The Levy measure of a multivariate alpha-stable Levy motion











up vote
2
down vote

favorite
3












I am having difficulties to understand the form of the Levy measure of the multivariate Levy-stable motion. Let me start by defining the one dimensional motion in order to clarify my question.



The univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion ($L_t$) is defined as follows:





  1. $L_0 = 0$ almost surely.

  2. For $t_0 < t_1 < dots< t_N$, the increments $(L_{t_n} −L_{t_{n−1}})$ are independent ($n = 1,dots,
    N$
    ).

  3. The difference $(L_t − L_s)$ and $L_{t−s}$ have the same distribution: $Salpha S((t − s)^{1/α})$ for $s < t$.


  4. $L_t$ has stochastically continuous sample paths.


Here $Salpha S(sigma)$ denotes the symmetric $alpha$-stable distribution with scale parameter $sigma$.



The Levy measure of a univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion is given as follows:



$$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+1}}dx.$$



I know that this measure is related to the characteristic function of $Salpha S(1)$, which is $exp(-|w|^alpha)$.



My confusion arises when we define this motion in $mathbb{R}^d$: even though I can perfectly understand that the characteristic function of a multivariate symmetric $alpha$-stable variable (a.k.a elliptically contoured) becomes $exp(|w|^alpha)$, I am getting confused by the corresponding Levy measure that is defined as follows:



$$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+d}}dx.$$



I am not able to understand why the term $d$ appears in the exponent. I would be very happy if someone can shed some light on this issue.










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    2
    down vote

    favorite
    3












    I am having difficulties to understand the form of the Levy measure of the multivariate Levy-stable motion. Let me start by defining the one dimensional motion in order to clarify my question.



    The univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion ($L_t$) is defined as follows:





    1. $L_0 = 0$ almost surely.

    2. For $t_0 < t_1 < dots< t_N$, the increments $(L_{t_n} −L_{t_{n−1}})$ are independent ($n = 1,dots,
      N$
      ).

    3. The difference $(L_t − L_s)$ and $L_{t−s}$ have the same distribution: $Salpha S((t − s)^{1/α})$ for $s < t$.


    4. $L_t$ has stochastically continuous sample paths.


    Here $Salpha S(sigma)$ denotes the symmetric $alpha$-stable distribution with scale parameter $sigma$.



    The Levy measure of a univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion is given as follows:



    $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+1}}dx.$$



    I know that this measure is related to the characteristic function of $Salpha S(1)$, which is $exp(-|w|^alpha)$.



    My confusion arises when we define this motion in $mathbb{R}^d$: even though I can perfectly understand that the characteristic function of a multivariate symmetric $alpha$-stable variable (a.k.a elliptically contoured) becomes $exp(|w|^alpha)$, I am getting confused by the corresponding Levy measure that is defined as follows:



    $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+d}}dx.$$



    I am not able to understand why the term $d$ appears in the exponent. I would be very happy if someone can shed some light on this issue.










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      3









      up vote
      2
      down vote

      favorite
      3






      3





      I am having difficulties to understand the form of the Levy measure of the multivariate Levy-stable motion. Let me start by defining the one dimensional motion in order to clarify my question.



      The univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion ($L_t$) is defined as follows:





      1. $L_0 = 0$ almost surely.

      2. For $t_0 < t_1 < dots< t_N$, the increments $(L_{t_n} −L_{t_{n−1}})$ are independent ($n = 1,dots,
        N$
        ).

      3. The difference $(L_t − L_s)$ and $L_{t−s}$ have the same distribution: $Salpha S((t − s)^{1/α})$ for $s < t$.


      4. $L_t$ has stochastically continuous sample paths.


      Here $Salpha S(sigma)$ denotes the symmetric $alpha$-stable distribution with scale parameter $sigma$.



      The Levy measure of a univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion is given as follows:



      $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+1}}dx.$$



      I know that this measure is related to the characteristic function of $Salpha S(1)$, which is $exp(-|w|^alpha)$.



      My confusion arises when we define this motion in $mathbb{R}^d$: even though I can perfectly understand that the characteristic function of a multivariate symmetric $alpha$-stable variable (a.k.a elliptically contoured) becomes $exp(|w|^alpha)$, I am getting confused by the corresponding Levy measure that is defined as follows:



      $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+d}}dx.$$



      I am not able to understand why the term $d$ appears in the exponent. I would be very happy if someone can shed some light on this issue.










      share|cite|improve this question















      I am having difficulties to understand the form of the Levy measure of the multivariate Levy-stable motion. Let me start by defining the one dimensional motion in order to clarify my question.



      The univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion ($L_t$) is defined as follows:





      1. $L_0 = 0$ almost surely.

      2. For $t_0 < t_1 < dots< t_N$, the increments $(L_{t_n} −L_{t_{n−1}})$ are independent ($n = 1,dots,
        N$
        ).

      3. The difference $(L_t − L_s)$ and $L_{t−s}$ have the same distribution: $Salpha S((t − s)^{1/α})$ for $s < t$.


      4. $L_t$ has stochastically continuous sample paths.


      Here $Salpha S(sigma)$ denotes the symmetric $alpha$-stable distribution with scale parameter $sigma$.



      The Levy measure of a univariate $alpha$-stable Levy motion is given as follows:



      $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+1}}dx.$$



      I know that this measure is related to the characteristic function of $Salpha S(1)$, which is $exp(-|w|^alpha)$.



      My confusion arises when we define this motion in $mathbb{R}^d$: even though I can perfectly understand that the characteristic function of a multivariate symmetric $alpha$-stable variable (a.k.a elliptically contoured) becomes $exp(|w|^alpha)$, I am getting confused by the corresponding Levy measure that is defined as follows:



      $$nu(dx) = frac1{|x|^{alpha+d}}dx.$$



      I am not able to understand why the term $d$ appears in the exponent. I would be very happy if someone can shed some light on this issue.







      probability-theory stochastic-processes stochastic-calculus levy-processes






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 18 at 19:10









      saz

      76.9k755118




      76.9k755118










      asked Nov 18 at 5:12









      thmusic

      758




      758






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          3
          down vote













          Roughly speaking, the $d$ in the exponent comes into play because of the change of variables formula in $mathbb{R}^d$: $$int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(ry) , dy = r^{-d} int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(y) , dy. tag{1}$$



          Denote by $$psi(xi) := int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(y cdot xi)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ the characteristic exponent associatd with the measure $nu(dy) = |y|^{-d-alpha} , dy$. Since $psi$ is rotationally invariant, we have $$psi(xi) =psi(|xi| e_1)= int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(|xi| y cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ where $e_1 = (1,0,ldots,0)^T$ denotes the first unit vector in $mathbb{R}^d$. Now a change of variables, $z := |xi| y$ shows by $(1)$ that



          $$psi(xi) = |xi|^{alpha} underbrace{int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(z cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|z|^{d+alpha}} , dz}_{=: C_{d,alpha}} = C_{d,alpha} |xi|^{alpha}.$$



          Note that we need the exponent $d$ in the dominator in order to cancel the $|xi|^d$-term which comes into play because of $(1)$; otherwise we would end up with a different power of $|xi|$.



          Alternatively, you can also see from the integrability condition $int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} min{1,|y|^2} , nu(dy) < infty$ (which any Lévy measure $nu$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ has to satisfy) that we need the exponent $d$; this is due to the fact that



          $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; 0<|y|<1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta<d$$



          and



          $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; |y| geq 1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta>d.$$



          Using these characterizations you can easily show that $nu(dy)=|y|^{-d-alpha}$ is a $d$-dimensional Lévy measure if, and only if, $alpha in (0,2)$.






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003151%2fthe-levy-measure-of-a-multivariate-alpha-stable-levy-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            3
            down vote













            Roughly speaking, the $d$ in the exponent comes into play because of the change of variables formula in $mathbb{R}^d$: $$int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(ry) , dy = r^{-d} int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(y) , dy. tag{1}$$



            Denote by $$psi(xi) := int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(y cdot xi)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ the characteristic exponent associatd with the measure $nu(dy) = |y|^{-d-alpha} , dy$. Since $psi$ is rotationally invariant, we have $$psi(xi) =psi(|xi| e_1)= int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(|xi| y cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ where $e_1 = (1,0,ldots,0)^T$ denotes the first unit vector in $mathbb{R}^d$. Now a change of variables, $z := |xi| y$ shows by $(1)$ that



            $$psi(xi) = |xi|^{alpha} underbrace{int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(z cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|z|^{d+alpha}} , dz}_{=: C_{d,alpha}} = C_{d,alpha} |xi|^{alpha}.$$



            Note that we need the exponent $d$ in the dominator in order to cancel the $|xi|^d$-term which comes into play because of $(1)$; otherwise we would end up with a different power of $|xi|$.



            Alternatively, you can also see from the integrability condition $int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} min{1,|y|^2} , nu(dy) < infty$ (which any Lévy measure $nu$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ has to satisfy) that we need the exponent $d$; this is due to the fact that



            $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; 0<|y|<1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta<d$$



            and



            $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; |y| geq 1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta>d.$$



            Using these characterizations you can easily show that $nu(dy)=|y|^{-d-alpha}$ is a $d$-dimensional Lévy measure if, and only if, $alpha in (0,2)$.






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              3
              down vote













              Roughly speaking, the $d$ in the exponent comes into play because of the change of variables formula in $mathbb{R}^d$: $$int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(ry) , dy = r^{-d} int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(y) , dy. tag{1}$$



              Denote by $$psi(xi) := int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(y cdot xi)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ the characteristic exponent associatd with the measure $nu(dy) = |y|^{-d-alpha} , dy$. Since $psi$ is rotationally invariant, we have $$psi(xi) =psi(|xi| e_1)= int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(|xi| y cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ where $e_1 = (1,0,ldots,0)^T$ denotes the first unit vector in $mathbb{R}^d$. Now a change of variables, $z := |xi| y$ shows by $(1)$ that



              $$psi(xi) = |xi|^{alpha} underbrace{int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(z cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|z|^{d+alpha}} , dz}_{=: C_{d,alpha}} = C_{d,alpha} |xi|^{alpha}.$$



              Note that we need the exponent $d$ in the dominator in order to cancel the $|xi|^d$-term which comes into play because of $(1)$; otherwise we would end up with a different power of $|xi|$.



              Alternatively, you can also see from the integrability condition $int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} min{1,|y|^2} , nu(dy) < infty$ (which any Lévy measure $nu$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ has to satisfy) that we need the exponent $d$; this is due to the fact that



              $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; 0<|y|<1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta<d$$



              and



              $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; |y| geq 1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta>d.$$



              Using these characterizations you can easily show that $nu(dy)=|y|^{-d-alpha}$ is a $d$-dimensional Lévy measure if, and only if, $alpha in (0,2)$.






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                3
                down vote










                up vote
                3
                down vote









                Roughly speaking, the $d$ in the exponent comes into play because of the change of variables formula in $mathbb{R}^d$: $$int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(ry) , dy = r^{-d} int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(y) , dy. tag{1}$$



                Denote by $$psi(xi) := int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(y cdot xi)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ the characteristic exponent associatd with the measure $nu(dy) = |y|^{-d-alpha} , dy$. Since $psi$ is rotationally invariant, we have $$psi(xi) =psi(|xi| e_1)= int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(|xi| y cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ where $e_1 = (1,0,ldots,0)^T$ denotes the first unit vector in $mathbb{R}^d$. Now a change of variables, $z := |xi| y$ shows by $(1)$ that



                $$psi(xi) = |xi|^{alpha} underbrace{int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(z cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|z|^{d+alpha}} , dz}_{=: C_{d,alpha}} = C_{d,alpha} |xi|^{alpha}.$$



                Note that we need the exponent $d$ in the dominator in order to cancel the $|xi|^d$-term which comes into play because of $(1)$; otherwise we would end up with a different power of $|xi|$.



                Alternatively, you can also see from the integrability condition $int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} min{1,|y|^2} , nu(dy) < infty$ (which any Lévy measure $nu$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ has to satisfy) that we need the exponent $d$; this is due to the fact that



                $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; 0<|y|<1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta<d$$



                and



                $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; |y| geq 1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta>d.$$



                Using these characterizations you can easily show that $nu(dy)=|y|^{-d-alpha}$ is a $d$-dimensional Lévy measure if, and only if, $alpha in (0,2)$.






                share|cite|improve this answer














                Roughly speaking, the $d$ in the exponent comes into play because of the change of variables formula in $mathbb{R}^d$: $$int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(ry) , dy = r^{-d} int_{mathbb{R}^d} f(y) , dy. tag{1}$$



                Denote by $$psi(xi) := int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(y cdot xi)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ the characteristic exponent associatd with the measure $nu(dy) = |y|^{-d-alpha} , dy$. Since $psi$ is rotationally invariant, we have $$psi(xi) =psi(|xi| e_1)= int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(|xi| y cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|y|^{d+alpha}} , dy$$ where $e_1 = (1,0,ldots,0)^T$ denotes the first unit vector in $mathbb{R}^d$. Now a change of variables, $z := |xi| y$ shows by $(1)$ that



                $$psi(xi) = |xi|^{alpha} underbrace{int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} (1-cos(z cdot e_1)) frac{1}{|z|^{d+alpha}} , dz}_{=: C_{d,alpha}} = C_{d,alpha} |xi|^{alpha}.$$



                Note that we need the exponent $d$ in the dominator in order to cancel the $|xi|^d$-term which comes into play because of $(1)$; otherwise we would end up with a different power of $|xi|$.



                Alternatively, you can also see from the integrability condition $int_{mathbb{R}^d backslash {0}} min{1,|y|^2} , nu(dy) < infty$ (which any Lévy measure $nu$ on $mathbb{R}^d$ has to satisfy) that we need the exponent $d$; this is due to the fact that



                $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; 0<|y|<1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta<d$$



                and



                $$int_{{y in mathbb{R}^d; |y| geq 1}} |y|^{-beta} ,d y < infty iff beta>d.$$



                Using these characterizations you can easily show that $nu(dy)=|y|^{-d-alpha}$ is a $d$-dimensional Lévy measure if, and only if, $alpha in (0,2)$.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 25 at 21:26

























                answered Nov 18 at 6:46









                saz

                76.9k755118




                76.9k755118






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3003151%2fthe-levy-measure-of-a-multivariate-alpha-stable-levy-motion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                    How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                    QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater