If A is an Ideal of the Ring R, then show that $M_{2}$(A) is an Ideal of $M_{2}$(R)











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • what's M$_2$(A)?
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 17 at 2:44












  • @JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
    – user1551
    Nov 17 at 2:47















up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question






















  • what's M$_2$(A)?
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 17 at 2:44












  • @JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
    – user1551
    Nov 17 at 2:47













up vote
1
down vote

favorite









up vote
1
down vote

favorite











I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.










share|cite|improve this question













I have been trying to gain intuition on Ideals of Rings and came across this problem. I was hoping for some guidance in the right direction. Thank you.







abstract-algebra matrices ring-theory ideals






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked Nov 17 at 2:36









Jordan Reed

355




355












  • what's M$_2$(A)?
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 17 at 2:44












  • @JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
    – user1551
    Nov 17 at 2:47


















  • what's M$_2$(A)?
    – Joel Pereira
    Nov 17 at 2:44












  • @JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
    – user1551
    Nov 17 at 2:47
















what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44






what's M$_2$(A)?
– Joel Pereira
Nov 17 at 2:44














@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47




@JoelPereira There is a "matrices" tag, so the symbol most likely means $2times2$ matrices over $A$.
– user1551
Nov 17 at 2:47










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote













To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:





  1. $forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.


  2. $forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)


Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.



For the absorption property:



Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
$$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.



See if you can show the other containment.






share|cite|improve this answer





















    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001906%2fif-a-is-an-ideal-of-the-ring-r-then-show-that-m-2a-is-an-ideal-of-m-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    4
    down vote













    To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:





    1. $forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.


    2. $forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)


    Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
    $$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
    Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.



    For the absorption property:



    Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
    $$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
    Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.



    See if you can show the other containment.






    share|cite|improve this answer

























      up vote
      4
      down vote













      To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:





      1. $forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.


      2. $forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)


      Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
      $$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
      Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.



      For the absorption property:



      Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
      $$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
      Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.



      See if you can show the other containment.






      share|cite|improve this answer























        up vote
        4
        down vote










        up vote
        4
        down vote









        To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:





        1. $forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.


        2. $forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)


        Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
        $$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
        Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.



        For the absorption property:



        Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
        $$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
        Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.



        See if you can show the other containment.






        share|cite|improve this answer












        To prove a non-empty subset $S subseteq R$ is an ideal, you need to show two things:





        1. $forall , a,b in S$, $a-b in S$.


        2. $forall r in R$, $rS=Sr=S$ (absorption property)


        Let $B_1,B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$. Then you need to demonstrate $B_1-B_2 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
        $$begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}-begin{bmatrix}p&q\r&send{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}a-p&b-q\c-r&d-send{bmatrix}.$$
        Since $A$ is an ideal, so for $a,p in A$, we will have $a-p in A$. Similarly you can deal with remaining entries. So the final matrix is in $mathcal{M}_2(A)$.



        For the absorption property:



        Let $J=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix} in mathcal{M}_2(R)$. You need to show that $J[mathcal{M}_2(A)]=mathcal{M}_2(A)=[mathcal{M}_2(A)]J$. Said differently, you need to show that for all $B_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$, $JB_1 in mathcal{M}_2(A)$ and $B_1J in mathcal{M}_2(A)$.
        $$JB_1=begin{bmatrix}x&y\z&wend{bmatrix}begin{bmatrix}a&b\c&dend{bmatrix}=begin{bmatrix}xa+yc&star\star&starend{bmatrix}.$$
        Since $A$ is an ideal and $a,c in A$, so $xa, yc in A$ (by absorption property). But $A$ is a subring so closed under addition, which implies $xa+yc in A$. Now try doing this for remaining entries.



        See if you can show the other containment.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Nov 17 at 2:56









        Anurag A

        24.9k12249




        24.9k12249






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





            Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


            Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3001906%2fif-a-is-an-ideal-of-the-ring-r-then-show-that-m-2a-is-an-ideal-of-m-2%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater