Additive bijection between module sets.
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is already been solved, but lacks of what is inteded by additive bijection.
Could someone tell me what is the meaning of the map?
(like how would I read that, in the sense of how is the connection between the remainders and to the module of 6)
(Also, why was $3^{n}$ used?)
The simpler the explanation the better.
Thank you in advance.
abstract-algebra group-theory modular-arithmetic
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is already been solved, but lacks of what is inteded by additive bijection.
Could someone tell me what is the meaning of the map?
(like how would I read that, in the sense of how is the connection between the remainders and to the module of 6)
(Also, why was $3^{n}$ used?)
The simpler the explanation the better.
Thank you in advance.
abstract-algebra group-theory modular-arithmetic
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
This is already been solved, but lacks of what is inteded by additive bijection.
Could someone tell me what is the meaning of the map?
(like how would I read that, in the sense of how is the connection between the remainders and to the module of 6)
(Also, why was $3^{n}$ used?)
The simpler the explanation the better.
Thank you in advance.
abstract-algebra group-theory modular-arithmetic
This is already been solved, but lacks of what is inteded by additive bijection.
Could someone tell me what is the meaning of the map?
(like how would I read that, in the sense of how is the connection between the remainders and to the module of 6)
(Also, why was $3^{n}$ used?)
The simpler the explanation the better.
Thank you in advance.
abstract-algebra group-theory modular-arithmetic
abstract-algebra group-theory modular-arithmetic
edited Nov 17 at 19:03
Henning Makholm
236k16300534
236k16300534
asked Nov 17 at 18:45
Ricouello
1355
1355
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55
add a comment |
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002675%2fadditive-bijection-between-module-sets%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Are you asking what "additive bijection" means (it seems to be a rather strange term for group isomorphism here), or for intuition about the particular $T$ defined in the solution?
– Henning Makholm
Nov 17 at 18:49
Both of those things, there was like no explanation at all.
– Ricouello
Nov 17 at 18:55