Uniqueness of $L$-series of cusp forms
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.
I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?
modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.
I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?
modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions
1
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.
I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?
modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions
For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.
I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?
modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions
modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions
asked Nov 18 at 13:57
hrt
457310
457310
1
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36
add a comment |
1
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36
1
1
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.
By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.
By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.
By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
up vote
1
down vote
accepted
If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.
By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).
If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.
By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).
answered Nov 18 at 15:33
Watson
15.8k92870
15.8k92870
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003564%2funiqueness-of-l-series-of-cusp-forms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36