Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? [on hold]





.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}






up vote
-6
down vote

favorite












Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.



Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
    – solarflare
    Nov 14 at 1:38



















up vote
-6
down vote

favorite












Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.



Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 1




    Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
    – solarflare
    Nov 14 at 1:38















up vote
-6
down vote

favorite









up vote
-6
down vote

favorite











Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.



Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.










share|improve this question







New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











Why will a company let go of the head of a department without notifying the team? I can tell from internal communication that the head of the department has been let go but nobody else on the team knows about it after more than a week.



Why will a company do such a move? As days go by, the team members will start asking questions.







termination






share|improve this question







New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Nov 14 at 1:35









user94538

1




1




New contributor




user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user94538 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.




put on hold as off-topic by solarflare, Martin Tournoij, IDrinkandIKnowThings, gnat, BSMP 2 days ago


This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:


  • "Questions require a goal that we can address. Rather than explaining the difficulties of your situation, explain what you want to do to make it better. For more information, see this meta post." – solarflare, IDrinkandIKnowThings, BSMP

If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.








  • 1




    Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
    – solarflare
    Nov 14 at 1:38
















  • 1




    Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
    – solarflare
    Nov 14 at 1:38










1




1




Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38






Yes they can and often do such things. Why? Its anyones guess. This isn't really a question with a goal that can be addressed. It is only asking for speculations.
– solarflare
Nov 14 at 1:38












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote














Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
team?




Yes, they can.



Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.



Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.






share|improve this answer






























    up vote
    -3
    down vote













    Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:





    1. One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:




      • The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.

      • Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.

      • So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.




    2. One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:




      • You need a good timing to provide this kind of information

      • When you are not good, you often miss it

      • Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...



    3. Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?


    4. My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...







    share|improve this answer

















    • 1




      Any explanation about the downvotes?
      – P.Manthe
      Nov 14 at 3:48


















    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote














    Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
    team?




    Yes, they can.



    Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.



    Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.






    share|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote














      Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
      team?




      Yes, they can.



      Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.



      Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.






      share|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote










        Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
        team?




        Yes, they can.



        Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.



        Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.






        share|improve this answer















        Can companies let go of the head of a department without notifying the
        team?




        Yes, they can.



        Of course eventually someone on the team is going to notice and start to ask questions.



        Every time I have seen a department head let go, the team is gathered in a conference room immediately afterwards to discuss the dismissal and answer questions. I think it's pretty foolish not to do it that way and I have no idea why a company would let the event go by without any mention.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Nov 14 at 2:22

























        answered Nov 14 at 1:53









        Joe Strazzere

        237k115693986




        237k115693986
























            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:





            1. One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:




              • The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.

              • Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.

              • So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.




            2. One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:




              • You need a good timing to provide this kind of information

              • When you are not good, you often miss it

              • Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...



            3. Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?


            4. My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...







            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Any explanation about the downvotes?
              – P.Manthe
              Nov 14 at 3:48















            up vote
            -3
            down vote













            Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:





            1. One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:




              • The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.

              • Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.

              • So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.




            2. One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:




              • You need a good timing to provide this kind of information

              • When you are not good, you often miss it

              • Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...



            3. Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?


            4. My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...







            share|improve this answer

















            • 1




              Any explanation about the downvotes?
              – P.Manthe
              Nov 14 at 3:48













            up vote
            -3
            down vote










            up vote
            -3
            down vote









            Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:





            1. One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:




              • The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.

              • Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.

              • So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.




            2. One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:




              • You need a good timing to provide this kind of information

              • When you are not good, you often miss it

              • Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...



            3. Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?


            4. My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...







            share|improve this answer












            Since a general answer could only provide speculations, I will tell you about the situations I encountered:





            1. One of my manager really believe that power has something to do with withholding information. It is commonly accepted nowadays for different reasons:




              • The people will misinterpret the provided information in most cases: they will not accept it as-is, and start making their own speculations.

              • Having more information than the others, make you one step ahead.

              • So combining the two previous reasons, my manager will not provide the information at all.




            2. One of the team leader I work with is just bad at communication:




              • You need a good timing to provide this kind of information

              • When you are not good, you often miss it

              • Then, the later the information is provided, the more ridiculous it will sound...



            3. Who is actually in charge of this? If the information can be the source of problem, nobody wants to be accountable for it. If the company didn't clearly defined the person in charge of this kind of communication, who will be stupid enough to initiate it?


            4. My personnal opinion: being transparent require some bravery and humility. Nowadays it is not something that a company will require from the managers...








            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered Nov 14 at 2:00









            P.Manthe

            2211




            2211








            • 1




              Any explanation about the downvotes?
              – P.Manthe
              Nov 14 at 3:48














            • 1




              Any explanation about the downvotes?
              – P.Manthe
              Nov 14 at 3:48








            1




            1




            Any explanation about the downvotes?
            – P.Manthe
            Nov 14 at 3:48




            Any explanation about the downvotes?
            – P.Manthe
            Nov 14 at 3:48



            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater