Can we evaluate noninteger hyperoparations?
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The hyperoperation $a[n]b$ is addition when $n=1$, multiplication when $n=2$, exponentiation when $n=3$, tetration when $n=4$, and so on.
What happens when $n$ is noninteger?
Can we evaluate, e.g. $a[2.5]b$, $a[pi]$b$, etc?
How about $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[2.5]x$, $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}x[2.5]b$, or $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[x]b$? Integrals?
Is this a meaningful concept?
analytic-continuation hyperoperation
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The hyperoperation $a[n]b$ is addition when $n=1$, multiplication when $n=2$, exponentiation when $n=3$, tetration when $n=4$, and so on.
What happens when $n$ is noninteger?
Can we evaluate, e.g. $a[2.5]b$, $a[pi]$b$, etc?
How about $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[2.5]x$, $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}x[2.5]b$, or $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[x]b$? Integrals?
Is this a meaningful concept?
analytic-continuation hyperoperation
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
up vote
0
down vote
favorite
The hyperoperation $a[n]b$ is addition when $n=1$, multiplication when $n=2$, exponentiation when $n=3$, tetration when $n=4$, and so on.
What happens when $n$ is noninteger?
Can we evaluate, e.g. $a[2.5]b$, $a[pi]$b$, etc?
How about $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[2.5]x$, $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}x[2.5]b$, or $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[x]b$? Integrals?
Is this a meaningful concept?
analytic-continuation hyperoperation
The hyperoperation $a[n]b$ is addition when $n=1$, multiplication when $n=2$, exponentiation when $n=3$, tetration when $n=4$, and so on.
What happens when $n$ is noninteger?
Can we evaluate, e.g. $a[2.5]b$, $a[pi]$b$, etc?
How about $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[2.5]x$, $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}x[2.5]b$, or $frac{mathrm{d}}{mathrm{d}x}a[x]b$? Integrals?
Is this a meaningful concept?
analytic-continuation hyperoperation
analytic-continuation hyperoperation
asked Nov 17 at 11:59
spraff
460213
460213
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22
add a comment |
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22
add a comment |
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.
Please pay close attention to the following guidance:
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002277%2fcan-we-evaluate-noninteger-hyperoparations%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
The question is "can we assign some values to these operations which would work for any $a$ and $b$ in a consistent way and reduce to the usual operations for integer order". There may be several ways to do so (or no way, which is an interesting theorem to prove)
– Yuriy S
Nov 17 at 12:06
There is an answer of mine giving one example see math.stackexchange.com/a/1272791/1714 . Note, this is not "the only" way to do that but it was focused to the question in the sense of binary operations
– Gottfried Helms
Nov 18 at 23:22