Uniqueness of $L$-series of cusp forms











up vote
0
down vote

favorite












For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.



I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    $(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
    – reuns
    Nov 18 at 15:36

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite












For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.



I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question


















  • 1




    $(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
    – reuns
    Nov 18 at 15:36















up vote
0
down vote

favorite









up vote
0
down vote

favorite











For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.



I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?










share|cite|improve this question













For a cusp form $f$, one gets an $L$-series by taking the Mellin transform as we have
$$ tilde{f}(s) = (2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f). $$
My question is: is this operation injective? It seems to me that this should be the case and that one should be able to recover $f$ using the inverse transform, but I could not find anything on the subject.



I would also assume that if the $L$-series admits an Euler product, then it determines $f$ completely by determining its Fourier coefficients. Is that correct?







modular-forms mellin-transform l-functions






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 18 at 13:57









hrt

457310




457310








  • 1




    $(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
    – reuns
    Nov 18 at 15:36
















  • 1




    $(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
    – reuns
    Nov 18 at 15:36










1




1




$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36






$(2pi)^{-s} Gamma(s) L(s,f)$ is the Mellin transform of $f(iy)$, that is the Fourier transform of $f(i e^{-u}) e^{-sigma u}$, which is inversible. And $f(z)$ is the analytic continuation of $f(iy)$. For non-holomorphic modular forms it is a little less obvious. A theorem I don't fully understand is that any eigensystem for the Hecke algebra is a modular form (so that $f^sigma, sigma in Gal(overline{mathbb{Q}},mathbb{Q})$ is a modular form if $f$ is an eigenform)
– reuns
Nov 18 at 15:36












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
1
down vote



accepted










If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.



By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003564%2funiqueness-of-l-series-of-cusp-forms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    1
    down vote



    accepted










    If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.



    By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      1
      down vote



      accepted










      If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.



      By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted







        up vote
        1
        down vote



        accepted






        If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.



        By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).






        share|cite|improve this answer












        If $f$ and $g$ have the same Mellin transform, then $L(s,f)=L(s,g)$. These are two Dirichlet series, with coefficients being respectively the Fourier coefficients $a_n(f)$ and $a_n(g)$ of $f$ and $g$ at the cusp $i infty$.



        By theorem 11.3 in Apostol, Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, one gets $a_n(f) = a_n(g)$ for every $n geq 1$. This implies that $f=g$ (having the same Laurent series).







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 18 at 15:33









        Watson

        15.8k92870




        15.8k92870






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003564%2funiqueness-of-l-series-of-cusp-forms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater

            Ивакино (Тотемский район)

            Can't locate Autom4te/ChannelDefs.pm in @INC (when it definitely is there)