Question about an inequality.











up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












$$forall iin {1,2,cdots, k}, n_iinmathbb{N}$$ $$sum_{i=1}^k n_i =n$$
then
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$





Like comment, If we apply induction,



$i) k=2$



$n_1+n_2=nland n_1,n_2in mathbb{N}$



then
$$n_1^2+n_2^2=n_1^2+(n-n_1)^2=n^2-2n_1n+2n_1^2=2(n_1-frac{n}{2})^2+frac{n^2}{2}$$



Actually this have maximum if $|n_1-frac{n}{2}|$ is maximum(when $n_1=1 lor n_1=n-1$)
therefore $$n_1^2+n_2^2leq 1^2+(n-1)^2= n^2-1*(2n-2)$$



ii)for induction,



suppose $sum_{i=1}^k n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$



and



claim:$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2leq n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2=sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2+n_{k+1}^2leq (n-n_{k+1})^2-(k-1)(2n-2n_{k+1}-k)+n_{k+1}^2$$
$$=2n_{k+1}^2-2n_{k+1}(n-k+1)+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=2(n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2})^2-frac{(n-k+1)^2}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$



Actually It have maximum if $|n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2}|$ is maximum, (at $n_{k+1}=1lor n-k$) therefore
$$leq frac{(n-k-1)^2}{2}-frac{(n-k+1)}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=-2(n-k)+n^2-2n(k-1)+(k-1)k$$
$$=n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$



therefore
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$ and equality occur when $forall i= 1,2,cdots,k-1 ,n_i=1,n_k=n-k+1$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
    – Eevee Trainer
    Nov 16 at 9:29










  • It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
    – Fabio Lucchini
    Nov 16 at 10:41












  • $n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
    – 백주상
    Nov 17 at 3:45

















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1












$$forall iin {1,2,cdots, k}, n_iinmathbb{N}$$ $$sum_{i=1}^k n_i =n$$
then
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$





Like comment, If we apply induction,



$i) k=2$



$n_1+n_2=nland n_1,n_2in mathbb{N}$



then
$$n_1^2+n_2^2=n_1^2+(n-n_1)^2=n^2-2n_1n+2n_1^2=2(n_1-frac{n}{2})^2+frac{n^2}{2}$$



Actually this have maximum if $|n_1-frac{n}{2}|$ is maximum(when $n_1=1 lor n_1=n-1$)
therefore $$n_1^2+n_2^2leq 1^2+(n-1)^2= n^2-1*(2n-2)$$



ii)for induction,



suppose $sum_{i=1}^k n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$



and



claim:$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2leq n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2=sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2+n_{k+1}^2leq (n-n_{k+1})^2-(k-1)(2n-2n_{k+1}-k)+n_{k+1}^2$$
$$=2n_{k+1}^2-2n_{k+1}(n-k+1)+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=2(n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2})^2-frac{(n-k+1)^2}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$



Actually It have maximum if $|n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2}|$ is maximum, (at $n_{k+1}=1lor n-k$) therefore
$$leq frac{(n-k-1)^2}{2}-frac{(n-k+1)}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=-2(n-k)+n^2-2n(k-1)+(k-1)k$$
$$=n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$



therefore
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$ and equality occur when $forall i= 1,2,cdots,k-1 ,n_i=1,n_k=n-k+1$










share|cite|improve this question




















  • 1




    Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
    – Eevee Trainer
    Nov 16 at 9:29










  • It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
    – Fabio Lucchini
    Nov 16 at 10:41












  • $n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
    – 백주상
    Nov 17 at 3:45















up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1









up vote
0
down vote

favorite
1






1





$$forall iin {1,2,cdots, k}, n_iinmathbb{N}$$ $$sum_{i=1}^k n_i =n$$
then
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$





Like comment, If we apply induction,



$i) k=2$



$n_1+n_2=nland n_1,n_2in mathbb{N}$



then
$$n_1^2+n_2^2=n_1^2+(n-n_1)^2=n^2-2n_1n+2n_1^2=2(n_1-frac{n}{2})^2+frac{n^2}{2}$$



Actually this have maximum if $|n_1-frac{n}{2}|$ is maximum(when $n_1=1 lor n_1=n-1$)
therefore $$n_1^2+n_2^2leq 1^2+(n-1)^2= n^2-1*(2n-2)$$



ii)for induction,



suppose $sum_{i=1}^k n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$



and



claim:$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2leq n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2=sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2+n_{k+1}^2leq (n-n_{k+1})^2-(k-1)(2n-2n_{k+1}-k)+n_{k+1}^2$$
$$=2n_{k+1}^2-2n_{k+1}(n-k+1)+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=2(n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2})^2-frac{(n-k+1)^2}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$



Actually It have maximum if $|n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2}|$ is maximum, (at $n_{k+1}=1lor n-k$) therefore
$$leq frac{(n-k-1)^2}{2}-frac{(n-k+1)}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=-2(n-k)+n^2-2n(k-1)+(k-1)k$$
$$=n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$



therefore
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$ and equality occur when $forall i= 1,2,cdots,k-1 ,n_i=1,n_k=n-k+1$










share|cite|improve this question















$$forall iin {1,2,cdots, k}, n_iinmathbb{N}$$ $$sum_{i=1}^k n_i =n$$
then
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$





Like comment, If we apply induction,



$i) k=2$



$n_1+n_2=nland n_1,n_2in mathbb{N}$



then
$$n_1^2+n_2^2=n_1^2+(n-n_1)^2=n^2-2n_1n+2n_1^2=2(n_1-frac{n}{2})^2+frac{n^2}{2}$$



Actually this have maximum if $|n_1-frac{n}{2}|$ is maximum(when $n_1=1 lor n_1=n-1$)
therefore $$n_1^2+n_2^2leq 1^2+(n-1)^2= n^2-1*(2n-2)$$



ii)for induction,



suppose $sum_{i=1}^k n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$



and



claim:$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i=nland n_iin mathbb{N}$
imply
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2leq n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$
$$sum_{i=1}^{k+1} n_i^2=sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2+n_{k+1}^2leq (n-n_{k+1})^2-(k-1)(2n-2n_{k+1}-k)+n_{k+1}^2$$
$$=2n_{k+1}^2-2n_{k+1}(n-k+1)+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=2(n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2})^2-frac{(n-k+1)^2}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$



Actually It have maximum if $|n_{k+1}-frac{n-k+1}{2}|$ is maximum, (at $n_{k+1}=1lor n-k$) therefore
$$leq frac{(n-k-1)^2}{2}-frac{(n-k+1)}{2}+n^2-2n(k-1)+k(k-1)$$
$$=-2(n-k)+n^2-2n(k-1)+(k-1)k$$
$$=n^2-k(2n-k-1)$$



therefore
$$sum_{i=1}^k n_i^2leq n^2-(k-1)(2n-k)$$ and equality occur when $forall i= 1,2,cdots,k-1 ,n_i=1,n_k=n-k+1$







inequality natural-numbers






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Nov 17 at 3:46

























asked Nov 16 at 9:26









백주상

1139




1139








  • 1




    Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
    – Eevee Trainer
    Nov 16 at 9:29










  • It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
    – Fabio Lucchini
    Nov 16 at 10:41












  • $n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
    – 백주상
    Nov 17 at 3:45
















  • 1




    Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
    – Eevee Trainer
    Nov 16 at 9:29










  • It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
    – Fabio Lucchini
    Nov 16 at 10:41












  • $n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
    – 백주상
    Nov 17 at 3:45










1




1




Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 16 at 9:29




Induction looks like a useful starting point. I'm not going to guarantee it'll work, though, but it would be my instinct with things like these. If you could provide details on an approach you've tried, it might be more helpful.
– Eevee Trainer
Nov 16 at 9:29












It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
– Fabio Lucchini
Nov 16 at 10:41






It's false: for $n_1=n_2=0$ and $n_3=2$ we have $0^2+0^2+2^2leq 2^2-(3-1)(2cdot 2-3)$ which is false.
– Fabio Lucchini
Nov 16 at 10:41














$n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
– 백주상
Nov 17 at 3:45






$n_1,n_2,n_3in mathbb{N}$ so $n_1,n_2,n_3geq 1$
– 백주상
Nov 17 at 3:45












1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes

















up vote
0
down vote













Let $m = min n_i$ and $M = max n_i$. We are told $n_i ge 1$ (i.e. $mathbb{N}$ stands for the set of positive integers), so $m ge 1$ and hence
$$M le n - (k-1)m le n - k + 1$$



This leads to



$$begin{align}
sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+1)(n_i-1) + 1)
le (M+1)sum_i (n_i - 1) + k\
&le (n - k + 2)(n-k) + k
= n^2 - (k-1)(2n-k)
end{align}tag{*1}
$$

This is the inequality we want to prove. We can improve this inequality by
using the actual maximum $M$ and minimum $m$. We have



$$begin{align}
sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+m)(n_i-m) + m^2)
le (M+m)sum_i (n_i - m) + km^2\
&le (M+m)(n - km) + km^2
= (M+m)n - kMm
end{align}
$$

Let $mu = frac{n}{k}$ and $sigma$ be the mean and standard derivation of $n_i$. Above inequality is equivalent to



$$k (sigma^2 + mu^2) le (M+m)mu k - kMm
quadiffquad sigma^2 le (M - mu)(mu - m)tag{*2}$$



When we replace $M$ and $m$ by other upper/lower bounds for $n_i$, $(M - mu)(mu - m)$ will only getting bigger and inequality $(*2)$ remains valid.
The inequality $(*1)$ is really a special case of this when we replace $M, m$ by $n-k+1$ and $1$.



The inequality on RHS$(*2)$ is known as Bhatia–Davis inequality. Look at its wiki entry for similar bounds.






share|cite|improve this answer























    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    });
    });
    }, "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














     

    draft saved


    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000936%2fquestion-about-an-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes








    up vote
    0
    down vote













    Let $m = min n_i$ and $M = max n_i$. We are told $n_i ge 1$ (i.e. $mathbb{N}$ stands for the set of positive integers), so $m ge 1$ and hence
    $$M le n - (k-1)m le n - k + 1$$



    This leads to



    $$begin{align}
    sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+1)(n_i-1) + 1)
    le (M+1)sum_i (n_i - 1) + k\
    &le (n - k + 2)(n-k) + k
    = n^2 - (k-1)(2n-k)
    end{align}tag{*1}
    $$

    This is the inequality we want to prove. We can improve this inequality by
    using the actual maximum $M$ and minimum $m$. We have



    $$begin{align}
    sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+m)(n_i-m) + m^2)
    le (M+m)sum_i (n_i - m) + km^2\
    &le (M+m)(n - km) + km^2
    = (M+m)n - kMm
    end{align}
    $$

    Let $mu = frac{n}{k}$ and $sigma$ be the mean and standard derivation of $n_i$. Above inequality is equivalent to



    $$k (sigma^2 + mu^2) le (M+m)mu k - kMm
    quadiffquad sigma^2 le (M - mu)(mu - m)tag{*2}$$



    When we replace $M$ and $m$ by other upper/lower bounds for $n_i$, $(M - mu)(mu - m)$ will only getting bigger and inequality $(*2)$ remains valid.
    The inequality $(*1)$ is really a special case of this when we replace $M, m$ by $n-k+1$ and $1$.



    The inequality on RHS$(*2)$ is known as Bhatia–Davis inequality. Look at its wiki entry for similar bounds.






    share|cite|improve this answer



























      up vote
      0
      down vote













      Let $m = min n_i$ and $M = max n_i$. We are told $n_i ge 1$ (i.e. $mathbb{N}$ stands for the set of positive integers), so $m ge 1$ and hence
      $$M le n - (k-1)m le n - k + 1$$



      This leads to



      $$begin{align}
      sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+1)(n_i-1) + 1)
      le (M+1)sum_i (n_i - 1) + k\
      &le (n - k + 2)(n-k) + k
      = n^2 - (k-1)(2n-k)
      end{align}tag{*1}
      $$

      This is the inequality we want to prove. We can improve this inequality by
      using the actual maximum $M$ and minimum $m$. We have



      $$begin{align}
      sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+m)(n_i-m) + m^2)
      le (M+m)sum_i (n_i - m) + km^2\
      &le (M+m)(n - km) + km^2
      = (M+m)n - kMm
      end{align}
      $$

      Let $mu = frac{n}{k}$ and $sigma$ be the mean and standard derivation of $n_i$. Above inequality is equivalent to



      $$k (sigma^2 + mu^2) le (M+m)mu k - kMm
      quadiffquad sigma^2 le (M - mu)(mu - m)tag{*2}$$



      When we replace $M$ and $m$ by other upper/lower bounds for $n_i$, $(M - mu)(mu - m)$ will only getting bigger and inequality $(*2)$ remains valid.
      The inequality $(*1)$ is really a special case of this when we replace $M, m$ by $n-k+1$ and $1$.



      The inequality on RHS$(*2)$ is known as Bhatia–Davis inequality. Look at its wiki entry for similar bounds.






      share|cite|improve this answer

























        up vote
        0
        down vote










        up vote
        0
        down vote









        Let $m = min n_i$ and $M = max n_i$. We are told $n_i ge 1$ (i.e. $mathbb{N}$ stands for the set of positive integers), so $m ge 1$ and hence
        $$M le n - (k-1)m le n - k + 1$$



        This leads to



        $$begin{align}
        sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+1)(n_i-1) + 1)
        le (M+1)sum_i (n_i - 1) + k\
        &le (n - k + 2)(n-k) + k
        = n^2 - (k-1)(2n-k)
        end{align}tag{*1}
        $$

        This is the inequality we want to prove. We can improve this inequality by
        using the actual maximum $M$ and minimum $m$. We have



        $$begin{align}
        sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+m)(n_i-m) + m^2)
        le (M+m)sum_i (n_i - m) + km^2\
        &le (M+m)(n - km) + km^2
        = (M+m)n - kMm
        end{align}
        $$

        Let $mu = frac{n}{k}$ and $sigma$ be the mean and standard derivation of $n_i$. Above inequality is equivalent to



        $$k (sigma^2 + mu^2) le (M+m)mu k - kMm
        quadiffquad sigma^2 le (M - mu)(mu - m)tag{*2}$$



        When we replace $M$ and $m$ by other upper/lower bounds for $n_i$, $(M - mu)(mu - m)$ will only getting bigger and inequality $(*2)$ remains valid.
        The inequality $(*1)$ is really a special case of this when we replace $M, m$ by $n-k+1$ and $1$.



        The inequality on RHS$(*2)$ is known as Bhatia–Davis inequality. Look at its wiki entry for similar bounds.






        share|cite|improve this answer














        Let $m = min n_i$ and $M = max n_i$. We are told $n_i ge 1$ (i.e. $mathbb{N}$ stands for the set of positive integers), so $m ge 1$ and hence
        $$M le n - (k-1)m le n - k + 1$$



        This leads to



        $$begin{align}
        sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+1)(n_i-1) + 1)
        le (M+1)sum_i (n_i - 1) + k\
        &le (n - k + 2)(n-k) + k
        = n^2 - (k-1)(2n-k)
        end{align}tag{*1}
        $$

        This is the inequality we want to prove. We can improve this inequality by
        using the actual maximum $M$ and minimum $m$. We have



        $$begin{align}
        sum_i n_i^2 &= sum_i ((n_i+m)(n_i-m) + m^2)
        le (M+m)sum_i (n_i - m) + km^2\
        &le (M+m)(n - km) + km^2
        = (M+m)n - kMm
        end{align}
        $$

        Let $mu = frac{n}{k}$ and $sigma$ be the mean and standard derivation of $n_i$. Above inequality is equivalent to



        $$k (sigma^2 + mu^2) le (M+m)mu k - kMm
        quadiffquad sigma^2 le (M - mu)(mu - m)tag{*2}$$



        When we replace $M$ and $m$ by other upper/lower bounds for $n_i$, $(M - mu)(mu - m)$ will only getting bigger and inequality $(*2)$ remains valid.
        The inequality $(*1)$ is really a special case of this when we replace $M, m$ by $n-k+1$ and $1$.



        The inequality on RHS$(*2)$ is known as Bhatia–Davis inequality. Look at its wiki entry for similar bounds.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited Nov 17 at 11:37

























        answered Nov 17 at 4:51









        achille hui

        93.7k5127251




        93.7k5127251






























             

            draft saved


            draft discarded



















































             


            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3000936%2fquestion-about-an-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            AnyDesk - Fatal Program Failure

            How to calibrate 16:9 built-in touch-screen to a 4:3 resolution?

            QoS: MAC-Priority for clients behind a repeater