How to introduce different costs by class in a binary logistic regression?
What is the form of the Negative Log-Likelihood Goal function in Logistic regression if we introduce different costs per class (e.g. the cost of erring class 1 is errc1, and class 2 is errc2)?
logistic-regression log-likelihood
add a comment |
What is the form of the Negative Log-Likelihood Goal function in Logistic regression if we introduce different costs per class (e.g. the cost of erring class 1 is errc1, and class 2 is errc2)?
logistic-regression log-likelihood
add a comment |
What is the form of the Negative Log-Likelihood Goal function in Logistic regression if we introduce different costs per class (e.g. the cost of erring class 1 is errc1, and class 2 is errc2)?
logistic-regression log-likelihood
What is the form of the Negative Log-Likelihood Goal function in Logistic regression if we introduce different costs per class (e.g. the cost of erring class 1 is errc1, and class 2 is errc2)?
logistic-regression log-likelihood
logistic-regression log-likelihood
asked Nov 19 '18 at 0:34
MrT77
114
114
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
The logistic regression hypothesis (sigmoid) is defined as:
$$h_w(x) = sigma(w^T x)$$
where $sigma(z) = frac{1}{1 + exp(-z)}$.
Logistic regression is fit by maximum likelihood, i.e. we want to maximize the probability of the observed data:
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(x^{(1)},y^{(1)}),p(x^{(2)},y^{(2)}),...,p(x^{(N)},y^{(N)})$$
which is equivalent to (by eliminating the constant priors):
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(y^{(1)}|x^{(1)})cdot p(y^{(2)}|x^{(2)})cdot...cdot p(y^{(N)}|x^{(N)})$$
By assumption, these conditional probabilities are the sigmoid, so our goal function (through MLE, and assuming independence) is:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{1-y_i}$$
If we introduce different costs, this is equivalent to weighting according to the correspondent class probabilities, e.g. if the cost of erring $C_2$ is twice the cost of erring $C_1$, this is like having another $C_2$ case in the training data. Thus, it's equivalent to doubling it's probability:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{C_1/C_0*y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{(C_0/C_1)*(1-y_i)}$$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004336%2fhow-to-introduce-different-costs-by-class-in-a-binary-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The logistic regression hypothesis (sigmoid) is defined as:
$$h_w(x) = sigma(w^T x)$$
where $sigma(z) = frac{1}{1 + exp(-z)}$.
Logistic regression is fit by maximum likelihood, i.e. we want to maximize the probability of the observed data:
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(x^{(1)},y^{(1)}),p(x^{(2)},y^{(2)}),...,p(x^{(N)},y^{(N)})$$
which is equivalent to (by eliminating the constant priors):
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(y^{(1)}|x^{(1)})cdot p(y^{(2)}|x^{(2)})cdot...cdot p(y^{(N)}|x^{(N)})$$
By assumption, these conditional probabilities are the sigmoid, so our goal function (through MLE, and assuming independence) is:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{1-y_i}$$
If we introduce different costs, this is equivalent to weighting according to the correspondent class probabilities, e.g. if the cost of erring $C_2$ is twice the cost of erring $C_1$, this is like having another $C_2$ case in the training data. Thus, it's equivalent to doubling it's probability:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{C_1/C_0*y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{(C_0/C_1)*(1-y_i)}$$
add a comment |
The logistic regression hypothesis (sigmoid) is defined as:
$$h_w(x) = sigma(w^T x)$$
where $sigma(z) = frac{1}{1 + exp(-z)}$.
Logistic regression is fit by maximum likelihood, i.e. we want to maximize the probability of the observed data:
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(x^{(1)},y^{(1)}),p(x^{(2)},y^{(2)}),...,p(x^{(N)},y^{(N)})$$
which is equivalent to (by eliminating the constant priors):
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(y^{(1)}|x^{(1)})cdot p(y^{(2)}|x^{(2)})cdot...cdot p(y^{(N)}|x^{(N)})$$
By assumption, these conditional probabilities are the sigmoid, so our goal function (through MLE, and assuming independence) is:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{1-y_i}$$
If we introduce different costs, this is equivalent to weighting according to the correspondent class probabilities, e.g. if the cost of erring $C_2$ is twice the cost of erring $C_1$, this is like having another $C_2$ case in the training data. Thus, it's equivalent to doubling it's probability:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{C_1/C_0*y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{(C_0/C_1)*(1-y_i)}$$
add a comment |
The logistic regression hypothesis (sigmoid) is defined as:
$$h_w(x) = sigma(w^T x)$$
where $sigma(z) = frac{1}{1 + exp(-z)}$.
Logistic regression is fit by maximum likelihood, i.e. we want to maximize the probability of the observed data:
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(x^{(1)},y^{(1)}),p(x^{(2)},y^{(2)}),...,p(x^{(N)},y^{(N)})$$
which is equivalent to (by eliminating the constant priors):
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(y^{(1)}|x^{(1)})cdot p(y^{(2)}|x^{(2)})cdot...cdot p(y^{(N)}|x^{(N)})$$
By assumption, these conditional probabilities are the sigmoid, so our goal function (through MLE, and assuming independence) is:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{1-y_i}$$
If we introduce different costs, this is equivalent to weighting according to the correspondent class probabilities, e.g. if the cost of erring $C_2$ is twice the cost of erring $C_1$, this is like having another $C_2$ case in the training data. Thus, it's equivalent to doubling it's probability:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{C_1/C_0*y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{(C_0/C_1)*(1-y_i)}$$
The logistic regression hypothesis (sigmoid) is defined as:
$$h_w(x) = sigma(w^T x)$$
where $sigma(z) = frac{1}{1 + exp(-z)}$.
Logistic regression is fit by maximum likelihood, i.e. we want to maximize the probability of the observed data:
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(x^{(1)},y^{(1)}),p(x^{(2)},y^{(2)}),...,p(x^{(N)},y^{(N)})$$
which is equivalent to (by eliminating the constant priors):
$$ arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) ;p(y^{(1)}|x^{(1)})cdot p(y^{(2)}|x^{(2)})cdot...cdot p(y^{(N)}|x^{(N)})$$
By assumption, these conditional probabilities are the sigmoid, so our goal function (through MLE, and assuming independence) is:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{1-y_i}$$
If we introduce different costs, this is equivalent to weighting according to the correspondent class probabilities, e.g. if the cost of erring $C_2$ is twice the cost of erring $C_1$, this is like having another $C_2$ case in the training data. Thus, it's equivalent to doubling it's probability:
$$ J(w) = arg,max ({mathbf{w}}) prod_{i=1}^{N} ;(p(y_i=1|x_i))^{C_1/C_0*y_i}cdot (p(y_i=0|x_i))^{(C_0/C_1)*(1-y_i)}$$
answered Dec 18 '18 at 13:35
MrT77
114
114
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004336%2fhow-to-introduce-different-costs-by-class-in-a-binary-logistic-regression%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown