Does series $4^{n}×frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$ converge or diverge?
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I know $4^{n}$ diverges, and $frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$ converges. I also think that their product diverges since the term of this series is increasing but I don't know how to prove it. I tried ratio test which is inconclusive, and some other tests.
sequences-and-series divergent-series
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I know $4^{n}$ diverges, and $frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$ converges. I also think that their product diverges since the term of this series is increasing but I don't know how to prove it. I tried ratio test which is inconclusive, and some other tests.
sequences-and-series divergent-series
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
3
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I know $4^{n}$ diverges, and $frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$ converges. I also think that their product diverges since the term of this series is increasing but I don't know how to prove it. I tried ratio test which is inconclusive, and some other tests.
sequences-and-series divergent-series
I know $4^{n}$ diverges, and $frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$ converges. I also think that their product diverges since the term of this series is increasing but I don't know how to prove it. I tried ratio test which is inconclusive, and some other tests.
sequences-and-series divergent-series
sequences-and-series divergent-series
asked Apr 15 at 16:32
Nebeski
21129
21129
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
3
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17
add a comment |
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
3
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
3
3
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $a_n:=4^ncdotfrac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$, and note that $2^ncdot n!=2cdot4cdot6cdots 2n$. Hence
$$a_n=4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}=prod_{k=1}^{n}frac{2k}{2k-1}=expleft(sum_{k=1}^nlogleft(frac{2k}{2k-1}right)right)ge expleft(nlogleft(frac{2n}{2n-1}right)right)tag1$$
and
$$lim_{xtoinfty}xlogleft(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{frac{2(2x-1)-4x}{(2x-1)^2}}{-left(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)frac1{x^2}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{2x^2}{(2x-1)2x}=frac12tag2$$
Thus $lim a_nge sqrt e$, so $sum a_n=infty$.
A more simple approach is expanding and chopping the product on $(1)$, that is
$$prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2k}{2k-1}=prod_{k=1}^nleft(1+frac1{2k-1}right)=1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}+ldotstag3$$
Then we have the lower bound
$$a_nge 1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}=1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k-1/2}ge 1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1ktag4$$
Hence $lim a_n=infty$ (because $sumfrac1k=infty$).
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Stirling's approximation? Naah, let us go for a greater overkill. Since the series
$$ sum_{ngeq 0}left[frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right]^3 $$
is convergent to $frac{pi}{Gammaleft(frac{3}{4}right)^4}$ due to the relation with the squared complete elliptic integral of the first kind (identity $(7)$ at $k=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$), its main term is convergent to zero and your sequence is divergent.
Seriously, an elementary approach. Since $2costheta=e^{itheta}+e^{-itheta}$ and $int_{0}^{2pi}e^{nitheta}e^{-mitheta},dtheta = 2pidelta(m,n)$,
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}cos^{2n}theta,dtheta. $$
By the dominated/monotone convergence theorem, the limit of both sides as $nto +infty$ is zero, hence your sequence is divergent. We also have that $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is log-convex due to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous integral representation.
Yet another elementary approach. You may prove in a combinatorial fashion that
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}binom{2k}{k}binom{2n-2k}{n-k} = 4^n tag{Convolution}$$
hence it follows that
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 leq sum_{k=0}^{2n} 1 = 2n $$
and
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}. $$
On the other hand we also have
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 geq sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = n $$
hence
$$ sqrt{n}leq sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}.tag{SumInequality} $$
Since the sequence $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is decreasing, the previous inequality implies that $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}llfrac{1}{sqrt{n}}$ as $nto +infty$. The correct asymptotic behaviour is given by Wallis' product and it is
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.tag{GoodToKnow}$$
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By Stirling's approximation
$$n! sim sqrt{2 pi n}left(frac{n}{e}right)^n$$
we have
$$4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}sim 4^n frac{2 pi nleft(frac{n}{e}right)^{2n}}{sqrt{4 pi n}left(frac{2n}{e}right)^{2n}}=sqrt{pi n}to infty$$
then the series diverges.
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $a_n:=4^ncdotfrac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$, and note that $2^ncdot n!=2cdot4cdot6cdots 2n$. Hence
$$a_n=4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}=prod_{k=1}^{n}frac{2k}{2k-1}=expleft(sum_{k=1}^nlogleft(frac{2k}{2k-1}right)right)ge expleft(nlogleft(frac{2n}{2n-1}right)right)tag1$$
and
$$lim_{xtoinfty}xlogleft(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{frac{2(2x-1)-4x}{(2x-1)^2}}{-left(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)frac1{x^2}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{2x^2}{(2x-1)2x}=frac12tag2$$
Thus $lim a_nge sqrt e$, so $sum a_n=infty$.
A more simple approach is expanding and chopping the product on $(1)$, that is
$$prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2k}{2k-1}=prod_{k=1}^nleft(1+frac1{2k-1}right)=1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}+ldotstag3$$
Then we have the lower bound
$$a_nge 1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}=1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k-1/2}ge 1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1ktag4$$
Hence $lim a_n=infty$ (because $sumfrac1k=infty$).
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $a_n:=4^ncdotfrac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$, and note that $2^ncdot n!=2cdot4cdot6cdots 2n$. Hence
$$a_n=4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}=prod_{k=1}^{n}frac{2k}{2k-1}=expleft(sum_{k=1}^nlogleft(frac{2k}{2k-1}right)right)ge expleft(nlogleft(frac{2n}{2n-1}right)right)tag1$$
and
$$lim_{xtoinfty}xlogleft(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{frac{2(2x-1)-4x}{(2x-1)^2}}{-left(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)frac1{x^2}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{2x^2}{(2x-1)2x}=frac12tag2$$
Thus $lim a_nge sqrt e$, so $sum a_n=infty$.
A more simple approach is expanding and chopping the product on $(1)$, that is
$$prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2k}{2k-1}=prod_{k=1}^nleft(1+frac1{2k-1}right)=1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}+ldotstag3$$
Then we have the lower bound
$$a_nge 1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}=1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k-1/2}ge 1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1ktag4$$
Hence $lim a_n=infty$ (because $sumfrac1k=infty$).
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
up vote
2
down vote
accepted
Let $a_n:=4^ncdotfrac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$, and note that $2^ncdot n!=2cdot4cdot6cdots 2n$. Hence
$$a_n=4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}=prod_{k=1}^{n}frac{2k}{2k-1}=expleft(sum_{k=1}^nlogleft(frac{2k}{2k-1}right)right)ge expleft(nlogleft(frac{2n}{2n-1}right)right)tag1$$
and
$$lim_{xtoinfty}xlogleft(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{frac{2(2x-1)-4x}{(2x-1)^2}}{-left(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)frac1{x^2}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{2x^2}{(2x-1)2x}=frac12tag2$$
Thus $lim a_nge sqrt e$, so $sum a_n=infty$.
A more simple approach is expanding and chopping the product on $(1)$, that is
$$prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2k}{2k-1}=prod_{k=1}^nleft(1+frac1{2k-1}right)=1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}+ldotstag3$$
Then we have the lower bound
$$a_nge 1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}=1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k-1/2}ge 1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1ktag4$$
Hence $lim a_n=infty$ (because $sumfrac1k=infty$).
Let $a_n:=4^ncdotfrac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}$, and note that $2^ncdot n!=2cdot4cdot6cdots 2n$. Hence
$$a_n=4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}=prod_{k=1}^{n}frac{2k}{2k-1}=expleft(sum_{k=1}^nlogleft(frac{2k}{2k-1}right)right)ge expleft(nlogleft(frac{2n}{2n-1}right)right)tag1$$
and
$$lim_{xtoinfty}xlogleft(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{frac{2(2x-1)-4x}{(2x-1)^2}}{-left(frac{2x}{2x-1}right)frac1{x^2}}=lim_{xtoinfty}frac{2x^2}{(2x-1)2x}=frac12tag2$$
Thus $lim a_nge sqrt e$, so $sum a_n=infty$.
A more simple approach is expanding and chopping the product on $(1)$, that is
$$prod_{k=1}^nfrac{2k}{2k-1}=prod_{k=1}^nleft(1+frac1{2k-1}right)=1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}+ldotstag3$$
Then we have the lower bound
$$a_nge 1+sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{2k-1}=1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1{k-1/2}ge 1+frac12sum_{k=1}^nfrac1ktag4$$
Hence $lim a_n=infty$ (because $sumfrac1k=infty$).
edited Apr 15 at 18:10
answered Apr 15 at 16:46
Masacroso
12.3k41746
12.3k41746
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
|
show 2 more comments
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
Where does the exponent n disappear in your note?
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:17
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I wasn't talking about that. $2^n×n!=2×4×dots×2n$ only if exponent n=1
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:24
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
I mean $2^n×n! = (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:35
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
@Nebeski this $2^n×n! neq (2^n)×(2×2^n)×dots×(n×2^n)$. In the RHS you are multiplying by $2^n$ many times, and in LHS only once.
– Masacroso
Apr 15 at 17:38
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
Ohhh yeah, I think all these $×$ confused me.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 17:45
|
show 2 more comments
up vote
2
down vote
Stirling's approximation? Naah, let us go for a greater overkill. Since the series
$$ sum_{ngeq 0}left[frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right]^3 $$
is convergent to $frac{pi}{Gammaleft(frac{3}{4}right)^4}$ due to the relation with the squared complete elliptic integral of the first kind (identity $(7)$ at $k=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$), its main term is convergent to zero and your sequence is divergent.
Seriously, an elementary approach. Since $2costheta=e^{itheta}+e^{-itheta}$ and $int_{0}^{2pi}e^{nitheta}e^{-mitheta},dtheta = 2pidelta(m,n)$,
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}cos^{2n}theta,dtheta. $$
By the dominated/monotone convergence theorem, the limit of both sides as $nto +infty$ is zero, hence your sequence is divergent. We also have that $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is log-convex due to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous integral representation.
Yet another elementary approach. You may prove in a combinatorial fashion that
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}binom{2k}{k}binom{2n-2k}{n-k} = 4^n tag{Convolution}$$
hence it follows that
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 leq sum_{k=0}^{2n} 1 = 2n $$
and
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}. $$
On the other hand we also have
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 geq sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = n $$
hence
$$ sqrt{n}leq sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}.tag{SumInequality} $$
Since the sequence $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is decreasing, the previous inequality implies that $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}llfrac{1}{sqrt{n}}$ as $nto +infty$. The correct asymptotic behaviour is given by Wallis' product and it is
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.tag{GoodToKnow}$$
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
Stirling's approximation? Naah, let us go for a greater overkill. Since the series
$$ sum_{ngeq 0}left[frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right]^3 $$
is convergent to $frac{pi}{Gammaleft(frac{3}{4}right)^4}$ due to the relation with the squared complete elliptic integral of the first kind (identity $(7)$ at $k=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$), its main term is convergent to zero and your sequence is divergent.
Seriously, an elementary approach. Since $2costheta=e^{itheta}+e^{-itheta}$ and $int_{0}^{2pi}e^{nitheta}e^{-mitheta},dtheta = 2pidelta(m,n)$,
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}cos^{2n}theta,dtheta. $$
By the dominated/monotone convergence theorem, the limit of both sides as $nto +infty$ is zero, hence your sequence is divergent. We also have that $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is log-convex due to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous integral representation.
Yet another elementary approach. You may prove in a combinatorial fashion that
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}binom{2k}{k}binom{2n-2k}{n-k} = 4^n tag{Convolution}$$
hence it follows that
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 leq sum_{k=0}^{2n} 1 = 2n $$
and
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}. $$
On the other hand we also have
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 geq sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = n $$
hence
$$ sqrt{n}leq sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}.tag{SumInequality} $$
Since the sequence $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is decreasing, the previous inequality implies that $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}llfrac{1}{sqrt{n}}$ as $nto +infty$. The correct asymptotic behaviour is given by Wallis' product and it is
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.tag{GoodToKnow}$$
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
add a comment |
up vote
2
down vote
up vote
2
down vote
Stirling's approximation? Naah, let us go for a greater overkill. Since the series
$$ sum_{ngeq 0}left[frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right]^3 $$
is convergent to $frac{pi}{Gammaleft(frac{3}{4}right)^4}$ due to the relation with the squared complete elliptic integral of the first kind (identity $(7)$ at $k=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$), its main term is convergent to zero and your sequence is divergent.
Seriously, an elementary approach. Since $2costheta=e^{itheta}+e^{-itheta}$ and $int_{0}^{2pi}e^{nitheta}e^{-mitheta},dtheta = 2pidelta(m,n)$,
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}cos^{2n}theta,dtheta. $$
By the dominated/monotone convergence theorem, the limit of both sides as $nto +infty$ is zero, hence your sequence is divergent. We also have that $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is log-convex due to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous integral representation.
Yet another elementary approach. You may prove in a combinatorial fashion that
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}binom{2k}{k}binom{2n-2k}{n-k} = 4^n tag{Convolution}$$
hence it follows that
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 leq sum_{k=0}^{2n} 1 = 2n $$
and
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}. $$
On the other hand we also have
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 geq sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = n $$
hence
$$ sqrt{n}leq sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}.tag{SumInequality} $$
Since the sequence $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is decreasing, the previous inequality implies that $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}llfrac{1}{sqrt{n}}$ as $nto +infty$. The correct asymptotic behaviour is given by Wallis' product and it is
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.tag{GoodToKnow}$$
Stirling's approximation? Naah, let us go for a greater overkill. Since the series
$$ sum_{ngeq 0}left[frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right]^3 $$
is convergent to $frac{pi}{Gammaleft(frac{3}{4}right)^4}$ due to the relation with the squared complete elliptic integral of the first kind (identity $(7)$ at $k=frac{1}{sqrt{2}}$), its main term is convergent to zero and your sequence is divergent.
