What is Ve in mosfet
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
up vote
4
down vote
favorite
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
In this curve that shows the operating regions of the mosfet
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
transistors mosfet
transistors mosfet
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
asked Nov 26 at 12:53
Gh-B
264
264
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36
add a comment |
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
up vote
6
down vote
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
What is Ve that is written Vgs +Ve ??
The word "positive" is sometimes shortened to "+ve" so looking at your graph you slightly misread what you saw - it says "+ve" and not "+Ve".
So it actually implies the gate source voltage (when positive).
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
answered Nov 26 at 12:57
Andy aka
236k10173401
236k10173401
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
add a comment |
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
Looks like we answered this at the same time! Yours is better though, +1.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:01
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
I get it now thank u for ur help
– Gh-B
Nov 26 at 13:06
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
add a comment |
up vote
5
down vote
up vote
5
down vote
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
"+ve" is a shorthand form of writing "positive". Likewise, you sometimes see "-ve" for "negative".
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
answered Nov 26 at 12:58
Hearth
3,378929
3,378929
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
add a comment |
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
2
2
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
I have never understood why that has become popular. The symbol "+" already means "plus" or "positive", depending on context. Writing "+ve" is like saying "positiveve", which is just as redundant as "ATM machine" or "PIN number".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:06
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
@DaveTweed I think it's because writing $V_{GS} +$ has some ambiguity; is it meant to be $V_{GS} + V_{something}$? Still, there are probably better ways of doing it; this just happens to be the one that stuck.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:08
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
That's why most people would write $+V_{GS}$, which reads as "positive $V_{GS}$".
– Dave Tweed♦
Nov 26 at 13:11
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
@DaveTweed In contrast to $-V_{gs}$, which could equally well mean "the additive inverse of $V_{gs}$", there's still potential for confusion. The quantity $+V_{gs}$ could itself be negative. This isn't exactly a problem to be solved in the comments, though.
– Hearth
Nov 26 at 13:15
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
No, yours is better +1 LOL
– Andy aka
Nov 26 at 14:06
add a comment |
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
draft saved
draft discarded
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Gh-B is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
draft saved
draft discarded
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2felectronics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f408914%2fwhat-is-ve-in-mosfet%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Ve is the variable that does into Id = K/2 * W/L * Ve^2.
– analogsystemsrf
Nov 26 at 17:36