${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, but does not possess a (norm-)convergent sequence in $L^{p^∗}(U)$
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $U=B_1(0)$ be the unit ball in $Bbb{R}^n$, $1≤p<n$, $p^∗=frac{np}{n−p}$. Consider the sequence:
begin{equation}
label{eq:aqui-le-mostramos-como-hacerle-la-llave-grande}
u_m = left{
begin{array}{ll}
m^{frac{n}{p}-1}(1-m|x|) & mathrm{if } x <1/m \
0 &mathrm{if } xgeq 1/m\
end{array}
right.
end{equation}
Prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, but does not possess a (norm-)convergent sequence in $L^{p^∗}(U)$.
I've managed to prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, and I've tried to prove the non-existence of a convegent subsequence via completeness of $L^{p^∗}(U)$ and taking a Cauchy series. So far I have gotten nothing. Any hints?
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces complete-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $U=B_1(0)$ be the unit ball in $Bbb{R}^n$, $1≤p<n$, $p^∗=frac{np}{n−p}$. Consider the sequence:
begin{equation}
label{eq:aqui-le-mostramos-como-hacerle-la-llave-grande}
u_m = left{
begin{array}{ll}
m^{frac{n}{p}-1}(1-m|x|) & mathrm{if } x <1/m \
0 &mathrm{if } xgeq 1/m\
end{array}
right.
end{equation}
Prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, but does not possess a (norm-)convergent sequence in $L^{p^∗}(U)$.
I've managed to prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, and I've tried to prove the non-existence of a convegent subsequence via completeness of $L^{p^∗}(U)$ and taking a Cauchy series. So far I have gotten nothing. Any hints?
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces complete-spaces
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
Let $U=B_1(0)$ be the unit ball in $Bbb{R}^n$, $1≤p<n$, $p^∗=frac{np}{n−p}$. Consider the sequence:
begin{equation}
label{eq:aqui-le-mostramos-como-hacerle-la-llave-grande}
u_m = left{
begin{array}{ll}
m^{frac{n}{p}-1}(1-m|x|) & mathrm{if } x <1/m \
0 &mathrm{if } xgeq 1/m\
end{array}
right.
end{equation}
Prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, but does not possess a (norm-)convergent sequence in $L^{p^∗}(U)$.
I've managed to prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, and I've tried to prove the non-existence of a convegent subsequence via completeness of $L^{p^∗}(U)$ and taking a Cauchy series. So far I have gotten nothing. Any hints?
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces complete-spaces
Let $U=B_1(0)$ be the unit ball in $Bbb{R}^n$, $1≤p<n$, $p^∗=frac{np}{n−p}$. Consider the sequence:
begin{equation}
label{eq:aqui-le-mostramos-como-hacerle-la-llave-grande}
u_m = left{
begin{array}{ll}
m^{frac{n}{p}-1}(1-m|x|) & mathrm{if } x <1/m \
0 &mathrm{if } xgeq 1/m\
end{array}
right.
end{equation}
Prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, but does not possess a (norm-)convergent sequence in $L^{p^∗}(U)$.
I've managed to prove that ${u_m}$ is bounded in $W^{1, p}(U)$, and I've tried to prove the non-existence of a convegent subsequence via completeness of $L^{p^∗}(U)$ and taking a Cauchy series. So far I have gotten nothing. Any hints?
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces complete-spaces
functional-analysis pde sobolev-spaces complete-spaces
edited 8 hours ago
asked 9 hours ago
Ajafca
62
62
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The sequence converges pointwise a.e. to zero. But $|u_m|_{L^{p^*}} notto0$. Hence $(u_m)$ cannot contain a subsequence that strongly converges in $L^{p^*}$, since pointwise a.e. limits and strong limits coincide (if they exist).
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
The sequence converges pointwise a.e. to zero. But $|u_m|_{L^{p^*}} notto0$. Hence $(u_m)$ cannot contain a subsequence that strongly converges in $L^{p^*}$, since pointwise a.e. limits and strong limits coincide (if they exist).
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
The sequence converges pointwise a.e. to zero. But $|u_m|_{L^{p^*}} notto0$. Hence $(u_m)$ cannot contain a subsequence that strongly converges in $L^{p^*}$, since pointwise a.e. limits and strong limits coincide (if they exist).
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
The sequence converges pointwise a.e. to zero. But $|u_m|_{L^{p^*}} notto0$. Hence $(u_m)$ cannot contain a subsequence that strongly converges in $L^{p^*}$, since pointwise a.e. limits and strong limits coincide (if they exist).
The sequence converges pointwise a.e. to zero. But $|u_m|_{L^{p^*}} notto0$. Hence $(u_m)$ cannot contain a subsequence that strongly converges in $L^{p^*}$, since pointwise a.e. limits and strong limits coincide (if they exist).
answered 2 hours ago
daw
23.6k1544
23.6k1544
add a comment |
add a comment |
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2999038%2fu-m-is-bounded-in-w1-pu-but-does-not-possess-a-norm-convergent%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password