Proving N-derivative test
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
add a comment |
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
add a comment |
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.
My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.
This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.
real-analysis
real-analysis
asked Nov 19 '18 at 3:55
HD5450
64
64
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
add a comment |
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
add a comment |
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
add a comment |
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :
$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .
answered Nov 19 '18 at 4:12
Red shoes
4,706621
4,706621
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
add a comment |
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16
$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17