Seriously, an elementary approach. Since $2costheta=e^{itheta}+e^{-itheta}$ and $int_{0}^{2pi}e^{nitheta}e^{-mitheta},dtheta = 2pidelta(m,n)$,
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}=frac{2}{pi}int_{0}^{pi/2}cos^{2n}theta,dtheta. $$
By the dominated/monotone convergence theorem, the limit of both sides as $nto +infty$ is zero, hence your sequence is divergent. We also have that $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is log-convex due to the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality and the previous integral representation.
Yet another elementary approach. You may prove in a combinatorial fashion that
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}binom{2k}{k}binom{2n-2k}{n-k} = 4^n tag{Convolution}$$
hence it follows that
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 leq sum_{k=0}^{2n} 1 = 2n $$
and
$$ sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}. $$
On the other hand we also have
$$ left[sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k}right]^2 geq sum_{k=0}^{n} 1 = n $$
hence
$$ sqrt{n}leq sum_{k=0}^{n}frac{1}{4^k}binom{2k}{k} leq sqrt{2n}.tag{SumInequality} $$
Since the sequence $left{frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}right}_{ngeq 1}$ is decreasing, the previous inequality implies that $frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}llfrac{1}{sqrt{n}}$ as $nto +infty$. The correct asymptotic behaviour is given by Wallis' product and it is
$$ frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}}.tag{GoodToKnow}$$
edited Apr 15 at 20:17
answered Apr 15 at 19:57
Jack D'Aurizio
284k33275653
284k33275653
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
add a comment |
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
1
1
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
Thanks for the "elementary" approach too! Stirling is very brutal and overkill but it works so well :)
– gimusi
Apr 15 at 20:12
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By Stirling's approximation
$$n! sim sqrt{2 pi n}left(frac{n}{e}right)^n$$
we have
$$4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}sim 4^n frac{2 pi nleft(frac{n}{e}right)^{2n}}{sqrt{4 pi n}left(frac{2n}{e}right)^{2n}}=sqrt{pi n}to infty$$
then the series diverges.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
By Stirling's approximation
$$n! sim sqrt{2 pi n}left(frac{n}{e}right)^n$$
we have
$$4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}sim 4^n frac{2 pi nleft(frac{n}{e}right)^{2n}}{sqrt{4 pi n}left(frac{2n}{e}right)^{2n}}=sqrt{pi n}to infty$$
then the series diverges.
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
up vote
1
down vote
By Stirling's approximation
$$n! sim sqrt{2 pi n}left(frac{n}{e}right)^n$$
we have
$$4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}sim 4^n frac{2 pi nleft(frac{n}{e}right)^{2n}}{sqrt{4 pi n}left(frac{2n}{e}right)^{2n}}=sqrt{pi n}to infty$$
then the series diverges.
By Stirling's approximation
$$n! sim sqrt{2 pi n}left(frac{n}{e}right)^n$$
we have
$$4^n frac{(n!)^2}{(2n)!}sim 4^n frac{2 pi nleft(frac{n}{e}right)^{2n}}{sqrt{4 pi n}left(frac{2n}{e}right)^{2n}}=sqrt{pi n}to infty$$
then the series diverges.
edited Apr 15 at 19:55
Masacroso
12.3k41746
12.3k41746
answered Apr 15 at 17:12
gimusi
89.3k74495
89.3k74495
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2738541%2fdoes-series-4n%25c3%2597-fracn22n-converge-or-diverge%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Use Stirling's approximation for the factorial term
– asdf
Apr 15 at 16:33
3
It has been proved multiple times on MSE that $$frac{1}{4^n}binom{2n}{n}simfrac{1}{sqrt{pi n}},$$ so... (you do not need Stirling's inequality/approximation to prove it)
– Jack D'Aurizio
Apr 15 at 16:33
Wait - do you really ask for the series $sum 4^n/{2nchoose n}$ or just for the sequence ${4^n/{2nchoose n}}_{n=0}^infty$?
– Hagen von Eitzen
Apr 15 at 16:43
I am asking for series.
– Nebeski
Apr 15 at 16:47
More methods at math.stackexchange.com/questions/1606836/…
– BAYMAX
Apr 15 at 17:17