Orthogonality of Legendre polynomials with logarithmic functions
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have to find the value of this integral:
$int_{-1}^1 ln(1-x)*P_3(x),dx$
where $P_3(x)$ is the Legendre polynomial.
I thought I can write $ln(1-x)$ as a summation of Legendre polynomials and then use the orthogonality relation to find the answer. That didn't really work, the closest I got was to:
$ln(1-x)$=$sum_{n=1}^infty P_n(1)*x^n$ and that's not getting me anywhere.
Is this the right track of thought? Or is this question done in an entirely different method?
P.S The answer is $frac {-1}6$
integration orthogonality legendre-polynomials
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have to find the value of this integral:
$int_{-1}^1 ln(1-x)*P_3(x),dx$
where $P_3(x)$ is the Legendre polynomial.
I thought I can write $ln(1-x)$ as a summation of Legendre polynomials and then use the orthogonality relation to find the answer. That didn't really work, the closest I got was to:
$ln(1-x)$=$sum_{n=1}^infty P_n(1)*x^n$ and that's not getting me anywhere.
Is this the right track of thought? Or is this question done in an entirely different method?
P.S The answer is $frac {-1}6$
integration orthogonality legendre-polynomials
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have to find the value of this integral:
$int_{-1}^1 ln(1-x)*P_3(x),dx$
where $P_3(x)$ is the Legendre polynomial.
I thought I can write $ln(1-x)$ as a summation of Legendre polynomials and then use the orthogonality relation to find the answer. That didn't really work, the closest I got was to:
$ln(1-x)$=$sum_{n=1}^infty P_n(1)*x^n$ and that's not getting me anywhere.
Is this the right track of thought? Or is this question done in an entirely different method?
P.S The answer is $frac {-1}6$
integration orthogonality legendre-polynomials
I have to find the value of this integral:
$int_{-1}^1 ln(1-x)*P_3(x),dx$
where $P_3(x)$ is the Legendre polynomial.
I thought I can write $ln(1-x)$ as a summation of Legendre polynomials and then use the orthogonality relation to find the answer. That didn't really work, the closest I got was to:
$ln(1-x)$=$sum_{n=1}^infty P_n(1)*x^n$ and that's not getting me anywhere.
Is this the right track of thought? Or is this question done in an entirely different method?
P.S The answer is $frac {-1}6$
integration orthogonality legendre-polynomials
integration orthogonality legendre-polynomials
edited Nov 17 at 13:09
Bernard
116k637108
116k637108
asked Nov 17 at 13:04
Shikhar Asthana
61
61
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12
add a comment |
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002345%2forthogonality-of-legendre-polynomials-with-logarithmic-functions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Writing a transcendental function as polynomial sounds difficult. How are Legendre polynomials defined?
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:16
Got it! Replace it by Rodrigues' formula and use integration by parts 3 times
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 13:21
Yes to consider the differential equation properties of these functions can be useful.
– mathreadler
Nov 17 at 13:33
Thank you for your help !
– Shikhar Asthana
Nov 17 at 14:12