Proving N-derivative test












1














Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
















1














Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:17














1












1








1







Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.










share|cite|improve this question













Suppose $f:(a,b) rightarrow mathbb{R}$ is differentialbe on $(a,b)$ and $c in (a,b)$ has $f(c) = f'(c) = dots = f^{n-1}(c) = 0$ and $f^{(n)}(c) > 0$. If $n$ is even, then $f$ has a local min at $c$.



My attempt: Consider the interval $a < c < beta < B$, then by Taylor's Theorem, there exists $x_0 in (c, beta)$ such that $f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n$.



This is the part where I am stuck, I know that normally $f(c) not = 0$ where you can prove with $f(beta) - f(c) > 0$ but since $f(c) = 0$ in this case, I have no idea where to proceed.







real-analysis






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 19 '18 at 3:55









HD5450

64




64












  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:17


















  • How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
    – Jimmy R.
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:16










  • $f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:17
















How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16




How many times is $f$ differentiable? $n$ or $n+1$?
– Jimmy R.
Nov 19 '18 at 4:16












$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17




$f$ is $n$ times differentiable.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:17










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















1














Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:30











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









1














Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
















1














Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer





















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:30














1












1








1






Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .






share|cite|improve this answer












Assuming the n-th derivative of $f$ is continuous, $f^n(c) >0$ implies there exist $delta > 0 $ such that $f^n(x) > 0 $ for all $ x in(c-delta , c+ delta)$. Now for all $ beta in (c-delta , c+ delta) $, by writing taylor expansion around $ x = c$ we get :



$$ f(beta) = frac{1}{n!}f^{(n)}(x_0)(beta - c)^n $$ for some $ x_0 in (c-delta , c+ delta) $ this shows $ f(beta) geq 0 = f(c) $ .







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered Nov 19 '18 at 4:12









Red shoes

4,706621




4,706621












  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:30


















  • so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:21










  • yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
    – Red shoes
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:25










  • Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
    – HD5450
    Nov 19 '18 at 4:30
















so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21




so we are considering the interval within this delta neighbourhood? Also, how does that imply $f(c)$ is a local min.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:21












yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25




yes. because $f(c) = 0 $ but $f geq 0 $ on entire that interval .
– Red shoes
Nov 19 '18 at 4:25












Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30




Ah, I get it now. Thank you for the help.
– HD5450
Nov 19 '18 at 4:30


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3004503%2fproving-n-derivative-test%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater