Sorting a list while keeping its correspondence to another list












5














I have the following two lists:



ids = {5, 11, 17, 24, 31, 37, 40, 39, 38, 33, 32, 25}



values = {0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.065752, 0.191388, 0.063796, 0.173784, 0.0503769, 0.0875244, 0.0146484, 0.0351563}


where entries in values correspond to entries in ids.



I now wish to sort ids in ascending order while maintaining the correspondence to values, such that elements in values must be changed according to the changes made to ids.



How can that be achieved?






list-manipulation







share|improve this question
























  • values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
    – user1066
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:53
















5














I have the following two lists:



ids = {5, 11, 17, 24, 31, 37, 40, 39, 38, 33, 32, 25}



values = {0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.065752, 0.191388, 0.063796, 0.173784, 0.0503769, 0.0875244, 0.0146484, 0.0351563}


where entries in values correspond to entries in ids.



I now wish to sort ids in ascending order while maintaining the correspondence to values, such that elements in values must be changed according to the changes made to ids.



How can that be achieved?






list-manipulation







share|improve this question
























  • values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
    – user1066
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:53














5












5








5


1





I have the following two lists:



ids = {5, 11, 17, 24, 31, 37, 40, 39, 38, 33, 32, 25}



values = {0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.065752, 0.191388, 0.063796, 0.173784, 0.0503769, 0.0875244, 0.0146484, 0.0351563}


where entries in values correspond to entries in ids.



I now wish to sort ids in ascending order while maintaining the correspondence to values, such that elements in values must be changed according to the changes made to ids.



How can that be achieved?






list-manipulation







share|improve this question















I have the following two lists:



ids = {5, 11, 17, 24, 31, 37, 40, 39, 38, 33, 32, 25}



values = {0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.065752, 0.191388, 0.063796, 0.173784, 0.0503769, 0.0875244, 0.0146484, 0.0351563}


where entries in values correspond to entries in ids.



I now wish to sort ids in ascending order while maintaining the correspondence to values, such that elements in values must be changed according to the changes made to ids.



How can that be achieved?






list-manipulation




list-manipulation






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Dec 2 '18 at 16:49

























asked Dec 2 '18 at 16:40









user120911

58418




58418












  • values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
    – user1066
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:53


















  • values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
    – user1066
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:53
















values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
– user1066
Dec 2 '18 at 17:53




values[[Ordering@ids]] and SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First] == Transpose[{Sort@ids, values[[Ordering@ids]]}]
– user1066
Dec 2 '18 at 17:53










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















5














With[{p = Ordering[ids]},

 idsnew = ids[[p]];

 valuesnew = values[[p]];

 ]

idsnew

valuesnew



{5, 11, 17, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40}



{0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.0351563, 0.065752, 0.0146484, 0.0875244, 0.191388, 0.0503769, 0.173784, 0.063796}







share|improve this answer























  • This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 16:59










  • Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:07



















4














I would keep them together while sorting.



SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First]





{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,

   0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37, 

  0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}






share|improve this answer





















  • See also my remark under Okke's post.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:17



















4














AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort


Edit
To extract keys and values



sorted = AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort

sortedIds = Keys[sorted]

sortedValues = Values[sorted]





share|improve this answer























  • This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:00










  • @user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
    – Rohit Namjoshi
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:24



















2














Since Sort sort it by the first entry by default 



Sort@Transpose@{ids, values}



{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,
0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37,
0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:16











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187161%2fsorting-a-list-while-keeping-its-correspondence-to-another-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









5














With[{p = Ordering[ids]},

 idsnew = ids[[p]];

 valuesnew = values[[p]];

 ]

idsnew

valuesnew



{5, 11, 17, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40}



{0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.0351563, 0.065752, 0.0146484, 0.0875244, 0.191388, 0.0503769, 0.173784, 0.063796}







share|improve this answer























  • This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 16:59










  • Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:07
















5














With[{p = Ordering[ids]},

 idsnew = ids[[p]];

 valuesnew = values[[p]];

 ]

idsnew

valuesnew



{5, 11, 17, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40}



{0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.0351563, 0.065752, 0.0146484, 0.0875244, 0.191388, 0.0503769, 0.173784, 0.063796}







share|improve this answer























  • This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 16:59










  • Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:07














5












5








5






With[{p = Ordering[ids]},

 idsnew = ids[[p]];

 valuesnew = values[[p]];

 ]

idsnew

valuesnew



{5, 11, 17, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40}



{0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.0351563, 0.065752, 0.0146484, 0.0875244, 0.191388, 0.0503769, 0.173784, 0.063796}







share|improve this answer














With[{p = Ordering[ids]},

 idsnew = ids[[p]];

 valuesnew = values[[p]];

 ]

idsnew

valuesnew



{5, 11, 17, 24, 25, 31, 32, 33, 37, 38, 39, 40}



{0.0351563, 0.131836, 0.086792, 0.0637894, 0.0351563, 0.065752, 0.0146484, 0.0875244, 0.191388, 0.0503769, 0.173784, 0.063796}








share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 2 '18 at 17:06

























answered Dec 2 '18 at 16:48









Henrik Schumacher

48.8k467139




48.8k467139












  • This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 16:59










  • Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:07


















  • This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 16:59










  • Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:07
















This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
– user120911
Dec 2 '18 at 16:59




This generates an error for me: Set::write: Tag Times in valuesnew {5,11,17,24,25,31,32,33,37,38,39,40} is Protected.
– user120911
Dec 2 '18 at 16:59












Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 17:07




Sorry, I missed a semicolon that was necessary after wrapping everything with With. Please try again.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 17:07











4














I would keep them together while sorting.



SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First]





{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,

   0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37, 

  0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}






share|improve this answer





















  • See also my remark under Okke's post.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:17
















4














I would keep them together while sorting.



SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First]





{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,

   0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37, 

  0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}






share|improve this answer





















  • See also my remark under Okke's post.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:17














4












4








4






I would keep them together while sorting.



SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First]





{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,

   0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37, 

  0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}






share|improve this answer












I would keep them together while sorting.



SortBy[Transpose[{ids, values}], First]





{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,

   0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37, 

  0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 2 '18 at 16:45









Johu

3,6681037




3,6681037












  • See also my remark under Okke's post.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:17


















  • See also my remark under Okke's post.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:17
















See also my remark under Okke's post.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 18:17




See also my remark under Okke's post.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 18:17











4














AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort


Edit
To extract keys and values



sorted = AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort

sortedIds = Keys[sorted]

sortedValues = Values[sorted]





share|improve this answer























  • This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:00










  • @user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
    – Rohit Namjoshi
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:24
















4














AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort


Edit
To extract keys and values



sorted = AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort

sortedIds = Keys[sorted]

sortedValues = Values[sorted]





share|improve this answer























  • This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:00










  • @user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
    – Rohit Namjoshi
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:24














4












4








4






AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort


Edit
To extract keys and values



sorted = AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort

sortedIds = Keys[sorted]

sortedValues = Values[sorted]





share|improve this answer














AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort


Edit
To extract keys and values



sorted = AssociationThread[ids, values] // KeySort

sortedIds = Keys[sorted]

sortedValues = Values[sorted]






share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited Dec 2 '18 at 17:24

























answered Dec 2 '18 at 16:46









Rohit Namjoshi

7871111




7871111












  • This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:00










  • @user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
    – Rohit Namjoshi
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:24


















  • This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
    – user120911
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:00










  • @user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
    – Rohit Namjoshi
    Dec 2 '18 at 17:24
















This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
– user120911
Dec 2 '18 at 17:00




This looks simple, but how do I work with these afterwards?
– user120911
Dec 2 '18 at 17:00












@user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
– Rohit Namjoshi
Dec 2 '18 at 17:24




@user120911 Added sorted key / value extraction.
– Rohit Namjoshi
Dec 2 '18 at 17:24











2














Since Sort sort it by the first entry by default 



Sort@Transpose@{ids, values}



{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,
0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37,
0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:16
















2














Since Sort sort it by the first entry by default 



Sort@Transpose@{ids, values}



{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,
0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37,
0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}







share|improve this answer

















  • 1




    A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:16














2












2








2






Since Sort sort it by the first entry by default 



Sort@Transpose@{ids, values}



{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,
0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37,
0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}







share|improve this answer












Since Sort sort it by the first entry by default 



Sort@Transpose@{ids, values}



{{5, 0.0351563}, {11, 0.131836}, {17, 0.086792}, {24, 0.0637894}, {25,
0.0351563}, {31, 0.065752}, {32, 0.0146484}, {33, 0.0875244}, {37,
0.191388}, {38, 0.0503769}, {39, 0.173784}, {40, 0.063796}}








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Dec 2 '18 at 18:07









Okkes Dulgerci

3,9851816




3,9851816








  • 1




    A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:16














  • 1




    A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
    – Henrik Schumacher
    Dec 2 '18 at 18:16








1




1




A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 18:16




A problem that arises here with Transpose is is that it unpacks arrays: ids is a list of integers and values is a list of machine reals. So both can be packed separately; but not Transpose@{ids, values} as it has mixed data types. This may become important when processing large datasets.
– Henrik Schumacher
Dec 2 '18 at 18:16


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid …



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f187161%2fsorting-a-list-while-keeping-its-correspondence-to-another-list%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







-

Popular posts from this blog

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

Image
up vote 0 down vote favorite Good day all. I have a window that pops up saying Fatal Program Failure (AnyDesk). This is what I have done so far: Uninstalled AnyDesk and reinstalled it. ( The window still appeared ) I disabled AnyDesk start up in Msconfig and the window seems to have disapeared. Lastly I made sure that AnyDesk worked by remoting into it, and it worked. Today the same window appeared. How do I get rid of this window? remote-desktop share | improve this question edited 10 hours ago Tomasz Jakub Rup 552 3 13 ...
Read more

How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

Image
up vote 0 down vote favorite I need help with an issue we're facing in a project where we are moving from a Windows-based POS environment to one running on CentOS7. The problem consists of a number of factors, please find the details below: The supplier of our POS application will only deliver an application that is hard-coded to run in a 1024:768 4:3 format. The hardware we are using is a POS unit from HP that has a built-in 16:9 touch-screen. The employees using this solution is not supposed to see nor have access to anything but the POS application. Our sales organization demands that touch is an available feature when going live with the new POS environment. Going further into this, allow me to explain what we have encountered on the way trying to achieve the goal of having a touch-screen: We've simply change...
Read more

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

Image
1 1 I've setup a wireless network using a Linksys-Router (DD-WRT) as an AP and a TP-Link repeater for range extension. To manage bandwith for specific users, I've setup QoS-Rules on the AP (DD-WRT) using MAC-Priority: However the AP shows only the Repeater's MAC and the MACs of users inside the AP-Range. The MAC addresses of users behind the Repeater are not listed : The purple MAC is not listed in the AP-Clientlist. Its related to a device connected via the TP-Link repeater. Q: How can I setup MAC-Priority for repeater-clients? Do I simply add the purple MAC in AP-MAC priority list although it's not listed as a client? I want to setup specific priority instead of giving one priority for all clients behind the repeater by adding the repeater's MAC in the MAC priority list in the AP as ...
Read more