Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? [on hold]
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
up vote
-6
down vote
favorite
Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.
Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.
termination
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
add a comment |
up vote
-6
down vote
favorite
Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.
Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.
termination
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38
add a comment |
up vote
-6
down vote
favorite
up vote
-6
down vote
favorite
Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.
Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.
termination
New contributor
Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.
Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.
termination
termination
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Nov 14 at 1:35
user94538
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago
This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:
- "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.
1
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38
add a comment |
1
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38
1
1
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?
Yes, they can.
Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.
Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:
One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:
- The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.
- Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.
- So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.
One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:
- You need a good timing to provide this kind of information
- When you are not good, you often miss it
- Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...
Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?
My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
up vote
0
down vote
Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?
Yes, they can.
Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.
Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?
Yes, they can.
Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.
Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.
add a comment |
up vote
0
down vote
up vote
0
down vote
Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?
Yes, they can.
Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.
Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.
Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?
Yes, they can.
Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.
Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.
edited Nov 14 at 2:22
answered Nov 14 at 1:53
Joe Strazzere
237k115693986
237k115693986
add a comment |
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:
One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:
- The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.
- Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.
- So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.
One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:
- You need a good timing to provide this kind of information
- When you are not good, you often miss it
- Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...
Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?
My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:
One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:
- The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.
- Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.
- So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.
One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:
- You need a good timing to provide this kind of information
- When you are not good, you often miss it
- Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...
Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?
My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
add a comment |
up vote
-3
down vote
up vote
-3
down vote
Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:
One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:
- The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.
- Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.
- So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.
One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:
- You need a good timing to provide this kind of information
- When you are not good, you often miss it
- Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...
Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?
My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...
Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:
One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:
- The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.
- Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.
- So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.
One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:
- You need a good timing to provide this kind of information
- When you are not good, you often miss it
- Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...
Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?
My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...
answered Nov 14 at 2:00
P.Manthe
2211
2211
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
add a comment |
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
1
1
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
Any explanation about the downvotes?
– P.Manthe
Nov 14 at 3:48
add a comment |
1
Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38