Converting a 2-form on $mathbb{R}^{3}$ to a vector field on $mathbb{R}^{3}$











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












How do I convert a 2-form $x dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz$ on $mathbb{R^{3}}$ to a vector field on $mathbb{R^{3}}$?



Attempt:



Suppose we have two vectors fields a and b in $mathbb{R^{3}}$ such that $a=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})$ and $b=(b_{1},b_{2},b_{3})$ .



Now,



$(dy wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{2} & a_{3} \ b_{2} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} = a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}$



$(dx wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{1} & a_{3} \ b_{1} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} =a_{1}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{1}$



I ended up getting



$x (a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}) + y^2 (a_{1}b_{3}-a{3}b_{1})$



How does the $x$ and the $y^{2}$ convert?










share|cite|improve this question


























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    How do I convert a 2-form $x dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz$ on $mathbb{R^{3}}$ to a vector field on $mathbb{R^{3}}$?



    Attempt:



    Suppose we have two vectors fields a and b in $mathbb{R^{3}}$ such that $a=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})$ and $b=(b_{1},b_{2},b_{3})$ .



    Now,



    $(dy wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{2} & a_{3} \ b_{2} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} = a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}$



    $(dx wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{1} & a_{3} \ b_{1} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} =a_{1}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{1}$



    I ended up getting



    $x (a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}) + y^2 (a_{1}b_{3}-a{3}b_{1})$



    How does the $x$ and the $y^{2}$ convert?










    share|cite|improve this question
























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      How do I convert a 2-form $x dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz$ on $mathbb{R^{3}}$ to a vector field on $mathbb{R^{3}}$?



      Attempt:



      Suppose we have two vectors fields a and b in $mathbb{R^{3}}$ such that $a=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})$ and $b=(b_{1},b_{2},b_{3})$ .



      Now,



      $(dy wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{2} & a_{3} \ b_{2} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} = a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}$



      $(dx wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{1} & a_{3} \ b_{1} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} =a_{1}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{1}$



      I ended up getting



      $x (a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}) + y^2 (a_{1}b_{3}-a{3}b_{1})$



      How does the $x$ and the $y^{2}$ convert?










      share|cite|improve this question













      How do I convert a 2-form $x dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz$ on $mathbb{R^{3}}$ to a vector field on $mathbb{R^{3}}$?



      Attempt:



      Suppose we have two vectors fields a and b in $mathbb{R^{3}}$ such that $a=(a_{1},a_{2},a_{3})$ and $b=(b_{1},b_{2},b_{3})$ .



      Now,



      $(dy wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{2} & a_{3} \ b_{2} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} = a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}$



      $(dx wedge dz)(a,b) = det begin{pmatrix} a_{1} & a_{3} \ b_{1} & b_{3} end{pmatrix} =a_{1}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{1}$



      I ended up getting



      $x (a_{2}b_{3}-a_{3}b_{2}) + y^2 (a_{1}b_{3}-a{3}b_{1})$



      How does the $x$ and the $y^{2}$ convert?







      vector-analysis






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked Nov 17 at 20:16









      usukidoll

      1,1621032




      1,1621032






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          2
          down vote



          accepted










          Edit:
          The user Travis just pointed to an more general way in the comments.



          With the volume from
          $$Omega = mathbf e_1 wedge mathbf e_2 wedge mathbf e_3$$
          we get an isomorphism via
          $$
          T mathbb R^3 to Lambda^2 mathbb R^3 : mathbf v mapsto Omega( mathbf v, cdot, cdot).
          $$



          It's inverse yields exactly the same map as described below, i.e.
          $$mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z mapsto mathbf e_1,
          quad
          mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x mapsto mathbf e_2 quad text{and} quad
          mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y mapsto mathbf e_3.$$



          Old, less general reply:



          There is the Hodge star operator, which assigns
          $$star(mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z) mapsto mathrm{d} x,
          quad
          star(mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x) mapsto mathrm dy quad text{and} quad
          star(mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y) mapsto mathrm d z.$$



          You can look up the exact definition of the Hodge star operator in the link above or in books. It is a map $Lambda^k mathcal M to Lambda^{m-k} mathcal M$. In our case it allows us to convert a 2-from into a 1-from.



          Then we are left with the task to convert a 1-from (or a co-tangential vector) into a tangential vector. Such a map is for example provided, if there is a scalar product on the tangential spaces, i.e. a Riemannian metric $langle cdot , cdot rangle$.



          At a point $p in mathcal M$, the map is given by
          $$T_p mathcal M to T^*_p mathcal M: mathbf v mapsto langle mathbf v, cdot rangle_p.$$



          In the case of $mathbb R^3$ the inverse of this map is given by
          $$mathrm dx mapsto mathbf e_1 = begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix},
          quad
          mathrm dy mapsto mathbf e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{pmatrix} quad text{and} quad
          mathrm dz mapsto mathbf e_3 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{pmatrix}.$$



          Putting those two isomorphism together yields a map $Lambda^2_p mathbb R^3 to T_p mathbb R^3$.



          Why?
          For an intuition, I always think of $mathrm{d} x wedge mathrm{d} y$ as something which measures two dimensional volumes in $mathbb R^3$ and the vector $mathbf e_1$ is somehow a vector which is needed to span up the rest or $mathbb R^3$, something like a normal vector to the surface.



          Hodge star operator



          Example



          In your case, we get the 1-from
          $$star(x mathrm dy wedge mathrm dz + y^2 mathrm dx wedge mathrm dz) = x mathrm d x - y^2 mathrm d y =: omega.$$



          Following the steps from above, the vector field is then defined as
          $$
          mathbf v = omega(mathbf e_1) mathbf e_1 + omega(mathbf e_2) mathbf e_2 + omega(mathbf e_3) mathbf e_3.
          $$



          Hence, the corresponding vector field is
          $$
          begin{pmatrix} x \ -y^2 \ 0 end{pmatrix}.
          $$






          share|cite|improve this answer























          • Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
            – usukidoll
            Nov 17 at 21:04










          • Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:19






          • 1




            This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
            – Travis
            Nov 17 at 21:37






          • 1




            Thanks for the hint!
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:49






          • 1




            Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
            – Travis
            Nov 18 at 6:15


















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          While the question is about vector fields, the map $phi : Gamma(bigwedge^2 T^* Bbb R^3) stackrel{cong}{to} Gamma(bigwedge^1 T Bbb R^3) = Gamma(T Bbb R^3)$ is tensorial, so it suffices to describe it at a single point, say, $phi_0 : Lambda^2 T^*_0 Bbb R^3 to T_0 Bbb R^3$. Using the canonical identification $T_a Bbb R^3 cong Bbb R^3$ and suppressing the subscript, we'll write $$phi : textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*} stackrel{cong}{to} textstyle{bigwedge^1 Bbb R^3} = Bbb R^3 .$$



          First, since this map is linear, so as with any linear map the coefficients come along for the ride:
          $$phi(x ,dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz) = x phi(dy wedge dz) + y^2 phi(dx wedge dz) .$$



          We get such a map from any volume form, that is, any nonvanishing top form $omega in bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$. With this in hand, it's easier to describe the inverse, which is just interior multiplication,



          $$phi^{-1} : Bbb R^3 to textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*}, qquad X mapsto iota_X omega = omega(X,,cdot,,,cdot,) .$$



          Since it's not stated otherwise, we'll take the standard volume form, $dx wedge dy wedge dz$. So, for example, $$phi^{-1}(partial_x) = iota_{partial_x} (dx wedge dy wedge dz) = dy wedge dz .$$ Thus,
          $$boxed{phi(dy wedge dz) = partial_x} ,$$
          and by symmetry cyclic permutation gives that image under $phi$ of the other two basis elements.



          We can also write down the inverse in an invariant (i.e., coordinate-independent) way: Since the space $bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$ is $1$-dimensional, there is a unique element $Omega$ of its dual, $bigwedge^3 Bbb R^3$, that satisfies $omega(Omega) = 3! = 6$. Here, the notation on the l.h.s. just means the full contraction of $omega$ and $Omega$.) Then, checking on a basis (again, by symmetry, it's enough to check a single basis element), we find that
          $$phi(mu) = frac{1}{2} Omega(mu,,cdot,),$$
          where the notation on the r.h.s. just means that we contract $mu$ with the first two slots of $Omega$. Computing gives in our case that $$Omega = partial_x wedge partial_y wedge partial_z .$$






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002764%2fconverting-a-2-form-on-mathbbr3-to-a-vector-field-on-mathbbr3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Edit:
            The user Travis just pointed to an more general way in the comments.



            With the volume from
            $$Omega = mathbf e_1 wedge mathbf e_2 wedge mathbf e_3$$
            we get an isomorphism via
            $$
            T mathbb R^3 to Lambda^2 mathbb R^3 : mathbf v mapsto Omega( mathbf v, cdot, cdot).
            $$



            It's inverse yields exactly the same map as described below, i.e.
            $$mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z mapsto mathbf e_1,
            quad
            mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x mapsto mathbf e_2 quad text{and} quad
            mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y mapsto mathbf e_3.$$



            Old, less general reply:



            There is the Hodge star operator, which assigns
            $$star(mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z) mapsto mathrm{d} x,
            quad
            star(mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x) mapsto mathrm dy quad text{and} quad
            star(mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y) mapsto mathrm d z.$$



            You can look up the exact definition of the Hodge star operator in the link above or in books. It is a map $Lambda^k mathcal M to Lambda^{m-k} mathcal M$. In our case it allows us to convert a 2-from into a 1-from.



            Then we are left with the task to convert a 1-from (or a co-tangential vector) into a tangential vector. Such a map is for example provided, if there is a scalar product on the tangential spaces, i.e. a Riemannian metric $langle cdot , cdot rangle$.



            At a point $p in mathcal M$, the map is given by
            $$T_p mathcal M to T^*_p mathcal M: mathbf v mapsto langle mathbf v, cdot rangle_p.$$



            In the case of $mathbb R^3$ the inverse of this map is given by
            $$mathrm dx mapsto mathbf e_1 = begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix},
            quad
            mathrm dy mapsto mathbf e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{pmatrix} quad text{and} quad
            mathrm dz mapsto mathbf e_3 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{pmatrix}.$$



            Putting those two isomorphism together yields a map $Lambda^2_p mathbb R^3 to T_p mathbb R^3$.



            Why?
            For an intuition, I always think of $mathrm{d} x wedge mathrm{d} y$ as something which measures two dimensional volumes in $mathbb R^3$ and the vector $mathbf e_1$ is somehow a vector which is needed to span up the rest or $mathbb R^3$, something like a normal vector to the surface.



            Hodge star operator



            Example



            In your case, we get the 1-from
            $$star(x mathrm dy wedge mathrm dz + y^2 mathrm dx wedge mathrm dz) = x mathrm d x - y^2 mathrm d y =: omega.$$



            Following the steps from above, the vector field is then defined as
            $$
            mathbf v = omega(mathbf e_1) mathbf e_1 + omega(mathbf e_2) mathbf e_2 + omega(mathbf e_3) mathbf e_3.
            $$



            Hence, the corresponding vector field is
            $$
            begin{pmatrix} x \ -y^2 \ 0 end{pmatrix}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
              – usukidoll
              Nov 17 at 21:04










            • Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:19






            • 1




              This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
              – Travis
              Nov 17 at 21:37






            • 1




              Thanks for the hint!
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:49






            • 1




              Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
              – Travis
              Nov 18 at 6:15















            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted










            Edit:
            The user Travis just pointed to an more general way in the comments.



            With the volume from
            $$Omega = mathbf e_1 wedge mathbf e_2 wedge mathbf e_3$$
            we get an isomorphism via
            $$
            T mathbb R^3 to Lambda^2 mathbb R^3 : mathbf v mapsto Omega( mathbf v, cdot, cdot).
            $$



            It's inverse yields exactly the same map as described below, i.e.
            $$mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z mapsto mathbf e_1,
            quad
            mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x mapsto mathbf e_2 quad text{and} quad
            mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y mapsto mathbf e_3.$$



            Old, less general reply:



            There is the Hodge star operator, which assigns
            $$star(mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z) mapsto mathrm{d} x,
            quad
            star(mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x) mapsto mathrm dy quad text{and} quad
            star(mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y) mapsto mathrm d z.$$



            You can look up the exact definition of the Hodge star operator in the link above or in books. It is a map $Lambda^k mathcal M to Lambda^{m-k} mathcal M$. In our case it allows us to convert a 2-from into a 1-from.



            Then we are left with the task to convert a 1-from (or a co-tangential vector) into a tangential vector. Such a map is for example provided, if there is a scalar product on the tangential spaces, i.e. a Riemannian metric $langle cdot , cdot rangle$.



            At a point $p in mathcal M$, the map is given by
            $$T_p mathcal M to T^*_p mathcal M: mathbf v mapsto langle mathbf v, cdot rangle_p.$$



            In the case of $mathbb R^3$ the inverse of this map is given by
            $$mathrm dx mapsto mathbf e_1 = begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix},
            quad
            mathrm dy mapsto mathbf e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{pmatrix} quad text{and} quad
            mathrm dz mapsto mathbf e_3 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{pmatrix}.$$



            Putting those two isomorphism together yields a map $Lambda^2_p mathbb R^3 to T_p mathbb R^3$.



            Why?
            For an intuition, I always think of $mathrm{d} x wedge mathrm{d} y$ as something which measures two dimensional volumes in $mathbb R^3$ and the vector $mathbf e_1$ is somehow a vector which is needed to span up the rest or $mathbb R^3$, something like a normal vector to the surface.



            Hodge star operator



            Example



            In your case, we get the 1-from
            $$star(x mathrm dy wedge mathrm dz + y^2 mathrm dx wedge mathrm dz) = x mathrm d x - y^2 mathrm d y =: omega.$$



            Following the steps from above, the vector field is then defined as
            $$
            mathbf v = omega(mathbf e_1) mathbf e_1 + omega(mathbf e_2) mathbf e_2 + omega(mathbf e_3) mathbf e_3.
            $$



            Hence, the corresponding vector field is
            $$
            begin{pmatrix} x \ -y^2 \ 0 end{pmatrix}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer























            • Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
              – usukidoll
              Nov 17 at 21:04










            • Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:19






            • 1




              This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
              – Travis
              Nov 17 at 21:37






            • 1




              Thanks for the hint!
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:49






            • 1




              Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
              – Travis
              Nov 18 at 6:15













            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted







            up vote
            2
            down vote



            accepted






            Edit:
            The user Travis just pointed to an more general way in the comments.



            With the volume from
            $$Omega = mathbf e_1 wedge mathbf e_2 wedge mathbf e_3$$
            we get an isomorphism via
            $$
            T mathbb R^3 to Lambda^2 mathbb R^3 : mathbf v mapsto Omega( mathbf v, cdot, cdot).
            $$



            It's inverse yields exactly the same map as described below, i.e.
            $$mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z mapsto mathbf e_1,
            quad
            mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x mapsto mathbf e_2 quad text{and} quad
            mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y mapsto mathbf e_3.$$



            Old, less general reply:



            There is the Hodge star operator, which assigns
            $$star(mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z) mapsto mathrm{d} x,
            quad
            star(mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x) mapsto mathrm dy quad text{and} quad
            star(mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y) mapsto mathrm d z.$$



            You can look up the exact definition of the Hodge star operator in the link above or in books. It is a map $Lambda^k mathcal M to Lambda^{m-k} mathcal M$. In our case it allows us to convert a 2-from into a 1-from.



            Then we are left with the task to convert a 1-from (or a co-tangential vector) into a tangential vector. Such a map is for example provided, if there is a scalar product on the tangential spaces, i.e. a Riemannian metric $langle cdot , cdot rangle$.



            At a point $p in mathcal M$, the map is given by
            $$T_p mathcal M to T^*_p mathcal M: mathbf v mapsto langle mathbf v, cdot rangle_p.$$



            In the case of $mathbb R^3$ the inverse of this map is given by
            $$mathrm dx mapsto mathbf e_1 = begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix},
            quad
            mathrm dy mapsto mathbf e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{pmatrix} quad text{and} quad
            mathrm dz mapsto mathbf e_3 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{pmatrix}.$$



            Putting those two isomorphism together yields a map $Lambda^2_p mathbb R^3 to T_p mathbb R^3$.



            Why?
            For an intuition, I always think of $mathrm{d} x wedge mathrm{d} y$ as something which measures two dimensional volumes in $mathbb R^3$ and the vector $mathbf e_1$ is somehow a vector which is needed to span up the rest or $mathbb R^3$, something like a normal vector to the surface.



            Hodge star operator



            Example



            In your case, we get the 1-from
            $$star(x mathrm dy wedge mathrm dz + y^2 mathrm dx wedge mathrm dz) = x mathrm d x - y^2 mathrm d y =: omega.$$



            Following the steps from above, the vector field is then defined as
            $$
            mathbf v = omega(mathbf e_1) mathbf e_1 + omega(mathbf e_2) mathbf e_2 + omega(mathbf e_3) mathbf e_3.
            $$



            Hence, the corresponding vector field is
            $$
            begin{pmatrix} x \ -y^2 \ 0 end{pmatrix}.
            $$






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Edit:
            The user Travis just pointed to an more general way in the comments.



            With the volume from
            $$Omega = mathbf e_1 wedge mathbf e_2 wedge mathbf e_3$$
            we get an isomorphism via
            $$
            T mathbb R^3 to Lambda^2 mathbb R^3 : mathbf v mapsto Omega( mathbf v, cdot, cdot).
            $$



            It's inverse yields exactly the same map as described below, i.e.
            $$mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z mapsto mathbf e_1,
            quad
            mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x mapsto mathbf e_2 quad text{and} quad
            mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y mapsto mathbf e_3.$$



            Old, less general reply:



            There is the Hodge star operator, which assigns
            $$star(mathrm{d}y wedge mathrm{d}z) mapsto mathrm{d} x,
            quad
            star(mathrm{d}z wedge mathrm{d} x) mapsto mathrm dy quad text{and} quad
            star(mathrm{d}x wedge mathrm{d} y) mapsto mathrm d z.$$



            You can look up the exact definition of the Hodge star operator in the link above or in books. It is a map $Lambda^k mathcal M to Lambda^{m-k} mathcal M$. In our case it allows us to convert a 2-from into a 1-from.



            Then we are left with the task to convert a 1-from (or a co-tangential vector) into a tangential vector. Such a map is for example provided, if there is a scalar product on the tangential spaces, i.e. a Riemannian metric $langle cdot , cdot rangle$.



            At a point $p in mathcal M$, the map is given by
            $$T_p mathcal M to T^*_p mathcal M: mathbf v mapsto langle mathbf v, cdot rangle_p.$$



            In the case of $mathbb R^3$ the inverse of this map is given by
            $$mathrm dx mapsto mathbf e_1 = begin{pmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 end{pmatrix},
            quad
            mathrm dy mapsto mathbf e_2 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 end{pmatrix} quad text{and} quad
            mathrm dz mapsto mathbf e_3 = begin{pmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 end{pmatrix}.$$



            Putting those two isomorphism together yields a map $Lambda^2_p mathbb R^3 to T_p mathbb R^3$.



            Why?
            For an intuition, I always think of $mathrm{d} x wedge mathrm{d} y$ as something which measures two dimensional volumes in $mathbb R^3$ and the vector $mathbf e_1$ is somehow a vector which is needed to span up the rest or $mathbb R^3$, something like a normal vector to the surface.



            Hodge star operator



            Example



            In your case, we get the 1-from
            $$star(x mathrm dy wedge mathrm dz + y^2 mathrm dx wedge mathrm dz) = x mathrm d x - y^2 mathrm d y =: omega.$$



            Following the steps from above, the vector field is then defined as
            $$
            mathbf v = omega(mathbf e_1) mathbf e_1 + omega(mathbf e_2) mathbf e_2 + omega(mathbf e_3) mathbf e_3.
            $$



            Hence, the corresponding vector field is
            $$
            begin{pmatrix} x \ -y^2 \ 0 end{pmatrix}.
            $$







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 17 at 21:58

























            answered Nov 17 at 21:00









            Steffen Plunder

            498211




            498211












            • Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
              – usukidoll
              Nov 17 at 21:04










            • Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:19






            • 1




              This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
              – Travis
              Nov 17 at 21:37






            • 1




              Thanks for the hint!
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:49






            • 1




              Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
              – Travis
              Nov 18 at 6:15


















            • Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
              – usukidoll
              Nov 17 at 21:04










            • Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:19






            • 1




              This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
              – Travis
              Nov 17 at 21:37






            • 1




              Thanks for the hint!
              – Steffen Plunder
              Nov 17 at 21:49






            • 1




              Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
              – Travis
              Nov 18 at 6:15
















            Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
            – usukidoll
            Nov 17 at 21:04




            Ooooohhhhh so first I have to convert a 2 -form into a 1-form and then use whatever I did to turn it into a vector field on R^3?
            – usukidoll
            Nov 17 at 21:04












            Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:19




            Maybe there is also another way. But yes, what you did is the same like the second step. (Notice, that $star$ is a linear map, hence after you get used to it, you can read of the vector field, directly from the 2-from, if the two form is provided in terms of $mathrm dxwedge mathrm dy$, $mathrm dywedge mathrm dz$ and $mathrm dzwedge mathrm dx$.
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:19




            1




            1




            This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
            – Travis
            Nov 17 at 21:37




            This is correct, but NB the identification $Lambda^2 (Bbb R^3)^* stackrel{cong}{to} Bbb R^3$ doesn't require an inner product on $Bbb R^3$---you only need a volume form, or dually, a volume multivector $Omega in Lambda^3 Bbb R^3$, which up to a constant is just ${bf e}_1 wedge {bf e}_2 wedge {bf e}_3$. Then (up to a constant depending on our convention), the map is just contraction with $Omega$. This gives, e.g., $dx wedge dy leftrightarrow e_3$.
            – Travis
            Nov 17 at 21:37




            1




            1




            Thanks for the hint!
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:49




            Thanks for the hint!
            – Steffen Plunder
            Nov 17 at 21:49




            1




            1




            Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
            – Travis
            Nov 18 at 6:15




            Yes, that's fine, of course. I've written my own answer now---not because I think the approach I suggest is necessarily better, but just to give some details of the construction that just uses a volume form.
            – Travis
            Nov 18 at 6:15










            up vote
            1
            down vote













            While the question is about vector fields, the map $phi : Gamma(bigwedge^2 T^* Bbb R^3) stackrel{cong}{to} Gamma(bigwedge^1 T Bbb R^3) = Gamma(T Bbb R^3)$ is tensorial, so it suffices to describe it at a single point, say, $phi_0 : Lambda^2 T^*_0 Bbb R^3 to T_0 Bbb R^3$. Using the canonical identification $T_a Bbb R^3 cong Bbb R^3$ and suppressing the subscript, we'll write $$phi : textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*} stackrel{cong}{to} textstyle{bigwedge^1 Bbb R^3} = Bbb R^3 .$$



            First, since this map is linear, so as with any linear map the coefficients come along for the ride:
            $$phi(x ,dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz) = x phi(dy wedge dz) + y^2 phi(dx wedge dz) .$$



            We get such a map from any volume form, that is, any nonvanishing top form $omega in bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$. With this in hand, it's easier to describe the inverse, which is just interior multiplication,



            $$phi^{-1} : Bbb R^3 to textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*}, qquad X mapsto iota_X omega = omega(X,,cdot,,,cdot,) .$$



            Since it's not stated otherwise, we'll take the standard volume form, $dx wedge dy wedge dz$. So, for example, $$phi^{-1}(partial_x) = iota_{partial_x} (dx wedge dy wedge dz) = dy wedge dz .$$ Thus,
            $$boxed{phi(dy wedge dz) = partial_x} ,$$
            and by symmetry cyclic permutation gives that image under $phi$ of the other two basis elements.



            We can also write down the inverse in an invariant (i.e., coordinate-independent) way: Since the space $bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$ is $1$-dimensional, there is a unique element $Omega$ of its dual, $bigwedge^3 Bbb R^3$, that satisfies $omega(Omega) = 3! = 6$. Here, the notation on the l.h.s. just means the full contraction of $omega$ and $Omega$.) Then, checking on a basis (again, by symmetry, it's enough to check a single basis element), we find that
            $$phi(mu) = frac{1}{2} Omega(mu,,cdot,),$$
            where the notation on the r.h.s. just means that we contract $mu$ with the first two slots of $Omega$. Computing gives in our case that $$Omega = partial_x wedge partial_y wedge partial_z .$$






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote













              While the question is about vector fields, the map $phi : Gamma(bigwedge^2 T^* Bbb R^3) stackrel{cong}{to} Gamma(bigwedge^1 T Bbb R^3) = Gamma(T Bbb R^3)$ is tensorial, so it suffices to describe it at a single point, say, $phi_0 : Lambda^2 T^*_0 Bbb R^3 to T_0 Bbb R^3$. Using the canonical identification $T_a Bbb R^3 cong Bbb R^3$ and suppressing the subscript, we'll write $$phi : textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*} stackrel{cong}{to} textstyle{bigwedge^1 Bbb R^3} = Bbb R^3 .$$



              First, since this map is linear, so as with any linear map the coefficients come along for the ride:
              $$phi(x ,dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz) = x phi(dy wedge dz) + y^2 phi(dx wedge dz) .$$



              We get such a map from any volume form, that is, any nonvanishing top form $omega in bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$. With this in hand, it's easier to describe the inverse, which is just interior multiplication,



              $$phi^{-1} : Bbb R^3 to textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*}, qquad X mapsto iota_X omega = omega(X,,cdot,,,cdot,) .$$



              Since it's not stated otherwise, we'll take the standard volume form, $dx wedge dy wedge dz$. So, for example, $$phi^{-1}(partial_x) = iota_{partial_x} (dx wedge dy wedge dz) = dy wedge dz .$$ Thus,
              $$boxed{phi(dy wedge dz) = partial_x} ,$$
              and by symmetry cyclic permutation gives that image under $phi$ of the other two basis elements.



              We can also write down the inverse in an invariant (i.e., coordinate-independent) way: Since the space $bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$ is $1$-dimensional, there is a unique element $Omega$ of its dual, $bigwedge^3 Bbb R^3$, that satisfies $omega(Omega) = 3! = 6$. Here, the notation on the l.h.s. just means the full contraction of $omega$ and $Omega$.) Then, checking on a basis (again, by symmetry, it's enough to check a single basis element), we find that
              $$phi(mu) = frac{1}{2} Omega(mu,,cdot,),$$
              where the notation on the r.h.s. just means that we contract $mu$ with the first two slots of $Omega$. Computing gives in our case that $$Omega = partial_x wedge partial_y wedge partial_z .$$






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote










                up vote
                1
                down vote









                While the question is about vector fields, the map $phi : Gamma(bigwedge^2 T^* Bbb R^3) stackrel{cong}{to} Gamma(bigwedge^1 T Bbb R^3) = Gamma(T Bbb R^3)$ is tensorial, so it suffices to describe it at a single point, say, $phi_0 : Lambda^2 T^*_0 Bbb R^3 to T_0 Bbb R^3$. Using the canonical identification $T_a Bbb R^3 cong Bbb R^3$ and suppressing the subscript, we'll write $$phi : textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*} stackrel{cong}{to} textstyle{bigwedge^1 Bbb R^3} = Bbb R^3 .$$



                First, since this map is linear, so as with any linear map the coefficients come along for the ride:
                $$phi(x ,dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz) = x phi(dy wedge dz) + y^2 phi(dx wedge dz) .$$



                We get such a map from any volume form, that is, any nonvanishing top form $omega in bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$. With this in hand, it's easier to describe the inverse, which is just interior multiplication,



                $$phi^{-1} : Bbb R^3 to textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*}, qquad X mapsto iota_X omega = omega(X,,cdot,,,cdot,) .$$



                Since it's not stated otherwise, we'll take the standard volume form, $dx wedge dy wedge dz$. So, for example, $$phi^{-1}(partial_x) = iota_{partial_x} (dx wedge dy wedge dz) = dy wedge dz .$$ Thus,
                $$boxed{phi(dy wedge dz) = partial_x} ,$$
                and by symmetry cyclic permutation gives that image under $phi$ of the other two basis elements.



                We can also write down the inverse in an invariant (i.e., coordinate-independent) way: Since the space $bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$ is $1$-dimensional, there is a unique element $Omega$ of its dual, $bigwedge^3 Bbb R^3$, that satisfies $omega(Omega) = 3! = 6$. Here, the notation on the l.h.s. just means the full contraction of $omega$ and $Omega$.) Then, checking on a basis (again, by symmetry, it's enough to check a single basis element), we find that
                $$phi(mu) = frac{1}{2} Omega(mu,,cdot,),$$
                where the notation on the r.h.s. just means that we contract $mu$ with the first two slots of $Omega$. Computing gives in our case that $$Omega = partial_x wedge partial_y wedge partial_z .$$






                share|cite|improve this answer














                While the question is about vector fields, the map $phi : Gamma(bigwedge^2 T^* Bbb R^3) stackrel{cong}{to} Gamma(bigwedge^1 T Bbb R^3) = Gamma(T Bbb R^3)$ is tensorial, so it suffices to describe it at a single point, say, $phi_0 : Lambda^2 T^*_0 Bbb R^3 to T_0 Bbb R^3$. Using the canonical identification $T_a Bbb R^3 cong Bbb R^3$ and suppressing the subscript, we'll write $$phi : textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*} stackrel{cong}{to} textstyle{bigwedge^1 Bbb R^3} = Bbb R^3 .$$



                First, since this map is linear, so as with any linear map the coefficients come along for the ride:
                $$phi(x ,dy wedge dz + y^2 dx wedge dz) = x phi(dy wedge dz) + y^2 phi(dx wedge dz) .$$



                We get such a map from any volume form, that is, any nonvanishing top form $omega in bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$. With this in hand, it's easier to describe the inverse, which is just interior multiplication,



                $$phi^{-1} : Bbb R^3 to textstyle{bigwedge^2 (Bbb R^3)^*}, qquad X mapsto iota_X omega = omega(X,,cdot,,,cdot,) .$$



                Since it's not stated otherwise, we'll take the standard volume form, $dx wedge dy wedge dz$. So, for example, $$phi^{-1}(partial_x) = iota_{partial_x} (dx wedge dy wedge dz) = dy wedge dz .$$ Thus,
                $$boxed{phi(dy wedge dz) = partial_x} ,$$
                and by symmetry cyclic permutation gives that image under $phi$ of the other two basis elements.



                We can also write down the inverse in an invariant (i.e., coordinate-independent) way: Since the space $bigwedge^3 (Bbb R^3)^*$ is $1$-dimensional, there is a unique element $Omega$ of its dual, $bigwedge^3 Bbb R^3$, that satisfies $omega(Omega) = 3! = 6$. Here, the notation on the l.h.s. just means the full contraction of $omega$ and $Omega$.) Then, checking on a basis (again, by symmetry, it's enough to check a single basis element), we find that
                $$phi(mu) = frac{1}{2} Omega(mu,,cdot,),$$
                where the notation on the r.h.s. just means that we contract $mu$ with the first two slots of $Omega$. Computing gives in our case that $$Omega = partial_x wedge partial_y wedge partial_z .$$







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 18 at 9:46

























                answered Nov 18 at 6:10









                Travis

                59k766144




                59k766144






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.





                    Some of your past answers have not been well-received, and you're in danger of being blocked from answering.


                    Please pay close attention to the following guidance:


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3002764%2fconverting-a-2-form-on-mathbbr3-to-a-vector-field-on-mathbbr3%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

                    How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

                    QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater