Double checkmark symbol
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
add a comment |
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
up vote
6
down vote
favorite
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
New contributor
How do I produce double checkmarks? Similar to this:
rlap{checkmark}checkmark
overlaps one on the other
stacking-symbols
stacking-symbols
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 27 at 2:18
Rakshit Kothari
333
333
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
add a comment |
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
up vote
14
down vote
accepted
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
Rather than checkmark
from the amssymb package this symbols looks closure to checked
from wasysym. You can use:
documentclass{article}
usepackage{xcolor}
usepackage{wasysym}
newcommanddoublecheck{textcolor{blue}{checkedkern-0.6emchecked}}
begin{document}
doublecheck
end{document}
to produce:
edited Nov 27 at 19:45
answered Nov 27 at 2:29
Andrew
29.7k34279
29.7k34279
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
add a comment |
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
Thank you for the answer, I've marked this as solved.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:02
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
@egreg Thanks. Fixed.
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 13:08
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
add a comment |
up vote
8
down vote
up vote
8
down vote
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
Just for fun (meaning that @Andrew's answer is the one that should be accepted): a TikZy proposal.
documentclass{article}
usepackage{tikz}
tikzset{pics/.cd,
checkmark/.style={code={% starting point : https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/132790/121799
pgfgettransformentries{tmpxx}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}{tmp}
draw[line width=tmpxx*1pt,blue!80,fill=blue!60,line join=bevel] (0,.35) -- (.25,0) to[bend left=5] (0.8,.6) to[bend
right=5] (.25,.18) -- cycle;}}}
newcommand{doubleckmark}{begin{tikzpicture}[baseline={(0,0)}]
path (0,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark} (0.12,0) pic[scale=0.4]{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}}
begin{document}
begin{tikzpicture}
pic{checkmark};
end{tikzpicture}
abc doubleckmark xyz
end{document}
answered Nov 27 at 2:49
marmot
79.6k490168
79.6k490168
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
add a comment |
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
2
2
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
+1 I vote for marmot's answer as it fulfills the two colour requirement
– Andrew
Nov 27 at 3:01
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
Nice, but the slope is not steep enough and the colours are not the same.
– AndréC
Nov 27 at 5:29
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
@AndréC Thanks! Yes, I know that this is not an exact match, but the OP says "similar to". Of course, if the OP gives me more feedback, I'll be happy to adjust the graphics.
– marmot
Nov 27 at 5:34
1
1
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
Thank you very much @marmot you gave me exactly what I needed. The slope and colors are minor details irrelevant to my needs.
– Rakshit Kothari
Nov 27 at 6:01
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
@Andrew I agree too and I vote positively.
– Sebastiano
Nov 27 at 13:21
add a comment |
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Rakshit Kothari is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f461926%2fdouble-checkmark-symbol%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown