If A is an Ideal of the Ring R, then show that $M_{2}$(A) is an Ideal of $M_{2}$(R)
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.
abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.
abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47
add a comment |
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
up vote
1
down vote
favorite
I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.
abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals
I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.
abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals
abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals
asked Nov 17 at 2:36
Jordan Reed
355
355
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47
add a comment |
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:
$forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.
$forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)
Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
For the absorption property:
Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.
See if you can show the other containment.
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
4
down vote
To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:
$forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.
$forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)
Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
For the absorption property:
Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.
See if you can show the other containment.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:
$forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.
$forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)
Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
For the absorption property:
Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.
See if you can show the other containment.
add a comment |
up vote
4
down vote
up vote
4
down vote
To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:
$forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.
$forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)
Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
For the absorption property:
Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.
See if you can show the other containment.
To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:
$forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.
$forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)
Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
For the absorption property:
Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.
See if you can show the other containment.
answered Nov 17 at 2:56
Anurag A
24.9k12249
24.9k12249
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001906%2fif-a-is-an-ideal-of-the-ring-r-then-show-that-m-2a-is-an-ideal-of-m-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44
@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47