34
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002162%2fdefinition-of-an-exact-sequence%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown