Suffix of a number





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
4
down vote

favorite












What is the right word to describe the end of a (phone) number?



I know suffix is used for words (letters), but I'm unsure if it is the right word for numbers.



Example with a number:



34 is a ____ of 1234



... or with a phone number:



1234 is a ____ of +972500001234



I'm not sure the fact that its a phone number matters but maybe it does.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
    – David
    Nov 25 at 13:48












  • Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 13:51






  • 3




    "The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 14:31






  • 1




    Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
    – oerkelens
    Nov 25 at 15:35






  • 1




    Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
    – Spencer
    Nov 25 at 19:18



















up vote
4
down vote

favorite












What is the right word to describe the end of a (phone) number?



I know suffix is used for words (letters), but I'm unsure if it is the right word for numbers.



Example with a number:



34 is a ____ of 1234



... or with a phone number:



1234 is a ____ of +972500001234



I'm not sure the fact that its a phone number matters but maybe it does.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 2




    Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
    – David
    Nov 25 at 13:48












  • Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 13:51






  • 3




    "The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 14:31






  • 1




    Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
    – oerkelens
    Nov 25 at 15:35






  • 1




    Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
    – Spencer
    Nov 25 at 19:18















up vote
4
down vote

favorite









up vote
4
down vote

favorite











What is the right word to describe the end of a (phone) number?



I know suffix is used for words (letters), but I'm unsure if it is the right word for numbers.



Example with a number:



34 is a ____ of 1234



... or with a phone number:



1234 is a ____ of +972500001234



I'm not sure the fact that its a phone number matters but maybe it does.










share|improve this question









New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











What is the right word to describe the end of a (phone) number?



I know suffix is used for words (letters), but I'm unsure if it is the right word for numbers.



Example with a number:



34 is a ____ of 1234



... or with a phone number:



1234 is a ____ of +972500001234



I'm not sure the fact that its a phone number matters but maybe it does.







single-word-requests






share|improve this question









New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Nov 25 at 13:51





















New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 25 at 13:05









Reut Sharabani

786




786




New contributor




Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Reut Sharabani is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
    – David
    Nov 25 at 13:48












  • Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 13:51






  • 3




    "The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 14:31






  • 1




    Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
    – oerkelens
    Nov 25 at 15:35






  • 1




    Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
    – Spencer
    Nov 25 at 19:18
















  • 2




    Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
    – David
    Nov 25 at 13:48












  • Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 13:51






  • 3




    "The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
    – Hot Licks
    Nov 25 at 14:31






  • 1




    Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
    – oerkelens
    Nov 25 at 15:35






  • 1




    Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
    – Spencer
    Nov 25 at 19:18










2




2




Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
– David
Nov 25 at 13:48






Example please. I have no idea what you consider as the end of a phone number or indeed which end you are thinking of. Do you mean the country code? If not you may be thinking that the structure of phone numbers is identical in all countries. It isn't.
– David
Nov 25 at 13:48














Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
– Hot Licks
Nov 25 at 13:51




Other than an extension number, why would you ever put a "suffix" on a phone number. What do you mean? Give examples!
– Hot Licks
Nov 25 at 13:51




3




3




"The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
– Hot Licks
Nov 25 at 14:31




"The last two digits" and "the last four digits".
– Hot Licks
Nov 25 at 14:31




1




1




Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
– oerkelens
Nov 25 at 15:35




Bear in mind that suffix is not just "the end of a word"!
– oerkelens
Nov 25 at 15:35




1




1




Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
– Spencer
Nov 25 at 19:18






Are you asking about an arbitrary number of final digits, or a specific (case-by-case) number?
– Spencer
Nov 25 at 19:18












4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
4
down vote



accepted










In a general context of string processing in programming, I would call the substring that appears in the end a postfix. Collins has postfix as a synonym for suffix, while defining suffix as




one or more numbers or letters added to the end of a code number to indicate, for example, what area something belongs to.




To compare, a substring that appears in the beginning would be a prefix, and a substring in the middle would be an infix.






share|improve this answer




























    up vote
    3
    down vote













    That it is a phone number does make a difference.  Phone numbers are encodings, and each section has a meaning and a purpose. 



    1-800-555-1212 x1234



    I would label the sections of this phone number in this manner:



    1-800-555-1212 x123
    | | | | |
    | | | | extension (if any)
    | | | |
    | | | line number
    | | |
    | | exchange
    | |
    | area code
    |
    prefix


    However, the above is an American phone number format, and it assumes dialing on an outside line. 



    +972500001234



    I might guess that the +9 is a prefix for reaching an outside line from within a local PBX, but if so I can't parse the rest of it with any confidence.  The number of digits is just odd. 



    Or, that might be the +972 country calling code prefix for Israel.  If so, I'm tempted to parse it this way:



    +972 50 000-1234
    | | | |
    | | | |
    | | | |
    | | | line number
    | | |
    | | exchange
    | |
    | area code
    |
    country code


    I've answered, but I don't think this is an on-topic question for this site. 






    share|improve this answer

















    • 2




      Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      Nov 25 at 19:57










    • Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
      – n.st
      Nov 25 at 20:34






    • 1




      In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
      – n.st
      Nov 25 at 20:39


















    up vote
    2
    down vote













    As mentioned in a comment, if a certain institution has several numbers beginning with +97250000, distributed around several departments, the last four numbers are telephone extension numbers. In your example it would be extension "1234".





    • The number assigned within an organization to an individual telephone that extends the external telephone number. (NCI Thesaurus)







    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
      – Reut Sharabani
      Nov 25 at 15:38








    • 1




      @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
      – Janus Bahs Jacquet
      Nov 25 at 15:55










    • X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
      – Reut Sharabani
      Nov 25 at 21:12


















    up vote
    1
    down vote













    I think "suffix", rather than "postfix", is the word you want. In discussions of algorithms, the latter portion of any string is a suffix, irrespective of whether the string consists of digits, letters, or any other combination of symbols. See, for instance, the Wikipedia article on suffix trees. It sounds like it isn't really important that the strings you are working with are phone numbers, so I think you should go with the general term.



    "Postfix", on the other hand, is an adjective describing a mathematical operator that goes after its operands.






    share|improve this answer





















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "97"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });






      Reut Sharabani is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474421%2fsuffix-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes








      up vote
      4
      down vote



      accepted










      In a general context of string processing in programming, I would call the substring that appears in the end a postfix. Collins has postfix as a synonym for suffix, while defining suffix as




      one or more numbers or letters added to the end of a code number to indicate, for example, what area something belongs to.




      To compare, a substring that appears in the beginning would be a prefix, and a substring in the middle would be an infix.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        4
        down vote



        accepted










        In a general context of string processing in programming, I would call the substring that appears in the end a postfix. Collins has postfix as a synonym for suffix, while defining suffix as




        one or more numbers or letters added to the end of a code number to indicate, for example, what area something belongs to.




        To compare, a substring that appears in the beginning would be a prefix, and a substring in the middle would be an infix.






        share|improve this answer























          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted







          up vote
          4
          down vote



          accepted






          In a general context of string processing in programming, I would call the substring that appears in the end a postfix. Collins has postfix as a synonym for suffix, while defining suffix as




          one or more numbers or letters added to the end of a code number to indicate, for example, what area something belongs to.




          To compare, a substring that appears in the beginning would be a prefix, and a substring in the middle would be an infix.






          share|improve this answer












          In a general context of string processing in programming, I would call the substring that appears in the end a postfix. Collins has postfix as a synonym for suffix, while defining suffix as




          one or more numbers or letters added to the end of a code number to indicate, for example, what area something belongs to.




          To compare, a substring that appears in the beginning would be a prefix, and a substring in the middle would be an infix.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Nov 25 at 15:50









          svavil

          1,02149




          1,02149
























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              That it is a phone number does make a difference.  Phone numbers are encodings, and each section has a meaning and a purpose. 



              1-800-555-1212 x1234



              I would label the sections of this phone number in this manner:



              1-800-555-1212 x123
              | | | | |
              | | | | extension (if any)
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              prefix


              However, the above is an American phone number format, and it assumes dialing on an outside line. 



              +972500001234



              I might guess that the +9 is a prefix for reaching an outside line from within a local PBX, but if so I can't parse the rest of it with any confidence.  The number of digits is just odd. 



              Or, that might be the +972 country calling code prefix for Israel.  If so, I'm tempted to parse it this way:



              +972 50 000-1234
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              country code


              I've answered, but I don't think this is an on-topic question for this site. 






              share|improve this answer

















              • 2




                Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 19:57










              • Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:34






              • 1




                In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:39















              up vote
              3
              down vote













              That it is a phone number does make a difference.  Phone numbers are encodings, and each section has a meaning and a purpose. 



              1-800-555-1212 x1234



              I would label the sections of this phone number in this manner:



              1-800-555-1212 x123
              | | | | |
              | | | | extension (if any)
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              prefix


              However, the above is an American phone number format, and it assumes dialing on an outside line. 



              +972500001234



              I might guess that the +9 is a prefix for reaching an outside line from within a local PBX, but if so I can't parse the rest of it with any confidence.  The number of digits is just odd. 



              Or, that might be the +972 country calling code prefix for Israel.  If so, I'm tempted to parse it this way:



              +972 50 000-1234
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              country code


              I've answered, but I don't think this is an on-topic question for this site. 






              share|improve this answer

















              • 2




                Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 19:57










              • Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:34






              • 1




                In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:39













              up vote
              3
              down vote










              up vote
              3
              down vote









              That it is a phone number does make a difference.  Phone numbers are encodings, and each section has a meaning and a purpose. 



              1-800-555-1212 x1234



              I would label the sections of this phone number in this manner:



              1-800-555-1212 x123
              | | | | |
              | | | | extension (if any)
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              prefix


              However, the above is an American phone number format, and it assumes dialing on an outside line. 



              +972500001234



              I might guess that the +9 is a prefix for reaching an outside line from within a local PBX, but if so I can't parse the rest of it with any confidence.  The number of digits is just odd. 



              Or, that might be the +972 country calling code prefix for Israel.  If so, I'm tempted to parse it this way:



              +972 50 000-1234
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              country code


              I've answered, but I don't think this is an on-topic question for this site. 






              share|improve this answer












              That it is a phone number does make a difference.  Phone numbers are encodings, and each section has a meaning and a purpose. 



              1-800-555-1212 x1234



              I would label the sections of this phone number in this manner:



              1-800-555-1212 x123
              | | | | |
              | | | | extension (if any)
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              prefix


              However, the above is an American phone number format, and it assumes dialing on an outside line. 



              +972500001234



              I might guess that the +9 is a prefix for reaching an outside line from within a local PBX, but if so I can't parse the rest of it with any confidence.  The number of digits is just odd. 



              Or, that might be the +972 country calling code prefix for Israel.  If so, I'm tempted to parse it this way:



              +972 50 000-1234
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | |
              | | | line number
              | | |
              | | exchange
              | |
              | area code
              |
              country code


              I've answered, but I don't think this is an on-topic question for this site. 







              share|improve this answer












              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer










              answered Nov 25 at 17:52









              Gary Botnovcan

              1,419511




              1,419511








              • 2




                Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 19:57










              • Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:34






              • 1




                In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:39














              • 2




                Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 19:57










              • Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:34






              • 1




                In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
                – n.st
                Nov 25 at 20:39








              2




              2




              Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              Nov 25 at 19:57




              Trouble is you can’t expect all phone numbers to be structured the same way. For example, +46 40 341 937 and +46 73 739 3725 are both (fictitious) Swedish phone numbers, but only one of them contains an area code.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              Nov 25 at 19:57












              Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
              – n.st
              Nov 25 at 20:34




              Note that the grouping into "exchanges" is a historic limitation of the North American Numbering Plan. Most other countries' numbering plans do not have the notion of "exchanges". The ITU-T recommendation E.164 for an international numbering scheme really just distinguishes between a country code and a subscriber number. It is then up to the regulatory body of each country to structure the subscriber number. It's common to have area codes (referring to "numbering plan areas", not necessarily geographical areas, @JanusBahsJacquet), but even that is not universally the case.
              – n.st
              Nov 25 at 20:34




              1




              1




              In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
              – n.st
              Nov 25 at 20:39




              In fact, phone numbers are so diverse and complicated to parse that there is special software for it (and it contains tens of thousands lines of code and relies on a massive database of special cases).
              – n.st
              Nov 25 at 20:39










              up vote
              2
              down vote













              As mentioned in a comment, if a certain institution has several numbers beginning with +97250000, distributed around several departments, the last four numbers are telephone extension numbers. In your example it would be extension "1234".





              • The number assigned within an organization to an individual telephone that extends the external telephone number. (NCI Thesaurus)







              share|improve this answer























              • Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 15:38








              • 1




                @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 15:55










              • X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 21:12















              up vote
              2
              down vote













              As mentioned in a comment, if a certain institution has several numbers beginning with +97250000, distributed around several departments, the last four numbers are telephone extension numbers. In your example it would be extension "1234".





              • The number assigned within an organization to an individual telephone that extends the external telephone number. (NCI Thesaurus)







              share|improve this answer























              • Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 15:38








              • 1




                @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 15:55










              • X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 21:12













              up vote
              2
              down vote










              up vote
              2
              down vote









              As mentioned in a comment, if a certain institution has several numbers beginning with +97250000, distributed around several departments, the last four numbers are telephone extension numbers. In your example it would be extension "1234".





              • The number assigned within an organization to an individual telephone that extends the external telephone number. (NCI Thesaurus)







              share|improve this answer














              As mentioned in a comment, if a certain institution has several numbers beginning with +97250000, distributed around several departments, the last four numbers are telephone extension numbers. In your example it would be extension "1234".





              • The number assigned within an organization to an individual telephone that extends the external telephone number. (NCI Thesaurus)








              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited Nov 25 at 14:29

























              answered Nov 25 at 14:23









              Centaurus

              37.4k27120237




              37.4k27120237












              • Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 15:38








              • 1




                @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 15:55










              • X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 21:12


















              • Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 15:38








              • 1




                @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
                – Janus Bahs Jacquet
                Nov 25 at 15:55










              • X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
                – Reut Sharabani
                Nov 25 at 21:12
















              Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
              – Reut Sharabani
              Nov 25 at 15:38






              Thanks for the reply. However, this is not what I meant. I do not know if the "suffix" I refer to is used to separate extensions in an organization or not. It is an arbitrary suffix of the phone number used for my own purpose. It is unlikely it is even an organization behind it. Just a regular, private-use, phone number
              – Reut Sharabani
              Nov 25 at 15:38






              1




              1




              @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              Nov 25 at 15:55




              @ReutSharabani What makes you think there should be a word for that? Just like there’s no word for ‘the last X letters of any given word’, there’s no word for ‘the last X digits of any given number’.
              – Janus Bahs Jacquet
              Nov 25 at 15:55












              X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
              – Reut Sharabani
              Nov 25 at 21:12




              X is meaningless. Any suffix of a number. In my case a telephone number. There maynot ne a word for it, or as mentioned in a different answer suffix may be acceptable. Thank you for your input...
              – Reut Sharabani
              Nov 25 at 21:12










              up vote
              1
              down vote













              I think "suffix", rather than "postfix", is the word you want. In discussions of algorithms, the latter portion of any string is a suffix, irrespective of whether the string consists of digits, letters, or any other combination of symbols. See, for instance, the Wikipedia article on suffix trees. It sounds like it isn't really important that the strings you are working with are phone numbers, so I think you should go with the general term.



              "Postfix", on the other hand, is an adjective describing a mathematical operator that goes after its operands.






              share|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote













                I think "suffix", rather than "postfix", is the word you want. In discussions of algorithms, the latter portion of any string is a suffix, irrespective of whether the string consists of digits, letters, or any other combination of symbols. See, for instance, the Wikipedia article on suffix trees. It sounds like it isn't really important that the strings you are working with are phone numbers, so I think you should go with the general term.



                "Postfix", on the other hand, is an adjective describing a mathematical operator that goes after its operands.






                share|improve this answer























                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote










                  up vote
                  1
                  down vote









                  I think "suffix", rather than "postfix", is the word you want. In discussions of algorithms, the latter portion of any string is a suffix, irrespective of whether the string consists of digits, letters, or any other combination of symbols. See, for instance, the Wikipedia article on suffix trees. It sounds like it isn't really important that the strings you are working with are phone numbers, so I think you should go with the general term.



                  "Postfix", on the other hand, is an adjective describing a mathematical operator that goes after its operands.






                  share|improve this answer












                  I think "suffix", rather than "postfix", is the word you want. In discussions of algorithms, the latter portion of any string is a suffix, irrespective of whether the string consists of digits, letters, or any other combination of symbols. See, for instance, the Wikipedia article on suffix trees. It sounds like it isn't really important that the strings you are working with are phone numbers, so I think you should go with the general term.



                  "Postfix", on the other hand, is an adjective describing a mathematical operator that goes after its operands.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Nov 26 at 3:38









                  Mark Foskey

                  38212




                  38212






















                      Reut Sharabani is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Reut Sharabani is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                      Reut Sharabani is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Reut Sharabani is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language & Usage Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                      Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                      Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fenglish.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f474421%2fsuffix-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                      How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                      QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater