Prove “Contractible implies simply connected” using tools in Munkres Topology. Context is theta-space.











up vote
1
down vote

favorite












I've read this online, but I haven't seen this proved in Munkres Topology. Has it been? If so, where?



In any case, here is my attempt to show it using the tools given in the book. Please verify.



The book has 2 exercises on contractible spaces. One says contractible spaces are path connected and the other says a space is contractible if and only if the space has the same homotopy type of a one-point space. Since simply connected is defined as path connected and trivial fundamental group, I think that if a space has the same homotopy type as that of a one-point space, then the fundamental group of the space is trivial. Is that right? If so, I can work out the details myself.



Exercise 51.3b



enter image description here



Exercise 58.5



enter image description here



Definition of fundamental group



enter image description here



Definition of simply connected



enter image description here





The context is the claim made here in Example 70.1



enter image description here










share|cite|improve this question




























    up vote
    1
    down vote

    favorite












    I've read this online, but I haven't seen this proved in Munkres Topology. Has it been? If so, where?



    In any case, here is my attempt to show it using the tools given in the book. Please verify.



    The book has 2 exercises on contractible spaces. One says contractible spaces are path connected and the other says a space is contractible if and only if the space has the same homotopy type of a one-point space. Since simply connected is defined as path connected and trivial fundamental group, I think that if a space has the same homotopy type as that of a one-point space, then the fundamental group of the space is trivial. Is that right? If so, I can work out the details myself.



    Exercise 51.3b



    enter image description here



    Exercise 58.5



    enter image description here



    Definition of fundamental group



    enter image description here



    Definition of simply connected



    enter image description here





    The context is the claim made here in Example 70.1



    enter image description here










    share|cite|improve this question


























      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite









      up vote
      1
      down vote

      favorite











      I've read this online, but I haven't seen this proved in Munkres Topology. Has it been? If so, where?



      In any case, here is my attempt to show it using the tools given in the book. Please verify.



      The book has 2 exercises on contractible spaces. One says contractible spaces are path connected and the other says a space is contractible if and only if the space has the same homotopy type of a one-point space. Since simply connected is defined as path connected and trivial fundamental group, I think that if a space has the same homotopy type as that of a one-point space, then the fundamental group of the space is trivial. Is that right? If so, I can work out the details myself.



      Exercise 51.3b



      enter image description here



      Exercise 58.5



      enter image description here



      Definition of fundamental group



      enter image description here



      Definition of simply connected



      enter image description here





      The context is the claim made here in Example 70.1



      enter image description here










      share|cite|improve this question















      I've read this online, but I haven't seen this proved in Munkres Topology. Has it been? If so, where?



      In any case, here is my attempt to show it using the tools given in the book. Please verify.



      The book has 2 exercises on contractible spaces. One says contractible spaces are path connected and the other says a space is contractible if and only if the space has the same homotopy type of a one-point space. Since simply connected is defined as path connected and trivial fundamental group, I think that if a space has the same homotopy type as that of a one-point space, then the fundamental group of the space is trivial. Is that right? If so, I can work out the details myself.



      Exercise 51.3b



      enter image description here



      Exercise 58.5



      enter image description here



      Definition of fundamental group



      enter image description here



      Definition of simply connected



      enter image description here





      The context is the claim made here in Example 70.1



      enter image description here







      abstract-algebra general-topology algebraic-topology homotopy-theory fundamental-groups






      share|cite|improve this question















      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question








      edited Nov 11 at 11:00

























      asked Nov 11 at 10:28









      Jack Bauer

      1,236531




      1,236531






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes

















          up vote
          1
          down vote













          Straight from the definitions:



          If $X$ is contractible this means there is a point $x_0 in X$ and a continuous $H: X times I to X$ such that $H(x,0) = x$ for all $x in X$, $H(x,1) = x_0$ for all $x in X$. (i.e. The identity is homotopic to a constant map)



          This means that if $x in X$, the map $p_x: [0,1] to X$ defined by $p_x(t) = H(X,t)$ is continuous (it's the composition of $H$ with the map $t to (x,t)$ which are both continuous) and it's a path from $p_x(0) = H(x,0)= x$ to $p_x(1) = H(x,1) = x_0$.



          As we have a path from any $x$ to this fixed $x_0$, $X$ is path-connected: to get a path from $x$ to $y$, compose the path $p_x$ with the reverse path of $p_y$:
          $p(t) = H(x,2t)$ for $t le frac12$, $p(t) = H(y, 1-2t)$ for $t ge frac12$, which is continuous by the pasting lemma for $[0,frac12]$ and $[frac12,1]$, as the two definitions coincide for $t=frac12$, as $H(x,1) = H(y,1) = x_0$.



          This defines a path from $x$ to $y$ directly from the homotopy $H$.



          Now point (c) of exercise 3 implies that $[I,X]$ has but one element (the class of the constant map, which always is in any $[I,X]$) and this set already almost equal to $pi_1(X,x_0)$ (the difference being that the homotopy must keep end-points fixed all the time). So we almost have that $X$ is simply connected: path-connected (see above) and $pi_1(X,x_0)$ a single element for some $x_0$ (almost, keeping endpoints fixed is the only possible issue)...






          share|cite|improve this answer



















          • 1




            OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 11 at 13:35






          • 1




            It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:34






          • 1




            On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:35






          • 1




            @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 13 at 16:43






          • 1




            I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:56


















          up vote
          1
          down vote



          accepted










          I thought of one. Use Corollary 58.6 with $h$ as the identity map.



          enter image description here



          Since $h$ is nullhomotopic by definition of contractible, the induced homomorphism $h_{*}$ is both the identity isomorphism and the trivial homomorphism.



          This means all loop classes are what they are mapped to, which is the identity class!






          share|cite|improve this answer























            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "69"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            convertImagesToLinks: true,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: 10,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














             

            draft saved


            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2993687%2fprove-contractible-implies-simply-connected-using-tools-in-munkres-topology-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes








            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Straight from the definitions:



            If $X$ is contractible this means there is a point $x_0 in X$ and a continuous $H: X times I to X$ such that $H(x,0) = x$ for all $x in X$, $H(x,1) = x_0$ for all $x in X$. (i.e. The identity is homotopic to a constant map)



            This means that if $x in X$, the map $p_x: [0,1] to X$ defined by $p_x(t) = H(X,t)$ is continuous (it's the composition of $H$ with the map $t to (x,t)$ which are both continuous) and it's a path from $p_x(0) = H(x,0)= x$ to $p_x(1) = H(x,1) = x_0$.



            As we have a path from any $x$ to this fixed $x_0$, $X$ is path-connected: to get a path from $x$ to $y$, compose the path $p_x$ with the reverse path of $p_y$:
            $p(t) = H(x,2t)$ for $t le frac12$, $p(t) = H(y, 1-2t)$ for $t ge frac12$, which is continuous by the pasting lemma for $[0,frac12]$ and $[frac12,1]$, as the two definitions coincide for $t=frac12$, as $H(x,1) = H(y,1) = x_0$.



            This defines a path from $x$ to $y$ directly from the homotopy $H$.



            Now point (c) of exercise 3 implies that $[I,X]$ has but one element (the class of the constant map, which always is in any $[I,X]$) and this set already almost equal to $pi_1(X,x_0)$ (the difference being that the homotopy must keep end-points fixed all the time). So we almost have that $X$ is simply connected: path-connected (see above) and $pi_1(X,x_0)$ a single element for some $x_0$ (almost, keeping endpoints fixed is the only possible issue)...






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 11 at 13:35






            • 1




              It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:34






            • 1




              On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:35






            • 1




              @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 13 at 16:43






            • 1




              I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:56















            up vote
            1
            down vote













            Straight from the definitions:



            If $X$ is contractible this means there is a point $x_0 in X$ and a continuous $H: X times I to X$ such that $H(x,0) = x$ for all $x in X$, $H(x,1) = x_0$ for all $x in X$. (i.e. The identity is homotopic to a constant map)



            This means that if $x in X$, the map $p_x: [0,1] to X$ defined by $p_x(t) = H(X,t)$ is continuous (it's the composition of $H$ with the map $t to (x,t)$ which are both continuous) and it's a path from $p_x(0) = H(x,0)= x$ to $p_x(1) = H(x,1) = x_0$.



            As we have a path from any $x$ to this fixed $x_0$, $X$ is path-connected: to get a path from $x$ to $y$, compose the path $p_x$ with the reverse path of $p_y$:
            $p(t) = H(x,2t)$ for $t le frac12$, $p(t) = H(y, 1-2t)$ for $t ge frac12$, which is continuous by the pasting lemma for $[0,frac12]$ and $[frac12,1]$, as the two definitions coincide for $t=frac12$, as $H(x,1) = H(y,1) = x_0$.



            This defines a path from $x$ to $y$ directly from the homotopy $H$.



            Now point (c) of exercise 3 implies that $[I,X]$ has but one element (the class of the constant map, which always is in any $[I,X]$) and this set already almost equal to $pi_1(X,x_0)$ (the difference being that the homotopy must keep end-points fixed all the time). So we almost have that $X$ is simply connected: path-connected (see above) and $pi_1(X,x_0)$ a single element for some $x_0$ (almost, keeping endpoints fixed is the only possible issue)...






            share|cite|improve this answer



















            • 1




              OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 11 at 13:35






            • 1




              It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:34






            • 1




              On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:35






            • 1




              @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 13 at 16:43






            • 1




              I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:56













            up vote
            1
            down vote










            up vote
            1
            down vote









            Straight from the definitions:



            If $X$ is contractible this means there is a point $x_0 in X$ and a continuous $H: X times I to X$ such that $H(x,0) = x$ for all $x in X$, $H(x,1) = x_0$ for all $x in X$. (i.e. The identity is homotopic to a constant map)



            This means that if $x in X$, the map $p_x: [0,1] to X$ defined by $p_x(t) = H(X,t)$ is continuous (it's the composition of $H$ with the map $t to (x,t)$ which are both continuous) and it's a path from $p_x(0) = H(x,0)= x$ to $p_x(1) = H(x,1) = x_0$.



            As we have a path from any $x$ to this fixed $x_0$, $X$ is path-connected: to get a path from $x$ to $y$, compose the path $p_x$ with the reverse path of $p_y$:
            $p(t) = H(x,2t)$ for $t le frac12$, $p(t) = H(y, 1-2t)$ for $t ge frac12$, which is continuous by the pasting lemma for $[0,frac12]$ and $[frac12,1]$, as the two definitions coincide for $t=frac12$, as $H(x,1) = H(y,1) = x_0$.



            This defines a path from $x$ to $y$ directly from the homotopy $H$.



            Now point (c) of exercise 3 implies that $[I,X]$ has but one element (the class of the constant map, which always is in any $[I,X]$) and this set already almost equal to $pi_1(X,x_0)$ (the difference being that the homotopy must keep end-points fixed all the time). So we almost have that $X$ is simply connected: path-connected (see above) and $pi_1(X,x_0)$ a single element for some $x_0$ (almost, keeping endpoints fixed is the only possible issue)...






            share|cite|improve this answer














            Straight from the definitions:



            If $X$ is contractible this means there is a point $x_0 in X$ and a continuous $H: X times I to X$ such that $H(x,0) = x$ for all $x in X$, $H(x,1) = x_0$ for all $x in X$. (i.e. The identity is homotopic to a constant map)



            This means that if $x in X$, the map $p_x: [0,1] to X$ defined by $p_x(t) = H(X,t)$ is continuous (it's the composition of $H$ with the map $t to (x,t)$ which are both continuous) and it's a path from $p_x(0) = H(x,0)= x$ to $p_x(1) = H(x,1) = x_0$.



            As we have a path from any $x$ to this fixed $x_0$, $X$ is path-connected: to get a path from $x$ to $y$, compose the path $p_x$ with the reverse path of $p_y$:
            $p(t) = H(x,2t)$ for $t le frac12$, $p(t) = H(y, 1-2t)$ for $t ge frac12$, which is continuous by the pasting lemma for $[0,frac12]$ and $[frac12,1]$, as the two definitions coincide for $t=frac12$, as $H(x,1) = H(y,1) = x_0$.



            This defines a path from $x$ to $y$ directly from the homotopy $H$.



            Now point (c) of exercise 3 implies that $[I,X]$ has but one element (the class of the constant map, which always is in any $[I,X]$) and this set already almost equal to $pi_1(X,x_0)$ (the difference being that the homotopy must keep end-points fixed all the time). So we almost have that $X$ is simply connected: path-connected (see above) and $pi_1(X,x_0)$ a single element for some $x_0$ (almost, keeping endpoints fixed is the only possible issue)...







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited Nov 11 at 14:34

























            answered Nov 11 at 13:33









            Henno Brandsma

            102k344107




            102k344107








            • 1




              OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 11 at 13:35






            • 1




              It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:34






            • 1




              On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:35






            • 1




              @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 13 at 16:43






            • 1




              I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:56














            • 1




              OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 11 at 13:35






            • 1




              It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:34






            • 1




              On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:35






            • 1




              @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
              – Henno Brandsma
              Nov 13 at 16:43






            • 1




              I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
              – Mike Miller
              Nov 13 at 16:56








            1




            1




            OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 11 at 13:35




            OK. I saw I needed to show simple-connectedness. More thought needed.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 11 at 13:35




            1




            1




            It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:34




            It comes for free as long as your contraction is a deformation retraction onto $x_0$ (these are the assumptions in your first paragraph). In favorable situations, we can modify a contraction to a deformation retraction onto a point, but this is not always guaranteed. (It is easy to prove, for instance, if you replace $X$ with $X cup_{x_0} I$ - that is, $X$ with a whisker attached along $x_0$. Now you need to show these have the same pointed homotopy type, which requires some demands on the space.)
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:34




            1




            1




            On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:35




            On the other hand, here is an argument that implies that you do not need the contraction to preserve the basepoint. 1) Free homotopy classes of loops in $X$ are identified with conjugacy classes in $pi_1(X, x_0)$. 2) A contractible space has one free homotopy class of loop. 3) A group with only one conjugacy class is trivial, because the identity element is not conjugate to anything else.
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:35




            1




            1




            @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 13 at 16:43




            @MikeMiller For a deformation retraction I would need $H(x_0,t)=x_0$ for all $t$, which was not in my first paragraph. If we would have it we'd be done straight away. But IIRC there are spaces $X$ such that $1_X$ is homotopic to the constant map $x_0$ without $x_0$ being a deformation retract of $X$.
            – Henno Brandsma
            Nov 13 at 16:43




            1




            1




            I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:56




            I made a mistake in reading your definition. My apologies. There absolutely are spaces that admit a contraction without admitting a deformation retraction to a point (easier to cook up examples so that you can't d.r. to a specific point, but there are some that you cannot d.r. to any point).
            – Mike Miller
            Nov 13 at 16:56










            up vote
            1
            down vote



            accepted










            I thought of one. Use Corollary 58.6 with $h$ as the identity map.



            enter image description here



            Since $h$ is nullhomotopic by definition of contractible, the induced homomorphism $h_{*}$ is both the identity isomorphism and the trivial homomorphism.



            This means all loop classes are what they are mapped to, which is the identity class!






            share|cite|improve this answer



























              up vote
              1
              down vote



              accepted










              I thought of one. Use Corollary 58.6 with $h$ as the identity map.



              enter image description here



              Since $h$ is nullhomotopic by definition of contractible, the induced homomorphism $h_{*}$ is both the identity isomorphism and the trivial homomorphism.



              This means all loop classes are what they are mapped to, which is the identity class!






              share|cite|improve this answer

























                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted







                up vote
                1
                down vote



                accepted






                I thought of one. Use Corollary 58.6 with $h$ as the identity map.



                enter image description here



                Since $h$ is nullhomotopic by definition of contractible, the induced homomorphism $h_{*}$ is both the identity isomorphism and the trivial homomorphism.



                This means all loop classes are what they are mapped to, which is the identity class!






                share|cite|improve this answer














                I thought of one. Use Corollary 58.6 with $h$ as the identity map.



                enter image description here



                Since $h$ is nullhomotopic by definition of contractible, the induced homomorphism $h_{*}$ is both the identity isomorphism and the trivial homomorphism.



                This means all loop classes are what they are mapped to, which is the identity class!







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited Nov 16 at 14:02

























                answered Nov 16 at 5:52









                Jack Bauer

                1,236531




                1,236531






























                     

                    draft saved


                    draft discarded



















































                     


                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f2993687%2fprove-contractible-implies-simply-connected-using-tools-in-munkres-topology-c%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    What is the Guru Parampara of Kashmiri Shaivism?

                    Герой Советского Союза

                    AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure